Hearth Record

Harbor Hospice of Baytown LP

A hospice in Baytown, Texas 77520

1600 James Bowie Suite D-111, Baytown, Texas 77520. (281) 427-3800.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 66 hospices serving ZIP code 77520 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 13, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 13, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 274 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 16 patient records reviewed, During RR# 1, RRHV# 1, RRHV# 2, RRHV# 3 and RRHV# 4’s home observation and patient records review it was noted the organization had not ensured the staff followed the organization policy Ongoing Comprehensive Assessments, No. 2-031 that included the nurse would assess the patient on each visit for skin integrity, pain, bowel sounds, bowel elimination, breath sounds, appetite/diet, and nutritional status. For example: during RRHV# 4’s home observation the Registered Nurse did not complete a skin assessment. This was observed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Nursing. Review of RRHV# 4’s patient record revealed RRHV# 4’s start of care date was approximately four months prior to the surveyor review of the record. Review of the Skilled Nurse (SN) visit notes revealed no documentation of a skin assessment, and/or breath sounds, and/or bowel sounds with bowel elimination documented on three SN visit notes. Review of RRHV# 3’s patient record revealed RRHV# 3’s start of care date was approximately five months prior to the surveyor review of the record. Further review of RRHV# 3’s patient record revealed 10 Skilled Nurse visit notes with no documentation of bowel elimination. Review of RRHV# 2’s patient record revealed seven SN visit notes with no documentation of lung sounds or bowel sounds. Review of RRHV# 1’s patient record revealed eight SN visit notes with no documentation of lung sounds and/or bowel sounds. Review of RR# 1’s patient record revealed seven SN visit notes with no documentation of the last bowel movement, lung sounds, or bowel sounds. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0529. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 3 bereavement patient records reviewed, During RRBR# 1 and RRBR# 3’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured it assessed and reassesses its patients survivor risk factors, such as the nature of the relationship with the patient, circumstances surrounding the death, behaviors before and after death, availability of coping mechanisms, and potential for pathological grief reactions per law and regulation and organization policy Bereavement Services, No. 2-010 that included a bereavement risk assessment would be completed on admission and after death. For example: review of RRBR# 1’s patient record revealed no documentation of a post death bereavement risk assessment. Review of RRBR# 3’s patient record revealed no documentation of a post death bereavement risk assessment. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Bereavement Coordinator and Administrator.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 16 patient records reviewed, During RRHV# 3’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured it maintained complete and accurate patient records. For example: review of RRHV# 3’s hospice aide written instructions revealed the task of documenting bowel movements. Review of the RRHV# 3’s hospice aide visit notes revealed no documentation of bowel movements. Review of RN hospice aide supervisory visit revealed documentation Yes under Aide following plan of care/assignment and documentation Yes under Aide documentation adequate. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 16 patient records reviewed, During RR# 8’s patient record review it was noted the organization had not ensured the plan of care included statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs. For example: review of RR# 8’s patient record revealed documentation that RR# 8 had a Volunteer visit for haircuts as needed. However, review of the plan of care revealed no documentation of Volunteer scope or frequency. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visited conducted with Medication Reconciliation, During RRHV# 1 and RRHV# 4’s home observations it was noted the organization had not ensured the plan of care included all services needed for palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. For example: during RRHV# 1’s medication reconciliation during the home observation the medication profile revealed the medication Imodium A-D 2mg tablet AS DIRECTED-LOOSE STOOLS with no other documentation to include the dose or frequency of the medication. During RRHV# 4’s medication reconciliation during the home observation the medication profile revealed “Haloperidol 1mg tablet take 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours for agitation/restlessness” with no clear indication if the Haloperidol was scheduled or as needed. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Registered Nurse and Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 284 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 16 patient records reviewed, During RRHV# 2 and RRHV# 4’s home observation and patient records review it was noted the organization had not ensured the nurse followed the plan of care. For example: review of RRHV# 4’s plan of care revealed the intervention to assess the skin every visit. During RRHV# 4’s home observation the registered nurse did not complete a skin assessment. This was observed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Patient Care Services. Review of RRHV# 4’s patient record revealed RRHV# 4’s start of care date approximately four months prior to the surveyor review of the record. Review of RRHV# 4’s patient record revealed weekly Skilled Nurse visit notes with documentation skin assessment completed with no documentation of the skin assessment. Review of RRHV# 2’s plan of care revealed the intervention to assess patient use of oxygen and oxygen effectiveness. Review of RRHV# 2’s SN visit notes revealed no documentation of oxygen use or effectiveness. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Nursing. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 bereavement patient records reviewed, During RRBR# 3’s patient record it was noted the organization had not ensured it provided care, treatment, or services according to the patient’s individualized plan of care. For example: review of RRBR# 3’s record revealed a bereavement care plan that included a bereavement letter to be sent one month after RRBR# 3’s death which was approximately 90 days prior to the surveyor review of the record. Further review of the RRBR# 3’s patient record revealed no documentation the one month bereavement letter was sent. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Bereavement Coordinator and Administrator..”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted with vital sign equipment, During RRHV# 1 and RRHV# 2’s home observations the organization had not ensured staff followed the manufacturer’s guidelines and organization policy Bag Technique that included cleaning the thermometer with alcohol and cleaning the B/P cuff per manufacturer’s guidelines. For example: during RRHV# 1 and RRHV# 2’s home observation the Registered Nurse was observed cleaning the thermometer with B/P cuff with a Clorox wipe. Review of the B/P cuff’s manufacturer’s guidelines revealed the B/P cuff was to be cleaned with a dry cloth only and unable to be disinfected for multiple patient use. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 3 bereavement patient records reviewed, During RRBR# 1 and RRBR# 2’s patient records revealed the organization had not ensured it developed an individual bereavement plan of care. For example: review of RRBR# 1’s patient record revealed an initial bereavement risk assessment that indicated a bereavement risk of moderate. However, review of the RRBR# 1’s bereavement care plan revealed no documentation of a 2 month call that would be included in a moderate risk level. During RRBR# 2’s patient record revealed a Post Death Bereavement Risk Assessment that indicated a bereavement risk of low. However, review of RRBR# 2’s bereavement care plan revealed documentation of moderate risk level interventions. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Bereavement Coordinator and Administrator.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 358 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 11 patient records reviewed with hospice aide, During RRHV# 1, RRHV# 2, RRHV# 3, RR# 1, RR# 4, RR# 6 and RR# 7’s patient records review it was noted the organization had not ensured the hospice aide followed the written patient care instructions that included documenting the last bowel movement. For example: review of RRHV# 3’s hospice aide written patient care instructions revealed the task of document bowel movements. Review of the hospice aide visit notes revealed documentation Done under document bowel movements. Further review of RRHV# 3’s patient record revealed RRHV# 3’s start of care was approximately five months prior to the surveyor review of the record and the hospice aide frequency was five times a week. Review of RRHV# 1’s patient record revealed RRHV# 1’s state of care date was approximately five months prior to the surveyor review of the record. Review of RRHV# 1’s hospice aide written patient care instructions revealed the task of document bowel movements. Review of the hospice aide visit notes revealed documentation “Done” with no documented date of last bowel movement. Review of RRHV# 2’s patient record revealed RRHV# 2’s start of care was approximately a year prior to the surveyor review of the record. Review of RRHV# 2’s hospice aide written patient care instructions revealed the task of notifying the RN if no BM [bowel movement]. Review of the hospice aide visit notes revealed no documentation of a BM. Review of RR# 1’s patient record revealed RR# 1’s start of care was approximately four months prior to the surveyor review of the record. Review of RR# 1’s hospice aide written patient care instructions revealed the task of document bowel movements. Review of RR# 1’s hospice aide visit notes revealed no documentation of the date of the last BM. Review of RR# 4, RR# 6 and RR# 7’s patient records revealed hospice aide written patient care instructions with the task “document bowel movements”. However, review of RR# 4, RR# 6 and RR# 7’s hospice aide visit notes revealed no documentation of bowel movement. This was reviewed, discussed and validated with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 200 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 11 patient records reviewed with hospice aide services, During RRHV# 1, RRHV# 2, RRHV# 3, and RR# 1’s patient records review it was noted the organization had not ensured the hospice aide was supervised by the registered nurse during on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days. For example: review of RRHV# 1’s patient record revealed RRHV# 1 with hospice aide visits two visits a week. Further review of RRHV# 1’s patient record revealed no documentation of a RN supervisory visit for approximately the last 60 days. Review of RRHV# 2’s patient record revealed hospice aide visits five visits each week. Further review of RRHV# 2’s patient record revealed no documentation of a RN supervisory visit for approximately 60 days. Review of RRHV# 3’s patient record revealed no documentation of a RN supervisory visit for 21 days when the hospice aide services were initiated. Review of RR# 1’s patient record revealed hospice aide visits two visits a week. Further review of RR# 1’s patient record revealed no documentation of a RN supervisory visit for approximately 40 days. This was reviewed, discussed and validated with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted with Medication Reconciliation, During RRHV# 1 and RRHV# 4’s home observations it was noted the organization had not ensured the patient record contained information that reflected the patient’s care, treatment, or services. For example: during RRHV# 1’s medication reconciliation during the home observation the medication profile revealed documentation of Imodium A-D 2mg tablet AS DIRECTED-LOOSE STOOLS. However, RRHV# 1’s spouse shared she had tried the Imodium tablet for diarrhea approximately 38 days prior to the home observation and RRHV# 1 was unable to swallow the tablet, so she bought pediatric Imodium (1mg/75cc) and gave one dose to RRHV# 1 and that was all the RRHV# 1 needed. During RRHV# 4’s medication reconciliation during the home observation the Assisted Living Facility (ALF) medication administration record (MAR) revealed “Hydroxyzine HCL 10 mg tablet every morning and at bedtime for anxiety” dated approximately 70 days prior to the home observation. Review of the Hospice medication profile revealed no documentation of Hydroxyzine HCl. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Registered Nurse and the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(ii))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 1 home visits conducted in a Nursing Facility, During RRHV# 2’s home observation, in a Nursing Facility, it was noted the organization had not ensured it coordinated the patient’s care, treatment, or services based on the patient’s needs. For example: review of RRHV# 2’s Nursing Facility patient medical record & Hospice binder revealed no documentation of the election of benefit (EOB). This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(iii))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 1 home visits conducted in a Nursing Facility, During RRHV# 2’s home observation, in a Nursing Facility, it was noted the organization had not ensured it coordinated the patient’s care, treatment, or services based on the patient’s needs. For example: review of RRHV# 2’s Nursing Facility patient medical record & Hospice binder revealed no documentation of the physician certification and recertification of the patient’s terminal illness. This was reviewed, discussed, and validated with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 13, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 23, 2010.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 8.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 71% at home, 9% in assisted living, 15% in a nursing facility, 2% in a hospital, 3% in an inpatient hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day8.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.8%
Visits near death97.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Hhcs Managers LLC runs it.
  • 14 owners or officers are people: Qamar U Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 40.15%); Kelley L Arfeen (owns 5% or more through other companies, 40.15%); Qamar U Arfeen (general partner, 0.5%); Kelley L Arfeen (general partner, 0.5%); Federico L Dancel (limited partner); Karen Carter (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); James K Horn (limited partner); Samuel S Rocha (limited partner); Lilette Eva Daumas - Britsch (limited partner); Howard J Smith (limited partner); Qamar U Arfeen (corporate director); Qamar U Arfeen (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Julian J Gonzalez (limited partner); Teddy James (limited partner).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Arfeen Properties, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies79.3%May 27, 2008
Hhcs Managers LLCGeneral partner1%May 27, 2008
Paul J. Allencherril M.D., P.a.Limited partnerOct 21, 2008
Atul Sachdev, M.D., PaLimited partnerOct 21, 2008
Arfeen Properties, L.P.Limited partnerMay 27, 2008
Hhcs Managers LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)May 27, 2008

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 75% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 72% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 92.51% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 49.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 66 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 77520, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.