Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Corpus Christi, Texas 78401

210 S Carancahua St Ste 303, Corpus Christi, Texas 78401. (361) 992-2700.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 29 hospices serving ZIP code 78401 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 25, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 25, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 304 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patients #2,#3,#6,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 2: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility profile contained multiple medications not on the hospice profile including: scheduled Coenzyme Q-10, Cranberry tablets, Miralax, Omega-3 tablets, and Systane eye drops; and PRN Milk of Magnesia, Preparation H, and lactulose. Corrected on site with order clarification and update to profile. Patient 3: The medication profile contained duplicative listings of Tylenol PRN instructions. Corrected on site with update to profile. Patient 6: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility profile contained scheduled calcium carbonate that was not on the hospice profile and did not contain scheduled Fosamax and Geri-Lanta that were on hospice profile. Also the dose of Vitamin D3 was 50 mcg per facility, 1250 mcg per hospice, facility route for hyoscyamine was sublingual not g-tube per hospice, facility dose of morphine was 5 mg, not 5-10mg per hospice, and multivitamin was Ocuvite Lutein not Women 50 Plus with Iron per hospice. Corrected on site with order clarification and update to profile. Patient 10: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility profile contained senna PRN instead of scheduled per hospice. The medication profile also contained duplicative listings of acetaminophen tab PRN and supp PRN, Benadryl PRN, bisacodyl supp PRN, Claritin scheduled, famotidine scheduled, fentanyl patch, hydrocodone-acetaminophen PRN, hyoscyamine PRN, lorazepam PRN, losartan scheduled, magnesium oxide scheduled, naproxen PRN, pioglitazone scheduled, prochlorperazine PRN, senna scheduled, sertraline scheduled. Duplicative listings were corrected on site with update to profile. Facility discrepancy corrected on site with order clarification received and update to profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 213 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patients #3,#4,#6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient diagnoses of heart failure and atrial fibrillation. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to cardiac dysfunction included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with plan of care update. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient history of seizures and dysphagia requiring mechanical soft diet. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to seizure precautions and dysphagia included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with plan of care update. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient history of seizures. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to seizure precautions included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with plan of care update.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patients #2,#6,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication orders did not match. The facility had multiple medication order that hospice did not have including: scheduled Coenzyme Q-10, Cranberry tablets, Miralax, Omega-3 tablets, and Systane eye drops; and PRN Milk of Magnesia, Preparation H, and lactulose. Corrected on site with order clarification. Patient 6: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication orders did not match. The facility had orders for scheduled calcium carbonate that hospice did not have and did not have orders for scheduled Fosamax and Geri-Lanta that hospice had. Also the ordered dose of Vitamin D3 was 50 mcg per facility, 1250 mcg per hospice, facility route for hyoscyamine was sublingual not g-tube per hospice order, facility dose of morphine was 5 mg, not 5-10mg per hospice order, and multivitamin was Ocuvite Lutein not Women’s 50 plus with Iron per hospice order. Corrected on site with order clarification. Patient 10: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication orders did not match. The facility had an order for senna PRN instead of scheduled per hospice order. Corrected on site with order clarification.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 249 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patients #1,#2,#4,#8,#9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 8/13/25 identifying patient use of a raised toilet seat. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with order received. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification assessment 6/25/25 identifying patient use of a hospital bed and overbed table. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with order received. Patient 4: The medical record contained an aide care plan identifying patient use of a walker, and social worker documentation 9/11/25 identifying use of a wheelchair. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with order received. Patient 8: The medical record contained an aide care plan identifying patient use of a shower chair. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with order received. Patient 9: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of a shower chair. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site with order received.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 96 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 8: The medical record contained an order to discontinue spiritual care visits 8/18/25. The current plan of care contained problems, goals, and interventions related to spiritual care to be completed by the chaplain. There was no evidence the plan of care was updated after services were discontinued. Corrected on site with plan of care update.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #8,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are specific to patient needs. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient requires a maximum assistance with transfers. There was no evidence of instructions for patient transport or ambulation included in the aide care plan. Corrected on site with update to aide care plan. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient requires two person assist with transfers and documentation 9/5/25 identifying patient’s wound was healed. There was no evidence of instructions for patient transfers included in the aide care plan, and there were current instructions regarding management of wound bandage. Corrected on site with update to aide care plan.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 25, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 23, 2007.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 37% at home, 37% in assisted living, 18% in a nursing facility, 8% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.6%
Visits near death97.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Curo Health Services LLC owns 100% directly since Jul 11, 2018.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Tracy Atchison (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jul 11, 2018
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)0%Jul 11, 2018

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.5% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 78.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 29 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78401, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.