Hearth Record

Atlas Hospice

A hospice in Layton, Utah 84041

880 Heritage Park Blvd, Suite 200, Layton, Utah 84041. (801) 771-9099.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 29 hospices serving ZIP code 84041 had 0.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 3, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 23, 2024: recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Patients’ rights (42 CFR 418.52)

    “Based on interviews and record review, it was determined the hospice agency failed to meet the Condition of Participation for Patient Rights. Specifically, the hospice agency failed to report and investigate violations of patient rights. Findings include: The agency failed to immediately investigate all alleged violations of patients’ rights and take immediate action to prevent further potential violations while the alleged violation was being verified. (Refer to tag L509) The agency failed to ensure that violations were reported to state and local bodies having jurisdiction. (Refer to tag L511)”

    Rule L0500. Condition-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(4)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 599 words

    “Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the hospice agency did not immediately investigate all alleged violations of patients rights and immediately take action to prevent further potential violations while the alleged violation was being verified. Specifically, the agency did not do its own investigation into 2 out of 2 incidents and did not immediately take action to prevent further violations. (Patient identifiers: 20 and 21) Findings include: 1. It was documented on an incident report dated 3/4/2024 that patient 21s bottle of morphine went missing. The follow-up regarding the incident report stated the assisted living facility notified the police and opened an investigation, but there was not enough evidence, so the incident was closed. No further documented evidence of an investigation/follow-up was provided. 2. An incident report dated 7/10/2024 regarding patient 20 was reviewed and revealed the following: The incident report was filed by an aide (staff 1) of the hospice agency who observed the incident. Staff 1 stated she was having difficulty convincing patient 20 to shower, so she requested the assistance of two aides from the assisted living where patient 20 resides. Staff 1 documented the two aides from the assisted living “;forced patient out of her bed by grabbing her by her arms and hands forcing her against her will. Patient was screaming/yelling to stop youre hurting me.” Staff 1 documented that she noticed new bruises from where the aides grabbed patient 20. Staff 1 submitted pictures with the incident report that showed bruising around patient 20s arm and wrist. The follow-up section of the incident report documented that the hospice agency met with the administrator of the assisted living facility to discuss the incident. The administrator stated they would check the camera footage and talk to the patient about the incident. In a follow-up communication note dated 7/12/2024, the assisted living administrator assured the hospice case manager that the cameras were reviewed, and no foul play was witnessed. The note further stated that education was provided to the assisted living staff and that patient 20 was safe at that time. On 12/19/2024 at 3:34 PM, an interview was conducted with the hospice director of nursing (staff 2). Staff 2 stated they do not do their own investigation if the incident does not involve their own staff. Staff 2 stated the incident investigation was left up to the assisted living facility. Staff 2 was asked if they do not investigate an incident on their own, how would they determine if a patient was safe or not. Staff 2 stated that the patient and family both felt that patient 20 was safe and that they did not want to report the incident. Staff 2 stated she was not sure if the aides from the incident continued to provide care to patient 20 after the incident but stated those aides no longer work at the assisted living facility. On 12/23/2024 at 1:53 PM, an interview was conducted with patient 20s emergency contact (patient 20s sister). The emergency contact stated she was never told of any incident involving staff being forceful with patient 20, causing bruising, or regarding the patient being forced to shower. The emergency contact was asked if patient 20 was cognitive enough to express whether she felt safe or not. Patient 20s sister replied, “;no, she does not know what is going on.” Patient 20 resided in the memory care unit of the assisted living facility. There was no documented evidence that the hospice agency took immediate action to prevent further incidents. Patient 20 was discharged from the hospice agency on 7/16/2024.”

    Rule L0509. Standard-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(4)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 186 words

    “Based on interview and record review, it was determined the hospice agency did not ensure that violations were reported to State and local bodies having jurisdiction (including the state survey and certification agency) within 5 working days of becoming aware of the violation. Specifically, the agency did not report 2 out of 2 incidents reviewed. Findings include: Two incidents were selected from the incident log to review. One involved an observation of mistreatment/abuse, the other involved a patients bottle of morphine going missing. On 12/19/2024 at 3:34 PM, an interview was conducted with the agencys Director of Nursing (staff 2). Staff 2 stated they did not report either incident to the Department of Health, police, or Adult Protective Services. When asked why the incidents were not reported, she stated they did not want to hurt their relationship with assisted living and only reported confirmed cases. (Note: The abuse allegation incident was directly observed by hospice staff.) During the survey, on 12/19/2024, the hospice agency notified the Department of Health of both incidents, as well as notified Adult Protective Services and the police of the abuse allegation.”

    Rule L0511. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 3, 2025Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Dec 23, 2024Recertification inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 16, 2004.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 38% at home, 56% in assisted living, 6% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.6%
Visits near death94.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 13 owners or officers are people: Gene R Spaulding (owns 5% or more directly, 28.67%); Nathan S Boswell (owns 5% or more directly, 28.67%); Scott B Monson (owns 5% or more directly, 28.67%); Patric B Hess (owns 5% or more directly, 10%); Erica Bauer (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Gene R Spaulding (corporate officer); Gene R Spaulding (corporate director); Nathan S Boswell (corporate officer); Nathan S Boswell (corporate director); Patric B Hess (managing employee (on the payroll)); Scott B Monson (corporate officer); Scott B Monson (corporate director); Casey Lawrence Stelter (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 76% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 75% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.19% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 70.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 29 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 84041, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 0; this one had 3.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.