Hearth Record

Concordia Hospice of Bethlen

A hospice in Ligonier, Pennsylvania 15658

135 Kalassay Drive, Ligonier, Pennsylvania 15658. (724) 238-2613.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 14 hospices serving ZIP code 15658 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 17, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 13, 2024: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 264 words

    “Based on review of agency policy/procedure, clinical records (CR), and staff (EMP) interview, the agency failed to conduct and initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death and incorporated findings in the plan of care for two (2) of two (2) bereavement records reviewed (CR 1 & 2). Findings included: Review of agency policy/procedure on 9/13/24 at approximately 10:30am revealed: “SUBJECT: Bereavement...Pre-Death: 1. The initial bereavement assessment is completed at time of admission or MSW/Bereavement evaluation and is updated as needed during the course of care, at time of death, and during bereavement follow-up...Following the Death: ...2. Concordia Hospice of Bethlen staff may make a bereavement visit to the bereaved and assess for the need of additional support or interventions as determined by the plan of care., 3. The initial bereavement assessment will be updated as needed by the Bereavement coordinator, Social Worker, or designee...” Review of clinical records on 9/12/24 at approximately 11:25am revealed: CR1, dates reviewed from election of benefits on 3/15/24 through date of death 3/23/24. CR failed to include documentation of initial bereavement assessment or incorporation of bereavement needs into plan of care. CR2, dates reviewed from election of benefits 3/14/24 through date of death 3/18/24. CR failed to include documentation of initial bereavement assessment or incorporation of bereavement needs into plan of care. Findings confirmed at exit interview conducted with Quality Manager, Director of compliance and Education, and Informatics Specialist on 9/13/24 at approximately 3:00pm.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 863 words

    “Based on review of agency policy/procedure, personnel files (PF), and staff (EMP) interview, the agency failed to develop a plan of care (POC) that included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions for seven (7) of eleven (11) CR reviewed (CR 5-11). Findings included: Review of CR on 9/13/24 between approximately 10:30am and 3:00pm revealed: CR5, election of benefits (EOB) 5/6/24, dates reviewed 5/6/24-9/13/24. Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) Plan of Care (POC) update included the following updates effective 7/26/24: “Changes to discipline frequency: ... MSW (Medical Social Worker) 1-4x Month x3 Months, CH (Chaplain) 1x Week x 13 weeks, ...Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care, ...Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustments to care and develop a plan of care...” CR failed to include POC developed by MSW or CH. CR6, EOB 6/11/24, dates reviewed 6/11/24-9/13/24. IDG POC update included the following updates effective 8/25/24: “Changes to discipline frequency: ... MSW 1-4x Month x3 Months, CH 1-4x Month x 3 Months. Also, updates effective 8/14/24 and 8/27/24: “Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care, ...Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustments to care and develop a plan of care...” CR failed to include POC developed by MSW or CH. CR7, EOB 9/6/24, dates reviewed 9/6/24-9/13/24. POC dated 9/4/24 included: “MSW effective 6/30/24: 2 week 1, CH effective 6/30/24: 1 week 1, ...Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustments to care and develop a plan of care, ...Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care...” 7/26/24 order: MSW 1 x Month, 7/28/24 order: MSW 1 every 2 weeks x2. CR failed to include POC developed by MSW or CH. CR8, EOB 6/28/24, dates reviewed 6/28/24-9/13/24. POC dated 6/28/24 included: “MSW 1 time a month for 3 months, CH 1 time a month for 3 months, ...Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustments to care and develop a plan of care, ...Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care...” CR failed to include POC developed by MSW or CH. CR9, EOB 6/27/24, dates reviewed 6/27/24-9/13/24. POC dated 6/27/24 included: “MSW effective 6/30/24: 1 week 1, CH effective 6/30/24: 1 week 1, ...Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustments to care and develop a plan of care, ...Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care...” Order 7/1/24: “Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustments to care and develop a plan of care...Goals: A Medical Social Worker Plan of Care will be established... MSW effective 1 week 13...” Order 7/2/24: “Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care. Goal: A chaplain Plan of Care will be established...” Visit schedule confirmed MSW visits conducted 7/1/24, 7/10/24, 7/17/24, 7/24/24, 7/31/24, and 9/4/24. Chaplin visits conducted 7/2/24, 8/7/24, 8/22/24, and 9/12/24. CR failed to include POC developed by MSW or CH. CR10, EOB 9/6/24, dates reviewed 9/6/24-9/13/24. POC dated 9/6/24 included: “MSW effective 9/8/24: 1 week 1, 1 every 4 week 8, CH effective 9/8/24: 1 week 1, 1 every 4 week 8, ...Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustments to care and develop a plan of care, ...Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care...” Order 9/11/24: “Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustments to care and develop a plan of care... Goal: A Medical Social Worker Plan of Care will be established... MSW effective 9/8/24 5 week 1, 1 every 4 week 8...” Visit schedule confirmed MSW and CH visits conducted 9/9/24. CR failed to include POC developed by MSW or CH. CR11, EOB 8/21/24, dates reviewed 8/21/24-9/13/24. POC dated 8/21/24 included: “MSW effective 8/25/24: 1 week 1, CH effective 1 week 1...Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustments to care and develop a plan of care, ...Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care...” Order 8/23/24: “Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care. Goal: A chaplain Plan of Care will be established...” Order 8/28/24: “Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustments to care and develop a plan of care... Goal: A Medical Social Worker Plan of Care will be established... MSW effective MSW 1 time a month for 3 months and PRN (as needed) for additional social and emotional support and end of life care planning...” Findings confirmed at exit interview conducted with Quality Manager, Director of compliance and Education, and Informatics Specialist on 9/13/24 at approximately 3:00pm.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 258 words

    “Based on review of agency policy/procedure, clinical records (CR), and staff (EMP) interview, the agency failed to develop a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery for two (2) of two (2) bereavement records reviewed (CR 1 & 2). Findings included: Review of agency policy/procedure on 9/13/24 at approximately 10:30am revealed: “SUBJECT: Bereavement...Pre-Death: 1. The initial bereavement assessment is completed at time of admission or MSW/Bereavement evaluation and is updated as needed during the course of care, at time of death, and during bereavement follow-up...Following the Death: ...2. Concordia Hospice of Bethlen staff may make a bereavement visit to the bereaved and assess for the need of additional support or interventions as determined by the plan of care., 3. The initial bereavement assessment will be updated as needed by the Bereavement coordinator, Social Worker, or designee...” Review of clinical records on 9/12/24 at approximately 11:25am revealed: CR1, dates reviewed from election of benefits on 3/15/24 through date of death 3/23/24. CR failed to include a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. CR2, dates reviewed from election of benefits 3/14/24 through date of death 3/18/24. CR failed to include a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. Findings confirmed at exit interview conducted with Quality Manager, Director of compliance and Education, and Informatics Specialist on 9/13/24 at approximately 3:00pm.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.78(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “Based on review of agency policy/procedure, personnel files (PF), and staff (EMP) interview, the agency failed to document and provide volunteer orientation and supervision in accordance with agency policy for two (2) of two (2) volunteer records reviewed (PF 8 & 9). Findings included: Review of agency policy/procedure on 9/13/24 at approximately 10:30am revealed: SUBJECT: Volunteer Program...2. Screening Qualifications...Two references required; three references preferred...4. Supervision, a. Volunteer are under supervision of the Volunteer Coordinator., b. The volunteer Coordinator’s supervisory responsibilities include: ... Monitoring of volunteer performance, providing coaching as needed, completing annual evaluations, and providing opportunities for feedback, Maintaining organized individual volunteer files that include documentation of background screening information, orientation and training documentation, and annual evaluations...” Review of PF on 9/10/24 at approximately 1:00pm revealed: PF8, date of hire 4/20/22 failed to include evidence of 2 references. File also failed to include evidence of annual evaluations for 2023 and 2024. PF9, date of hire 3/24/22 failed to include evidence of 2 references. File also failed to include evidence of annual evaluations for 2023 and 2024. Findings confirmed at exit interview conducted with Quality Manager, Director of compliance and Education, and Informatics Specialist on 9/13/24 at approximately 3:00pm.”

    Rule L0643. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 17, 2024Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Sep 13, 2024Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 27, 2009.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 3.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 30% at home, 47% in assisted living, 10% in a nursing facility, 13% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends3.9%
Visits near death90.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Concordia Care Network owns 100% directly since Apr 3, 2023.
  • 16 owners or officers are people: Erica Grubesky (corporate director); Leonard Quimby (corporate director); Michael Joseph Falbo (corporate director); Holly Brown Vareha (corporate director); Kristen Fuhrer (corporate director); Kim Kramer (corporate director); Martin Trettel (corporate director); Tammy Young (corporate officer); Tammy Young (corporate director); Dina Cecere Dosch (managing employee (under contract)); Lindsey Manns (managing employee (on the payroll)); Brian Hortert (corporate director); William P Malloy (corporate director); Judit Mayer (corporate director); Thomas Burian (corporate director); Misty Ingram (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Concordia Care NetworkOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 3, 2023

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 67% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 73% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 73.75% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 47.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 14 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 15658, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.