Hearth Record

Bluevine Hospice

A hospice in Houston, Texas 77036

6464 Savoy Drive, Suite 850, Houston, Texas 77036. (281) 751-8333.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 95 hospices serving ZIP code 77036 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 20, 2026: an initial follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 17, 2026: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner11 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    The inspectors’ words, 201 words

    “It is required that the hospice designates an Interdisciplinary Group or groups who, in consultation with the patient’s attending physician, prepare a written plan of care (POC) for each patient. The plan of care specifies the hospice care and services necessary to meet the specific needs of the patient and family identified in the comprehensive assessment, relative to the terminal illness and related conditions. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCY. This CONDITION was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interviews which revealed the hospice: Failed to ensure the individualized plan of care was reviewed, revised, and documented by the IDG no less frequently than every 15 calendar days {HCPC.22.I/552 418.56(d)}; and Failed to ensure that the patient’s plan of care was updated to reflect new information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment {HCPC.22.I/553 418.56(d)}. The cumulative effect of these systemic problems resulted in the hospice agency’s inability to ensure the provision of quality health care in a safe environment for the condition of participation, CFR 418.56: Interdisciplinary group, care planning, and coordination of service. The deficient practice illustrated systemic process failures that had the potential to affect all patients cared for by the hospice agency.”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 487 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 6 of 11 (55%) clinical records reviewed of patients who received hospice services for more than 5 calendar days, the agency did not ensure the initial comprehensive assessment was completed no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected hospice benefit on 02/06/2026. The initial nursing assessment completed on 02/06/2026 did not have documented evidence of an initial psychosocial or spiritual assessment, and the lack of documentation that the services were declined on admission. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected hospice benefit on 02/14/2026. The initial nursing assessment was completed on 02/14/2026. Documentation on 02/18/2026 by the Chaplain stated, “Family felt overwhelmed with the amount of visits. Family requests an appointment on February 19, 2026.” There was no further documentation or visits for the Chaplain in the clinical record. The initial spiritual assessment was not completed within the 5 calendar days after election of benefit. CLINICAL RECORD 6: The patient elected hospice benefit on 06/19/2024. The initial nursing assessment was completed on 06/19/2024. The clinical record did not have documented evidence of an initial spiritual assessment, and no evidence that spiritual services were declined. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient elected hospice benefit on 11/14/2024. The initial nursing assessment was completed on 11/14/2024. The initial psychosocial assessment was completed on 11/21/2024, a total of 7 days after the election of benefit and two days outstanding. The clinical record did not have documented evidence of an initial spiritual assessment, and no evidence that spiritual services were declined. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient elected hospice benefit on 11/25/2024. The initial nursing assessment was completed on 11/25/2024. The initial psychosocial assessment was completed on 12/13/2024, a total of 18 days after the election of benefit and 13 days outstanding. The clinical record did not have documented evidence of an initial spiritual assessment, and no evidence that spiritual services were declined. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected hospice benefit on 12/05/2024. The initial nursing assessment was completed on 12/05/2024. The initial psychosocial assessment was completed on 12/12/2024, a total of 7 days after the election of benefit and 2 days outstanding. The clinical record did not have documented evidence of an initial spiritual assessment, and no evidence that spiritual services were declined. During an interview with the Supervising Nurse (Personnel Record 1) on 06/17/2026, she stated, “That some of the missing initial assessments were due to services being declined but that the information was not documented in the clinical record, and that she will need to provide education to the clinical staff.””

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 352 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 6 of 14 (43%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure documentation of an initial bereavement assessment that included the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/06/2026 with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease without dyskinesia. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record of an initial bereavement assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/14/2026 with a diagnosis of Heart failure. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record of an initial bereavement assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/19/2024 with a diagnosis of Malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of unspecified bronchus or lung. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record of an initial bereavement assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/14/2024 with a diagnosis of Multiple myeloma no having achieved remission. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record of an initial bereavement assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/27/2026 with a diagnosis of Krabbe disease. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record of an initial bereavement assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 14: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/07/2025 with a diagnosis of Malignant neoplasm of appendix. There was no documented evidence in the clinical record of an initial bereavement assessment. During an interview with the Supervising Nurse (Personnel Record 1) and the Alternate Administrator (Personnel Record 6) on 06/17/2026, they stated that they have updated the process so that the admitting nurse conducts the initial bereavement assessment, as social worker and chaplain services are not always accepted.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 410 words

    “It is required that the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG), in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician (if any), reviews, revises, and documents the individualized care plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires, but no less frequently than every 15 calendar days. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 6 of 14 (43%) clinical records reviewed, the organization did not ensure the individualized plan of care was reviewed, revised, and documented by the IDG no less frequently than every 15 calendar days. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/06/2026. The benefit period from 02/06/2026 to 05/06/2026 had documented Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) dates of 03/05/2026 (27 days), 03/19/2026, 04/02/2026, and 04/30/2026 (28 days). The clinical record did not have documented evidence that the IDG reviewed, revised, and documented the individualized care plan no less frequently than every 15 days. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/14/2026. The benefit period from 02/14/2026 to 05/14/2026 had documented Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) dates of 03/05/2026 (19 days), 03/19/2026, 04/02/2026, 04/30/2026 (28 days), and 05/14/2026. The clinical record did not have documented evidence that the IDG reviewed, revised, and documented the individualized care plan no less frequently than every 15 days. CLINICAL RECORD 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/19/2024. The benefit periods from 12/16/2024 to 02/13/2025, 02/14/2025 to 04/14/2025, 04/15/2025 to 06/13/2025, and 08/13/2025 to 10/11/2025 had no documented evidence of IDG meetings in the clinical record for any of these periods. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/14/2024. The benefit periods from 1/14/2025 to 02/11/2025, 05/13/2025 to 07/11/2025, 09/10/2025 to11/08/2025, and 11/09/2025 to 01/07/2026 had no documented evidence of IDG meetings in the clinical record for any of these periods. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/25/2024. The benefit periods from 11/25/2024 to 02/22/2025, 05/24/2025 to 07/22/2025, and 09/21/2025 to 11/19/2025 had no documented evidence of IDG meetings in the clinical record for any of these periods. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/05/2024. The benefit periods from 12/05/2024 to 03/04/2025, 06/03/2025 to 08/01/2025, 10/01/2025 to 11/29/2025, and 01/29/2026 to 03/29/2026 had no documented evidence of IDG meetings in the clinical record for any of these periods. During an interview with the supervising nurse (Personnel Record 1) on 06/17/2026, she stated, “She did not know how or why there were no IDGs in the clinical record.””

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 240 words

    “It is required that a revise the plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and a record of the patient’s progress toward the outcomes and goals specified in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the plan of care was revised based on the patient’s updated comprehensive assessments. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient was admitted to hospice on 02/06/2026 with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease without dyskinesia. The nurse documented on the visit note dated 05/27/2026, “Pt (patient) came back from a 5-day stay respite. (The patient) has a swollen right shoulder. Pt fell at the facility 4 times, but they only notified hospice of one fall. Spoke with DON (Director of Nursing) there, stated she will educate the nurses. Ordered shoulder X-ray.” The Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meetings dated 05/14/2026, 05/28/2026, and 06/11/2026, did not include documentation of changes to the patient’s condition or information related to the patient’s respite stay. The clinical record did not have documented evidence that the plan of care was revised to include information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment. During an interview with the Supervising Nurse (Personnel Record 1) on 06/17/2026, she stated, “That she does remember discussing the changes in interoffice communication but does not know why the IDG or plan of care was not updated.””

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Physician services (42 CFR 418.64(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 176 words

    “It is required that the hospice must designate a physician to serve as medical director. The medical director must be a Doctor of Medicine or osteopathy who is an employee or is under contract with the hospice. When the medical director is not available, a physician designated by the hospice assumes the same responsibilities and obligations as the medical director. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. The agency did not ensure designation of an Alternate Medical Director who provided backup to the Medical Director. During a review of the contract list, it was noted that only the hospice medical director was listed; no alternate physician was listed. When interviewed on 06/16/2026, the Supervising Nurse (Personnel Record 1) and the Alternate Administrator (Personnel Record 6) stated that they were just discussing starting to look for a backup physician but had not yet begun, and that they would start. During a review of the contract list, it was noted that only the hospice medical director was listed; no alternate physician was listed.”

    Rule L0590. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 197 words

    “It is required that counseling services include an organized program for providing bereavement services delivered by or under the supervision of a qualified professional with experience or education in grief or loss counseling. The bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved per a bereavement plan of care that includes: the types of bereavement services to be offered; and the frequency of service delivery. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 3 (33%) clinical records review of patients who died while on hospice services, the agency did not ensure documentation of a bereavement plan of care that included the types of bereavement services offered and the frequency of services. CLINICAL RECORD 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/31/2026, and the patient’s death was dated 04/03/2026. The clinical record review did not have documented evidence of a bereavement plan of care. During an interview with the Supervising Nurse (Personnel Record 1) on 06/17/2026, she stated, “She does not know how the death was not followed by bereavement; it may have been due to missed communication, but she was not sure. They would review and update the process.””

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “It is required that a hospice aide provides services that are included in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 6 (17%) clinical records reviewed with hospice aide services provided, the agency did not ensure hospice aide services were provided as ordered in the plan of care. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/06/2026 with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease without dyskinesia. The plan of care dated 05/07/2026-08/04/2026 included orders for a hospice aide 5 times per week. The clinical record did not have documented evidence of a hospice aide visit completed on 05/08/2026, 05/11/2026, 05/12/2026, 05/13/2026, and 05/14/2026, with no documentation of a missed visit or a new order to change the frequency of the hospice aide. During an interview with the Supervising Nurse (Personnel Record 1) on 06/17/2026, she stated, “That she does not know why those visits were missed.””

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 581 words

    “It is required that the hospice medical director, physician-designee, or physician member of the IDG provides written and signed recertification of the terminal illness to meet the hospice care benefit requirement. Recertification is completed no later than two (2) calendar days after the first day of each benefit period, and no more than fifteen (15) days before the next benefit period begins. This standard was not met, as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 9 of 9 (100%) clinical records reviewed, where recertification is required, the agency did not ensure recertification was completed no later than two calendar days after the first day of each benefit period. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The patient elected hospice benefit on 01/14/2025 with a diagnosis of Senile degeneration of the brain. The clinical record does not include documented evidence of a signed recertification of terminal illness for the benefit periods of 01/14/2025 to 04/13/2025, 04/14/2025 to 07/12/2025, and 03/10/2026 to 05/08/2026. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected hospice benefit on 03/22/2025 with a diagnosis of Vascular dementia. The clinical record does not include documented evidence of a signed recertification of terminal illness for the benefit period of 05/16/2026 to 07/14/2026. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected hospice benefit on 02/06/2026 with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease without dyskinesia. The clinical record does not include documented evidence of a signed recertification of terminal illness for the benefit period of 05/07/2026 to 08/04/2026. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected hospice benefit on 10/31/2025 with a diagnosis of Vascular dementia. The clinical record does not include documented evidence of a signed recertification of terminal illness for the benefit periods of 10/31/2025 to 01/28/2026 and 01/29/2026 to 04/28/2026. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected hospice benefit on 02/14/2026 with a diagnosis of Heart failure. The clinical record does not include documented evidence of a signed recertification of terminal illness for the benefit period of 05/15/2026 to 08/12/2026. CLINICAL RECORD 6: The patient elected hospice benefit on 06/19/2024 with a diagnosis of Malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of unspecified bronchus or lung. The clinical record does not include documented evidence of a signed recertification of terminal illness for the benefit periods of 04/15/2025 to 06/13/2025 and 06/14/2025 to 08/07/2025. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient elected hospice benefit on 11/14/2024 with a diagnosis of Multiple myeloma not having achieved remission. The clinical record does not include documented evidence of a signed recertification of terminal illness for the benefit periods of 05/13/2025 to 07/11/2025, 09/10/2025 to 11/08/2025, 11/09/2025 to 01/07/2026, 01/08/2026 to 03/08/2026, and 05/08/2026 to 07/06/2026. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient elected hospice benefit on 11/25/2024 with a diagnosis of Malignant neoplasm of connective and soft tissue of head, face, and neck. The clinical record does not include documented evidence of a signed recertification of terminal illness for the benefit periods of 05/24/2025 to 07/22/2025, 09/21/2025 to 11/19/2025, 01/19/2026 to 03/19/2026, 03/20/2026 to 05/18/2026, and 05/19/2026 to 07/17/2026. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected hospice benefit on 12/05/2024 with a diagnosis of Malignant neoplasm of prostate. The clinical record does not include documented evidence of a signed recertification of terminal illness for the benefit periods of 06/03/2025 to 08/01/2025, 10/01/2025 to 11/29/2025, 01/29/2026 to 03/29/2026, 03/30/2026 to 05/28/2026, and 05/29/2026 to 07/27/2026. During an interview with the Supervising Nurse (Personnel Record 1) and the Alternate Administrator (Personnel Record 6) on 06/17/2026, they stated that they did not know why the recertifications of terminal illness were missing the Medical Director’s signature.”

    Rule L0676. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice per hospice regulation §418.26 (i.e., no longer terminally ill), the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary and the patient’s record, if requested. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed for patients that revoked the hospice benefit, the agency did not ensure a copy of the hospice discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 13: The patient called for a revocation of the hospice benefit on 03/04/2026. The clinical record did not have documented evidence that the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. CLINICAL RECORD 14: The patient called for a revocation of the hospice benefit on 01/21/2026. The clinical record did not have documented evidence that the discharge summary was forwarded to the patient’s attending physician. During an interview with the Supervising Nurse (Personnel Record 1) on 06/17/2026, she stated, “She does not know why the discharge summary was not present in the record.””

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care for respite purposes (42 CFR 418.108(b)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 213 words

    “It is required that the facility offering respite care provides 24-hour nursing services that meet the needs of the patients and each patient’s plan of care (POC). Each patient receives all nursing services as prescribed in the plan of care and is kept comfortable, clean, well-groomed, and protected from accident, injury, and infection. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) clinical record reviewed of a patient who received respite care, the agency did not ensure the patient was protected from accidents, injuries, and infections. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected hospice benefit on 02/06/2026. The nurse documented in clinical record on 05/27/2026, “Pt (patient) came back from a 5-day stay respite. (The patient) has a swollen right shoulder. Pt fell at the facility 4 times, but they only notified hospice of one fall. Spoke with DON (Director of Nursing) there, stated she will educate the nurses. Ordered shoulder X-ray.” The clinical record did not have documented evidence that the facility providing respite care protected the patient from accidents and injuries. During an interview with the Supervising Nurse (Personnel Record 1) on 06/17/2026, she stated that she did call the facility and speak with the Director of Nursing and updated the Medical Director.”

    Rule L0710. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 20, 2026Initial follow-up inspection by the Community Health Accreditation PartnerNo deficiencies cited
Jun 17, 2026Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 3, 2019.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 7.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 66.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day7.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.5%
Visits near death66.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Jesenia Paredes (corporate officer, 100%); Jesenia Paredes (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Jesenia Paredes (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Chinabaeze Darlington Aneke (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Chinabaeze Darlington Aneke (corporate officer, 50%); Chinabaeze Darlington Aneke (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 95 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77036, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.