Hearth Record

Hjm Hospice and Palliative Care

A hospice in Houston, Texas 77077

1505 Highway 6 S Suite 240, Houston, Texas 77077. (832) 704-3609.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 88 hospices serving ZIP code 77077 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 7, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 7, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 247 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that the Interdisciplinary Group completed the initial comprehensive assessment within 5 days after the start of care. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice services on 10/31/2024. As of the clinical record review date, 11/06/2024, there was no documented evidence in the clinical record that the Chaplain completed an initial assessment and no additional documentation why this visit was not completed. Clinical Record 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit and was admitted to hospice services on 10/07/2024. As of the clinical record review date, 11/06/2024, there was no documented evidence in the clinical record that the Chaplain completed an initial assessment, no addition documentation why this visit was not completed and no documentation in the interdisciplinary Team Meeting dated 10/11/2024. During a joint clinical record review and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/06/2024, the DON confirmed that there was no documentation in the clinical record as to why the Chaplain did not document an initial assessment within 5 days after the admission.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(v))

    The inspectors’ words, 344 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current: Prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs; Supplements; Herbal remedies; Other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication review process includes the identification of the following: The effectiveness of drug therapy; Drug side effects; Actual or potential drug interactions; Duplicate drug therapy; Drug therapy associated with laboratory monitoring. The assessment includes evidence that common side effects of medication in the hospice populations are anticipated, and as appropriate, preventive measurements are implemented to manage the side effects. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added, or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, interview, and observation. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the medication profile included all of the patient’s current prescription and over the counter (OTC) drugs. Agency Policy PC.85 Medication Listing and Monitoring read in part “ The hospice will review, monitor and maintain a current, accurate list of prescription and over the counter (OTC) medications, herbal remedies and other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy by the patient.” Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/18/2024. During a home visit on 11/06/2024 with the Registered Nurse (RN) (Personnel Record 6), a medication reconciliation was performed comparing the patient’s medications to the agency’s medication profile. The caregiver brought out a bottle stating that the medication was delivered 2 days ago and the date of the visit 11/6/2024 was the last dose. On 11/4/2024, the skilled nurse performed a visit and contacted the physician and received an order for Lasix 40 mg po daily x 3 dated 11/04/2024. The order was written by the skilled nurse; however, the medication profile was not updated with the Lasix. The findings were reviewed with the DON on 11/06/2024, and it was confirmed that the medication profile was not accurate.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 234 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and considered in the bereavement plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed the agency did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment included an initial bereavement risk assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Clinical Record 2: The hospice election of benefit was dated 08/02/2024. At the time of the clinical record review on 11/06/24, there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement risk assessment had been completed. Clinical Record 5: The hospice election benefit was dated 08/22/2024. At the time of the clinical record review on 11/06/24, there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement risk assessment had been completed. During a joint clinical record review and interview with the DON (Personnel Record 3) the DON confirmed that there was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement risk assessment had been completed. No further information was provided.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 297 words

    “It is required that counseling services include an organized program for providing bereavement services delivered by or under the supervision of a qualified professional with experience or education in grief or loss counseling. Bereavement services are available to the family and other individuals up to one (1) year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling extends to residents of a SNF/NF (skilled nursing facility/nursing facility) or ICF/IID (intermediate care facility/Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities) when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care. The bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved per a bereavement plan of care that includes: The types of bereavement services to be offered; The frequency of service delivery. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 1 of 2 (50%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure that a post death bereavement risk assessment and a plan of care to include the required elements of pt/family grief and/or loss issues were completed post death. Policy # 130 titled Bereavement read in part “The bereavement coordinator will complete a follow-up assessment and develop a bereavement POC for bereavement services based on the re-assessment and family and/or caregiver’s needs.” “The bereavement coordinator will ensure bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved.” Clinical Record 14: The patient’s election of benefit was 09/23/2022 and expired on 12/25/2023. There was no documented evidence of a post death bereavement risk assessment or a plan of care based on family needs. The DON stated, “ The family accepted bereavement services.” No bereavement services were provided for the family as of survey date 11/06/2023. The findings were reviewed with the DON on 11/06/2024, and it was confirmed that no bereavement services were provided. No further information was provided.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 263 words

    “It is required that if the care of a hospice patient is transferred to a Medicare/Medicaid certified facility, the hospice forwards to the receiving facility a copy of: The hospice discharge summary described in HCDT 40.I; and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. In 2 of 3 (67%) clinical record review of a patient that transferred to a Medicare/Medicaid facility, the hospice did not ensure that the discharge summary was forwarded to the receiving facility. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record of coordination with the receiving facility. The hospice policy titled “ Patient Discharge” with the revised date of 09/01/2024, read in part “ if the care of a patient is transferred to another Medicare/Medicaid-Certified facility, the Hospice will forward copies of the following to the receiving: A summary of the patient’s care (pain management, symptoms and treatments), The patient’s current plan of care, including the current medication profile.” Clinical Record 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/05/2024 and was transferred to a non-contracted hospital on 08/01/2024. There was no documentation or evidence that a discharge summary was forwarded to the hospital. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/09/2024 and transferred to a non-contracted hospital on 08/01/2024. There was no documentation or evidence that a discharge summary was forwarded to the hospital. During a joint record review and interview on 11/06/2024, the DON confirmed that a discharge summary was not sent to the local hospital. No further information was provided.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(iii))

    The inspectors’ words, 314 words

    “It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided to a facility receiving a hospice patient for care—or to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge—includes at least the following: A summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management; The patient’s current plan of care; The patient’s latest physician orders; Any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 3 (67%) clinical reviewed of patient that discharged from hospice services revealed that the agency did not ensure a discharge summary was created and included a summary of the patient’s stay, treatments, symptoms, pain management, current plan of care (POC), and physician orders to assist in continuity of care post-discharge. Clinical Record 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/05/2024.A Physician order to discharge the patient was obtained on 08/07/24. The clinical record did not include documented evidence to support a discharge summary of the patient’s stay, treatments, symptoms, pain management, current plan of care (POC), and physician orders to assist in continuity of care post-discharge. There was a patient’s documented revocation statement in the clinical record but no discharge summary. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/09/2024. A Physician order to discharge the patient was obtained on 08/01/24. The clinical record did not include documented evidence to support a discharge summary of the patient’s stay, treatments, symptoms, pain management, current plan of care (POC), and physician orders to assist in continuity of care post-discharge. There was a patient’s documented revocation statement in the clinical record but no discharge summary. During a joint record review and interview on 11/06/2024, the DON confirmed that a discharge summary was not created. No further information was provided.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 7, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 20, 2022.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 5.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 33.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day5.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.8%
Visits near death33.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Jemea Mosenge (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Eunice K Koffi (managing employee (on the payroll)); Hameed Ali (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Jemea Mosenge (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Humphrey Mosenge (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 6 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold6 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 88 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77077, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.