Hearth Record

Whatcom Hospice

A hospice in Bellingham, Washington 98225

2800 Douglas Ave, Suite 1-C, Bellingham, Washington 98225. (360) 733-5877.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 4 hospices serving ZIP code 98225 had 8.5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 4, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 4, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 23 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted the not all of the interdisciplinary group had made an initial comprehensive visit within the 5 calendar days after the election of Hospice (EOHB). for example, in RRNHV1, the Chaplain had not made a visit until 7 days post EOHB without explanation why the evaluation had not occurred. This was validated with leadership present during the record review.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(8))

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 resident records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted that not all patient assessments and treatments had been documented in the EMR. For example, in INPTRR3, the patient had a wound in the L Axilla that was being treated. The Surveyor had been unable to validate that an assessment of the wound had occurred as there had not been any documentation that included size, drainage, peri-wound skin, nor that the dressing had been changed. This was validated with the Leadership present during the record review. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 23 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted the patient assessment did not include all required elements. For example, in RRNHV8, the patient had Necrotizing Fasciitis with multiple wounds receiving care. There had not been an assessment related to the size of the wounds (that included: length, width and depth), wound bed appearance, peri-wound skin, and drainage since the patient came onto Hospice service 3 months ago. This was validated with the Assistant Director assisting with record reviews.”

    Rule L0532. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 3 resident records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted orders not present for all care provided to the patient. For example, in INPTRR1, there had been documentation that a condom catheter had been placed on the patient; however, there had not been orders to apply the device. In INPTRR2, the patient was receiving care to L axilla wound, but there had not been orders that included what to cleanse the wound with, the frequency of the care, nor who was to complete the wound care. This was validated with clinical leadership present during the review. Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 23 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted not all orders for patient care had been present in the EMR. For example, in RRHV3, the patient, residing in a skilled facility, had an indwelling suprapubic catheter; however, there had been no orders for the insertion or changing of the catheter. In RRHV5, the patient had wound care with the use of ‘Mepitel’ over the skin tear, but this had not been in the orders. In RRHV6, the patient had an Aspira drain in the right abdomen that had orders for dressing changes; however, the order had not included what the site was to be cleansed with nor the frequency. This was validated with the Leadership present during the record review.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 23 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted that the Hospice Aide supervision had not occurred every 14 days. For example, in RRNHV3, there had been a period of 18 days between HA supervisory visits in June and 16 days in August. This was validated with the Assistant Nurse Manager assisting with record review.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Observed in HR File Review. The organization did not meet the requirement for having initial orientation to hospice philosophy completed. This was evidenced by 1 of 11 employee records reviewed lacking documentation of hospice philosophy on record. The Acupuncturist did not have documentation demonstrating completion of the required initial training. This finding was discussed with the Nursing Leader.”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 23 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted documentation of patient care had not occurred per HCO policy. In RRNHV8, the patient had multiple wounds related to Necrotizing Fasciitis. The clinicians providing care over the 3 months the patient had been on service had documented ‘wound dressing changed per orders’ and ‘complex wound dressing done this visit’ and had not included all elements of the wound care and assessment as required in their Wound Documentation policy. The policy required full wound assessment (including measurements, description of the wound bed and surrounding skin, and drainage) as well as the actual care provided. This was validated with the Assistant Director assisting with record reviews.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 175 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 23 patient records reviewed, In RRHV3, the patient had an indwelling urinary catheter. There had been no clear orders present for who was responsible for the care of the catheter, Hospice staff or SNF staff. In RRHV6, the patient had an Aspira drain in the right abdomen that had orders for dressing changes and to drain the abdominal fluid up to 1000ml; however, the order did not include who was responsible to provide the care, whether Hospice RN or SNF staff. RRNHV8, the patient had complex wounds with care orders for 3 times per week. Hospice had been seeing the patient 2 times per week. There had been no clear information about the SNF responsibility in providing care for the 3rd dressing of the week. In RRNHV11, the patient had an indwelling urinary catheter. There had been no clear orders present for who was responsible for the care of the catheter, Hospice staff or SNF staff. This was validated with the Assistant Manager present during the record reviews.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

Nov 17, 2023: initial inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 207 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 27 patient records reviewed, Confirmed by the RN Program Manager. The hospice individualized plan of care goals had not been measurable and had not been reflective of the patient’s goal. . Example: During review of HOSv#2 the plan of care goal had documented that spiritual resources are identified to include beliefs and practices that support or impair hospice experience. The patient will be knowledgeable in the management of bleeding. HOSv#5 goal had stated that the pain level would remain at a 3/10, however during assessment the patient pain goal had been to remain 1/10. HOSrr#13 the plan of care pain goal had documented to remain at 4/10, however the patient goal on assessment had been 1/10. HOSv#4 goal had documented that patient will identify their beliefs that support or impair hospice experience. Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 27 patient records reviewed, Confirmed by the RN Program Manager. The Hospice had not developed a plan of care to reflect interventions based on the problems identified in the comprehensive assessments. Example: During review of HOSv#3 the plan of care had not documented care to a decubitus ulcer and swallowing difficulties. HOSrr#13 had not included the wound care and treatment .”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 27 patient records reviewed, Confirmed by the RN Program Manager. The plan of care had not been updated to reflect changes to the care or treatments. Example: During review of HOSrr#12 the patient had a wound being treated . The change in treatment to include medi honey had not been updated in the plan of care. During review HOSv#2 nursing notes it had been documented that the patient had complained of dizziness and prednisone had been ordered. It had not been updated to the plan of care. HOSv#3 plan of care had not been updated with the changes in treatment being provided to the sacral wound.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 6 hospice visits observed and confirmed by the RN Program Manager. Staff had not followed accepted standards of practice. Example: During observation of HOSv#5 the SN had changed gloves frequently without cleansing her hands between glove changes per CDC guidelines and organization policy, Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 6 Hospice patient visits observed and confirmed by the RN Program Manager. Staff had not followed accepted standards of practice or organization policy. Example: During observation of HOSv#5 staff had not followed agency policy and had placed her bag on the floor . Policy had stated that the bag should not be placed on the floor unless it had been a rolling bag.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in HR File Review. The organization had not defined competencies for nursing staff that care for pediatric patients. The organization did not have evidence that pediatric competencies had been performed by the staff that provided care for pediatric patients.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 3 patient records reviewed, Confirmed by the RN Program Manager. During review of Hospice live discharge records , it had been identified that the organization had not completed a discharge summary to contain all required elements. Example : During review of HOSd/c#2 and #3 staff had been unable to retrieve a documented discharge summary.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 4, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies cited
Nov 17, 2023Initial inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 24, 2001.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 12.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 46% at home, 28% in assisted living, 18% in a skilled nursing facility, 3% in an inpatient hospice, 6% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends12.5%
Visits near death91.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Peacehealth owns 100% directly since Jul 27, 2001.
  • 24 owners or officers are people: Kevin G Murphy (corporate officer, 0%); Shelley Rice (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Shelley Rice (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Charlotte Virgia Davenport (corporate officer, 0%); Ione S Adams (corporate director, 0%); Leonard W Kearney (corporate officer, 0%); Thomas Karnes (corporate officer, 0%); Lorraine Arvin (corporate director, 0%); Danny W Hollingshead (corporate officer, 0%); Richard Harry Wollenberg (corporate officer, 0%); Timothy Ackman (corporate officer, 0%); Carolyn Aaron (corporate director, 0%); Arthur Craig Springer II (corporate officer, 0%); Linda Lea Jackson (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Richard E Magnuson (corporate officer, 0%); Deleesa Meashintubby (corporate director, 0%); Mary Mcwilliams (corporate director, 0%); Kathleen Lee Pruitt (corporate officer, 0%); Sheila Lemieux (corporate director, 0%); Sarah Marie Ness (corporate officer, 0%); Andrea C Nenzel (corporate officer, 0%); Donna King (corporate director, 0%); Jodi Newcomer (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Jodi Newcomer (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
PeacehealthOwns 5% or more directly100%Jul 27, 2001

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.85% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 50.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 98225, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8.5; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 4 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 98225
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Whatcom Hospice This hospice12
Eden Hospice52
Hospice of the Northwest5
Providence at Home With Compassus, Puget Sound South0

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.