Hearth Record

Blue Star Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Katy, Texas 77449

2023 N Mason Rd Suite 202, Katy, Texas 77449. (832) 727-9119.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 97 hospices serving ZIP code 77449 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 5, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 3, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(8))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor had been unable to validate that volunteer services had been offered to the patient and family. In records RRNHV #5, RRNHV #6, RRNHV #7, RRNHV #9, RRNHV #12, RRNHV #13 and RRNHV #14 there had been no documentation in the patient record identifying volunteer services as provided. In records RRHV #1, RRHV #2, RRHV #3, RRHV #4 and RRHV #11 there had been documentation that volunteer services had been explained; however there had been no documentation related to patient accepting or declining the service. This was validated with the DPCS and Clinical supervisor.”

    Rule L0532. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted in RRHV #3 an addendum note, written by the RN, contained data, including name, of a patient different from the record under review. This was validated with the Clinical Supervisor.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted patient care goals on the Plan of Care that had been generic, not measurable and without a specific time frame for achievement. For example, in RRHV #1, for diabetes-Pt will achieve and maintain blood glucose levels within acceptable range. For decline in ADL’s: Support resident who has declined in order to lessen the likelihood of complications (i.e., pressure ulcers and contractures). RRHV #2 for pain the goal was Patient will report that pain is reduced to the level personally desired: on a scale of 1-10 and Patient’s quality of life will be at an optimal level. RRHV #3, the goal for Skin Integrity was Patient will be free of skin breakdown maintaining skin integrity during hospice length of stay and Patient will experience no discomfort from skin breakdown during hospice length of stay. Of note this patient had stage 3 and 4 pressure wounds and had been experiencing significant pain. This had been evident in all records reviewed. This was validated with the DPCS and the Clinical Supervisor. 
”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 544 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 14 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor observed that not all patient clinical needs identified during patient assessments had been addressed on the patient plan of care (POC). For example, in RRHV #1 the patient had a high risk for pressure injuries; however, the POC had been missing skin care and pressure injury prevention. RRHV #2 had orders to flush the patients port a cath but this care had not been included on the POC. This same patient had an implanted pain pump, but this had not been referenced on the POC. RRHV #3 the patient had two urinary tract infections (UTI) documented in the last month; however, the UTI and methods to mitigate had not been added to the POC. This same patient had multiple wounds that had become infected, but this was not added to the POC. RRHV #4, the patient had chronic hypoxia, was Oxygen dependent and had bouts of pneumonia; however, this had not been included on the POC. RRNHV #6, the patient had identified problems with dysphagia and UTI’s but neither had been included on the POC. RRNHV #7 the patient had an upper respiratory infection and started on antibiotics but this had not been added to the POC. The patient also had issues with dysphagia, pain and falls that had not been included on the POC. In RRNHV #8, the patient had issues with agitation/anxiety and dysphagia problems that had not been on the POC. RRNHV #12, the patient had a wound that had been treated and a recent upper respiratory infection and neither of these had been on the POC. In RRNHV #13, the patient had a wound that had been treated but integumentary status had not been included on the POC, and in RRNHV #14, the patient had been an aspiration risk and high risk for skin breakdown, yet these had not been on the poc. This was validated with the DPCS and Clinical Supervisor. Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 14 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted patient medication or treatment orders to be incomplete. For example, in RRHV #1, the patient had ketoconazole 0.02 MG/MG Topical Gel 2%thin layer Topical Gel Topical as needed without a identifying a specific area of application. The Same patient had orders for wound care that had been missing the frequency of the care and who was to complete. In RRHV #2, the patient had and order that stated: “Ok to flush Port-A-Cath per protocol” without the specific protocol attached to the patient record, who was to complete and the frequency of the flushing. In RRHV #3, the patient had Morphine Sulfate ordered every 6 hours as needed for pain and Norco every 4 hours as needed for pain without specific clinical indications for administration. In RRHV #4, the patient had Tramadol 50 mg every 6 hours as needed pain and acetaminophen 3 times per day as needed pain/fever, and morphine 30 mg every 12 hours prn pain without specific indications for which to use. In RRNHV #11 the patient had hydrocortisone acetate 0.01 MG/MG Topical Ointment ordered to apply a thin layer as needed without specifying the area of application. This was validated with the Clinical Supervisor.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d ))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting documentation had not captured the collaboration between disciplines nor had it reflected changes in the patient condition since the previous IDT with updates to the Plan of Care and progress towards goals. This was validated with the DPCS.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted a patient on continuous home Oxygen at 3 lpm and the Hospice Aide (HA) care plan had not addressed whether the oxygen could be removed for the bath. In RRHV #4, the HA had been observed removing the patients Oxygen for the shower and then place it back on the patient post shower. The HA had also been observed changing the Oxygen tubing. This was validated with the Clinical Supervisor present during the visit.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted the HCO had not documented any active volunteer recruitment in 11 months. The have been utilizing a passive recruitment website that had not produced a new volunteer for the organization in 15 months. The HCO has not had a patient care volunteer since 2020. This was validated with the DPCS and the Volunteer Coordinator.”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 247 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 5 patient records reviewed, where the patient had a wound, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted documentation of the treatments performed such as dressing change had not been fully described in the clinical notes. For example in RRHV #2, the patient had an order to ‘flush Port-A-Cath per protocol’; however, there had been no protocol in the patient record and the Surveyor had not been able to validate that the Port had ever been flushed. In RRHV #3, RRNHV #12, RRNHV #13 and RRNHV #14, the RN documented that wound care had been done per orders. This was validated with the DPCS. 

 Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 4 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted the medication list in the electronic medical record (EMR) had been inaccurate, missing either the correct dosage or frequency of the medication. For example, in RRHV #2 the patient had a bottle of Night Time Sleep Aide (Diphenhydramine 50mg) that he had been taking for a while that had not been included on the medication list as well as an incorrect Zofran dose. The EMR said 8 mg but the patient had 4 mg in the home. In RRHV #3, the patient had been taking the medication docusate sodium 50 MG / sennosides, USP 8.6 MG Oral Tablet 2 times per day, but the EMR reflected the patient taking daily. This was validated with the Clinical Supervisor present during the home visits.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. The Hospice Nurse Surveyor during RRHV #4, noted multiple oxygen tanks were standing upright, against a wall, unsecured. The Surveyor had been unable to validate that re-education on the safety and storing of back-up oxygen tanks had been provided since the initial home safety evaluation in 2022. This was validated with the Clinical Supervisor present during the home visit.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 patient records reviewed, the Hospice Nurse Surveyor noted the Hospice Aide (HA) had not followed the HA Plan of Care (POC) per the documentation. For example, in RRNHV #5, the HA had orders to perform a shower, shampoo, and inspect the mouth 5 times per week; however, the HA had not documented that all of these had been completed as ordered and there had been no documentation to support the reason for not following the POC nor communication documented that the primary nurse had been communicated with. In RRNHV #7 the HA had orders to inspect the patient’s mouth, bath feet and apply lotion and complete the skin sheet 3 times per week; however, there had been multiple visits where this had not been documented as completed. This had been observed in RRNHV #8, RRNHV #9 , This was validated with the DPCS and the Clinical Supervisor”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 5, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 3, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 6, 2015.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 88.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 78% at home, 22% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.5%
Visits near death88.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Elizabeth Coon-Nguyen MD PLLC owns 10% directly since Mar 16, 2017.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Robert Rossi (corporate officer, 100%); Sonia Rossi (owns 5% or more directly, 90%); Sonia Rossi (corporate director, 90%); Sonia Rossi (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Robert Rossi (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Robert Rossi (corporate director, 1%); Jose Daniel Rossi (corporate director); Sonia E Garcia-Reskallah (managing employee (on the payroll)); Elizabeth A Coon Nguyen (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Elizabeth Coon-Nguyen MD PLLCOwns 5% or more directly10%Mar 16, 2017

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 78% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 74.34% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 39.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 97 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77449, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.