Hearth Record

Renew Hospice

A hospice in Murray, Utah 84107

5280 South Commerce Drive, Suite E160, Murray, Utah 84107. (801) 364-4250.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 41 hospices serving ZIP code 84107 had 0.

The last inspection on record was on May 16, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 4, 2024: recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies
  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 167 words

    “Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the hospice agency did not ensure that all hospice staff were trained in emergency preparedness (EP) policies and procedures for all new and existing staff and did not provide ongoing training. Specifically, the hospice agency did not maintain documentation of all EP training. (Employee identifiers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) Findings include: A review of 9 personnel files was completed from 4/1/2024 through 4/4/2024. EP training documentation was requested from the hospice agency on 4/1/2024, at 2:59 PM. In an interview with the hospice executive director on 4/3/2024, at 2:05 PM, when asked about EP training he stated that he would investigate. On 4/3/2024, at 3:10 PM, an email was received from an administrative assistant that stated the agency had looked at their files for EP training, had been unable to locate the information, and the agency would be be adding this to their next quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) meeting.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 206 words

    “Based on interview and record review, it was determined the hospice agency did not ensure care and services were provided as identified in the plan of care (POC) for 1 of 19 sampled patients. Specifically, aide visits were not provided as identified in the plan of care (POC). (Patient identifier: 3) Findings include: Patient 3 was admitted to the hospice agency on 2/16/2024, with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimers disease with late onset. Patient 3s medical record was reviewed on 4/3/2024. Review of the plan of care (POC) developed for patient 3 on 2/16/2024, indicated that a hospice aide was to assist with activities of daily living 5 times per week. No documented evidence was found in the medical record to indicate a hospice aide visit was completed or refused from 2/16/2024 to 2/29/2024. An interview was conducted with the director of nursing (DON) on 4/3/2024, at 2:05 PM. The DON stated the hospice aide did not see the patient between 2/16/2024 and 2/29/2024, due to the family refusing aide visits during that period. The DON stated the aide visits were not completed as ordered during those dates. Additionally, the DON stated the family refusal of aide visits should have been documented in the medical record.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 258 words

    “Based on interview and record review, it was determined the hospice agency did not measure, analyze, and track quality indicators, including all adverse patient events. Specifically, the hospice did not have a functioning system in place to track adverse events. Findings include: Upon entrance on 4/1/2024, at 10:05 AM, the agencys adverse event log was requested. On 4/1/2024, at 12:39 PM, a fall log for the past 6 months was received by surveyors. On 4/1/2024, at 2:10 PM, an email was sent listing information that had not been received by surveyors, including the adverse event log. On 4/1/2024, at 2:22 PM, an email was received by surveyors with a fall log for the past 6 months. On 4/1/2024, at 4:13PM, an email was received by surveyors with a fall log for the past 6 months. On 4/2/2024, at 5:09 PM, in an email communication, surveyors asked for clarification regarding the adverse event log, stating that surveyors had received a fall log multiple times and requesting to know if the fall log was considered a complete adverse event log by the agency. No further information was received regarding the adverse event log. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 4/3/2024, at 2:05 PM, the DON stated that the application in the agencys electronic medical records (EMR) for adverse events only tracked falls. She further stated that if there were any other type of adverse events, the events were added to the individual patients medical record in the EMR, but not listed on an adverse event log.”

    Rule L0562. Standard-level.

  • In-service training (42 CFR 418.76(d)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 174 words

    “Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the hospice agency did not maintain documentation that their hospice aides received 12 hours of in-service training per year for 3 out of 3 hospice aides. (Employee identifiers: 1, 2 and 3) Findings include: A review of 9 personnel files was completed from 4/1/2024 through 4/4/2024. On 4/1/2024, at 2:59 PM, surveyors requested documentation of all in-service training for the past 12 months for 3 sampled certified nursing assistants (CNAs). An interview was conducted on 4/3/2024, at 2:05 PM, with the executive director. The executive director stated the CNA coordinator had been doing in-service training once a month but the tracking of in-services was inconsistent and did not tie into the files that the agency keeps. The executive director further stated there was no available list showing what in-services had been completed by each CNA. He stated the CNA coordinator had documentation of completed in-services for each CNA on her computer, but the agency had not been able to get the information from her.”

    Rule L0622. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 131 words

    “Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the hospice agency did not have documentation that an initial orientation that addressed employee’s specific job duties was provided for 4 out of 9 employees. (Employee identifiers: 1, 2, 3, and 6) Findings include: A review of 9 personnel files was completed from 4/1/2024 through 4/4/2024. Initial orientations with specific job duties for 9 sampled personnel were requested on 4/1/2024 at 2:59 PM. No information was received for 4 of 9 employees which included 3 certified nursing assistants and 1 registered nurse. In an interview with the executive director and director of nursing on 4/3/2024, at 2:05 PM, they stated they would provide surveyors with any information the agency could find on the missing initial orientations. No further information was received.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 16, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Apr 4, 2024Recertification inspection by the state5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 3, 2015.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 28% at home, 66% in assisted living, 5% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.5%
Visits near death98.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 12 owners or officers are people: Brian Zullo (owns 5% or more directly, 17.25%); Joshua Barlow (owns 5% or more directly, 17.25%); Tyler Glenn (owns 5% or more directly, 17.25%); Jeffrey Stacy (owns 5% or more directly, 17.25%); Jarvis S Maughan (owns 5% or more directly, 7%); Aaron Scott Lewis (owns 5% or more directly, 7%); Kimball Probst (owns 5% or more directly, 7%); Holly Lee Carter (owns 5% or more directly, 6%); Aaron Scott Lewis (corporate officer); Aaron Scott Lewis (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joshua Barlow (corporate officer); Tyler Glenn (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.93% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 85.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 41 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 84107, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 0; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 41 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 84107
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Horizon Hospice SpecialistsNot given
Superior Hospice0
Canyon Hospice0
Valeo Hospice LLCNot given
Symbii Hospice South0
Renew Hospice This hospice5
Aspen Ridge HospiceNot given
Harmony Hospice0
Enhabit Hospice0
Bristol Hospice - Utah II, LLC0
Cns Community HospiceNot given
Intermountain Health Hospice - Salt LakeNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.