Hearth Record

Gentiva II

A hospice in Altoona, Pennsylvania 16602

400 Lakemont Park Boulevard, Suite 300, Altoona, Pennsylvania 16602. (814) 944-9724.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 12 hospices serving ZIP code 16602 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 17, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 17, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 296 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patients #1,#5,#6,#8,#11,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: The medication profile contained morphine scheduled hourly instead of as needed in error. Patient 5: The medication profile contained docusate scheduled twice daily, however the instructions identified the medication to be administered as needed if the patient did not have a bowel movement. Patient 6: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility profile contained a Biofreeze gel for knee pain scheduled twice daily for application that was not on the hospice profile. The hospice medication profile contained two listings of MiraLAX without instructions that the as needed dose is in addition to the scheduled dose. It was unclear if the scheduled dose 6/7/26 had been changed to as needed 7/10/26 but agency confirmed it was added without instructions specifying to be taken together. Patient 8: The medication profile contained nystatin topical with no area defined for administration. Patient 11: The medication profile contained Tylenol scheduled every 4 hours in error. The medication was a PRN, not scheduled. Patient 13: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility profile contained oxygen scheduled at bedtime in addition to the PRN order on the hospice profile, scheduled NovoLog in addition to the sliding scale order on hospice profile, and protonix twice daily instead of hospice frequency of once daily.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 6: The plan of care contained inaccurate problems, goals, and interventions related to oxygen use. The patient does not have oxygen.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 256 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patients #1,#5,#6,#8,#11,#13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The medication order for morphine was scheduled hourly instead of as needed. Agency confirmed this was in error. Patient 5: The medication order for docusate had conflicting frequencies of scheduled twice daily, however the instructions identified the medication to be administered as needed if the patient did not have a bowel movement. Patient 6: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication orders did not match. The facility contained an order for Biofreeze gel for knee pain scheduled twice daily for application that was not in the hospice record. The hospice medical record also contained two orders for MiraLAX without instructions that the as needed dose is in addition to the scheduled dose. It was unclear if the scheduled dose 6/7/26 had been changed to as needed 7/10/26. Patient 8: The medication order for nystatin had no area defined for administration. Patient 11: The medication order for Tylenol was scheduled every 4 hours instead of as needed. Agency confirmed this was in error. Patient 13: During home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication orders did not match. The facility had orders for oxygen scheduled at bedtime in addition to the PRN order, scheduled NovoLog in addition to the sliding scale order, and protonix twice daily instead of hospice frequency of once daily.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 7: The medical record contained an inappropriate order for catheter supplies. The patient has not had a catheter.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #3,#13,#17) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 3: The medical record contained an order for social worker visits once monthly. There was no evidence of a visit made in June. Patient 13: The medical record contained an order effective 6/8/26 for spiritual care visits twice in June. There was no evidence of a second visit completed. Patient 17: The medical record contained nursing documentation 12/16/25 identifying the RN instructed the patient’s wife to administer 2 tabs of Levsin and order was for 1 tab every 6 hours as needed.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #6) did not have evidence that the IDG documents the sharing of information between all disciplines providing care and services in all settings, whether the care and services are provided directly or under arrangement. Patient 6: The social worker documented receiving information from the facility that they were going to complete a urinalysis on the patient. There was no evidence the social worker updated the hospice RN.”

    Rule L0557. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    “Upon observation during 1 of 4 home visits, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. During a home visit with patient #6, the LPN placed clean equipment in same spot as they were positioned when dirty. There was no separation of clean and dirty areas on the barrier.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved Patient 17: The bereavement care plan contained task to make monthly phone calls. There was no evidence of phone calls completed in May and June.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #12) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 12: The medical record contained an order for aide visits five times weekly. There was no evidence of a fifth visit completed the week of 5/24/26.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 17, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 16, 2004.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 38% at home, 33% in assisted living, 29% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.9%
Visits near death95.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Southerncare Holdings, Inc. owns 100% directly since Feb 21, 2003.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Patrick D Rice (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate director, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (other role (CMS gives no detail), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Shannon Yingling (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate director, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Curo Hospice SC LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Ksoc Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 1, 2011
Southerncare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Feb 21, 2003
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 93% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.8% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 79.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 55 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 16602, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.