Hearth Record

Eden Hospice

A hospice in Oregon City, Oregon 97045

221 Molalla Avenue, Suite 102 & 120, Oregon City, Oregon 97045. (971) 256-6642.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 28 hospices serving ZIP code 97045 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 10, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 10, 2025: complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 519 words

    “Based on documentation review and interview, it was determined the agency failed to meet the requirements established by the Division and the CMS Conditions of Participation for hospice programs in providing Medical social services in a manner that is consistent with accepted standards of practice. An agency employee who did not have the required qualifications of a Medical Social Service provider was permitted to provide services to patients in Oregon. Findings:Review of the document titled “Medical Social Services Policy, Effective 7/18/2022” revealed the statement “Medical social services are provided by qualified individuals in accordance with the state’s Social Work Practice Act professional standards, the Eden Hospice job description and policies and procedure.” The agency failed to provide documentation that qualified Employee #1 to practice Social Work in the State of Oregon.Review of the document titled “JOB DESCRIPTION Medical Social Worker (MSW)” and signed by Employee #1 on 04/19/2023, revealed a section titled, “PROFESSIONAL REQUIREMENTS, #7 Maintains regulatory requirements, including federal, state, local regulations, and accrediting organization standards.” It also revealed a section titled “EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE, #1 Has a Master of Social Work degree ... or, # 2 Has a baccalaureate degree in social work ... or, #3 Has a baccalaureate degree ... other field related to social work ..., #4 Current valid state clinical social worker license if required by state regulations.” The agency failed to provide documentation of licensure from the Oregon State Board of Licensed Social Workers and evidence of completion of an education program that qualified Employee #1 to practice as a Medical Social Worker.Review of the document titled “ANNUAL EVALUATION MEDICAL SOCIAL WORKER (MSW), Date of Evaluation: 5/20/24,” revealed the statement, “Maintains regulatory requirements, including federal, state, local regulations, and accrediting organization standards.” Next to the statement is a column titled, “SCORING.” Within this column and next to the statement is revealed a check mark next to “Met.” Also, in this document under a section titled, “SUMMARY” it is revealed for goals and objectives for Employee #1 to “Continue to complete MSW degree.” The agency failed to provide documentation of licensure from the Oregon State Board of Licensed Social Workers.Review of personnel records of Employee #1 with a hire date of 05/01/2023 lacked documentation of licensure from the Oregon State Board of Licensed Social Workers.During an interview with the Executive Director and the HR Manager on 07/10/2025 at 3:00 PM, the above findings were presented. The HR Manager acknowledged that employment records for Employee #1 did not contain licensure from the Oregon Board of Social Workers nor documentation of meeting the education requirements for a Social Worker. The Executive Director stated that recently a hospice agency, located in Washington State, was acquired by this hospice. The previous administration assumed that because this MSW had a Washington license and was over-seen by an LCSW that this was valid for the MSW to see Oregon clients. When the new administration preformed an audit of employee records after the acquisition, it was discovered Employee #1 did not meet qualifications to practice Social Work in Oregon. Employee #1 stopped providing services to Oregon patients on February 12, 2025.”

    Rule L0787. Standard-level. From a complaint.

May 9, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient #8: The Election Statement reads: “I choose below physician as my attending physician. If s/he declines or fails to respond to this request to follow my care onto hospice within two business days, I choose the Hospice Medical Providers to manage my medical care related to my terminal illness and related conditions.” This Beneficiary chose their own attending physician from Kaiser (non-hospice physician). Agency did not have evidence of attempts to contact the attending physician of choice. Per Agency, they searched through emails and were unable to find.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 233 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 23 (Patients #1,2,5,6) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: During medication reconciliation on home visit, the hospice medication profile included Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tabs and B-12 supplement. The patient had acetaminophen 500 mg tabs and acetaminophen 160mg/5mL solution on hand and B-Complex supplement (not B-12) on hand. Additionally, patient had Zinc Lozenges, Compound W cream and Lidocaine patch in home. These were not listed on hospice medication profile. Corrected on Site. Patient #2: During medication reconciliation on home visit, the patient had Eliquis 5mg BID, Levothyroxine 50 mcg daily and Mira-lax 17gm daily. These medications were not on the hospice medication profile. Corrected on Site. Patient #5: During medication reconciliation on home visit, the ALF had Diclofenac 1% cream and melatonin 5mg marked discontinued on their medication administration record. The hospice medication profile showed these meds as current. Corrected on Site. Patient #6: During medication reconciliation on home visit, the patient had Tylenol 500mg on hand. This medication was not on the hospice medication profile. Corrected on Site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 146 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 23 (Patients #1,3,16,20) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #1: This patient was admitted on 3/25/25. The bereavement risk assessment was completed on 4/4/25 (>5days). Patient #3: This patient was admitted on 4/11/25. The bereavement risk assessment was completed on 5/6/25 (>5days). Patient #16: This patient was admitted on 1/24/25. The bereavement risk assessment was completed on 4/22/25 (>5days). Patient #20: This patient was admitted on 12/19/24. The bereavement risk assessment was completed on 12/26/24 (>5days).”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that the hospice follows the individualized plan of care developed in in collaboration with the attending physician (if any), the patient or representative, and the primary caregiver in accordance with the patient’s needs if any of them so desire. Patient #8: The Beneficiary chose their own attending physician from Kaiser (non-hospice physician). There was no evidence of collaboration of care with the attending physician in developing the POC.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #1) did not have evidence the plan of care (POC) must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: During medication reconciliation on home visit, the hospice POC included Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tabs and B-12 supplement. The patient had acetaminophen 500 mg tabs and acetaminophen 160mg/5mL solution on hand and B-Complex supplement (not B-12) on hand. Corrected on Site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 23 (Patients #2,3,5,7) did not have evidence the plan of care (POC) must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #2: This patient had a cane. This item was not included on the POC. Corrected on Site. Patient #3: This patient had a walker. This item was not included on the POC. Corrected on Site. Patient #5: This patient had an air mattress and wheel chair. These were not included on the POC. Corrected on Site. Patient #7: The record reflected that this patient had a cane. These were not included on the POC. Corrected on Site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #17) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care (POC). Patient #17: The POC indicated that the Hospice Nurse to provide wound care daily and PRN peri care to stage II cleanse with N/S, pat dry and cover. Instruct CG in wound care. The hospice nurse visit frequency is 2 x week. New order obtained. Corrected on Site.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 23 (Patients #5, 11,12) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care (POC) Patient #5: The aide care plan written instructions indicated the task of nail care every visit. The record indicated that this task was not performed on 5/7/25. Patient #11: The POC listed aide visit frequency of, 1wk2, 2wk12 (4/13/25). There have been no visits to current date by an aide. There is a coordination note by an aide on 5/7/25 that indicated missed visit note that read: “to stop visits for the time being.” There is no evidence of an order by to stop aide services. Patient #12: The aide written instructions (4/1/25) indicated the tasks of turning, bed bath, dressing, skin care, shaving, nail care, change linens and empty trash every visit. The record indicated that these tasks were not performed and had no evidence the RN had been informed.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 23 (Patients #2,15) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #2: The Election Statement start of care (SOC) indicated 4/2/25. The agency electronic medical record (EMR) indicated SOC as 4/4/25. Corrected on Site Patient #15: Election Statement indicated 3/5/25. The agency EMR indicated SOC of 3/6/25.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 23 (Patient #20) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information as follows: • The patient’s current plan of care”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 10, 2025Complaint inspection by the state1 deficiency cited
May 9, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 8, 2022.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 10.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 48% at home, 33% in assisted living, 5% in a skilled nursing facility, 14% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends10.4%
Visits near death90.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Empres Hospice, LLC owns 100% directly since Dec 1, 2021.
  • Empres Financial Services LLC and Eden Healthcare Management, LLC run it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Kimberly Scarpine (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Jennifer Kreighbaum (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Kirsten Carr (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Jamie Brown (corporate director, 100%); Julie Obert (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Michael J Miller (corporate officer, 100%); Glen R Patrizio (managing employee (on the payroll)); Brent Weil (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Empres Healthcare Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 1, 2021
Empres Home and Hospice LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 1, 2021
Greatbanc Trust CompanyOther role (CMS gives no detail)100%Dec 1, 2021
Midcap Financial TrustHolds 5% or more security interest100%Dec 1, 2021
Empres Financial Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Dec 1, 2021
Empres Hospice, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Dec 1, 2021
Eden Healthcare Management, LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Jan 1, 2023
Empres Healthcare Group, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 1, 2021

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 93.69% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 55.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 28 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 97045, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.