Harbor Hospice of South Texas LP
A hospice in McAllen, Texas 78504
801 E Nolana Ave, Ste 20a, McAllen, Texas 78504. (956) 800-4977.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 21 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- Not available CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
21 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 47 hospices serving ZIP code 78504 had 5.5.
The last inspection on record was on Dec 23, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.
2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
21 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jan 14, 2025: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission2 deficiencies
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, the Surveyor noted the organization failed to assess and reassess its patient’s per standards. For example, in RRHV#1, in the month of December, there had been a gap of 17 days between RN comprehensive assessments. This was validated with the Director of Nursing. 

”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 138 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 1 home visits conducted, the organization failed to maintain a medical record that reflected the patient’s care, treatment, or services. During RRHV#1, the medication profile in the electronic medical record (EMR) had the following discrepancies: medications missing from the EMR list: Phenylephrine nasal spray, Advil PM, Aleve, Promethazine 25 mg tab every 4 hours as needed for nausea, Colace, Vitamin D3, B-12, and Magnesium. Medications that the patient was being administered differently than prescribed (for over a month per the patients wife): Metoprolol 25 mg and Lisinopril 20 mg as needed rather than daily, Janumet 50mg-1000 mg tab, taking 1 tab daily and not 1 tab twice daily, Trazodone 150mg stopped over 1 month ago and Senna 8.6. This was validated with the Director of Nursing present during the visit. 
”
Dec 5, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission19 deficiencies
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by deficiencies at 418.54, 418.58, 418.104 and 418.100. 

This was reviewed and discussed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, patients who transferred, the organization failed to provide the accepting hospice a discharge summary. During record review for RRNHV#2, the organization did not follow the required process for discharge. 

For example in RRNHV#2, the patient had opted to transfer to another hospice. Per the organizational policy the hospice was to send a transfer summary but there was no documentation that the transfer summary was sent. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 105 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to assess and reassess its patient’s. During a home visit for RRHV#3, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed a failed medication assessment. The LVN was asked to perform a medication reconciliation based on policy. He began to look at the bottles but had nothing to compare them to. The Surveyor suggested he check the EMR and he was able to pull it up on his phone. He continued by checking names of the medications but did not double check doses and routes. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 127 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to assess and reassess its patient’s. During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, and RRNHV#1, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the assessments not completed as required. 

For example in RRHV#1, the RN did not complete a comprehensive assessment at least every 15 days. During the month of October there was an 18 day period with no RN assessment. 

In RRHV#2, the patient had RN comprehensive assessment dates that were 16 days apart. 


For example in RRNHV#1, the RN did not complete a comprehensive assessment at least every 15 days. During the month of October there was an 16 day period with no RN assessment. 
This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 227 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to maintain a complete and accurate patient record. During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#3, RRNHV#1, RRNHV#2 and RRNHV#5, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed inaccurate or confusing documentation. 

For example RRHV#1 had the IDG meeting held on 11/15 and all staff signed off on that date. But the documentation in the IDG showed information of the patient’s bowel movements and newly ordered Lorazepam on 11/25. 

For RRHV#3, the IDG meeting was held on 11/27 and staff signed off on that date. The documentation in the IDG showed information about the patient’s bowel movements for 11/30. 

In RRNHV#1, the IDG meeting was held on 11/15 and staff signed off on that date. The documentation in the IDG showed information about new medication, bowel movement status and PPS for 11/19. 

In RRNHV#2, the IDG meeting was held 12/30/22 and staff signed off on that date. The documentation in the IDG showed information about PPS and bowel movements through 4/10/23. This occurred on several IDG’s for this patient. 

In RRNHV#5, the patient revoked 13 days prior to IDG. The IDG notes stated discharge but the narrative for IDG supported that the patient was still on service. There was no documentation of the patient revoking for continued treatment. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Observed in Record Review. the organization failed to plan the patient’s care. During record review for RRHV#3, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the plan of care was not based on the patient’s goals, time frames, settings or services required. 

For example in RRHV#3, the patient had been tested for a UTI 3 weeks prior to survey and goals had been placed on his Plan of Care. The goals were not resolved or removed when the test came back negative and the patient was no longer on an antibiotic. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 215 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to plan the patients care. During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRNHV#1, and RRDC#1,the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the plan of care did not contain all needed elements. 

For example in RRHV#1, the patient was struggling with pain, constipation, anxiety, and two recent falls but these were not addressed on the plan of care. 

In RRHV#2, the patient had multiple wounds with the only orders stating use Dakins for wound cleanser, let dry and cover with non-adherent dressing. The order did not state which wound this was for. And the nurse was documenting that the caregiver was utilizing betadine and meta-honey for wound care. Also the Plan Of Care did not contain details about the wound care to be provided but the nurse was documenting wound care per plan of care. The SN was also documenting that family was using Zinc-Oxide on redness to the coccyx but there were no orders for this treatment. 

In RRNHV#1, the SN documented edema on several occasions but it was not addressed on the POC. 

In RRDC#1, the patient was struggling with restlessness and sleep disturbance but these were not addressed on the POC. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing. 

”
-
Program scope (42 CFR 418.58(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 95 words
“Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to document a quality assessment and performance improvement program that demonstrated improvement in the indicators related to improved palliative outcomes and hospice services. There was a corporate wide QAPI plan in place but locally there was no documentation of engagement or implementation of the plan. The hospice surveyor noted the QAPI program did not demonstrate improvement in its palliative outcomes and hospice services as evidenced by the HCO was not able to provide documentation at the time of survey.

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2)(i))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. The surveyor noted the HCO did not use the data collected to monitor the effectiveness and safety of services and the quality of care as evidenced by the organization was unable to provide detailed data for 2022 and 2023. And the data collected for 2024 was not used by the organization to determine if effectiveness or safety was achieved. 
 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2)(ii))
The inspectors’ words, 126 words
“Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to document that it compiled and analyzed data. During tracer activities for Data Management, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the organization was unable to provide data for 2022 and 2023. And the data collected for the current year was not compiled and compared. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing. Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to document that it compiled and analyzed data. During tracer activities for Data Management, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the organization was unable to provide data for 2022 and 2023. And the data collected for the current year was not compiled and compared in order to identify improvement opportunities. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(2))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to document that it collected data to monitor performance. During tracer activities for Data Management, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the organization was unable to provide data for 2022 and 2023. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(1))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. The surveyor noted the number and scope of performance improvement projects were not based on patients’ needs and internal organization needs as evidenced by the organization was unable to provide any documented performance improvement projects. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(2))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. The surveyor noted the organization failed to document what performance improvement projects were being conducted, the reasons for conducting and the measurable progress achieved as evidenced by the HCO was not able to produce this documentation at the time of survey.

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(1))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to document an effective and on-going performance improvement program. The surveyor noted the hospice did not evaluate its QAPI program annually as evidenced by the HCO was not able to produce this documentation at the time of survey.

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Executive responsibilities (42 CFR 418.58(e)(2))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. The surveyor noted the HCO did not evaluate its improvement actions were effective as evidenced by the HCO was not able to produce this documentation at the time of survey.

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing. Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to establish priorities for performance improvement. The surveyor noted performance improvement was not organization wide as evidenced by no documentation of improvement opportunities for 2022, 2023 and 2024. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(2)(ii))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to document compliance with hand hygiene. During tracer activities for Infection Control, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed there was no documentation of data collected for 2022, 2023 or 2024 and therefore there was no evaluation of the compliance with hand hygiene. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 138 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 5 patient records reviewed, with aide services, the organization failed to supervise effectively. During record review for RRHV#1, RRHV#3, RRNHV#1, and RRNHV#7, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed supervision did not take place as required. 

For example in RRHV#1, between the time the patient started aide services and the first supervision was 17 days. The next two supervision visit were completed in 20 day increment not completed every 14 days as required.

In RRHV#3, there were two time periods with extended aide supervision beyond 14 days. 

In RRNHV#1, the patient had 17 days between aide supervision. 

In RRNHV#7, the patient had home health services 3 times over the course of 21 days and there was no documentation of supervision during that time period. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 120 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to maintain a medical record that reflected the patient’s care, treatment, or services. During a home visit for RRHV#3, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed the LVN do a medication reconciliation. The bottles of medications in the home that the patient was currently taking was not correctly reflected on the medication list in the electronic medical record. The patient was taking Vitamin D3 and B-Complex but these were not on the medical record. The patient had a course of antibiotics the month prior to survey which were completed but it was not removed from the medication list. 

This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 194 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 4 patient records reviewed, patients who revoked or discharged, the organization failed to send the provider a discharge summary. During record review for RRNHV#4, RRNHV#5, RRDC#1, and RRDC#2, the organization did not follow the required process for discharge. In RRNHV#4, the patient was discharged for extended prognosis but there was no documentation that the discharge summary was sent to the provider. The daughter had not decided on which provider at their office to go with but had decided on a certain provider office. There was no collaboration documented. In RRNHV#5, the patient revoked hospice services one day into her certification so she could continue chemotherapy. There was no collaboration or documentation that a discharge summary was provided to the primary care provider, as required by organizational policy. In RRDC#1, the patient revoked hospice services to seek aggressive treatment, revocation was signed but documentation of a discharge summary being sent did not occur. In RRDC#2, the patient revoked hospice services to seek aggressive treatment, revocation was signed but documentation of a discharge summary being sent did not occur. This was discussed and reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2025 | Complaint inspection by the state | No deficiencies cited |
| Jan 14, 2025 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Dec 5, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 19 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 6, 2021.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Arfeen Properties, L.P. owns 99% directly since Dec 12, 2012.
- 3 owners or officers are people: Qamar U Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Kelley L Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Karen Carter (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arfeen Properties, L.P. | Owns 5% or more directly | 99% | Dec 12, 2012 |
| Hhcs Managers LLC | General partner | 1% | Dec 12, 2012 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 47 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78504, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5.5; this one had 21.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Only Love Hospice | 8 |
| Harbor Hospice of Mcallen LP | 7 |
| Amavi Hospice and Palliative Care, LLC | 5 |
| St Anthony’s Hospice | Not given |
| Anchor of Love Hospice | 10 |
| Harbor Hospice of South Texas LP This hospice | 21 |
| Guardian Home Care LLC | 2 |
| Iph Hospice Care Inc. | 2 |
| Atex Hospice | 2 |
| Life Care Hospice and Palliative Services LLC | 0 |
| Casa Mia Hospice Care, LLC. | 3 |
| Gentiva | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.