Hearth Record

Echo Hospice of Ohio LLC

A hospice in Gahanna, Ohio 43230

690 Taylor Road, Suite 110, Gahanna, Ohio 43230. (614) 929-7930.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 26 hospices serving ZIP code 43230 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 24, 2025: a complaint inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 24, 2025: complaint inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care3 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Upon home visit review, 1 of 5 (Patient #5) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 5: On the hospice medication profile there is an order for Prochlorperazine 10mg 1 tablet every 6 hours as needed, this medication is not on facility plan of care.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 4: There is documentation of a g-tube for enteral feedings. There are not supplies or items needed for enteral feedings and g-tube care listed on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 4: In the patient record there is documentation that the patient has a g-tube, on the plan of care there is not instructions for care of the g-tube with goals and interventions.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jan 9, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 276 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patients #1,2,3,4,10,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: Patient had an oxygen concentrator. Oxygen was not included on the medication profile. COS. Patient #2: During medication reconciliation in patients home, the meds being administered by caregiver were not included on the medication profile. They were, Eliquis, Atorvastatin, Clopidogrel, Sertraline, Loperamide, Insulin N, Metoprolol, Spirnolactone, Furosemide and Melatonin. COS. Patient #3: During medication reconciliation at facility where the patient resides, the meds on the hospice medication profile did not match facility med profile. Hospice had multiple entries for lorazepam 0.25 mL to give every 3 hours PRN, every 6 hours PRN and routine TID. Whereas, that facility had new order for 0.5mL every 6 hours. Also, the hospice medication profile for morphine indicated TID and Q1hr PRN. The facility medication profile indicated morphine Q6 hours. Additionally, the Cranberry tab was listed as 450 mg and the facility is giving 500 mg. COS. Patient #4: During medication reconciliation at facility the patient resides, The hospice medication profile indicated Lorazepam 5mg solution and the facility indicated lorazepam in tablet form. COS. Patient #10: The record reflected the patient had oxygen. Oxygen was not included on the medication profile. COS. Patient #11: The medication profile indicated Polyethylene Glycol 17gm powder order with no diluent. COS.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patients #1,2,3,4,10,11) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: Patient had an oxygen concentrator. Oxygen was not included on the Plan of Care. COS. Patient #2: During medication reconciliation in the patient home, the meds being administered by caregiver were not included on the Plan of Care. They were, Eliquis, Atorvastatin, Clopidogrel, Sertraline, Loperamide, Insulin N, Metoprolol, Spirnolactone, Furosemide and Melatonin. COS. Patient #3: The following medication patient is taking was not included on the Plan of Care. They are, Lorazepam 0.5mL every 6 hours, morphine sulfate every 6 hours, and Cranberry Tab 500 mg Daily. COS. Patient #4: The following medication patient is taking was not included on the Plan of Care, Lorazepam 5mg tablet (not solution). Patient #10: The record reflected this patient had oxygen. Oxygen was not included on the Plan of Care. COS. Patient #11: The Plan of Care indicated Polyethylene Glycol 17 gm powder order with no diluent. COS.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 113 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #2,3,6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #2: This patient had a wheelchair and bedside commode. These items were not included on the Plan of Care. COS. Patient #3: This patient had a fall mat, Hi-Lo Bed and bedside table. These items were not included on the Plan of Care. COS. Patient #6: The record reflected that this patient had an order for Duo-neb inhalation solution. There was no nebulizer machine listed as DME on the Plan of Care. COS.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #17,19) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient #17: This patient timeline is in 12 month timeline since patient passed. There is only phone call after death completed on the Bereavement Plan of Care. There is no evidence of 2,4,6,8,10,12 and 13 month follow-up as indicated in Bereavement Plan of Care. Patient #19: This patient is in the 3 month timeline since patient passed. There is no evidence of any follow-up as indicated in Bereavement Plan of Care.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #9,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patients #9 and #10: The POC listed the Aide visit frequency of 3X’s per week and PRN. There is no indication of PRN listed. COS.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care (POC) • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient #2: The POC listed the Aide visit frequency of 3X’s per week. For first Benefit Week there were only 2 visits on 12/26/24 and 12/27/24. COS.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #14) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel #14: The Volunteer did not have competency validation completed. There was a self-assessment only.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #2: The beneficiary elected to receive the “Patient Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items, Services, and Drugs”. The Patient Notification was not signed and dated by the beneficiary. There was a note by hospice employee that this form was handed to patient at start of care.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the following information: • Hospice election form • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient Patient #3: The patient file at the SNF facility did not include Hospice Election Form or current Certification of Terminal Illness. Corrected on Site”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 24, 2025Complaint inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care3 deficiencies cited
Jan 9, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited
Jul 30, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 19, 2022.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 22% at home, 14% in assisted living, 9% in a nursing facility, 55% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.5%
Visits near death93.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Lake Tay, Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 7, 2020.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Harvey Bullock (managing employee (on the payroll)); Nicole R Smith (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Christopher C Doyle (corporate director); Christopher Lackner (corporate officer); Christopher Lackner (corporate director); Kevin Michael Webb (owns 5% or more through other companies).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Lake Tay, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 7, 2020

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 63% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 64% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 57.74% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 52.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 26 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 43230, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.