Central Wyoming Hospice Program
A hospice in Casper, Wyoming 82601
319 South Wilson Street, Casper, Wyoming 82601. (307) 577-4832.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
8 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 4 hospices serving ZIP code 82601 had 1.5.
The last inspection on record was on Mar 18, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jan 13, 2026: recertification inspection by the state8 deficiencies
-
Roles Under a Waiver Declared by Secretary (42 CFR 418.113(b)(6)(C)(iv))
The inspectors’ words, 155 words
“Based on document review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide an Emergency Preparedness Plan (EPP) with policies and procedures in accordance with §418.113(b)(6)(C)(iv). The EPP failed to outline the role of the facility under a waiver declared by the Secretary, in accordance with section 1135 of the Act, in the provision of care and treatment at an alternate care site identified by emergency management officials. The findings were: Review of the EPP on 01/13/202 starting at 11:00 AM revealed that the facility’s EPP failed to develop and implement policies and procedures which outline the facility’s role in the provision of care and treatment under section 1135 waivers during a declared public health emergency in alternate care sites. Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.”
-
Means of Egress - General (42 CFR NFPA 101)
The inspectors’ words, 193 words
“Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the means of egress in the Kloefkorn Building in accordance with the 2012 NFPA 101, Life Safety Code. Failure to maintain the means of egress could lead to injury or death in the event of an emergency. The deficiency affected one (1) of multiple means of egress. The deficiency could affect all residents, staff, and visitors at the facility. The findings were: Observation on 01/13/2026 at 10:27 AM revealed a pair of 3/4 hour fire rated cross corridor doors with hold open devices in the exit access corridor in the Kloefkorn building. Both doors closed and latched when dropped from their magnetic hold open devices. Further observations revealed the exit hardware on the east door failed to release the door latch leaving the door inoperable after it closed. The inoperable door created an obstruction within the means of egress.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency. REF: 2012 NFPA 101, Sections 19.2.1, 7.1.10.1, 7.2.1.5.1”
-
Doors with Self-Closing Devices (42 CFR NFPA 101)
The inspectors’ words, 266 words
“Based on observation and staff interview in the Chapman Building, the facility failed to ensure doors in an exit passageway, stairway enclosure, horizontal exit, smoke barrier, or hazardous area enclosure are self-closing and kept in the closed position unless held open by a release device in accordance with the 2012 NFPA 101, Life Safety Code. Failure to ensure self-closing doors close and latch could allow for the spread of smoke and fire leading to injury or death in the event of a fire. The deficiency affected one (1) of multiple doors and could potentially affect all residents, staff, and visitors. The findings were: Observation on 01/13/2026 at 9:50 AM in the Chapman building revealed the Janitor’s Closet was protected with a fire rated self-closing door. Further observation revealed the self-closing door failed to close and latch when dropped from the open position.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.REF: 2012 NFPA 101, Sections 19.2.2.2.7, 19.3.2.1, 19.3.2.1.3 Observation on 01/13/2026 at 10:39 AM in the Kloefkorn building revealed the Pantry storage room was protected with a fire rated self-closing door. Further observation revealed the self-closing door failed to close and latch when dropped from the open position.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.REF: 2012 NFPA 101, Sections 19.2.2.2.7, 19.3.2.1, 19.3.2.1.3”
-
Emergency Lighting (42 CFR NFPA 101)
The inspectors’ words, 295 words
“Based on document review and staff interview, the facility failed to test battery-operated emergency lighting and exit signs at the Kloefkorn building in accordance with the 2012 NFPA 101, Life Safety Code. Failure to test battery-operated emergency lighting equipment as required could result in inadequate lighting or failure to identify exit access during an emergency, resulting in injury or death. The deficiency impacted all battery powered exit signage and emergency lighting throughout the facility. The findings were: Document review on 01/13/2026 starting at 11:00 AM revealed the facility failed to provide evidence of required 30 second functional testing of the battery-operated emergency lighting and exit signs at the Kloefkorn building for the months of July and August of 2025. The 2012 NFPA 101, section 7.9.3.1.1 requires monthly functional testing of battery powered emergency lighting and exit signs for not less than 30 seconds.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.REF: 2012 NFPA 101, Sections 19.2.9, 19.2.10, 7.9.3.1, 7.10.9.2 Document review on 01/13/2026 starting at 11:00 AM revealed the facility failed to provide evidence of required 30 second functional testing of the battery-operated emergency lighting and exit signs at the Chapman building for the months of July and August of 2025. The 2012 NFPA 101, section 7.9.3.1.1 requires monthly functional testing of battery powered emergency lighting and exit signs for not less than 30 seconds.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.REF: 2012 NFPA 101, Sections 19.2.9, 19.2.10, 7.9.3.1, 7.10.9.2”
-
Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing (42 CFR NFPA 101)
The inspectors’ words, 283 words
“Based on observation, document review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain and provide documentation of required maintenance for the water-based fire protection systems at the Kloefkorn Building in accordance with 2012 NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, and 2011 NFPA 25, Standard for the Inspection, Testing, and Maintenance of Water-Based Fire Protection Systems. Failure to test and maintain water-based fire protection systems could result in injury or death in the event of a fire. The deficiency could affect the entire fire sprinkler system. The findings were: Document review on 01/13/2026 starting at 11:00 AM for the Kloefkorn building revealed the facility failed to provide evidence of internal inspection of piping as required by the 2011 NFPA 25, section 14.2. An internal inspection of the fire sprinkler system’s piping and branch line conditions shall be conducted every 5 years. Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.REF: 2012 NFPA 101, Section 9.7.5, 2010 NFPA 25, Section 14.2 Document review on 01/13/2026 starting at 11:00 AM for the Chapman building revealed the facility failed to provide evidence of internal inspection of piping as required by the 2011 NFPA 25, section 14.2. An internal inspection of the fire sprinkler system’s piping and branch line conditions shall be conducted every 5 years. Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.REF: 2012 NFPA 101, Section 9.7.5, 2010 NFPA 25, Section 14.2”
-
Fire Drills (42 CFR NFPA 101)
The inspectors’ words, 255 words
“Based on document review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide documentation of fire drills conducted quarterly on each shift under varied conditions at the Chapman building in accordance with 2012 NFPA 101, Life Safety Code. Failure to conduct fire drills quarterly for all shifts and under varied conditions could lead to confusion or delay response resulting in injury or death in the event of a fire emergency. The deficiency could affect all residents, staff, and visitors. The findings were: Document review on 01/13/2026 starting at 11:00 AM revealed the facility failed to conduct fire drills quarterly on each shift under varied conditions at the Chapman building. The facility failed to provide evidence of a second shift fire drill occurring during the fourth quarter of 2025. Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.REF: 2012 NFPA 101, Section 19.7.1 Document review on 01/13/2026 starting at 11:00 AM revealed the facility failed to conduct fire drills quarterly on each shift under varied conditions at the Kloefkorn building. The facility failed to provide evidence of a second shift fire drill occurring during the fourth quarter of 2025. Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.REF: 2012 NFPA 101, Section 19.7.1”
-
Essential Electrical Systems – Generator or Alternate Source (42 CFR NFPA 101)
The inspectors’ words, 366 words
“Based on document review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement the emergency power system inspection, testing and maintenance requirements found in the 2012 NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities Code, and 2010 NFPA 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, and the 2012 NFPA 110, Life Safety Code. Failure to provide the required inspection, testing, and maintenance of emergency power systems could lead to injury or death for all residents and staff in the event of an electrical system failure or emergency. The deficiency affected all of the emergency power systems at the Chapman building. The deficiency could potentially affect all residents, staff, and visitors. The findings were: Document review on 01/13/2026 starting at 11:00 AM revealed the facility’s Emergency Power Supply Systems for the Chapman building were not tested and maintained in accordance with the 2010 NFPA 110 Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, and the 2012 NFPA 99, Healthcare Facilities Code. Document review revealed the facility failed to provide evidence of the following: Emergency Power Supply System (EPSS) main and feeder circuit breakers shall be inspected annually and a program established for exercising components per manufacturer’s recommendations.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.REF: 2012 NFPA 99, Section 6.4.4.1.2, and 2010 NFPA 110, Section 8.4.9 Document review on 01/13/2026 starting at 11:00 AM revealed the facility’s Emergency Power Supply Systems for the Kloefkorn building were not tested and maintained in accordance with the 2010 NFPA 110 Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, and the 2012 NFPA 99, Healthcare Facilities Code. Document review revealed the facility failed to provide evidence of the following: Emergency Power Supply System (EPSS) main and feeder circuit breakers shall be inspected annually and a program established for exercising components per manufacturer’s recommendations.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility administrator and the facility maintenance manager at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.REF: 2012 NFPA 99, Section 6.4.4.1.2, and 2010 NFPA 110, Section 8.4.9”
-
Electrical Equipment – Ground-Fault Circuit-Interrupter Protection (42 CFR NFPA 101)
The inspectors’ words, 323 words
“Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to properly handle and store gas cylinders in the Kloefkorn building in accordance with 2012 NFPA 99, Healthcare Facilities Code. Failure to properly handle and store compressed gas cylinders could result in injury or death in the event of accident or fire. The deficiency could affect all residents, staff, and visitors within the affected area. The findings were: Observations on 01/13/2026 at 10:20 AM in the Kloefkorn building revealed the facility failed to provide proper storage for nonflammable gas cylinders. The facility allowed for storage of compressed oxygen E-cylinders with a total volume greater than 300 cu. ft. compressed to be stored in an interior storage room within 5 ft of combustible supplies. Further observations of the oxygen storage room in the Kloefkorn building revealed the facility failed to provide the proper precautionary signage in accordance with the 2012 NFPA 99, section 11.3.4.Interview with the facility maintenance manager and the facility administrator at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility maintenance manager and the facility administrator at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.REF: 2012 NFPA 99 Section 11.3, 11.3.2, 11.3.3, 11.3.4 Observations on 01/13/2026 at 10:08 AM in the Chapman building revealed the facility failed to provide proper storage for nonflammable gas cylinders. The facility allowed for storage of compressed oxygen E-cylinders with a total volume greater than 300 cu. ft. compressed to be stored in an interior storage room within 5 ft of combustible supplies. Further observations of the oxygen storage room in the Chapman building revealed the facility failed to provide the proper precautionary signage in accordance with the 2012 NFPA 99, section 11.3.4.Interview with the facility maintenance manager and the facility administrator at the time of the observation acknowledged the deficiency.Interview with the facility maintenance manager and the facility administrator at the time of exit confirmed the deficiency.REF: 2012 NFPA 99 Section 11.3, 11.3.2, 11.3.3, 11.3.4”
All 5 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2026 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Mar 6, 2026 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Jan 15, 2026 | Recertification inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Jan 13, 2026 | Recertification inspection by the state | 8 deficiencies cited |
| Aug 29, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 6, 1992.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 24.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 28.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.5% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 65% at home, 12% in assisted living, 7% in a nursing facility, 15% in an inpatient hospice.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 24.6 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 28.3% |
| Visits near death | 97.5% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 6 owners or officers are people: Lisa Mathiowetz (managing employee (on the payroll)); Larry A Kloster (corporate officer); Joan Means (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Joseph K Schoeber (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Stuart Atnip (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Kilty Brown (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 95% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 94.44% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 87.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 4 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 82601, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1.5; this one had 8.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Central Wyoming Hospice Program This hospice | 8 |
| Enhabit Hospice | 0 |
| Caringedge Hospice of Casper LLC | 2 |
| Hospice of Campbell County Memorial Hospital | 1 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.