Healing Hands Hospice
A hospice in Las Vegas, Nevada 89183
9728 Gilespie St Ste 26, Las Vegas, Nevada 89183. (702) 592-9149.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 18 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- Not available CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
18 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 62 hospices serving ZIP code 89183 had 6.
The last inspection on record was on Dec 3, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
18 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Dec 3, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care4 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 111 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 7 charts reviewed (Patient #1, #4, #5, #6, #7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient #1,4,5,6,7: There was no evidence a bereavement assessment was fully completed, there was no mention of the bereaved person and there was no bereavement risk score.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 110 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 7 charts reviewed (Patient #1) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient #1: The record indicated on 5/16/24 the patient reported “complaints of back pain but Tylenol does not help. Dr. Chang made aware and advised to start Ibuprofen 600mg po Q8hours prn. There was no evidence of RN follow up. There was no follow up until 5/20/24.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 246 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 7 records reviewed (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #1: The record indicated an MD order on 2/20/24 for a hospital bed with half side rails, wheel chair and Oxygen concentrator. There was no evidence of these items in the initial plan of care. COS. Patient #2: The record indicated an MD order on 10/23/24 for a hospital bed, wheel chair and oxygen. There was no evidence of these items in the initial plan of care. COS. Patient #3: The record indicated an MD order on 10/24/24 for a hospital bed with half side rails, wheel chair, walker, oxygen concentrator. There was no evidence of these items in the initial plan of care. COS. In addition, a hoyer lift was in the plan of care but there was no MD order. Both were COS. Patient #4: The record indicated an MD order on 02/18/24 for a hospital bed with half side rails and an oxygen concentrator. There was no evidence of these items in the initial plan of care. COS. Patient #5: The record indicated an MD order on 02/17/24 for a hospital bed with half side rails, APP mattress, wheel chair and oxygen concentrator. There was no evidence of these items in the initial plan of care. COS.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 7 records reviewed (Patient #2) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #2: The record indicated the patients start of hospice care was on 03/22/24. There was no evidence of the effective date on the election form.”
Oct 11, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies
-
Establishment of the Emergency Program (EP) (42 CFR 418.113)
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice complies with all applicable federal, state, and local emergency preparedness requirements by establishing and maintaining an emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of 42 CFR 418.113. COS.”
-
Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Preparedness plan: • Is based on and includes a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach • Includes strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment, including the management of the consequences of power failures, natural disasters, and other emergencies that would affect the hospice’s ability to provide care. COS.”
-
EP Program Patient Population (42 CFR 418.113(a)(3))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the The Emergency Preparedness plan addresses patient population, including, but not limited to: • The type of services the hospice has • The ability to provide in an emergency; and continuity of operations, including delegations of authority and succession plans COS.”
-
Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process (42 CFR 418.113(a)(4))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Preparedness plan includes a process for cooperation and collaboration with local, tribal, regional, state, and federal emergency preparedness officials’ efforts to maintain an integrated response during a disaster or emergency situation. COS.”
-
Arrangement with Other Facilities (42 CFR 418.113(b)(5))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence of contracts/agreements with other facilities/agencies/hospices to receive patients in the event the hospice cannot provide care to their patients during an emergency. COS.”
-
Names and Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(1))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan includes all of the following: • Names and contact information for the following: • Hospice employees • Entities providing services under arrangement • Patients’ physicians • Other hospices COS.”
-
Emergency Officials Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(2))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan must include a primary and alternate means for communicating with hospice’s employees; in addition, it must include contact information for Federal, state, tribal, regional, or local emergency preparedness staff. COS.”
-
Methods for Sharing Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(4))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan includes: • A method for sharing information and medical documentation for patients under the hospice’s care, as necessary, with other health care providers to maintain the continuity of care • A means, in the event of an evacuation, to release patient information as permitted under 45 CFR 164.510(b)(1)(ii) • A means of providing information about the general condition and location of patients under the facility’s care as permitted under 45 CFR 164.510(b)(4) COS.”
-
EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 114 words
“Upon personnel record review, 9 of 12 (Personnel #1,2,3,7,8,9,10,11,12) did not have evidence Emergency Preparedness training including: • Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing hospice employees, and individuals providing services under arrangement, consistent with their expected roles • Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures • Provide emergency preparedness training at least annually • Periodically review and rehearse its emergency preparedness plan with hospice employees (including nonemployee staff), with special emphasis placed on carrying out the procedures necessary to protect patients and others • Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training Agency prepared a completed EPP plan during this survey and has initiated training with staff. Partial COS.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 5 (Patients #1,2,3,4,5) did not have evidence the plan of care (POC) must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs Patients #1,2,3,4,5: The POC indicated Bereavement Coordinator (BC) frequency “one as needed”. There was no baseline visit frequency for the BC. Agency provided late entry clarification orders. COS.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 113 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 5 (Patients #1,2,3,4,5) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patients #1,2,3,4,5: These Aide assignments indicated 3 x weekly and PRN. This PRN frequency did not identify if the patient/caregiver is cognitively and functionally able to make a choice of the PRN determination. Agency obtained clarification of orders. COS.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 92 words
“Upon patient record review 3 of 5 (Patients #1,3,5) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care Patient #1: The POC listed Aide visit frequency of, 3 X’s per week. For first Benefit Week there were no visits provided by the Aide. Patients #3 and #5: The POC listed Aide visit frequency of, 3 X’s per week. For first Benefit Week, there were only 2 visits on 2/21/24 and 2/23/24.”
-
Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e))
“Upon contract review, 3 of 6 (contract PT/OT/ST) did not have evidence the agreement to furnish any services under arrangement included that the hospice must retain administrative and financial management, and oversight of staff and services for all arranged services, to ensure the provision of quality care. Arranged care/services are supported by written contract/agreement that requires all care/services are: • Delivered in accordance with the patient’s plan of care not included in contract.”
-
Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 5 (Patients #4, 5) did not have evidence that the discharge summary (DC) includes all required information. Patients #4, 5: Did not include that the patients current plan of care was included in DC Summary”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2024 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 4 deficiencies cited |
| Oct 11, 2024 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 14 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 11, 2024.
- CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 4 owners or officers are people: Abdon Ilagan (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Abdon Ilagan (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Aileen Mijares (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Aileen Mijares (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 62 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89183, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 18.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Mother’s Love Hospice | 7 |
| Healing Hands Hospice This hospice | 18 |
| Nathan Adelson Hospice | 15 |
| Southwest Medical Associates Hospice and Palliative Care | 0 |
| Physicians Choice Hospice | 5 |
| Harmony Hospice | 3 |
| Compassioncare Hospice | Not given |
| Comfort Hospice | Not given |
| Infinity Hospice Care | 2 |
| Hospice Del Sol | 10 |
| Traditions Health | 10 |
| Enhabit Hospice | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.