Hearth Record

Regional Hospice Services

A hospice in Ashland, Wisconsin 54806

1913 Beaser Ave, Ashland, Wisconsin 54806. (715) 685-5151.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 3 hospices serving ZIP code 54806 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 24, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 24, 2025: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,060 words

    “Based on record review the agency staff failed to develop plans of care that included measurable goals to meet the patient’s needs in 14 of 21 (Patients #2, #3, #4, #6, #8, #9 #10, #11, #12 #13, #14, #17, #20, and #21) patient records reviewed. Findings include:Review of agency’s Policy and Procedure titled “Plan of Care” (POC) revealed under Procedure: “Using data obtained during the initial and ongoing Hospice assessments, the interdisciplinary team members develop a list of patient problems and needs with corresponding goals, interventions and anticipated target dates for reaching goals.” No reference to making patient goals measurable was documented within policy.Record review for Patient #2 revealed Patient #2 was admitted to the hospice 11/24/2023 with a primary diagnosis of rectal carcinoma. Patient #2’s POC dated 03/18/2025 - 05/17/2025 revealed “Goal: Identify/report bowel changes for term of care with goal of avoiding painful obstructions, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #2.Record review for Patient #3 revealed Patient #3 was admitted to the hospice 07/01/2024 with a primary diagnosis of biliary cirrhosis. Patient #3’s POC dated 02/26/2025 – 04/26/2025 revealed “Goal: Report pain is relieved/controlled, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #3. Record review for Patient #4 revealed Patient #4 was admitted to the hospice 02/13/2025 with a primary diagnosis of pulmonary fibrosis. Patient #4’s POC dated 02/13/2025 – 05/13/2025 revealed “Goal: Coordinate care with patient, caregiver, attending physician and family. Hospice team will assist patient and his family regarding patient’s comfort, caregiving needs and concerns in a timely manner, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #4. Record review for Patient #6 revealed Patient #6 was admitted to the hospice 03/10/2025 with a primary diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome. Patient #6’s POC dated 03/10/2025 – 06/07/2025 revealed “Goal: Coordinate care with patient, caregiver, attending physician and family to achieve patient’s hospice goals, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #6. Record review for Patient #8 revealed Patient #8 was admitted to the hospice 03/26/2022 with a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Patient #8’s POC dated 03/10/2025 – 05/08/2025 revealed “Goal: Coordinate care with patient, caregiver, attending physician and family… to achieve comfort and manage symptoms, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #8.Record review for Patient #9 revealed Patient #9 was admitted to the hospice 04/12/2025 with a primary diagnosis of malnutrition. Patient #9’s POC dated 04/12/2025 – 07/10/2025 revealed “Goal: Maintain safe home environment addressing declining mobility and needs related to those changes as disease progresses, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #9. Record review for Patient #10 revealed Patient #10 was admitted to the hospice 02/26/2025 with a primary diagnosis of malnutrition. Patient #10’s POC dated 02/26/2025 – 05/26/2025 revealed “Goal: Adjust to changing nutritional needs related to appetite and or ability to swallow without aspiration, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #10.Record review for Patient #11 revealed Patient #11 was admitted to the hospice 03/28/2025 with a primary diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm without rupture. Patient #11’s POC dated 03/28/2025 – 06/25/2025 revealed “Goal: Effective grieving pt., family, and facility staff will be able to express their thoughts and feelings in ways meaningful to them relating to end-of-life experience, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient 11. Record review for Patient #12 revealed Patient #12 was admitted to the hospice 02/26/2025 with a primary diagnosis of heart failure. Patient #12’s POC dated 02/26/2025 – 05/26/2025 revealed “Goal: Begin the grieving process associated with a loss, patient will be able to express her thoughts and feelings in ways meaningful to them relating to the end-of-life experience, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #12. Record review for Patient #13 revealed Patient #13 was admitted to the hospice 03/27/2025 with a primary diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Patient #13’s POC dated 03/27/2025 – 06/25/2025 revealed “Goal: Coordinate care with patient, caregiver, attending physician and family. Patient will make needs and wants known, with hospice team to address questions or concerns in a timely manner to support comfort and caregiving, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #13. Record review for Patient #14 revealed Patient #14 was admitted to the hospice 04/11/2025 with a primary diagnosis of malnutrition. Patient #14’s POC dated 04/11/2025 – 07/09/2025 revealed “Goal: Effective grieving patient, family, and facility staff will be able to express their thoughts and feelings in ways meaningful to them relating to end-of-life experience, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #14. Record review for Patient #17 revealed Patient #17 was admitted to the hospice 03/21/2025 with a primary diagnosis of metastatic bone cancer. Patient #17’s POC dated 03/21/2025 – 06/20/2025 revealed “Goal: Begin verbalizing feelings associated with the loss, patient and her family will be able to express their thoughts and feelings in ways meaningful to them relating to end-of-life experience, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #17. Record review for Patient #20 revealed Patient #20 was admitted to the hospice 01/28/2025 with a primary diagnosis of critical left lower extremity ischemia with gangrene. Patient #20’s POC dated 01/28/2025 – 04/27/2025 revealed “Goal: Achieve preferred level of relief from grief symptoms with hospice staff to address any s/sx of negative grieving, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #20. Record review for Patient #21 revealed Patient #21 was admitted to the hospice 01/22/2025 with a primary diagnosis of metastatic bone cancer. Patient #21’s POC dated 4/22/2025 – 07/20/2025 revealed “Goal: Achieve preferred level of relief from grief symptoms with hospice staff to address any s/sx of negative grieving, ongoing.” The goal stated on the POC was not measurable to meet the specific needs of Patient #21.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Based on record review and interview, agency failed to ensure that relevant data was used in the design of its program in 1 of 1 Quality Assessment and Process Improvement (QAPI) program reviewed. Findings include:Review of the agency’s QAPI program revealed no documentation of quality indicator data being used in the design of the program.During an interview conducted with Administrator A on 4/24/2025 at 8:12 a.m., Administrator A was asked what quality indicators are used to design the program. Administrator A stated that the indicators are analyzed quarter to quarter. Administrator A further stated “We’re analyzing, we’re just not documenting.””

    Rule L0563. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 149 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure that performance improvement projects had reasons for conducting the projects as well as measurable data and documentation of progress/improvement in 1 of 1 Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) program reviewed. Findings include:Review of the agency’s current performance improvement projects revealed 5 current projects:-Volunteer Connect team calls. -Implementation of centralized electronic cloud faxing. -Advance Directive workshops strategic plan to address community need and increase program awareness.-Review and update Employee Handbook.-Update Clinical Care Coordinator binders.There was no documentation of any data with which to measure improvement and no documentation of the reasons for conducting these projects. During an interview conducted with Administrator A on 4/24/2025 at 8:12 a.m., Administrator A was asked if these projects were data driven and reasons for selecting the projects was documented. Administrator A stated no and that the projects are more process and task oriented.”

    Rule L0573. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Based on record review and interview the agency failed to establish policies/procedures to screen/monitor continuing employees for communicable diseases in 1 of 1 infection control programs reviewed. Findings include:Review of policy tilted, “Infection Control Policy” dated 2011, last reviewed 08/2024 revealed no documentation on how the agency planned to screen or monitor continuing employees for communicable diseases.During an interview with Executive Director A on 04/24/2025 at 9:05 AM, Executive Director A confirmed that the agency had no written polices related to above information. Executive Director a stated that the agency relies on employee self reporting.”

    Rule L0581. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 24, 2025Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 16, 1992.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 70% at home, 11% in assisted living, 18% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.3%
Visits near death95.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 10 owners or officers are people: Leonard L Meysembourg (corporate director); Diana Anderson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Edward W Haugen (corporate director); Lynda G Anderson (corporate director); Lynda G Anderson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kim Ogle (managing employee (under contract)); Nina J Gilberg (corporate director, 0%); Luke Daniel Beirl (corporate director); Michael D Schafer (corporate director); Megan Sandgren (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 94.86% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 65.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 3 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 54806, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 3 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 54806
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Regional Hospice Services This hospice4
St Croix Hospice Hudson4
St Croix Hospice Eau Claire10

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.