Assured Hospice
A hospice in Moses Lake, Washington 98837
1350 S Pioneer Way, Ste A, Moses Lake, Washington 98837. (509) 766-2580.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 2 hospices serving ZIP code 98837 had 2.
The last inspection on record was on Oct 31, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Oct 31, 2024: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
-
Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))
The inspectors’ words, 457 words
“. Based on document review, record reviews, and interview, the agency failed to notify the patients physician of missed services resulting in changes to the patients plan of care in 3 of 14 patients (Patient #8, Patient #9, and Patient #13). Failure to communicate with the patients physician of changes to the plan of care may potentially have a clinical impact on the patients medical needs. Findings included: 1. Document review of the agencys policy titled, “;Plan of Care,” (Policy #3.003, Revised date: 10/01/24) showed the plan of care include the detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs. 2. Record review of active patient records of Patient #8, Patient #9, and Patient #13 showed: a. Patient #8 was admitted on 08/02/24 with a primary diagnosis of Colon Cancer. Skilled Nursing (SN) services were ordered with frequencies of 2 times a week for 10 weeks, then 3 times a week for 1 week, then 2 times a week for 1 week, and 1 time a week for 1 week starting 08/04/24. There was no documentation as to why only 1 of the 2 ordered SN visits were made during the Medicare weeks of 08/04/24 to 08/10/24 and 08/11/24 to 08/17/24, and no physician notification of the missed visits. In addition, there was no documentation as to why there were no SN visits made during the Medicare weeks of 08/25/24 to 08/31/24 and 09/01/24 to 09/07/24, and no physician notification of the missed visits. b. Patient #9 was admitted on 08/13/24 with a primary diagnosis of Right Breast Cancer. Hospice Aide (HA) services were ordered with frequencies of 1 time a week for 1 week, then 2 times a week for 12 weeks starting 08/18/24. There was no documentation as to why only 1 of 2 HA visits were made during the Medicare week of 09/01/24 to 09/07/24, and no physician notification of the missed visit. c. Patient #13 was admitted on 08/16/24 with a primary diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. SN services were ordered with frequencies of 1 time a week for 1 week, then 2 times a week for 12 weeks, then 1 time a week for 1 week starting 08/18/24. There was no documentation as to why only 1 of 2 SN visits were made during the Medicare week of 09/08/24 to 09/14/24, and no physician notification of the missed visit. 3. On 10/31/24 at 8:45 AM, Surveyor #1 interviewed the agencys Executive Director (Staff #113) regarding the lack of documentation and physician notification of the missed services. Staff #113 acknowledged the findings and was unable to provide documentation of why the missed services occurred and why the patients physicians were not notified. .”
-
Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 331 words
“. Based on document review, record review and interview, the agency failed to develop policies and procedures (P&P) in compliance with conducting an annual Tuberculosis (TB) assessment using a Department of Health (DOH) approved risk assessment form and failed to conduct an annual TB risk assessment for 4 of 4 volunteers (Volunteer #9, Volunteer #10, Volunteer #11, and Volunteer #12). Failure to conduct annual TB risk assessment screening on volunteers may place the clients and staff at risk of exposure to infectious diseases. Findings included: 1. Document review of the agencys P&P showed no policy that describes conducting an annual TB risk assessment using a DOH-approved risk assessment form. 2. The personnel record review for the 4 of 4 volunteers (Volunteer #9, Volunteer #10, Volunteer #11, and Volunteer #12) showed: a. Volunteer #9 was hired on 09/07/22. There was no documentation that a DOH-approved TB risk assessment was completed during the year 2023. b. Volunteer #10 was hired on 11/18/22. There was no documentation that a DOH-approved TB risk assessment was completed during the year 2023. c. Volunteer #11 was hired on 06/06/22. There was no documentation that a DOH-approved TB risk assessment was completed during the year 2023. d. Volunteer #12 was hired on 10/08/18. There was no documentation that a DOH-approved TB risk assessment was completed during the year 2023. 3. Surveyor #1 conducted interviews with the Volunteer Manager and the agency’s Executive Director that showed: a. On 10/29/24 at 10:30 AM, Surveyor #1 interviewed the agencys Volunteer Manager (Staff #114) on the missing annual TB risk assessment in 2023 on volunteers. Staff #114 acknowledged the findings and was unable to provide documentation. b. On 10/31/24 at 9:00 AM, Surveyor #1 interviewed the agency’s Executive Director (Staff #113) on the lack of TB risk screening policy. Staff #113 acknowledged that the current agency TB form screening is used as the policy that the agency follows but was unable to provide agency documentation on current TB risk screening policy. .”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 311 words
“. Based on document review, record reviews and interview, the agency failed to obtain the Advance Directives for the patients’ medical records for 4 of 14 active patients (Patient #5, Patient #11, Patient #13, and Patient #14). Failure to have patient Advanced Directives documented in their record puts patients at risk of psychological or physical harm from improper or unwanted levels of care. Findings included: 1. Document review of the agencys policy titled, “;Advance Directives,” (Policy #1.007, Revised date: 09/01/23) showed the agency will obtain copies of the patients Advance Directives for the patients medical record. 2. Record review of patients (Patient #5, Patient #11, Patient #13, and Patient #14) showed: a. Patient #5 was admitted on 08/28/24. During the Skilled Nursing (SN) initial comprehensive assessment, there was documentation that the patient has Advance Directives. However, the agency failed to obtain copies of the Advance Directives for the patients medical records. b. Patient #11 was admitted on 09/30/24. During the Social Worker (MSW) initial assessment, there was documentation that the patient has Advance Directives. However, the agency failed to obtain copies of the Advance Directives for the patient medical records. c. Patient #13 was admitted on 08/16/24. During the SN initial comprehensive assessment, there was documentation that the patient has Advance Directives. However, the agency failed to obtain copies of the Advance Directives for the patient medical records. d. Patient #14 was admitted on 08/21/24. During the SN initial comprehensive assessment, there was documentation that the patient has Advance Directives. However, the agency failed to obtain copies of the Advance Directives for the patient medical records. 3. On 10/31/24 at 8:45 AM Surveyor #1 interviewed the agencys Executive Director (Staff #113) regarding the lack of Advance Directives. Staff #113 acknowledged the findings and stated that they were not aware of the missing copies of Advance Directives in the patients medical records.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 534 words
“. Based on document review, record reviews, and interview, the agency failed to complete missed visits in a timely manner for of 14 active patients (Patient #1, Patient #2, Patient #3, Patient #8, Patient #9, and Patient #13). Failure to maintain missed visits in a timely manner puts patients at risk of not meeting their medical needs. Findings included: 1. Document review of the agencys policy titled, “;Hospice Medical Record,” (Policy #9.001, Revised date: 10/01/24) showed to preserve the integrity of the documentation it should be completed and submitted within 24 hours. 2. Record review of patients (Patient #1, Patient #2, Patient #3, Patient #8, Patient #9, and Patient #13) showed: a. Patient #1 was admitted on 11/24/23. Documentation showed the patient refused a Skilled Nursing (SN) visit on 04/08/24. Agency staff failed to document the missed visit until 04/11/24, 3 days after the missed visit. The record also showed that the patient missed a visit due to staff emergency/illness on 06/04/24. The agency staff failed to document the missed visit until 06/10/24, 6 days after the missed visit. b. Patient #2 was admitted on 06/07/24. Documentation showed no answer to the patients home on a missed Social Worker (MSW) visit on 08/30/24. Agency staff failed to document the missed visit until 09/03/24, 4 days after the missed visit. c. Patient #3 was admitted on 09/06/23. Documentation showed the patient refused a SN visit on 09/29/23. Agency staff failed to document the missed visit until 10/02/23, 3 days after the missed visit. d. Patient #8 was admitted on 08/02/24. Documentation showed: i. The patient refused a HA visit on 08/2/24. Agency staff failed to document the missed visit until 08/14/24, 12 days after the missed visit. ii. The patient refused a SN visit on 08/09/24. Agency staff failed to document the missed visit until 08/13/24, 4 days after the missed visit. iii. The patient refused a HA visit on 08/16/24. Agency staff failed to document the missed visit until 08/21/24, 5 days after the missed visit. iv. There was no answer to the patients door on a MSW missed visit on 08/30/24. Agency staff failed to document the missed visit until 09/03/24, 4 days after the missed visit. v. Documentation showed that a missed HA visit on 09/10/24 was not on the HAs schedule. Agency staff failed to document the missed visit until 09/12/24, 2 days after the missed visit. vi. The patient refused a HA visit on 09/13/24. Agency staff failed to document the missed visit until 09/15/24, 2 days after the missed visit. e. Patient #9 was admitted on 08/13/24. Documentation showed the patient missed an HA visit on 09/10/24 because of a medical appointment. Agency staff failed to document the missed visit until 09/12/24, 2 days after the missed visit. f. Patient #13 was admitted on 08/16/24. The patient refused MSW visit on 08/19/24. Agency staff failed to document the missed visit until 08/21/24, 2 days after the missed visit. 3. On 10/31/24 at 8:45 AM, Surveyor #1 interviewed the agencys Executive Director (Staff #113) regarding the untimely documentation of missed visits. Staff #113 acknowledged the findings and stated that documentation should be completed within 24 hours per the agency policy.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2024 | Recertification inspection by the state | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 14, 1993.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.2% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 60% at home, 33% in assisted living, 6% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.5 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 5.9% |
| Visits near death | 94.2% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Washington Health Care Group, LLC owns 100% directly since May 1, 2009.
- LHC Group Inc. runs it.
- 8 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Matthew Hardy (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Wendy Daigle (corporate director); Jennifer L Gardner (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%); Brenda Standley (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 22, 2023 |
| Washington Health Care Group, LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | May 1, 2009 |
| LHC Group Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | May 1, 2009 |
| LHC Group Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | May 1, 2009 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 98.76% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 73.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 2 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 98837, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 4.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Assured Hospice This hospice | 4 |
| Encompass Health Hospice | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.