Hearth Record

Camino De Luz Hospice Care

A hospice in Manati, Puerto Rico 00674

Carr Num 670 Km 1 8 Bo Cotto Norte Interior, Manati, Puerto Rico 00674. (787) 884-0786.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

18 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 20 hospices serving ZIP code 00674 had 9.5.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 11, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

18 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 24, 2024: recertification inspection by the state18 deficiencies
  • Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)

    The inspectors’ words, 294 words

    “Based on three Home Visit (HV) with records reviewed, ten records reviewed (RR), staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the clinical record contains current assessment and reassessments for each hospice patient related to nutritional and spiritual counselor for 1 out of 10 records reviewed (RR#2) 1. RR # 2 is a 101-year-old female who was admitted on 9/17/2024 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Acute Respiratory Failure. According to the medical record review performed on 10/24/2024 at 2:00 PM. The plan of care performed by the physician included a nutritional assessment. The following was found during the record reviewed: a. No evidence was found of a nutritional assessment from the day of admission on 9/17/2024 through 10/24/2024 where the record was reviewed. b. During interview with the nurse on charge of the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) process employee # 3 on 10/24/2024 stated that the patient was assessed by the nutritionist, but the related document (Nutritional History) was pending to attach in the medical record. c. The facility failed to ensure that the nutritionist made accessible and available their assessment document (Nutritional History) in the clinical medical record. d. The spiritual counselor conducted an initial bereavement assessment on 9/18/2024. During interview with employee # 3 on 10/24/2024 stated that, the follow up visit has a monthly frequency. The medical record did not present evidence of a follow up visit on 10/18/2024. Employee # 3 stated that the hospice provides time until the end of the month, even if the date of the follow up visit exceeds the 31 calendar days (one month). f. The facility failed to ensure that the spiritual counselor made accessible and available their follow up visit in the clinical medical record.”

    Rule L0520. Condition-level.

  • Infection control (42 CFR 418.60)

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Based on review of the manual of infection control with Institutional Programs (employee #4) on 10/24/2024 at 4:32 PM, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the maintenance and documentation of an infection control program that protects patients, families, and hospice staff through infection prevention and control with this condition Not Met. Findings include: During the review of the infection control manual with institutional program (employee #4) on 10/24/2024 at 4:32 PM, the following was found: The manual did not contain a program of policies and procedures for the prevention and control of infectious transmissions, and it was observed that the hospice did not have a plan in place for an infection prevention and control education program for the staff.”

    Rule L0577. Condition-level.

  • Core services (42 CFR 418.64)

    “Based on interview with Nursing Supervisor (employee # 1) on 10/23/2024 at 8:25 AM, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure core service are provide directly by hospice employee with counseling services which makes this Condition Not Met. Findings include: During the interview with the nursing supervisor (employee #1) on 10/23/2024 at 8:46 AM she stated that the spiritual counseling staff was under contracted services. The facility did not ensure that the spiritual counselor was part as an employee of the facility.”

    Rule L0587. Condition-level.

  • Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually (42 CFR 418.113(a))

    “Based upon an Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP) survey performed on 10/23/2024 from 10:30 AM to 2:45 PM, to evaluate emergency preparedness requirements, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an updated emergency preparedness plan. Findings include: During the review of the facilities Emergency Preparedness Program with the Clinical Supervisor (employee #1) on 10/23/2024 it was noted that the facility failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be updated at least every 2 years. Emergency Plan presented to Surveyor was dated 11/10/2021.”

    Rule E0004. Standard-level.

  • Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process (42 CFR 418.113(a)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Based upon an Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP) survey performed on 10/23/2024 from 10:30 AM to 2:45 PM, to evaluate emergency preparedness requirements, it was determined that the facility failed to include a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, State and Federal emergency preparedness officials effort to maintain an integrated response during s disaster or emergency situation. Findings include: During the review of the facilities Emergency Preparedness Program with the Clinical Supervisor (employee #1) on 10/23/2024 it was noted that the facility failed to include a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, State and Federal emergency preparedness officials as required under §418.113(a)(4) of the Emergency Preparedness.”

    Rule E0009. Standard-level.

  • Hospice Follow up for Staff (42 CFR 418.113(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 167 words

    “Based upon an Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP) survey performed on 10/23/2024 from 10:30 AM to 2:45 PM, to evaluate emergency preparedness requirements, it was determined that the facility failed to develop procedures to follow up with on- duty staff and patients to determine services that are needed, in event that there is an interruption in services during or due to an emergency. The hospice must inform State and local officials of any on-duty staff or patient that they are unable to contact. Findings include: During the review of the facilities Emergency Preparedness Program with the Clinical Supervisor (employee #1) on 10/23/2024 it was noted that the facility failed to have written procedures to follow up with on- duty staff and patients to determine services that are needed, in event that there is an interruption in services during or due to an emergency, also the hospice must inform State and local officials of any on-duty staff or patient that they are unable to contact as required under §418.113(b)(1).”

    Rule E0016. Standard-level.

  • Homebound HHA/Hospice Inform EP Officials (42 CFR 418.113(b)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 126 words

    “Based upon an Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP) survey performed on 10/23/2024 from 10:30 AM to 2:45 PM, to evaluate emergency preparedness requirements, it was determined that the facility failed to develop procedures to inform State and local emergency preparedness officials about patients in need of evacuation from their residences at any time due to an emergency situation based on the patients medical or psychiatric condition and home environment. Findings include: During the review of the facilities Emergency Preparedness Program with the Clinical Supervisor (employee #1) on 10/23/2024 it was noted that the facility failed to have written procedures not notify State and local emergency preparedness officials about patients in need of evacuation from their residences at any time due to an emergency as required under §418.113(b)(2).”

    Rule E0019. Standard-level.

  • Policies/Procedures-Volunteers and Staffing (42 CFR 418.113(b)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Based upon an Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP) survey performed on 10/23/2024 from 10:30 AM to 2:45 PM, to evaluate emergency preparedness requirements, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure policies and procedures to facilitate the support of volunteers and other healthcare professionals in an emergency. Findings include: During the review of the facilities Emergency Preparedness Program with the Clinical Supervisor (employee #1) on 10/23/2024 it was noted that the facility failed to stablished policies and procedures to ensure and facilitate the support of volunteers and other healthcare professionals in an emergency as required under §418.113(b)(4).”

    Rule E0024. Standard-level.

  • Roles Under a Waiver Declared by Secretary (42 CFR 418.113(b)(6)(C)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 126 words

    “Based upon an Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP) survey performed on 10/23/2024 from 10:30 AM to 2:45 PM, to evaluate emergency preparedness requirements, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and maintain policies and procedures related with the role of the facility under a waiver declared by the Secretary in accordance with section 1135 of the Act in the provision of care and treatment. Findings include: During the review of the facilities Emergency Preparedness Program with the Clinical Supervisor (employee #1) on 10/23/2024 it was noted that the facility failed to include policies and procedures which outline the facility’s role in the provision of care and treatment under section 1135 waivers during a declared public health emergency in alternate care sites as required under §418.113(b)(6)(C)(iv).”

    Rule E0026. Standard-level.

  • Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Based upon an Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP) survey performed on 10/23/2024 from 10:30 AM to 2:45 PM, to evaluate emergency preparedness requirements, it was determined that the facility failed to develop primary / alternate means for communication with staff, Federal, State regional and local emergency management agencies in compliance with Federal, State and local laws. Findings include: During the review of the facilities Emergency Preparedness Program with the Clinical Supervisor (employee #1) on 10/23/2024 it was noted that the facility failed to provide evidence of the Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan that included primary and alternate means for communicating with the facility staff, Federal, State, regional and local emergency management agencies under §418.113(c)(3).”

    Rule E0032. Standard-level.

  • EP Training and Testing (42 CFR 418.113(d))

    “Based upon an Emergency Preparedness Program (EPP) survey performed on 10/23/2024 from 10:30 AM to 2:45 PM, to evaluate emergency preparedness requirements, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program. Findings include: During the review of the facilities Emergency Preparedness Program with the Clinical Supervisor (employee #1) on 10/23/2024 it was noted that the facility failed to develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program based on the facilities risk assessment.”

    Rule E0036. Standard-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 284 words

    “Based on three home visit (H.V) with thirteen records reviewed (R.R), interviews and observations on 10/23/2024 through 10/24/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure to inform the patient and family/caregivers of the Medicare number needed to file a complaint and the patient rights are promoted related to security, dignity and privacy 1 out of 3 home visits (HV#3). Findings include: During home visits with quality registered nurses (employee #2) and (employee #3), the following were observed: 1. HV#1 is a 78-year-old male with admitted 06/14/2024 with Malignant Neoplasm, Extrahepatic Bile Duct. It was noted in the medical record that the certification was going for the second of ninety. He was under the services for physician visit 1 month and as needed (PRN), social work 1 month and PRN, spiritual counselor 1 month and PRN, licensed practical nurse 5 days a week and the registered nurse 2 days a week and as needed. a. On 10/23/2024 at 10:39 AM, the licensed practical nurse (LPN) was observed leaving the side rail down to fix the bed. 2. HV#3 is a 95-year-old female with admitted 09/06/2024 with Cerebral infarction with Chronic Neurologic deficits. It was noted in the medical record that the certification was going for the six episodes. She was under the services of physician visit 1 month and as needed (PRN), social work 1 month and PRN, spiritual counselor 1 month and PRN, Home maker 5 days a week and registered nurse 2 days a week and as needed. a. On 10/24/2024 at 9:52 AM, during the ulcer treatment procedure, it was observed that the registered nurse (employee #5) left the patient uncovered for approximately 5 minutes while preparing the treatment materials.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 196 words

    “Based on three Home Visit (HV) with records reviewed, ten records reviewed (RR), staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the clinical record contains current assessment and reassessments for each hospice patient related to nutritional and spiritual counselor. 1.Findings include: 1. RR # 2 is a 101-year-old female who was admitted on 9/17/2024 with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-COPD and Acute Respiratory Failure. According to the medical record review performed on 10/24/2024 at 2:00 PM. The plan of care performed by the physician included a nutritional assessment. The following was found during the record reviewed: a. During an interview with the nurse supervisor employee # 1 on 10/24/2024 stated that even when it was pending to attach the nutritional history document, the interdisciplinary team has a WhatsApp chat where the nutritionist sent the document of diet plan, dated on 9/19/2024. b. The facility failed to ensure a confidential clinical record and the protection of patient health information (PHI) as the WhatsApp is not HIPAA compliant and cannot be use to collect, receive or transmit PHI, lacks the control required to ensure the confidentiality, integrity and confidentiality of the PHI.”

    Rule L0516. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “Based on three home visit (HV) with records reviewed , ten records reviewed (RR) on 10/23/2024 through 10/24/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to follow the frequency of services necessary to meet the specific needs according to each patient’s individualized plan of care 1 out of 13 (HV-RR #3). Findings include: 1. HV#3 is a 95-year-old female with admitted 09/06/2024 with Cerebral infarction with chronic neurologic deficits. Was noted in the medical record that the certification was going for the six of sixty. He was under the services of physician visit 1 month and as needed (PRN), social work 1 month and PRN, spiritual counselor 1 month and PRN, Home maker 5 days a week and registered nurse 2 days a week and as needed. a. On 10/24/2024 at 1:13 PM, during the record review observation it was found that on the days 10/13/2024 to 10/26/2024 no visits from the home maker were found.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 202 words

    “Based on three home visit (H.V) with thirteen records reviewed (R.R) interviews and observations on 10/23/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure follow accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable disease for 1 out of 3 (HV-RR#1). Findings include: During home visit with quality registered nurse (employee #2) on 10/23/2024 at 10:20 AM, the following was observed: 1. HV#1 is a 78-year-old male with admitted 06/14/2024 with Malignant neoplasm, Extrahepatic Bile Duct. It was noted in the medical record that the certification was going for the second of ninety. He was under the services of physician visit 1 month and as needed (PRN), social work 1 month and PRN, spiritual counselor 1 month and PRN, licensed practical nurse 5 days a week and registered nurse 2 days a week and as needed. a. During the home visit it was observed that the licensed practical nurse (employee #6) did not use soap and water or hand sanitizer at each glove change. b. During the patient’s bed bathing procedure, the licensed practical nurse (employee #6) did not perform the 3 water changes and did not ask him if he wanted to wash his head and mouth.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 277 words

    “Based on three (3) Home Visits (H.V.) with record reviewed, ten (10) Records Reviewed (R.R), review of policy and procedure, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the clinical records contain the Initial plan of care, initial assessment, comprehensive assessment, updated comprehensive assessment, and clinical notes. One (1) of thirteen (13 ) records review (R.R. #6). Findings include: R.R. #6 is an 78 year- old old female was admitted on 03/06/2024 with a Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease End Stage Late Stage, Bedridden, Severe Dysphagia with PEG #22, Stiffness of upper and lower limps, Urinary and Fecal Incontinence, Sacral pressure area and left heel, Dehydration, Weight loss and Appetite. According to the medical record review performed on 10/24/2024 at 1:05 P.M. provided evidence that patient was plan of care performed by the physician and the Interdisciplinary group on 03/07/2024 and establish that nursing service provide 2 visit per week an as necessary (PRN), the Physician 1 visit per month and PRN, the Social Worker 1 visit per month and PRN and the Spiritual counselor 1 visit per month and PRN. The following was found during the record reviewed: a. No evidence was found related to ’’ Initial Evaluation performed by the Spiritual Counselor on 03/06/2024. b. According of the patient record the first monthly visit performed per the Spiritual Counselor was 07/18/2024 and them on 08/29/2024 twelve days later. No evidence of monthly visits on 09/18/2024 and 10/18/2024. c. During interview with the Nurse Supervisor employee #1 on 10/24/2024 at 1:30 P.M. she stated: ’’ The Spiritual Counselor submitted the resignation with effective date on March 11/2024.’’ The facility lacks Spiritual Counselor until June 2024.”

    Rule L0672. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 216 words

    “Based on review of fifteen (15) credential files (C.F) with the nurse supervisor (employee #1) performed on 10/23/2024 from 9:30 AM, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that 6 out of 15 employees who provide services have updated credential files related to Register Nurses (RN), Practical Nurse, Dietitian, Speech Therapy, Occupational Therapist and Physical Therapist, lack of Influenza Vaccines, Annual Membership and Annual Evaluation. (CF#7,#9, #10, #11, #12,#13). Findings include: 1. Review of fifteen (15) credential files (C.F) of the hospice on 10/23/2024 from 9:30 AM till 2:30 PM provided evidence of the following: a. Five out of fifteen (15) credential files did not contain evidence of updated Annual Evaluation (Dietitian C.F #9, Respiratory therapist C.F #10, Speech therapy C.F #11, Occupational therapist C.F #12 and Physical therapist C. F #13 ). b. One out of fifteen (15) credential files did not contain evidence of updated Health Certificate expired on 07/20/2024, ( Occupational therapist C.F #12). c. Two out of fifteen (15) credential files did not contain evidence of updated Influenza Vaccines, (Speech Therapist C.F #11 and Physical Therapist C.F #13). d. Two out of fifteen (15) credential files did not contain evidence of updated CPR ( Practical Nurse C.F. #7 expired on 10/21/2024 and Speech Therapy C.F #11 expired on 07/2024 ).”

    Rule L0793. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Based on recertification survey, the review of fifteen personnel credential files (C.F) on 10/23/2024 at 10:00 AM with the facility nurse supervisor it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that 1 out of 15 employees providing services, have the criminal background check. ( R.N. #2). Findings include: On 10/23/2024 at 10:00 A.M during review of the credential files it was identify the following: a. Register Nurse Credential File (RN) #2, no evidence was provided of the certified negative criminal back ground check (Ley 300)”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 11, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Oct 24, 2024Recertification inspection by the state18 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 28, 2000.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 18.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 62% at home, 38% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day18.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.1%
Visits near death91.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 10 owners or officers are people: Manuel Santiago (owns 5% or more directly, 60%); Manuel Santiago (corporate officer, 60%); Manuel Santiago (corporate director, 60%); Manuel Santiago (managing employee (on the payroll), 60%); Nancy E Serpa (owns 5% or more directly, 40%); Nancy E Serpa (corporate officer, 40%); Nancy E Serpa (corporate director, 40%); Nancy E Serpa (managing employee (on the payroll), 40%); Robin Santiago Delgado (corporate director, 0%); Manuel Santiago Carrion (runs it (operational or managerial control)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.55% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 56.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 20 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 00674, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9.5; this one had 18.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.