Hearth Record

Harbor Hospice Medical Center - Houston LP

A hospice in Houston, Texas 77045

11980 Kirby Dr Suite 240, Houston, Texas 77045. (713) 777-5290.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 88 hospices serving ZIP code 77045 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 19, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 19, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 12 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure the plan of care was individualized to the patient’s needs and condition. For example, during a review of the medical record for RRHV#3, a clinician documented that the patient experienced a fall with injury during week 7, of the 2nd benefit period. The plan of care did not include a goal statement to evaluate care, treatment, and services related to fall prevention interventions. In addition, during week 8 of the 2nd benefit period, a clinician documented that the patient’s oxygen saturation was 76% and the patient was placed on oxygen at 6 liters per nasal cannula. The plan of care did not include a goal statement to evaluate care, treatment, and services related to oxygen therapy interventions. Example #2: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#1, and RRNHV#4, it was noted that the patient’s terminal illness diagnosis was Senile degeneration of brain, not elsewhere classified. The plan of care did not include a goal statement to evaluate care, treatment and services related to Senile degeneration of brain, not elsewhere classified. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 195 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 12 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure the plan of care was revised when the patient’s condition changed. For example, during a review of the medical record for RRHV#3, it was noted that during week 7 of the 2nd benefit period, the patient experienced a fall with injury. The plan of care was not updated with interventions to maintain patient safety, and strategies to prevent injury. In addition, during week 8 of the 2nd benefit period, a clinician documented that the patient’s oxygen saturation was 76% and the patient was placed on oxygen at 6 liters per nasal cannula. The plan of care did not include an order for oxygen therapy. The plan of care did not include oxygen therapy interventions. Example #2: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#1, and RRNHV#4, it was noted that the patient’s terminal illness diagnosis was Senile degeneration of brain, not elsewhere classified. The plan of care did not include interventions to address the care, treatment, and services related to Senile degeneration of brain, not elsewhere classified. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d ))

    The inspectors’ words, 333 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 12 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure the plan of care was reviewed and revised every 15 days. For example, during a review of the medical record for RRHV#2, there was no documented evidence that the interdisciplinary group, in collaboration with the patient’s attending physician reviewed and revised the plan of care for a 54-day timeframe during benefit period #1. The plan of care was not reviewed and revised for an 89-day timeframe for benefit period #2. The plan of care was not reviewed and revised for a 49-day timeframe during benefit period #3. Example #2: During a review of the medical record for RRHV#3, there was no documented evidence that the interdisciplinary group, in collaboration with the patient’s attending physician reviewed and revised the plan of care for an 89-day timeframe for benefit period #1. The plan of care was not reviewed and revised for a 67-day timeframe during benefit period #2. Example #3: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#1, there was no documented evidence that the interdisciplinary group, in collaboration with the patient’s attending physician reviewed and revised the plan of care for an 89-day timeframe for benefit period #1. The plan of care was not reviewed and revised for a 55-day timeframe for benefit period #2. Example #4: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#4, there was no documented evidence that the interdisciplinary group, in collaboration with the patient’s attending physician reviewed and revised the plan of care for an 25-day timeframe for benefit period #1. Example #5: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#5, there was no documented evidence that the interdisciplinary group, in collaboration with the patient’s attending physician reviewed and revised the plan of care for an 67-day timeframe for benefit period #1. The plan of care was not reviewed and revised for a 60-day timeframe for benefit period #2. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 6 patient records reviewed, for patient’s receiving hospice aide services, it was noted that the organization did not ensure all requirements for planning the care of patient’s were implemented. For example, a review of the medical record for RRHV#3, RRNHV#1, and RRNHV#2, revealed that the Plan of Care did not include written patient care instructions for the hospice aide prepared by the registered nurse member of the interdisciplinary group. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 6 patient records reviewed, for patients receiving Hospice Aide services, it was noted that the organization did not ensure Hospice Aide supervision was effective. For example, during the review of the medical record for RRNHV#1, it was noted that a Hospice Aide supervision visit was not documented by the Registered Nurse every 14 days. A Hospice Aide supervision visit was not documented during the 90-day timeframe for benefit period #1. A Hospice Aide supervision visit was not documented during a 55-day timeframe for benefit period #2. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 9 Human Resource files reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not complete competence assessment when required. For example, during a review of the Human Resource file for the Social Worker, it was noted that competence was not initially assessed and documented as a part of orientation. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))

    The inspectors’ words, 220 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 6 medical records reviewed, for patient’s receiving hospice aide services, it was noted that the organization did not ensure medical record entries were complete, promptly, and accurately documented. For example, during a review of the medical record for RRHV#3, it was noted that hospice aide services were ordered two (2) visits per week. The hospice aide visit notes for a 4 week period did not include documentation of the care, treatment, and services provided during the visit. Example #2: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#1, it was noted that hospice aide services were ordered three (3) visits per week. The hospice aide visit notes for a 13 week period did not include documentation of the care treatment, and services provided during the visit for benefit period #1. The hospice aide visit notes for an 8 week period did not include documentation of the care, treatment, and services provided during the visit for benefit period #2.Example #3: During a review of the medical record for RRNHV#2, it was noted that hospice aide services were ordered three (3) visits per week. The hospice aide visit notes for a 2 week period did not include documentation of the care treatment, and services provided during the visit. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0685. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 19, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 13, 2013.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 5.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 88.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 51% at home, 39% in assisted living, 6% in a nursing facility, 4% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day5.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.4%
Visits near death88.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Arfeen Properties, L.P. owns 99% directly since Dec 13, 2012.
  • 3 owners or officers are people: Qamar U Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Kelley L Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Karen Carter (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Arfeen Properties, L.P.Owns 5% or more directly99%Dec 13, 2012
Hhcs Managers LLCGeneral partner1%Dec 13, 2012

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 88 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77045, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.