Hearth Record

Hospice of Sweetwater County

A hospice in Rock Springs, Wyoming 82901

333 Broadway Street, Suite 220, Rock Springs, Wyoming 82901. (307) 362-1990.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 5 hospices serving ZIP code 82901 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 9, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 5, 2025: recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 539 words

    “Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy and procedure review the agency failed to ensure the plan of care (POC) included all pertinent information for 9 of 14 sample patients (#3, #4, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12). The findings were: 1. Review of the POC for patient #3 showed diagnoses including Cachexia, Parkinson’s disease, repeated falls, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Observation during the CNA home visit on 9/3/25 at 3:30 PM showed the patient had briefs, wipes, shower chair, toilet riser with handles, grip bars, oxygen, nasal cannula, wheelchair, and a 4-wheel walker. The POC failed to include the frequency of the CNA visits.2. Review of the medical record for patient #4 showed diagnoses including sepsis, COPD, pneumonia, and dementia. Review of the POC failed to include all services necessary and frequency of visits. 3. Review of the medical record for patient #6 showed diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of left ovary, and malignant neoplasm of retroperitoneum and peritoneum. Review of the POC under active items showed oxygen use, urinary incontinence, diminished strength, wound under left breast, wound under right breast, shortness of breath and risk of pressure sores. The POC failed to include all necessary services and frequency of visits.4. Review of the medical record for patient #7 showed diagnoses of melanoma neck and scalp, and malignant neoplasm of the lung. Review of the POC showed issues were functional needs, anxiety, bathing, confusion, edema, and shortness of breath. The POC failed to include all necessary services and frequency of visits.5. Review of the medical record for patient #8 showed diagnoses of prostate cancer and metastasis to bone. Review of the POC showed issues of air hunger, bathing, confusion, depression, diminished strength, edema, oxygen use, shortness of breath, urinary incontinence, and pain. The POC failed to include all necessary services and frequency of visits.6. Review of the medical record for patient #9 showed diagnoses of advanced COPD chronic and anemia. Review of the POC showed issues of shortness of breath, oxygen use, confusion, edema, air hunger, and depression. The POC failed to include all necessary services and frequency of visits. 7. Review of the medical record for patient #10 showed diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of retroperitoneum. Review of the POC showed issues of anxiety, nausea, pain, and shortness of breath. The POC failed to include all necessary services and frequency of visits.8. Review of the POC for patient #11 showed diagnoses of chronic systolic congestive heart failure, falls, dizziness, giddiness, mood disorder, and urinary tract infection. The POC failed to include all necessary services and frequency of visits.9. Review of the POC for patient #12 showed diagnoses of malignant melanoma of left lower limb, including hip. The POC failed to include all necessary services and frequency of visits.10. Interview with the administrator on 9/5/25 at 10 AM confirmed the POC’s did not include the services and the frequency of visits. 11. Review of policy “Plan of Care - Content” hand delivered on 9/4/25 at 3:44 PM by the administrator showed “...2.The plan of care includes, but not limited to:...b. a detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs...””

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 430 words

    “Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy and procedure review the agency failed to ensure drugs and treatment necessary to meet the patient needs were included in the plan of corrections (POC) for 7 of 14 patients (#2, #4, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10). The findings were: 1.Review of the POC for patient #2 showed diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, and muscle weakness. Further review showed the agency failed to include all the patient medications on the POC. During the home visit on 9/3/25 at 11 AM, RN# 1 stated the medications, she just delivered to the patient were metoprolol (beta blocker), ondansetron (serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists), nystatin (polyene antifungal medication), morphine (opiate), and docusate (laxative). The medications were not included on the POC.2. Review of the medical record for patient #4 showed diagnoses including sepsis, COPD, pneumonia, and dementia. Review of the POC failed to include the patients list of medications.3. Review of the medical record for patient #6 showed diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of left ovary, and malignant neoplasm of retroperitoneum and peritoneum. Review of the POC showed oxygen use, urinary incontinence, diminished strength, wound under left breast, wound under right breast, shortness of breath and risk of pressure sores. The POC failed to include the patients list of medications. 4. Review of the medical record for patient #7 showed diagnoses of melanoma neck and scalp, and malignant neoplasm of the lung. Review of the POC showed anxiety, bathing, confusion, edema, and shortness of breath. The POC failed to include the patients list of medications.5. Review of the medical record for patient #8 showed diagnoses of prostate cancer, and metastasis to the bone. Review of the POC showed issues of air hunger, bathing, confusion, depression, diminished strength, edema, oxygen use, shortness of breath, urinary incontinence, and pain. The POC failed to include the patients list of medications. 6. Review of the medical record for patient #9 showed diagnoses of advanced COPD chronic, and anemia. The POC failed to include the patients list of medications.7. Review of the medical record for patient #10 showed diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of retroperitoneum. The POC failed to include the patients list of medications. 8. Interview with the administrator on 9/5/25 at 10 AM revealed the POC the facility was currently using did not include the medications.9. Review of police “Plan of Care - Content” hand delivered on 9/4/25 at 3:44 PM by the administrator showed “...2. The plan of care includes, but is not limited to:...d. drugs and treatments necessary to meet the needs of the patient...””

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 668 words

    “Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy and procedure review the agency failed to ensure the plan of care (POC) included all pertinent information for 12 of 14 sample patients (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12). The findings were: 1.Review of the POC for patient #1 showed diagnoses including Alzheimer’s disease, repeated falls, and history of urinary tract infections. Observation on 9/4/25 at 9:30 AM showed the patient had a shower chair, hospital bed, wheelchair, grab bars, briefs. The POC failed to include the durable medical equipment (DME) and the safety precautions.2. Review of the POC for patient #2 showed diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, and muscle weakness. Observation during the home visit on 9/3/25 at 11 AM showed the patient had a hospital bed, oxygen, nasal cannula, shower chair, grab bars, wheelchair, bed pain, briefs, incontinent pads, foley catheter, and a medication minder. The POC failed to includes the DME and safety precautions.3. Review of the POC for patient #3 showed diagnoses including cachexia, Parkinson’s disease, repeated falls, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Observation during the home visit on 9/3/25 at 3:30 PM showed the patient had briefs, wipes, shower chair, toilet riser with handles, grip bars, oxygen, nasal cannula, wheelchair, and a 4-wheel walker. The POC failed to include the DME and safety precautions.4. Review of the medical record for patient #4 showed diagnoses including sepsis, COPD, pneumonia, and dementia. Review of the POC failed to include the diagnoses, DME and safety precautions.5. Review of the POC for patient #5 showed a diagnosis of disseminated malignant neoplasm. The POC failed to include the DME and safety precautions.6. Review of the medical record for patient #6 showed diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of left ovary, and malignant neoplasm of retroperitoneum and peritoneum. Review of the POC showed under active items was oxygen use, urinary incontinence, diminished strength, wound under left breast, wound under right breast, shortness of breath and risk of pressure sores. The POC failed to include the DME and safety precautions.7. Review of the medical record for patient #7 showed diagnoses of melanoma neck and scalp, and malignant neoplasm of the lung. Review of the POC showed under issues was functional needs, anxiety, bathing, confusion, edema, and shortness of breath. The POC failed to include diagnoses, DME and safety precautions.8. Review of the medical record for patient #8 showed diagnoses of prostate cancer and metastasis to the bone. Review of the POC showed issues of air hunger, bathing, confusion, depression, diminished strength, edema, oxygen use, shortness of breath, urinary incontinence, and pain. The POC failed to include diagnoses, DME and safety precautions.9. Review of the medical record for patient #9 showed diagnoses of advanced COPD chronic and anemia. Review of the POC showed issues of shortness of breath, oxygen use, confusion, edema, air hunger, and depression. The POC failed to include diagnoses, DME and safety precautions. 10. Review of the medical record for patient #10 showed diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of retroperitoneum. Review of the POC showed issues of anxiety, nausea, pain, and shortness of breath. The POC failed to include diagnoses, DME and safety precautions.11. Review of the POC for patient #11 showed diagnoses of chronic systolic congestive heart failure, falls, dizziness, giddiness, mood disorder, and urinary tract infection. The POC failed to include the DME and safety precautions.12. Review of the POC for patient #12 showed a diagnosis of malignant melanoma of left lower limb, including hip. The POC failed to include DME and safety precautions.13. Interview with CNA #1 on 9/4/25 at 9:30 AM she did not know the DME and safety precautions for patient #1 and would have to ask other staff. 14. Review of policy “Plan of Care - Content” had delivered on 9/4/25 at 3:44 PM by the administrator showed “...2.The plan of care includes, but not limited to:...e. medical supplies, equipment, and appliances necessary to meet the needs of the patient.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 9, 2026Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Sep 5, 2025Recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 18, 1987.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 17.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 86% at home, 14% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day17.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.6%
Visits near death93.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 9 owners or officers are people: Pamela K Ostdahl (corporate officer); Pamela K Ostdahl (corporate director); John Hay (corporate director); Lori Hall (corporate officer); Lori Hall (corporate director); John Kennedy (corporate officer); John Kennedy (corporate director); Nicole Mandros (corporate officer); Nicole Mandros (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.33% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 70.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 82901, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 5 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 82901
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Hospice of Sweetwater County This hospice3
Best Home Health & Hospice LLC1
Help for Health Hospice7
Symbii Hospice0
Cowboy Cares Home Health & HospiceNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.