Hearth Record

Reliable Hospice

A hospice in Las Vegas, Nevada 89129

7324 West Cheyenne Ave Ste. 6, Las Vegas, Nevada 89129. (844) 395-4694.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 74 hospices serving ZIP code 89129 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 20, 2025: an initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 20, 2025: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 519 words

    “It is required that the written Patient Bill of Rights includes the right to: Receive information about the services covered under the hospice benefit. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review and interview. In 6 of 6 (100%) clinical record review revealed that the agency did not ensure that the patients were notified verbally and in writing of their expected financial responsibility. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The patient was admitted on 10/15/2024. The financial responsibility form in the clinical record signed at admission, under payor source, listed Medicare (this was an initial site visit and these were nonbillable visits). Under the different levels of care listed, there were spaces to include the patient’s financial responsibility if there was any responsibility. The form was left blank and was signed at the bottom. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient was admitted on 10/14/2024. The financial responsibility form in the clinical record signed at admission, under payor source, listed Medicare (this was an initial site visit and these were nonbillable visits). Under the different levels of care listed, there were spaces to include the patient’s financial responsibility if there was any responsibility. The form was left blank and was signed at the bottom. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient was admitted on 01/07/2024. The financial responsibility form in the clinical record signed at admission, under payor source, listed Medicare (this was an initial site visit and these were nonbillable visits). Under the different levels of care listed, there were spaces to include the patient’s financial responsibility if there was any responsibility. The form was left blank and was signed at the bottom. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient was admitted on 10/09/2024. The financial responsibility form in the clinical record signed at admission, under payor source, listed Medicare (this was an initial site visit and these were nonbillable visits). Under the different levels of care listed, there were spaces to include the patient’s financial responsibility if there was any responsibility. The form was left blank and was signed at the bottom. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient was admitted on 10/06/2024. The financial responsibility form in the clinical record signed at admission, under payor source, listed Medicare (this was an initial site visit and these were nonbillable visits). Under the different levels of care listed, there were spaces to include the patient’s financial responsibility if there was any responsibility. The form was left blank and was signed at the bottom. CLINICAL RECORD 6: The patient was admitted on 09/03/2024. The financial responsibility form in the clinical record signed at admission, under payor source, listed Medicare (this was an initial site visit and these were nonbillable visits). Under the different levels of care listed, there were spaces to include the patient’s financial responsibility if there was any responsibility. The form was left blank and was signed at the bottom. In an interview with the Administrator on 02/19/2025 and 02/20/2025, the Administrator stated that Medicare is listed because that will be the patient’s payor source when they are able to bill and that it is implied that the patient has no financial responsibility.”

    Rule L0518. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 275 words

    “It is required that the patient’s pain is assessed as part of a comprehensive assessment. The documented assessment of the patient’s pain includes history of pain and its treatment, both pharmacological and non-pharmacological, use of a standardized pain assessment tool appropriate to the patient’s developmental and cognitive status, characteristics of the pain, including the location, frequency, and intensity, how pain impacts the patient’s ability to engage in usual activities and function and the patient’s/family’s goals for pain management and their satisfaction with the current level of pain control. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 3 (100%) clinical records reviewed, with pain as an active problem, the agency did not ensure the patient’s/family’s goals for pain management or their satisfaction with the current level of pain control were documented. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The comprehensive assessment dated 10/15/2024 included a pain assessment but did not include documentation of the patient’s/family’s goals for pain management or their satisfaction with the current level of pain control. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The comprehensive assessment dated 10/14/2024 included a pain assessment but did not include documentation of the patient’s/family’s goals for pain management or their satisfaction with the current level of pain control. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The comprehensive assessment dated 01/07/2024 included a pain assessment but did not include documentation of the patient’s/family’s goals for pain management or their satisfaction with the current level of pain control. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/19/2025, the DON agreed with the finding that the patient/family’s goals were not included but did not offer a reason why they were not included.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 445 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, supplements, herbal remedies, other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication review process includes the identification of the effectiveness of drug therapy, drug side effects, actual or potential drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and drug therapy associated with laboratory monitoring. The assessment includes evidence that common side effects of medication in the hospice populations are anticipated, and, as appropriate, preventive measurements are implemented to manage the side effects. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, observation, and interview. In 1 of 6 (17%) clinical records reviewed, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure the drug profile contained the patient’s current prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, supplements, herbal remedies, other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. Agency policy PC.M55, Medication Profile (2022), stated in part, “A patient-specific medication profile is maintained for each patient and reviewed at a minimum, every fifteen days. When the patient is admitted to hospice, a medication profile is initiated to document all of the patient’s prescription and over-the-counter drugs, herbal remedies, and all alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication profile must include all current patient medications, date prescribed or taken, name of medication, dose, frequency, drug classification, date discontinued, and any drug and/or food allergies. The patient’s medication profile is reviewed by the IDG whenever there is a significant change and, at a minimum, every fifteen days.” CLINICAL RECORD 3/Home Visit 1: During a home visit to observe the Social Worker (Personnel Record 3), the patient’s medications and equipment were reviewed. A nebulizer was noted on the patient’s dresser. In an interview, the patient stated that she used the nebulizer one to two times a year as needed. In an interview with the group home manager who administered the medications, the manager stated that the patient is forgetful and that he administered the nebulizer treatment with albuterol as needed for wheezing. The patient had resided in the group home for the last two and one-half years and the manager stated the patient was on the medication when she was admitted to the home. The Director of Nursing (DON) in an interview on 02/19/2025, stated that the group home did not let her know that the patient was on nebulizer treatments with Albuterol and agreed that the medication was not on the medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 339 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following: measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 6 (67%) clinical records reviewed, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure that measurable outcomes were anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The Plan of Care (POC) for the episode 10/15/2024 to 01/12/2025 identified pain as an active and potential problem. The goal was that pain would remain at a comfortable level until death/discharge. The patient’s comfort level was not defined thus the goal was not measurable. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The Plan of Care (POC) for the certification period of 10/14/2024 to 01/11/2025 included pain as an active problem, with interventions that included conducting a comprehensive pain assessment and identifying barriers to effective pain management. The goal was that pain would remain at a comfortable level until death/discharge. The patient’s comfort level was not defined thus the goal was not measurable. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The Plan of Care (POC) for the certification 01/07/2025 to 04/06/2025 included pain as an active problem. The documented interventions included assessment and monitoring pain and administration of pain medication per MD orders. The goal included, “Patient will remain comfortable during the entire care.” The patient’s comfort level was not defined thus the goal was not measurable. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The Plan of Care (POC) for the episode 10/09/2024 to 01/06/2025 identified anxiety/agitation and pain as problems with the goals of PCG will verbalize that anxiety and agitation are reduced to an acceptable level and PCG will verbalize understanding of non-verbal cues and patient’s pain will be managed throughout hospice care. The patient’s acceptable level was not defined thus the goal was not measurable. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/19/2025, the DON agreed the goals were not measurable.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 20, 2025Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 28, 2025.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 74 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89129, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.