Hearth Record

Washington Regional Medical Center

An acute care hospital in Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703

3215 N North Hills Boulevard, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703. (479) 463-5113.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 19, 2026: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 26, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Governing Body

    The inspectors’ words, 223 words

    “GOVERNING BODY CFR(s): 482.12 There must be an effective governing body that is legally responsible for the conduct of the hospital. If a hospital does not have an organized governing body, the persons legally responsible for the conduct of the hospital must carry out the functions specified in this part that pertain to the governing body ... This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 41508 Based on review of the obstetric (OB) and emergency department (ED) employee education files, obstetric registered Nurse (RN) job description, Medical Staff by-laws rules and regulations, and interviews, the hospital 1. Failed to ensure that six of six OB RNs (RN 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) in a total universe of 44 Labor, Delivery, Recovery, Postpartum (LDRP) RNs had a job description that include the additional job skills of ED triage and Qualified Medical Professional (QMP), 2. Failed to ensure that the medical staff included LDRP RNs as QMPs in their by-laws rules and regulations, had obtained the governing body (GB) review and approval for LDRP RNs as QMPs and/or defined the qualification, training and competency for the LDRP RN’s for 44 of 44 LDRP RNs (RN1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and RNs 19 - 56). The failed practice did not ensure the LDRP RNs were qualified to conduct MSE. See A-0048 for details.”

    Rule A0043. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Medical Staff - Bylaws And Rules

    The inspectors’ words, 1,423 words

    “MEDICAL STAFF - BYLAWS AND RULES CFR(s): 482.12(a)(4) [The governing body must] approve medical staff bylaws and other medical staff rules and regulations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 41508 Based on review of the obstetric (OB) and emergency department (ED) employee education files, obstetric registered Nurse (RN) job description, Medical Staff by-laws rules and regulations, and interviews, the hospital 1. Failed to ensure that six of six OB RNs (RN 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) in a total universe of 44 Labor, Delivery, Recovery, Postpartum (LDRP) RNs had a job description that include the additional job skills of ED triage and Qualified Medical Professional (QMP), 2. Failed to ensure that the medical staff included LDRP RNs as QMPs in their by-laws rules and regulations, had obtained the governing body (GB) review and approval for LDRP RNs as QMPs and/or defined the qualification, training and competency for the LDRP RN’s for 44 of 44 LDRP RNs (RN1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and RNs 19 - 56). The failed practice did not ensure the LDRP RNs were qualified to conduct MSE. Findings include: A. Review of the Medical Staff by-laws rules and regulation approved by the GB on 12/19/23 defined the “Clinical Specialist” as “The Clinical Specialist category shall include those AHPs (Allied Health Professionals) who are employed by a Member and who have been authorized by Washington Regional to provide care, treatment, and services only under the supervision of their Sponsoring Member. ...6. Registered Nurse (RN) ARTICLE IV . . . I. Emergency Care The responsibility for providing emergency care within Washington Regional rests with the Medical Staff. Because this responsibility cannot be delegated, every active and provisional active Member shall serve according to the published call schedule and be available for emergency room and for inpatient emergencies. ... Any individual who comes to the Emergency Department and requests treatment or examination for a medical condition or has such a request made on their behalf, shall receive an appropriate medical screening examination performed by a “Qualified Medical Person.” The term “Qualified Medical Person” shall be defined as physicians, advanced registered nurse practitioners, physician assistants, Sexual Abuse Nurse Examiners, and obstetric registered nurses. ... Where a pregnant woman presents to the Emergency Department and requests examination, or treatment of symptoms related to labor or has such a request made on their behalf| an Obstetric Registered Nurse or physician shall perform the medical screening examination.” The medical staff rules and regulations did not include a list of LDRP RNs that have been approved by the Governing Board and did not include the EMTALA law requirements, defined training, qualifications, or competencies to ensure that the LDRP RNs remained competent in the specialty skills required to conduct emergency Medical Screening Exams as a QMP. B. Review of the hospital’s job description for the RNs working in LDRP titled “Registered Nurse - Women and Infants,” dated 07/22, showed that under the header “Position Summary” the definition for the specialty role of the QMP was not included. Review under the header “Essential Position Responsibilities,” did not include the responsibilities of the specialty role of the QMP. Under the header “Qualifications,” the QMP qualifications were not included. C. Review of the employee training, qualifications, and competency file for LDRP RN (Staff ID #1) showed the “Triage of the OB Patient and Medical Screening Exam (MSE) Competency and Evaluation” was completed as an initial competency on 02/21/14. There was no evidence provided of other training, qualifications, or competencies for this QMP. D. Review of the employee training, qualifications, and competency file for LDRP RN (Staff ID #2) showed the “Triage of the OB Patient and Medical Screening Exam (MSE) Competency and Evaluation” was completed as an initial competency on 05/19/18. There was no evidence provided of other training, qualifications, or competencies for this QMP. E. Review of the employee training, qualifications, and competency file for LDRP RN (Staff ID #3) showed the “Triage of the OB Patient and Medical Screening Exam (MSE) Competency and Evaluation” was completed as an initial competency on 06/06/24. There was no evidence provided of other training, qualifications, or competencies for this QMP. F. Review of the employee training, qualifications, and competency file for LDRP RN (Staff ID #4) showed the “Triage of the OB Patient and Medical Screening Exam (MSE) Competency and Evaluation” was completed as an initial competency on 12/27/23. There was no evidence provided of other training, qualifications, or competencies for this QMP. G. Review of the employee training, qualifications, and competency file for LDRP RN (Staff ID # 5) showed the “Triage of the OB Patient and Medical Screening Exam (MSE) Competency and Evaluation” was completed as an initial competency on 12/23/21. There was no evidence provided of other training, qualifications, or competencies for this QMP. H. Review of the employee training, qualifications, and competency file for LDRP RN (Staff ID #6) showed the “Triage of the OB Patient and Medical Screening Exam (MSE) Competency and Evaluation” was completed as an initial competency on 10/20/21. There was no evidence provided of other training, qualifications, or competencies for this QMP. I. During an interview on 09/25/24 at 2:34 PM, the Woman and Infant Director (Staff ID #7) and the RN Educator (Staff ID #8) stated that although not defined in the Medical staff by-laws, rules, and regulations, the LDRP RNs must have at minimum one year of LDRP experience to train and test to become a QMP. The Woman and Infant Director 7 and RN Educator 8 confirmed that the LDRP RN job description did not include the additional skills, training, or competencies for the EMTALA [Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor ACT] QMP designation. Woman and Infant Director (Staff ID #7) and the RN Educator (Staff ID # 8) confirmed that the competency form allows for “initial,” “annual,” or “other” and aside from the “initial” the LDRP RNs did not have annual training, qualifications, or competencies to perform an EMTALA MSE. J. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 9:02 AM, the Director of Medical Staff and Continuing Medical Education (Staff ID #57) stated that the Medical Executive Committee had oversight of the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse and Medical Staff defined as QMPs for training, qualifications, and competencies, but the LDRP RNs were not privileged or approved by the Medical Executive Committee or the Governing Body as QMPs, stating that oversight was the responsibility of HR(Human Resources) and LDRP. K. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 10:38 AM while reviewing the Medical staff by-laws rules and regulations related to the QMP qualifications, Vice President of Human Resources (VPHR) (Staff ID #18) and Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) (Staff ID #17) confirmed that even though the LDRP RN’s were listed in the Medical staff by-laws rules and regulations as being QMPs, the Medical Staff services had no oversight of the LDRP RNs, that the LDRP Director and HR had that oversight, and there were no defined training, qualifications or competencies for the specialized role of the QMP.. L. On 09/26/24 at 11:20 AM, the Woman and Infant Director (Staff ID #7) provided a full list of all LDRP RNs currently working in LDRP. A total of 44 RNs were documented as having been designated as a QMP. Woman and Infant Director (Staff ID #7) confirmed that the remaining 38 LDRP RNs LDRP RN (Staff ID #19 through 56) did not have defined qualifications, training, or competencies beyond the “initial” competency. M. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 11:06 AM, the Chief of Staff (Staff ID #15) confirmed that the Medical staff by-laws, rules, and regulations defined the LDRP RNs as QMPs to conduct EMTALA MSEs for patients coming to the LDRP department seeking care for a potential medical emergency. When asked how the Medical Executive Committee determined which LDRP RNs were qualified to conduct EMTALA MSEs, the Chief of Staff (Staff ID #15) stated the RNs were usually paired with an OB Hospitalist and checked off by the Hospitalist as qualified, usually after a year of OB experience. The Chief of Staff (Staff ID #15) confirmed that the Medical Staff Executive Committee had not defined the qualification training and competencies for consistency among the QMPs. When asked who set the qualification training and competencies for the Physician and APRN QMPs, the Chief of Staff (Staff ID #15) confirmed that it was the Medical Executive Committee. The Chief of Staff (Staff ID #15) stated he/she was not aware of a Governing Body approved list of LDRP RNs based on qualifications, training, and competencies.”

    Rule A0048. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 19, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 18, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Sep 26, 2024Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Jul 11, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 8; safety of care, 3 better and 0 worse of 8; readmission, 5 better and 0 worse of 11.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (569 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 70% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 75% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), better than the national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after abdominal hysterectomy, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: better than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 10.8%, heart failure 11.6%, pneumonia 16.4%, COPD 10.2%, stroke 12.5%, heart bypass surgery 2.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.2%, heart failure 19.2%, pneumonia 14%, COPD 18.5%, heart bypass surgery 10.8%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 222 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
  • 55% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1.04 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 53 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
  • 94% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 21 owners or officers are people: James L Shackelford (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Jon Michael Berry (corporate director); M Gareth Eck (corporate director); Thomas Olmstead (corporate officer, 0%); Drew Rodgers (corporate director); Stacey Hanby (corporate director); Marshall Saviers (corporate director); James L Shackelford (corporate officer, 0%); Anne O’leary-Kelly (corporate director); Dennis Charles Burrows (corporate officer); Jim Daly (corporate officer); David Grady Ratcliff (corporate officer, 0%); Greg Lee (corporate director); Birch Wright (corporate officer); Birch Wright (managing employee (on the payroll)); Britton B Lott (corporate director); Kristy Spruell (corporate officer); Neal Pendergraft (corporate director); Meredith Green (corporate officer); Brock Gearhart (corporate director); Lucas K Campbell (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 4 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 hospitals CMS lists in Washington County, 3 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.