Hearth Record

Amen Hospice Huntsville

A hospice in Spring, Texas 77386

415 Woodline Dr, Spring, Texas 77386. (832) 415-1605.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 78 hospices serving ZIP code 77386 had 5.5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 13, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 13, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care7 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 162 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #2, #4, #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #2: Upon review of the medication profile the Ciclopirox topical cream did not include specific instructions on where the medication was to be applied. Patient #4: Upon review of the medication profile included Dulcolax 5mg to be given once daily as needed for constipation. There was not evidence of specific instructions to indicate under what circumstance to administer this medication. Patient #8: Upon review of the medication profile included MiraLAX 17gm powder. There was not evidence that indicated the specific quantity of liquid for reconstitution prior to administration.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 145 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #5, #8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #5: The medication profile indicates the patient is on oral diabetic medication. There was no evidence of a problem statement with goals, interventions, and progress toward outcomes related to risks associated with the management of diabetes. Patient #8: The patient was admitted on 9-1-25 and passed on 9-4-25 and was deemed imminent at the time of admission. There was no evidence a imminent death care plan was initiated.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 267 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #2, #4, #6, #8, #9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #2: The order on 2-11-25 indicates to apply ciclopirox 0.77% topically twice daily. The order does not identify the area(s) for application. Patient #4: The order on 5-28-26 indicates to administer Dulcolax 5mg daily as needed for constipation. There was not evidence the order indicated the circumstance on when to administer. And, an order for on 3-24-26 to administer Ibuprofen 200mg, 1-2 tablets as needed for pain. There was not evidence of clinical parameters to determine the appropriate dose to administer based on the patients reported level of pain. Patient #6: A wound order received on 7-22-26 with instructions to apply protective form bandage to deep tissue injury to left heel once weekly and as needed if soiled or removed. There is no evidence who is responsible for completing the cares - patient resides in a assisted living facility. Patient #8: The order on 9-1-25 for MiraLAX 17 grams failed to indicated the specific quantity of liquid required for reconstitution prior to administration. Patient #9: Documentation was present in the clinical note the patient had an colostomy with minimal output noted for 7 days prior to admission on 8-25-25. The nursing notes on 8-26-25 indicates a colostomy is in place and the nurse is to provide cares to the ostomy site each visit. There was no evidence of an order for the colostomy care.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #4: Documentation is present indicating the patient utilizes a walker with ambulation. No evidence an order was obtained for the equipment.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 109 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #3: An order was received on 6-2-26 for wound care to great L toe with directions to clean with wound cleaner, dry and apply bandage every nursing visit and when soiled. Nursing Documentation is present on 8-4-26 stated skin is intact and L toe is open to air. There is no evidence an order was received to update the plan of care to reflect the discontinuation of the current wound treatment or that current POC was followed.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 205 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2, #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #2: The patient has adhesive bandages to bilateral hips in place for prevention of skin breakdown. There is no evidence the hospice aide care plan was updated to reflect location of bandages and lacking instructions if bandages become wet or dislodged during aide cares to notify the RNCM. Patient #3: The patient required the use of a walker and wheelchair for safety with mobility. There is no evidence the aide care plan was updated to include this DME.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 13 (Personnel #7) did not have evidence the hospice employees and contract employees have received orientation on the hospice philosophy. Personnel record #7: There was not evidence the contracted employee received orientation to the hospice philosophy.”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 13, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 1, 2023.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 77% at home, 21% in assisted living, 2% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Saira Inayatali (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Saira Inayatali (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Abbas H Jafri (owns 5% or more directly, 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 78 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77386, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.