Hearth Record

Vnh - Visiting Nurse & Hospice - Vermont & New Hampshire

A hospice in White River Junction, Vermont 05001

88 Prospect Street, White River Junction, Vermont 05001. (802) 478-7125.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 3 hospices serving ZIP code 05001 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 20, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 20, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 211 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #3, 7, 10, and 13) did not contain documented evidence that the Comprehensive Assessment had included a Bereavement Risk component, which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial Bereavement Risk Assessment is incorporated into the Plan of Care and is considered in the Bereavement Plan of Care: Patient #3: There was not documented evidence that a Bereavement Risk Assessment had been conducted within the 5-day Comprehensive Assessment process. Patient #7: SOC 03/12/25. The Spiritual Counselor was not able to connect with the patient until 03/18/25, so the RN conducted the Bereavement Risk Assessment during the admission visit. However, the content of this assessment consisted of only, “Patient is not active in religion.” Patient #10: SOC 02/01/25. The Spiritual Counselor was not able to connect with the patient until 02/11/25 to conduct the Bereavement Risk Assessment. Patient #13: SOC 02/12/25. The Spiritual Counselor was not able to connect with the patient until 02/24/25, so the RN conducted the Bereavement Risk Assessment during the admission visit. However, the content of this assessment consisted of only, “Patient is Catholic.””

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #4) did not contain evidence that a Registered Nurse had been designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs, and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family: Patient #4: The 02/18/25 RN SOC visit reflected that the patient had a recent fall, resulting in a bruise on the right side of the head, and a scab on the right hand. The visit note for the next nursing visit on 02/20/25 did not evidence that the nurse had followed up on the status of these areas of concern.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not contain evidence that the Hospice had developed an individualized written Plan of Care for each patient. The Plan of Care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The Plan of Care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions: Patient #2: During Surveyor-attended home visit on 03/18/25, it was noted that the patient had a golf-ball-sized bulge emerging from the patient’s left eye inner canthus. The patient reported that he had recently been diagnosed with rare frontal brain cancer, and that his doctors had told him that the cancer had ‘pushed out’ of this eye area. There was nothing included on the most recent 03/11/25 IDG POC regarding any nursing interventions related to this area of concern, such as but not limited to the nurses assessment of, measurement of/monitoring of growth in size, care of (such as moistening of if indicated), nor monitoring for infection of (the patient repeatedly wiped over this bulge during the Surveyor home visit). The patient reported fluid drainage from this area.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not contain evidence that the IDG had ensured that the care and services were provided in accordance with the Plan of Care: Patient #2: The IDG POC assigned a Chaplain visit frequency of (1) visit every week, effective between 02/11/25 and 04/22/25. There was no visit made the week of 02/23-03/01/25.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 136 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 12 (Personnel #8) did not contain evidence that an initial Aide Skills Competency Assessment had been performed on the Aide, as per CMS guidelines: Personnel #8: An Aide Skills Competency Assessment was conducted between 10/29/24-11/05/24. However, the following tasks were not evaluated for: • Basic elements of body functioning, and changes in body function, that must be reported to an Aide’s supervisor • Maintenance of a clean, safe, and healthy environment • Recognizing patient emergencies and knowledge of emergency procedures and their application • The physical, emotional, and developmental needs of and ways to work with the populations served by the Hospice, Additionally, there was not documented evidence of the Aide having been observed providing the following tasks on a patient/pseudo-patient/responsive manikin: · Bed bath · Sponge and tub bath”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 316 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patients #1, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13) did not contain evidence that the Hospice Aide assignments and duties were: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #1: The Aide POC effective 03/10/2025 assigned: “Assistance with shower or sponge bath”, enabling the Aide and/or patient to make such choice. There was no notation made indicating that, ‘The patient/caregiver is cognitively and functionally able to make this bath choice.’ Patient #4: The Aide POC effective 02/18/2025 assigned: 1) Shampoo as needed; and 2) File fingernail and toenails as needed. Patient #8: The Aide POC effective 03/11/2025 assigned: 1) Assist Shampoo prn; 2) Assist bed bath prn; 3) Assist Shower prn; and 4) File fingernail and toenails prn. Patient #9: The Aide POC effective 12/17/2024 assigned: 1) Assist Shampoo prn; 2) Assist bed bath prn; 3) Assist Shower prn; and 4) File fingernail and toenails prn. Patient #10: The Aide POC effective 02/01/2025 assigned: 1) Assist Shampoo prn; and 2) Assist bed bath prn. Patient #11: The Aide POC effective 02/25/2025 assigned: 1) Assist Shampoo prn; 2) Assist Shower prn; and 3) File fingernail and toenails prn. Patient #13: The Aide POC effective 01/12/2025 assigned: 1) Assist Shampoo prn; 2) Assist bed bath prn; 3) Assist Shower prn; and 4) File fingernail and toenails prn.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 327 words

    “Upon patient record review 4 of 19 (Patients #1, 4, 10, and 12) did not contain documented evidence that the Hospice Aide had provided care/services that were: • Ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group • Included in the Aide Plan of Care Patient #1: The Aide POC effective 03/10/2025 assigned: 1) Assist with shower or sponge bath; 2) Fingernail/Toenail filing; and 3) Change bed linens. None of these interventions were provided/documented on the Aide visits of 03/10, 03/12, or 03/14/2025. Patient #4: The Aide POC assigned: 1) Assist with dressing QV, which was not done/documented for the Aide home visits made February 24, 25, 26, 2025 nor on March 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 2025; 2) Assist with foot care QV, which was not done/documented for the Aide home visits made February 24, 25, 26, 2025 nor on March 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 2025; 3) Oral care QV, which was not done/documented for the Aide home visits made February 25, 26, 2025 nor on March 1, 2, 3, 4, 2025; 4) Shampoo QV, which was not done/documented for the Aide home visits made February 24, 25, 26, 2025; and 5) Hair care QV, which was not done/documented for the Aide home visits made February 25, 26, 2025 nor on March 1, 3, 4, 2025. Patient #10: The Aide POC dated 02/01/25 assigned the Aide at a visit frequency of 2x per week. There was only one Aide visit made the week of 02/02-02/08/25. Patient #12: The 01/17/25 Aide POC assigned: 1) Assist with ambulate QV, which was not done/documented for the Aide home visits of January 22, 24, 31, 2025, February 3, 5, 2025, nor March 6, 10, 2025; 2) Change linens QV, which was not done/documented for the Aide home visits made March 6, 10, 13, 2025, and 3) Shampoo QV, which was not done/documented for the Aide home visits made January 22, 24, 31, 2025, February 3, 5, 2025 nor on March 6, 10 2025;”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #9) did not contain evidence that all entries were complete: Patient #9: The 12/17/24 RN SOC visit noted that the patient had an actively accessed Medi-port. A verbal order was obtained on 12/19/25 for an Hospice RN to de-access the port per Hospice policy. An RN visit dated 12/21/24 documented, “Port de-accessed per Hospice procedure,” without the details of such intervention.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients#1 and 4) did not contain evidence that the Hospice had provided the following required information to the SNF: Patient #1: Election of Hospice Benefit form Patient #4: Election of Hospice Benefit form; and The Physician initial Certification of the Terminal Illness”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 20, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 2, 1990.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 83% at home, 4% in assisted living, 8% in a nursing facility, 4% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.4%
Visits near death94.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 19 owners or officers are people: Daniel Gross (corporate director); Joel M Bradley (corporate director); Richard Greenwald (corporate director); Carolyn Isabelle (corporate director); Gerald Best (corporate director); Gerald Best (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Cynthia Twombly (corporate director); Catherine Ells (corporate director); Tammy Tarsa (corporate director); Devon Green (corporate director); Tracy Bach (corporate director); Katherine Milligan (corporate director); Ellen Flaherty (corporate director); Nirav S Kapadia (corporate director); Rebecca O’berry (corporate director); Deanna Howard (corporate director); Barbara Moore (corporate director, 0%); Joni Menard (corporate director); Brooke Adler (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.77% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 80.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 3 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 05001, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 3 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 05001
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Vnh - Visiting Nurse & Hospice - Vermont & New Hampshire This hospice9
Caledonia Home Health Care0
Bayada Hospice6

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.