Hearth Record

Hospice of Spokane

A hospice in Spokane, Washington 99202

121 S Arthur Street, Spokane, Washington 99202. (509) 456-0438.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 5 hospices serving ZIP code 99202 had 7.5.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 3, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 25, 2025: recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 212 words

    “.Based on document review and interview, the agency failed to provide a patient Bill of Rights that is in compliance with the Washington Administrative Code 246-335-635, Hospice Bill of Rights. Failure of the agency to update the patient’s Bill of Rights places the patient at risk of being unaware of their rights pertaining to their care. Reference:WAC 246-335-635 Bill of rights.A hospice agency at the time of admission must provide each patient, designated family member, or legal representative with a written bill of rights affirming each patient’s right to:(8) The name of the individual within the hospice agency responsible for supervising the patient’s care and the manner in which that individual may be contacted. Findings included: 1. Document review of the agency’s Hospice admission booklet in Client’s Patient Rights showed that the agency failed to include the name of the individual within the hospice agency responsible for supervising the patient’s care and the manner in which that individual may be contacted. 2. On 09/25/25 at 9:30 AM, Surveyor #1 interviewed the agency’s Chief Executive Office (Staff #113) regarding the missing patients’ Bill of Rights. Staff #113 acknowledged the findings and stated that the agency’s contact phone number is listed for complaints but no name of the agency who supervises the patient’s care.”

    Rule L0502. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 668 words

    “.Based on document review, record reviews, and interview, the agency failed to notify the patient’s physician of missed hospice services resulting in changes to the patient’s plan of care for 9 of 20 active patients (Patient #101, Patient #103, Patient #106, Patient #108, Patient #109, Patient #112, Patient #115, Patient #116, and Patient #119).Failure to communicate with the patient’s physician of changes to the plan of care may potentially have a clinical impact on the patient’s medical needs. Findings included:1. Document review of the agency’s policy titled, “Plan of Care,” (Revised: 01/25) showed that the plan of care contains hospice services available to meet the patient and family needs. 2. Record review of patient records of Patient #101, Patient #103, Patient #106, Patient #108, Patient #109, Patient #112, Patient #115, Patient #116, and Patient #119 showed:a. Patient #101 was admitted on 06/12/25. Registered Nurse (RN) Services were ordered with frequencies of 1 time a week starting 06/12/25. There was no documentation as to why there were no RN visits made during the Medicare week of 07/20/25 to 07/26/25, and no physician notification of the missed RN visit. b. Patient #103 was admitted on 06/26/25. Hospice Aide (HA) services were ordered with frequencies of 3 times a week starting 06/30/25. There was no documentation as to why only 1 of 3 HA visits were made during the Medicare week of 08/31/25 to 09/06/25, and no physician notification of the HA missed visit. c. Patient #106 was admitted on 08/07/25. RN Services were ordered with frequencies of 1 time a week starting 08/07/25. There was no documentation as to why there were no RN visits made during the Medicare week of 08/31/25 to 09/06/25, and no physician notification of the missed RN visit. d. Patient #108 was admitted on 08/13/25. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 2 times a week starting 08/17/25. There was no documentation as to why only 1 of 2 HA visits were made during the Medicare week of 08/31/25 to 09/06/25, and no physician notification of the HA missed visit. e. Patient #109 was admitted on 05/21/25. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 2 times a week starting 05/27/25. There was no documentation as to why only 1 of 2 HA visits were made during the Medicare week of 06/29/25 to 07/05/25, and no physician notification of the HA missed visit.f. Patient #112 was admitted on 06/04/25. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 1 time a week starting 06/11/25. There was no documentation as to why there was no HA visits made during the Medicare week of 07/27/25 to 08/02/25, and no physician notification of the HA missed visit.g. Patient #115 was admitted on 08/01/25. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 2 times a week starting 08/03/25. There was no documentation as to why only 1 of 2 HA visits were made during the Medicare week of 08/31/25 to 09/06/25, and no physician notification of the HA missed visit.h. Patient #116 was admitted on 06/05/25. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 2 times a week starting 06/10/25. There was no documentation as to why only 1 of 2 HA visits were made during the Medicare week of 06/29/25 to 07/05/25, and no physician notification of the HA missed visit.i. Patient #119 was admitted on 05/05/25. HA services were ordered with frequencies of 2 times a week starting 05/09/25. There was no documentation as to why only 1 of 2 HA visits were made during the Medicare week of 06/29/25 to 07/05/25, and no physician notification of the HA missed visit.3. On 09/24/25 at 3:30 PM, Surveyor #1 interviewed the agency’s Chief Executive Office (Staff #113) regarding the lack of documentation and physician notification of the missed hospice services. Staff #113 acknowledged the findings and stated that most of the missed services occurred during a holiday. In addition, Staff #113 stated that they were unable to provide documentation of why the missed services occurred and why the patient’s physician was not notified.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 224 words

    “.Based on document review, record review, and interview the agency failed to provide bereavement services to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to one year following the death of the patient for 1 of 4 bereavement patients (Patient #127) .Failure to provide bereavement services to the bereaved family or individuals puts them at risk of not being able to deal with their grief. Findings included:1. Document review of the agency’s policy titled, “Home Care Bereavement Services,” (Revised: 12/23) showed that bereavement services are provided up to 13 months following the death of the patient, and that the agency offers an organized program for the provisions of these bereavement services.2. Record review of Patient #127’s medical records showed that the patient’s date of death was 11/26/24. In addition, documentation showed that the agency attempted to contact the patient’s family member on 11/27/24, but there were no other documentation to show that the agency provided bereavement services up to the thirteen months following the date of death.3. On 09/25/25 at 10:00 AM, Surveyor #1 interviewed the agency’s Chief Executive Office (Staff #113) regarding the missed bereavement services for Patient#127’s family. Staff #113 acknowledged the findings and stated that they were unable to provide documentation as to why there were no bereavement services for 13 months for Patient #127’s bereaved family.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

Sep 23, 2025: recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies
  • General Requirements - Other (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    “Based upon observations and staff interviews on September 23, 2025 between approximately 0930 and 1400 hours the facility failed to notify Department of Health, Construction Review Services regarding any construction, replacement, alterations, additions, expansions, conversion, change of approved use, improvements, remodeling, renovating and upgrading for Hospice Care Centers, licensed under chapters RCW 70.127 and WAC 246.335. Findings: The facility is in the process of upgrading their flooring in their resident wings. The above was discussed and acknowledged by the facility staff.”

    Rule K0100. Standard-level.

  • Means of Egress - General (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Based upon observations and staff interviews on September 23, 2025 between approximately 0930 to 1400 hours the facility has failed to maintain all means of egress continuously free of obstructions. This could inhibit the orderly exit of patients, staff, and visitors out of the building during an emergency and may prevent emergency responders from entering. The findings include:During the inspection it is noted that the flooring is being replaced and in the west hall wing that is currently closed off from staff and residents, the exit is obstructed by flooring material. The above was discussed and acknowledged by the facility staff.”

    Rule K0211. Standard-level.

  • Hazardous Areas - Enclosure (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Based upon observations and staff interviews on September 23, 2025 between approximately 0930 to 1400 hours the facility has failed to maintain doors and walls to hazardous areas. This could result in the spreading of the toxic products of combustion into the corridor in the event of a fire which would endanger patients, staff and/or visitors. The findings include:During the physical inspection it is noted that the fire door to the supply room was being propped open by a wedge, not allowing it to automatically close and latch. The above was discussed and acknowledged by the facility staff.”

    Rule K0321. Standard-level.

  • Fire Alarm System - Testing and Maintenance (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 134 words

    “Based on observation and staff interview on September 23, 2025 between approximately 0930 to 1400 hours the facility has failed to have appropriate testing of the fire alarm system which result in the failure to notify staff of a problem with the fire alarm system. This could lead to the system not functioning as intended and lead residents, staff, and visitors within the building not being notified of a fire. The findings include:The facility was unable to provide documentation showing the Fire Alarm system has had the semi-annual battery discharge and visual inspection completed within the past 12 months.The facility was unable to provide documentation showing the Fire Alarm system has had a sensitivity test completed, last report on file is from October 3, 2019.The above was discussed and acknowledged by the facility staff.”

    Rule K0345. Standard-level.

  • Sprinkler System - Maintenance and Testing (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Based on observation and staff interview on September 23, 2025 between approximately 0930 to 1400 hours the facility has failed to maintain the fire sprinkler system as required. This could result in the failure of the fire sprinkler system to operate properly in the event of a fire and allow the fire to increase in size and intensity which would endanger the patients, staff, and/or visitors within the facility. The findings include: a. On the Western States Fire Protection annual report from 9/30/24 a dry UL test was completed on the 155 degree dry pendants, but facility was unable to provide the UL results report. b. Facility was unable to provide documentation on the 5-year FDC hydro. c. In the small supply closed there is fire rated caulk adhered to the fire sprinkler escutcheon. The above was discussed and acknowledged by the facility staff.”

    Rule K0353. Standard-level.

  • Fire Drills (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Based on observation and staff interview on September 23, 2025 between approximately 0930 to 1400 hours the facility has failed to provide fire drill records reflecting drills being conducted on all shifts for each quarter for the past 12 months. This could potentially result in the staff not responding in a coordinated manner in the event of a fire or other emergency and endangering patients, staff, and/or visitors. The findings include:The facility is not providing all the information on the completed fire drill documents, the time the fire drill was started and completed was missing.May 31, 2025 (day shift)--2nd quarterMarch 31, 2025 (day shift) --1st quarterThe above was discussed and acknowledged by the facility staff.”

    Rule K0712. Standard-level.

  • Electrical Equipment – Testing and Maintenance Requirements (42 CFR NFPA 101)

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Based on observation and staff interview on September 23, 2025 between approximately 0930 to 1400 hours the facility has failed to provide policies for the testing, repairs, and modifications of patient care related electrical equipment as required. This could result in the failure of the patient care related electrical equipment to operate properly which would endanger the patients, staff, and/or visitors within the facility. The findings include:The facility was unable to provide a policy/procedure for the testing, repairs and modifications of patient care related electrical equipment. The above was discussed and acknowledged by the facility staff.”

    Rule K0921. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 3, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Sep 25, 2025Recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited
Sep 23, 2025Recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 24, 1984.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 89.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 57% at home, 32% in assisted living, 6% in a nursing facility, 1% in an inpatient hospice, 3% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.1%
Visits near death89.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Hospice of Spokane owns 100% directly since Apr 14, 2014.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: April M Hansen (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Gina Drummond (managing employee (on the payroll)); Gina Drummond (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Brian Steverson (corporate officer); Ronda M Beckner (corporate director); Larry Swartz (corporate director); Nathan C Dikes (corporate director); Angela Shamblin (corporate director); Mark Kettner (corporate officer); George Novan (corporate officer, 0%); Carol Hunter (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Hospice of SpokaneOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 14, 2014

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.76% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 54.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 99202, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7.5; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 5 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 99202
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Hospice of Spokane This hospice10
Horizon Hospice0
Multicare Hospice8
GentivaNot given
Providence Hospice Spokane7

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.