Hearth Record

5 Star Hospice, LLC

A hospice in Missouri City, Texas 77459

4220 Cartwright Rd, Ste 304, Missouri City, Texas 77459. (832) 262-1299.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 112 hospices serving ZIP code 77459 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 8, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 30, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 308 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 5 of 14 (36%) clinical records reviewed for patients receiving hospice services revealed the hospice agency did not ensure the initial comprehensive assessment was completed no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 1: The patient’s election of benefit began on 02/23/2024. There were orders written on 02/13/2024 requesting an initial assessment to be completed by the social worker and chaplain for accepted services. There was no documented evidence of completed initial assessments by the social worker or chaplain. Clinical Record 2: The patient’s election of benefit began on 03/22/2024. The chaplain completed an initial assessment on 03/29/2024. This was completed two days past the five-day requirement. Clinical Record 4: The patient’s election of benefit began on 05/09/24. The patient accepted social worker services and was ordered on 05/09/2024. There was no documented evidence of a completed visit by the social worker within five calendar days after the election of hospice. Clinical Record 10: The patient elected hospice on 05/10/2024. There were orders written on 05/10/2024 for initial assessments to be completed by the social worker and the chaplain. There were no documented visits as of 05/30/24. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected hospice on 11/09/2023. The social worker’s initial assessment was completed on 11/17/2023. This was three days late. During an interview on 05/30/2024, the Assistant Director of Nursing agreed the social worker and chaplain had not completed initial assessments within five calendar days of the election of hospice.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 271 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and considered in the bereavement plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 14 (21%) clinical records reviewed revealed the hospice agency did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment included an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Clinical Record 1: The patient’s election of benefit began on 02/13/2024. There was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment had been completed for the patient’s family. Clinical Record 4: The patient’s election of benefit began on 05/19/2024. One attempt was made on 5/14/24 with no successful contact with the patient’s family. There were no other attempts documented to complete an initial bereavement assessment of the patient’s family. Clinical Record 10: The patient’s election of benefit began on 05/10/2024. There was no documented evidence that an initial bereavement assessment had been completed for the patient’s family as of 5/30/24. During an interview on 05/30/2024, the Assistant Director of Nursing agreed that the patient’s families had not had an initial bereavement assessment completed. The Assistant Director of Nursing stated that the Chaplain/Bereavement Coordinator/Licensed Vocational Nurse was possibly responsible for too many duties.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 375 words

    “It is required that the update of the comprehensive assessment is completed by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, who, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any, consider the changes that have taken place since the initial assessment. The update of the comprehensive assessment includes information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes and reassessment of the patient’s response to care. The assessment update is completed as frequently as the condition of the patient requires and no less frequently than every 15 days. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and document review. In 3 of 14 (21%) clinical records reviewed receiving hospice services revealed that the hospice agency did not ensure the patients received a comprehensive assessment by a registered nurse no less frequently than every fifteen (15) days. Document 1: Policy 013115 Hospice-CHAP, Plan of Care, stated in part, based on the updated comprehensive assessment, in collaboration with the individuals attending, if any, the IDG will review, revise and document the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires, but no less frequently than every fifteen calendar days. Clinical Record 1: The patient’s election of benefit began on 02/13/2024. The skilled nurse frequency was ordered one time a week (1xw). The patient received visits by the licensed vocational nurse (Personnel Record #6) weekly. The registered nurse made visits on 02/23/2024, 04/05/2024 and 04/12/2024. The patient did not receive a comprehensive assessment by a registered nurse every fifteen days. Clinical Record 2: The patient’s election of benefit began on 03/22/2024. The skilled nurse frequency was ordered one time a week (1xw). The registered nurse visited on 03/22/2024 to complete the initial comprehensive nursing assessment. The registered nurse did not visit again to complete a comprehensive assessment until 04/19/2024 and again on 05/17/2024. Clinical Record 6: The patient’s election of benefit began on 02/02/2024. The skilled nurse frequency was ordered two times a week (2xw) a week. The patient received a comprehensive assessment by a registered nurse on the weeks of 02/05/2024, 02/29/20243 and 04/25/2024. The licensed vocational nurse made visits for all other weeks. During an interview, the administrator stated they are having issues with late documentation. The patients are being seen but documentation is not being completed timely.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 166 words

    “It is required that the hospice designates a registered nurse member of the IDG to provide coordination of care; ensure continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs; and to ensure the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. The hospice care and services provided to patients and families follow the individualized plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) of clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the registered nurse implemented the IDG plan of care. Clinical Record 4: The patient’s election of benefit began on 05/09/2024. The skilled nurse frequency was ordered one time a week (1xw). The registered nurse completed an initial assessment on 05/09/24. There were no other documented visits for skilled nursing or reason the patient was not seen as ordered. During an interview, the administrator stated they are having issues with late documentation. The patients are being seen but documentation is not being completed timely.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 256 words

    “It is required that the hospice follows accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including the use of standard precautions, such as hand hygiene and safe handling of equipment in the patient’s care environment if it is likely to have been contaminated with body fluids. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview and observation. In 1 of 3 (33%) home visits observed for patients receiving hospice services revealed the hospice agency did not ensure acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections were utilized such as hand washing and safe hand of equipment that has been contaminated with body fluids. Document 1: Policy 042723 Hospice, Hand Hygiene, stated in part, decontaminate hands before having direct contact with clients. Home Visit 1: During the home visit (Home Visit 1) with the registered nurse/director of nursing (RN/DON) (Personnel Record 2) on 05/30/2024, the RN was observed washing her hands, using her wet hand to turn off the faucet, then dried her hands with clean paper towels. The RN proceeded to provide wound care. A pair of scissors were removed from the bag with wound supplies and the soiled dressing was removed with the scissors. The scissors were returned to the bag with clean wound supplies without proper cleaning. During an interview on 05/29/2024, the RN (Director of Nursing) stated she knew what she had done wrong during the visit by turning of the water with her wet hand and not cleaning the scissors after removing the soiled dressing.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 8, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 30, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 28, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 0 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 0% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 14.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day0.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends0%
Visits near death14.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Melissa D Wade (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Melissa D Wade (corporate officer, 100%); Melissa D Wade (corporate director, 100%); Melissa D Wade (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Melissa D Wade (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 4 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 46.91% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold4 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 112 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77459, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.