Hearth Record

Memorial Home Care Services/Hospice Services

A hospice in Yakima, Washington 98902

302 S 10th Ave, Yakima, Washington 98902. (509) 574-3600.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 3 hospices serving ZIP code 98902 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 9, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 16, 2024: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1)-(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 272 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the hospice failed to ensure the integrated health care system reviewed and updated their emergency preparedness plan (including hospice) every two years from the previous review. Failure to review and update the emergency preparedness plan every two years from the previous review puts patients, staff and visitors at risk of harm from changes to hazard vulnerabilities, or other unidentified issues that the health care system could address as a result of an organized review of the plan. Findings included: 1. Document review of the heath care system’s emergency preparedness plan titled, “Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Emergency Operations Plan”, last reviewed 05/21/21, showed that at least biennially, YVMH (Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital) conducts and documents a review of the EOP (Emergency Operations Plan) and associated components. 2. On 05/13/24 at 4:00 PM, Surveyor #7 interviewed the health care system’s Regulatory Program Administrator (Staff #701) about the review of the emergency preparedness plan. Staff #701 acknowledged that the plan had not been reviewed and updated since 2021, and stated that the plan was undergoing review, but not yet completed. 3. On 05/15/24 at 10:00 AM, Surveyor #7 completed a remote interview with the health care system’s Director of Emergency Preparedness (Staff #702) regarding the inclusion of the hospice agency (and hospice care center) in the health care system’s overall emergency preparedness plan. Staff #702 stated that the plan with the review date of 05/21/21 represented the current emergency plan and that the system would continue to review the plan to determine if the hospice agency would remain under the integrated plan or if there will be a change.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 479 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to update policies and procedures (P&Ps) to comply with the Washington State Tuberculosis (TB) infection control program by conducting the annual TB risk assessments using the department-approved form on 4 of 4 volunteers (Staff #601, #602, #603, and #604). Failure of the agency to comply with developing, updating, and implementing required P&Ps on TB screening and education may place the patients and staff at risk of TB exposure. References: Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 246-335-625 Personnel, contractor, and volunteer policies. (14) Infection control practices, communicable disease testing, and vaccinations. Policies and procedures must include, at minimum: (c) Tuberculosis (TB) infection control program. Key elements include but are not limited to: (i) Conducting a TB risk assessment for all new employees upon hire. Agencies must use a tuberculosis risk assessment form provided by the department. Based on risk assessment results, determine the agency’s responsibility to conduct TB testing of new employees. If TB testing is required, follow the department’s tuberculosis risk assessment form testing recommendations; (ii) Conducting an annual assessment of new TB risk factors for all employees. Agencies must use a tuberculosis risk assessment form provided by the department. Based on risk assessment results, determine the agencys responsibility to conduct TB testing of employees. Retesting should only be done for persons who previously tested negative and have new risk factors since the last assessment. Findings included: 1. Document review of the agency policy titled, “;TB Control Plan,” (Effective Date 12/2021) lacked the state requirements for conducting a TB risk assessment using the department-approved form for all personnel on hire and annually. 2. Record review on 4 of 4 volunteer files showed: a. Staff #601 was hired as a volunteer on 12/03/09. There was no documentation in the records to show that the agency completed a TB risk assessment using the department-approved form in 2023. b. Staff #602 was hired as a volunteer on 10/03/13. There was no documentation in the records to show that the agency completed a TB risk assessment using the department-approved form in 2023. c. Staff #603 was hired as a volunteer on 02/06/23. There was no documentation in the records to show that the agency completed a TB risk assessment using the department-approved form on hire. d. Staff #604 was hired as a volunteer on 03/02/07. There was no documentation in the records to show that the agency completed a TB risk assessment using the department-approved form in 2023. 3. On 05/14/23 at 3:00 PM, Surveyor #6 interviewed the agencys Supervisor of Non-Clinical Services (Staff #605) about the missing requirements in the agencys P&P and the missing department-approved TB risk assessments in the personnel records. Staff #605 stated that the P&P is managed by the hospital Employee Health Department and the agency was unable to provide documentation of the missing TB risk assessments in the personnel files.”

    Rule L0580. Standard-level.

May 14, 2024: recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies
  • Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Based upon observation and staff interviews on May 14, 2024 between approximately during the physical tour of the facility between approximately 0945 and 1115 hours the facility has failed to maintain their automatic and manual fire alarm system in accordance with NFPA 72. This could result a failure of the fire alarm system to properly operate in the event of a fire, which would endanger the patients, staff and/or visitors within the facility. Finding include: LS panel breaker 35 - fire alarm system breaker lock required. The above was discussed with facility staff.”

    Rule K0345. Standard-level.

  • Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Based on observation and staff interview on May 14, 2024 during the physical tour of the facility between approximately 0945 and 1115 hours, the facility has failed to maintain the fire sprinkler system as required. This could result in the failure of the fire sprinkler system to operate properly in the event of a fire and allow the fire to increase in size and intensity which would endanger the patients, staff, and/or visitors within the facility. Findings include: Exterior Storage Room - storage encroached on the 18” clearance from fire sprinkler head potentially inhibiting sprinkler discharge. The above was discussed with facility staff.”

    Rule K0353. Standard-level.

  • Sprinkler System - Out of Service (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    “Based on documentation review and staff interview on May 14, 2024 during document review between approximately 0945 and 1115 hours the facility has failed to have maintain a written procedure for instituting an approved fire watch in the event of a failure of the fire sprinkler system. This could result in an inadequate fire watch which may result in a delay of suppression, potentially endangering patients, staff, and/or visitors within the facility. Findings include: Facility had two fire watch policies which conflict. The above was discussed with facility staff.”

    Rule K0354. Standard-level.

  • Corridors - Construction of Walls (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    “Based on observation and staff interview on May 14, 2024 during the physical tour of the facility between approximately 0945 and 1115 hours, the facility has failed to maintain wall construction to resist the passage of smoke. This could result in toxic products of combustion getting into the room and/or the exit corridor which would endanger the patients, staff and/or visitors within the building. Findings include: Mechanical Mezzanine - fire pillow was dislodged. The above was discussed with facility staff.”

    Rule K0362. Standard-level.

  • Fire Drills (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Based on observation and staff interviews on May 14, 2024 during document review between approximately 0945 and 1115 hours the facility has failed to provide fire drill records reflecting drills being conducted on all shifts for each quarter for the past 12 months. This could potentially result in the staff not responding in a coordinated manner in the event of a fire or other emergency and endangering patients, staff, and/or visitors. Findings include: Facility failed to activate the fire alarm system on July 20, 2023, January 12, 2024 and April 18, 2024 during fire drills at 2000 hours. Fire drills conducted between 0600 and 2100 hours must include activation of the fire alarm system. The above was discussed with facility staff.”

    Rule K0712. Standard-level.

  • Essential Electrical Systems – Generator or Alternate Source (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Based upon record review and staff interviews on May 14, 2024 between approximately 0945 and 1115 hours, the facility has failed to fully maintain and test the emergency generator in accordance with NFPA 110. This could result in a failure of the emergency power system which would leave the facility without egress and work lighting in the event of a power failure which in turn would endanger the patients, staff, and/or visitors within the facility. Findings include: Facility was unable to provide documentation of monthly load testing of the emergency generator in February 2024. The above was discussed with facility staff.”

    Rule K0918. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Equipment – Power Cords and Extension Cords (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Based on observation and staff interview on May 14, 2024 during the physical tour of the facility between approximately 0945 and 1115 hours, the facility has failed to ensure all electrical wiring is in accordance with NFPA 70 and that extension cords are not used as a substitute for fixed wiring of a structure. This could result in an electrical hazard due to misuse or prolonged use of an extension cord, endangering the patients, staff, and/or visitors within the facility. Findings include: Multidisciplinary Station - a multiplug cube was plugged into a multiplug adapter. Medical Director’s Office - appliance was plugged into a multiplug adapter. The above was discussed with facility staff.”

    Rule K0920. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 9, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 16, 2024Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited
May 14, 2024Recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 26, 1995.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 83.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 53% at home, 29% in assisted living, 15% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in an inpatient hospice, 3% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.6%
Visits near death83.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Association owns 100% directly since Nov 20, 2007.
  • 26 owners or officers are people: Stephen M Rupp (corporate director); William G Robertson (corporate officer); William G Robertson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Cynthia Juarez (corporate director); Leslie Dale Sowell (corporate director); Doug Ellison (corporate director); Robert Yost (corporate director); Maribel Jimenez (corporate officer); John Wiborg (corporate director); Tariq Salam (corporate director); James Gyeong-Jin Lee (corporate officer); James Gyeong-Jin Lee (managing employee (on the payroll)); Tara Perry (corporate director); Florence Chang (corporate officer); Florence Chang (managing employee (on the payroll)); Duane R Rossman (corporate director); Robin J Thomashauer (corporate director); Janine Terrano (corporate director); Frank Tombari (corporate director); Deedee Walkey (corporate director); David Hargreaves (corporate director); Sally Leighton (corporate director); Gail Weaver (corporate director); Patrick Oshie (corporate director); Robert M Williams (corporate director); Mirna Ramos-Diaz (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital AssociationOwns 5% or more directly100%Nov 20, 2007
Multicare Health SystemOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 17, 2023

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.64% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 49.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 3 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 98902, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 3 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 98902
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Astria Hospice7
Memorial Home Care Services/Hospice Services This hospice9
Heartlinks0

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.