Hearth Record

Altus Hospice

A hospice in Laredo, Texas 78041

6909 Springfield Avenue, Suite 200, Laredo, Texas 78041. (956) 718-3000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 18 hospices serving ZIP code 78041 had 4.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 24, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 6, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies
  • Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)

    “Condition of Participation: Hospice Aide and Homemaker Services. L607”

    Rule L0607. Condition-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Upon patient record review 5 of 19 (Patient #2, 3, 5, 10, 11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 2: Patient admitted 6/1/23. Initial psychosocial assessment completed 6/8/23. Patient 3: Patient admitted 7/11/23. Initial psychosocial assessment completed 8/3/23. Patient 5: Patient admitted 11/29/23. Initial psychosocial assessment completed 12/6/23. Patient 10: Patient admitted 1/30/24. Initial psychosocial assessment completed 2/6/24. Patient 11: Patient admitted 4/29/23. Initial psychosocial assessment completed 5/5/23.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 19 (Patient #6, 9, 10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 6, 9, 10: No initial spiritual assessment documented in patient’s medical record.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1, 4) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: Patient has topical medications listed on medication profile: asperflex and nystatin. No administration site ordered. Patient has lomotil listed on medication profile. No dose or frequency listed for this medication. Patient 4: Patient has clonidine patch listed on medication profile. Frequency is listed as both daily and weekly. Ativan, zofran, and morphine injectables listed on medication profile. No evidence of route for these medications.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patient #1, 3, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patients 1, 3, 6, 7, 11, 12, 13 did not have evidence of bereavement risk assessment in medical record.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #8, 13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 8 and 13: Patient is taking eliquis and no bleeding precautions documented in patient’s plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #1, 4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: Patient has topical medications listed on medication order: asperflex and nystatin. No administration site ordered. Patient has lomotil listed on medication order. No dose or frequency ordered for this medication. Patient 4: Patient has clonidine patch listed on medication order. Frequency is listed as both daily and weekly. Ativan, zofran, and morphine injectables listed on medication order. No evidence of route for these medications.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 12) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: RN visits on 5/16/24 and 5/21/24 documented the RN drained 500ml fluid from aspira drain. There is no physician’s order for aspira drain care. Patient 2: SW is ordered as once a month. No evidence of visit made in May 2024. Patient 3: SN ordered twice weekly. RN completed routine visits on 5/20, 5/22, 5/24. Patient 12: SC ordered twice monthly. Only one visit documented 4/29/24. SC visit opened on 4/25 with no visit made or assessment completed this date.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 337 words

    “Upon patient record review, 13 of 19 (Patient #1-13) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1-5, 7, 10-12: Vital signs on aide care plan without parameters. Patient 2: Identified as high fall risk with no fall precautions on aide care plan. Patient 3: Identified as high fall risk and aspiration risk. No fall precautions or aspirations precautions on aide care plan. Patient 4: Aide care plan included tasks complete bed bath, partial bed bath, shower, shampoo listed as “per frequency” instead of frequency provided. Patient 5: Aide task turn and reposition is listed as per frequency. Patient 6: Identified as high fall risk and aspiration risk. No fall precautions or aspirations precautions on aide care plan. Patient also on oxygen and has no oxygen precautions on aide care plan. Patient 8: Aide tasks bed bath, linen, shampoo, shave, turn and reposition- no frequencies. Patient taking eliquis without bleeding precautions on aide care plan. Patient 9: Aide tasks bed bath, linen, shampoo, shave turn and reposition without frequencies. Identified as high fall risk and aspiration risk. No fall precautions or aspirations precautions on aide care plan. Patient also on oxygen and has no oxygen precautions on aide care plan. Patient 10: Aide task ROM frequency is “if requested” Patient 13: Aide task turn and reposition without frequency. Patient taking eliquis without bleeding precautions on aide care plan.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 313 words

    “Upon patient record review 11 of 19 (Patient #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 1: ROM ordered every visit. Not performed on 5/13 and 5/15. VS ordered every visit. Not performed on 5/13, 5/14, 5/16, 5/17. Max assist with transfers ordered every visit. Not documented 5/16, 5/17, 5/20, 5/23, 5/24, 5/25, 5/31. Provide pivot assist with transfers ordered every visit. Not performed 5/16, 5/17, 5/25, 5/30, 5/31, 6/1 Patient 2: Shave is ordered every visit. Not performed 5/18, 5/23. Vital signs ordered every visit. Not performed on 5/18, 5/21, 5/23, 5/25, 5/28, 6/1. ROM ordered every visit. Not performed 5/21, 5/25, 5,28, 6/1, 6/4. Patient 3: VS ordered every visit. Not performed during any aide visit 5/13-6/3. Change linen ordered every visit. Not performed 5/13, 5/22, 5/31. Patient 4: ROM ordered every visit. Not performed 5/18, 5/25, 5/28, 5/30, 6/4 VS ordered every visit. Not performed 5/18, 5/21, 5/25, 5/28, 5/30, 6/4. Patient 5: ROM ordered every visit. Not performed 5/13, 5/15, 5/17, 5/29, 5/31, 6/3. Vital signs ordered every visit. Not performed 5/13, 5/15, 5/22, 5/29, 5/31, 6/3. Patient 6: Change linen ordered every visit. Not performed 5/31. Patient 7: ROM and vital signs ordered every visit. Not performed 5/22, 5/24, 5/29, 5/31. Patient 9: Mouth care ordered every visit. Not performed 5/13. Patient 11: ROM and VS ordered every visit. Not performed 5/21, 5/25, 5/28, 5/30, 6/1. Patient 12: Change linen ordered every visit. Not performed 5/6, 5/10, 5/13, 5/15, 5/17, 5/29. Patient 13: ROM and VS ordered every visit. Not performed 5/18, 5/25, 5/28, 5/30.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Upon patient record review 5 of 19 (Patient #1, 2, 4, 9, 11) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 1: Patient admitted 5/12/24. First aide visit 5/13/24. No evidence of aide supervisory visit performed. Patient 2: No evidence of aide supervisory visit from 4/24 to 5/15. Patient 4: No evidence of aide supervisory visit after 5/10/24. Patient 9: Aide supervisory visits documented 5/20/24 and 6/4/24. Patient 11: No evidence of aide supervisory visit between 4/23 and 5/15.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #4) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 4: There was no evidence of physicians order for level of care change: GIP, continuous care.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 2: Consents incomplete: advance directive section with several boxes not marked yes or no. Payor source section was not completed.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 8: Wound care order for left buttocks. Order does not include frequency or who is performing wound care.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patient #4, 6, 7, 8) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the following information to the SNF: • The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient • Hospice election form and any Advance Directives specific to each patient • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient • Names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in hospice care of each patient • Instructions on how to access the hospice’s 24-hour on-call system • Hospice medication information specific to each patient • Hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders specific to each patient”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 24, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Jun 6, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care15 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 9, 2009.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 79% at home, 20% in a nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.2%
Visits near death99.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Care Hospice, Inc. owns 100% directly since Oct 25, 2019.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: John B Hunter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.42%); Jesse Reo Moore (corporate officer); Jesse Reo Moore (managing employee (on the payroll)); Pedro Fabian Palomo (managing employee (on the payroll)); Adonis Zuniga-Goldwater (managing employee (under contract)); Bart K Valdez (corporate officer); Bart K Valdez (managing employee (on the payroll)); Grant Brown (corporate officer); Grant Brown (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dana K Reid (corporate officer); Dana K Reid (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Care Hospice, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Oct 25, 2019
Care Hospice Acquisition, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 25, 2019
Hospice Care Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Hospice Care Holdings, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Hospice Care Intermediate I, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Hospice Care Intermediate II, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Thl Equity Fund VIII Investors (Hospice Care), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies29.16%Dec 9, 2020
Thomas H. Lee Parallel Fund VIII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies27.44%Dec 9, 2020
Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund VIII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.07%Dec 9, 2020

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 93% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.57% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 79.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 18 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78041, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4.5; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.