Hearth Record

Sierra Hospice & Palliative Care of Nevada, LLC

A hospice in Las Vegas, Nevada 89147

9183 W. Flamingo Road, Ste 100, Las Vegas, Nevada 89147.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 83 hospices serving ZIP code 89147 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 4, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 4, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner2 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 345 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care, in accordance with CMS §418.24–the elements of the hospice care election statement. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 14 (21%) clinical records reviewed that received hospice services at least five (5) days revealed the agency did not ensure that the hospice interdisciplinary group (IDG) completed an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/10/2026. The record lacked evidence of the spiritual counselor (SC) completing an initial assessment within the five (5) day window. The record also lacked evidence of the patient/family refusing or postponing the SC initial patient assessment during the 5-day window. There was evidence of a Spiritual initial assessment completed by the SC on 01/17/2026 (Day 7). CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/03/2025. The record lacked evidence of the spiritual counselor (SC) completing an initial assessment within the five (5) day window. The record also lacked evidence of the patient/family refusing or postponing the SC initial patient assessment during the 5-day window. There was evidence of a Spiritual initial assessment completed on 01/17/2026 (Day 11). CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/02/2025. The record lacked evidence of the spiritual counselor (SC) completing an initial assessment within the five (5) day window. The record also lacked evidence of the patient/family refusing or postponing the SC initial patient assessment during the 5-day window. There was evidence of a Spiritual initial assessment completed on 10/09/2025 (Day 7). The Administrator/Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS)/Nurse Practitioner (NP), Alternative DPCS/Registered Nurse Case Manager (RNCM), and Alternate Administrator/Master of Social Work/Bereavement Coordinator/Volunteer Coordinator stated in an interview on 06/3/2026 that the SC did not complete the initial Spiritual assessment within the required initial 5-day comprehensive assessment.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 619 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 14 of 14 (100%) clinical records reviewed that received hospice services at least five (5) days revealed the agency did not ensure that an initial bereavement assessment was completed as part of the initial comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/28/2026. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/04/2026. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/19/2026. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/25/2026. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 01/10/2026. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/29/2025. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/03/2025. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/24/2026. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/17/2025. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/31/2025. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/02/2025. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 12: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/04/2025. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 05/18/2026. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. CLINICAL RECORD 14: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/28/2026. The clinical record lacked evidence of a completed initial bereavement assessment as part of the comprehensive assessment. The Administrator/Director of Patient Care Services (DPCS)/Nurse Practitioner (NP), Alternative DPCS/Registered Nurse Case Manager (RNCM), and Alternate Administrator/Master of Social Work/Bereavement Coordinator/Volunteer Coordinator stated in an interview on 06/3/2026 that the clinical records were missing an initial bereavement assessment as required by regulation during the 5-day comprehensive assessment window. The Administrator/DPCS/NP stated, “The initial bereavement assessment has been added to all existing active patients and is now set-up to be assigned to the admission RN and will be completed as required.” It was also stated that the Bereavement Coordinator / MSW had been doing an initial bereavement assessment of sorts on an excel spreadsheet just not officially in the record - the EMR had changed and so that’s why it got missed. The bereavement assessment was immediately added to the clinical records before the visit ended.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 4, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 29, 2023.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 66% at home, 10% in assisted living, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 23% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.6%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Shpc Holdings, LLC owns 75% directly since Aug 8, 2022.
  • Shpc Holdings, LLC runs it.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Vincent Chiarelli (owns 5% or more through other companies, 25%); Vincent Chiarelli (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Max Dhoua Thao (owns 5% or more through other companies, 25%); Max Dhoua Thao (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Nathan Kaplan (owns 5% or more through other companies, 25%); Nathan Kaplan (runs it (operational or managerial control), 25%); Philip Gallinaro (owns 5% or more directly, 15%); Philip Gallinaro (runs it (operational or managerial control), 15%); Joseph Michael Gallinaro (owns 5% or more directly, 10%); Joseph Michael Gallinaro (runs it (operational or managerial control), 10%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Shpc Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more directly75%Aug 8, 2022
Shpc Holdings, LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)75%Aug 8, 2022

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 87.69% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 83 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89147, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.