Hearth Record

Sheridan Memorial Hospital Hospice

A hospice in Sheridan, Wyoming 82801

1401 W 5th Street, Sheridan, Wyoming 82801. (307) 672-1083.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 24 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

24 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 2 hospices serving ZIP code 82801 had 12.5.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 13, 2026: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

24 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

24 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 24, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission24 deficiencies
  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 263 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 live discharged patient records reviewed, During HOSRRDC# 1’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured it provided interdisciplinary, collaborative care, treatment, or services. For example: review of HOSRRDC# 1’s patient record revealed HOSRRDC# 1 revealed a terminal diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. Review of a Skilled Nurse visit note revealed documentation that HOSRRDC# 1 had fallen and had a bruise to the right elbow with no other injuries. Review of the Skilled Nurse visit note completed one day after the fall revealed HOSRRDC# 1 was complaining of weakness and having trouble transferring. Review of the Skilled Nurse visit note dated two days after the fall revealed documentation that HOSRRDC# 1 was no longer able to walk to the bathroom and required a bedside commode and continued to have declined in the ability to transfer. Review of an On-Call phone call dated three days after the fall revealed documentation that HOSRRDC# 1 had declined and the family was no longer able to transfer her or care for her. Further review of the On-Call phone call revealed documentation that the family was informed the patient could go to the emergency department and revoke hospice services. Review of HOSRRDC# 1’s patient record revealed no documentation that the physician was notified of the fall or the subsequent decline over the following three days. Further review of HOSRRDC# 1 patient record revealed HOSRRDC# 1 was diagnosed with a closed fracture of the right humerus with pneumonia. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0557. Condition-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed with hospice aide services, During HOSRRHV# 3’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured the RN completed supervisory assessments of the hospice aide’s services no less frequently than every 14 days. For example: review of HOSRRHV# 3’s patient record revealed the hospice aide provided hospice aide services two visits a week since approximately two months prior to the surveyor review of the record. Further review of the patient record revealed no documented RN supervisory assessments of the hospice aide services. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0629. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Record Review. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by Condition Level (CoP) deficiencies in 418.56 IDG, Care Planning, and Coordination; 418.100 Organization and Administration; 418.76 home health aides; 418.113 Emergency Manager.
”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually (42 CFR 418.113(a))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. Review of EOP revealed a one page 96 hour Rule that included directions to staff and no other EOP was documented or updated every 2 years. This was validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule E0004. Standard-level.

  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. Review of the Emergency Operation Plan revealed the organization had not ensured it conducted a hazard vulnerability analysis utilizing an all-hazards approach. For example: the Hospice was a part of a hospital wide emergency management plan but the HVA did not specifically address hospice’s vulnerabilities. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(2))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review of the EOP it was determined there was not specific HVA so unable to prioritize their identified potential emergencies. This was validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Policies/Procedures-Volunteers and Staffing (42 CFR 418.113(b)(4))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review of the Emergency Binder it was noted the HCO did not have a method to identify volunteers. This was validated with the Hospice Manager.
”

    Rule E0024. Standard-level.

  • Names and Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(1)(ii))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review of the Emergency Management binder revealed no contact information for the Volunteers. This was validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level.

  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(iii))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review of the HR file it was noted the Volunteers were not trained or included in the Emergency Management Binder. This was validated with Hospice Manager.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(2))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. Review of the Emergency Operation Plan revealed the organization had not ensured it planned and conducted exercises to test its emergency operations plan and response procedures. For example: review of the Emergency Operation Plan’s drill revealed the last drill was completed in 2021. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Integrated EP Program (42 CFR 418.113(e)(1))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. Review of the Emergency Operations Plan revealed the organization had failed to document the active participation in the development of the program or had a coordinated communication plan. This was validated with the Hospice Manager.
”

    Rule E0042. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(5))

    “Observed in Document Review. During Contracts review it was noted the organization had not ensured a Durable Medical Equipment contract included a Business Associate Agreement to include or language in the contract that included access to or release of patient information and clinical records as permitted in accordance with 45 CFR parts 160 and 164. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Nursing/Administrator.”

    Rule L0516. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 280 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 discharged patient records reviewed, During HOSRRDC# 1’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not planned the patient’s care. For example: review of HOSRRDC# 1’s patient record revealed HOSRRDC# 1 revealed a terminal diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. Review of a Skilled Nurse visit note revealed documentation that HOSRRDC# 1 had fallen and had a bruise to the right elbow with no other injuries. Review of the Skilled Nurse visit note completed one day after the fall revealed HOSRRDC# 1 was complaining of weakness and having trouble transferring with no update to the plan of care. Review of the Skilled Nurse visit note dated two days after the fall revealed documentation that HOSRRDC# 1 was no longer able to walk to the bathroom and required a bedside commode and continued to have declined in the ability to transfer with no update to the plan of care. Review of an On-Call phone call dated three days after the fall revealed documentation that HOSRRDC# 1 had declined and the family was no longer able to transfer her or care for her. Further review of the On-Call phone call revealed documentation that the family was informed the patient could go to the emergency department and revoke hospice services. Review of HOSRRDC# 1’s patient record revealed no documentation that the physician was notified of the fall or the subsequent decline over the following three days or the plan of care was updated. Further review of HOSRRDC# 1 patient record revealed HOSRRDC# 1 was diagnosed with a closed fracture of the right humerus with pneumonia. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d ))

    The inspectors’ words, 451 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 discharged patient records reviewed, During HOSRRDC# 1’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured the plan of care was updated to reflect the patient’s deterioration. For example: review of HOSRRDC# 1’s patient record revealed HOSRRDC# 1 revealed a terminal diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer. Review of a Skilled Nurse visit note revealed documentation that HOSRRDC# 1 had fallen and had a bruise to the right elbow with no other injuries. Review of the Skilled Nurse visit note completed one day after the fall revealed HOSRRDC# 1 was complaining of weakness and having trouble transferring with no update to the plan of care. Review of the Skilled Nurse visit note dated two days after the fall revealed documentation that HOSRRDC# 1 was no longer able to walk to the bathroom and required a bedside commode and continued to have declined in the ability to transfer with no update to the plan of care. Review of an On-Call phone call dated three days after the fall revealed documentation that HOSRRDC# 1 had declined and the family was no longer able to transfer her or care for her. Further review of the On-Call phone call revealed documentation that the family was informed the patient could go to the emergency department and revoke hospice services. Review of HOSRRDC# 1’s patient record revealed no documentation that the physician was notified of the fall or the subsequent decline over the following three days or the plan of care was updated. Further review of HOSRRDC# 1 patient record revealed HOSRRDC# 1 was diagnosed with a closed fracture of the right humerus with pneumonia. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Hospice Manager. Observed in Record Review. During the Medical Director interview and patient records review it was noted the organization had not ensured it provided interdisciplinary care, treatment, or services. For example: during the Medical Director interview it was noted the Medical Director did not have a back up physician to attend the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) when the Medical Director was not able to attend/participate. The Medical Director shared that when unable to attend/participate in the IDG, the Medical Director would follow up with the Hospice Manager for updates. The Hospice Manager shared if the Medical Director had not signed the IDG then the Medical Director did not attend. Review of the IDG’s dated approximately 58 days prior to the surveyor review of the record revealed no signature of the Medical Director. During IDG and patient record review it was noted the organization had not had a Spiritual Coordinator for approximately the last two months. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)

    “Observed in Data Session. During the data sessions it was noted the organization had not ensured it implemented and maintained an effective ongoing hospice-wide data-driven quality assessment and performance improvement program. For example: review of the QAPI data revealed the hospice had not included pharmacy or bereavement. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0559. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Observed in Record Review. During the IDG observation and interviews with the Director of Nursing and Hospice Manager it was noted the organization had not ensured Spiritual Coordinator was available to the patient ad family to assist the patient and family in minimizing the stress and problems that arise from the terminal illness, related conditions, and the dying process. For example: the organization’s Spiritual Coordinator resigned approximately two months prior to the survey and the BSW was being utilized for this role. However, review of the Spiritual Caregiver job description revealed the BSW did not meet the educational requirements of a Bachelor’s Degree from a CHEA in a content area relevant to chaplaincy. This was discussed and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0595. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 bereavement records reviewed, During HOSRRBR# 1 and HOSRRBR# 2’s bereavement records review it was noted the organization had not ensured it developed a bereavement plan of care that specified the types of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of delivery. For example review of HOSRRBR# 1 and HOSRRBR# 2’s bereavement records revealed a bereavement care plan with no documentation of services to be offered or a frequency of service delivery. Further review of the bereavement care plans revealed documentation after the services were completed. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed with Hospice Aide, During HR files review it was noted the organization had not ensure the hospice aide was evaluated by observing the hospice aide perform tasks on a patient or pseudo-patient. For example: Review of HOSHR# 4’s HR file revealed and initial competency assessment with documentation pass on all the tasks. However, there was not documentation of whether these tasks were observed. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(5))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 3 of 12 HR files reviewed, During review of the HR files it was noted the organization had not ensure it followed it’s policy Competency Assessment that included competency assessment annually. For example review of 3 of the 4 HR files revealed no competency assessment for 2024. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0619. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 1 home visits conducted with hospice aide, During HOSRRHV# 3’s home observation it was noted the organization had not ensured the hospice aide provided services as ordered in the plan of care. For example: during HOSRRHV# 3’s home observation the hospice aide removed the continuous oxygen while bathing. However, review of the hospice aide written patient care instructions revealed no documentation regarding removing the oxygen during cares. This was discussed and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed with Hospice Aide services, During HR files review it was noted the organization had note ensured the RN completed an annual on-site visit to the location where the patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each aide while the aide is providing care. For example: review of HOSHR# 4/Hospice Aide HR file revealed HOSHR# 4 date of hire was over 12 months from the day of the surveyor review of the HR file. Further review of the HOSHR# 4’s HR file revealed no documentation of a RN an annual on-site supervisory visit. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0632. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 Volunteer HR files reviewed, During HR files review it was noted the organization had not ensured it assessed the skills and competence of all volunteers. For example: review of the Volunteer Program orientation/education revealed a session with the Physical therapist for transfer training. The Volunteer Coordinator shared that Volunteers do transfer patients in the home. Review of HOSHV# 12/volunteer’s HR file revealed no documentation of a competency for transfers. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Volunteer Coordinator and the Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 180 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 2 home visits conducted with Skilled Nurse, During HOSRRHV# 1HOSRRHV# 2’s home observations it was noted the organization had not ensured the patient record contained information that reflected the patient’s care, treatment, or services. For example: review of HOSRRHV# 2’s medication profile revealed Lorazepam PRN. However, when reviewing HOSRRHV# 2’s medications with HOSRRHV# 2’s spouse it was noted HOSRRHV# 2 had not been taking Lorazepam for several months prior to the home observation and HOSRRHV# 2’s spouse had removed the medication to a cabinet away from the active medications. Further review of the medications in the home revealed HOSRRHV# 2 was taking Trazodone at bedtime as needed for sleep and had taken one the night prior to the home observation. Review of the medication profile revealed no documentation of Trazadone. During HOSRVHV# 1’s home observation the RN was observed putting Senna into HOSRRHV# 1’s medication minder from pm to am. However, review of the medication profile revealed no documentation of Senna. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the RN and Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Observed in Document Review. During contract review it was noted the organization had not ensured care, treatment, or services provided through contractual agreement are provided safely and effectively. For example: review of the Durable Medical Equipment contract revealed the contract failed to requirement criminal background checks. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Nursing and Hospice Manager.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 13, 2026Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 7, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Jan 24, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission24 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 15, 1996.
  • Ownership: government.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 18.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 82% at home, 10% in assisted living, 7% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day18.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.6%
Visits near death92.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Michael Mccafferty (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Nathan Stutte (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Michael Mccafferty (corporate officer); Nathan Stutte (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 97% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.14% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 63.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 82801, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 12.5; this one had 24.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 2 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 82801
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Sheridan Memorial Hospital Hospice This hospice24
Hospice of Campbell County Memorial Hospital1

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.