Hearth Record

Choice Hospice

A hospice in Las Vegas, Nevada 89119

215 E Warm Springs Rd, Ste 104, Las Vegas, Nevada 89119. (702) 752-9178.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 86 hospices serving ZIP code 89119 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 6, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 6, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan must includes a primary and alternate means for communicating with hospice’s employees and Federal, state, tribal, regional, and local emergency management agencies. The emergency communication plan did not contain evidence of alternate means of communication with federal, state, tribal, regional, and local emergency management agencies.”

    Rule E0032. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #3) Upon review of the patient’s medication profile reconciled with his medications at home, the patient’s medication profile did not contain evidence of the following: a) Hydralazine 100 mg, 1 tab oral daily, b) Lantus 14 units, subcutaneous two times a day, 3) Polyethylene Glycol 17 grams daily as needed for constipation, 4)Losartan Potassium, 100 mg oral daily. Patient’s spouse confirmed patient takes these medications daily.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “Upon patient record review, 14 of 14 (Patients # 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient’s # 1- 14) There was no evidence of documentation regarding scope for PRN visits for Nursing, MSW, and Chaplain on the patients’ plan of care. PRN frequencies only are not acceptable and 18 PRN per discipline does not meet the specific patient and family needs.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 438 words

    “Upon patient record review, 13 of 14 (Patients # 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #1) Patient’s plan of care dated 9/21/23 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included a hospital bed, overbed table, 02 concentrator, and wheelchair. Patient #2) Patient’s plan of care dated 5/19/24 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included a hospital bed, bed rails, and wheelchair. Patient #3) Patient’s plan of care dated 7/30/25 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included a walker, wheelchair, 02, overbed table. Patient #4) Patient’s plan of care dated 3/4/25 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included a walker. Patient #5) Patient’s plan of care dated 6/3/25 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included a wheeled walker, non-wheeled walker, and wheelchair. Patient #7) Patient’s plan of care dated 3/7/25 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included a bedside commode and walker. Patient #8) Patient’s plan of care dated 3/13/25 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included a walker and wheelchair. Patient #9) Patient’s plan of care dated 4/17/25 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included bedrails, hospital bed, overbed table, 02 concentrator, and gel overlay. Patient #10) Patient’s plan of care dated 7/9/25 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included an overbed table, 02 concentrator, and wheelchair. Patient #11) Patient’s plan of care dated 7/9/25 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included an overbed table, 02 concentrator, 02 cylinder, and wheelchair. Patient #12) Patient’s plan of care dated 11/7/23 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included bed rails, hospital bed, overbed table, 02 concentrator, and wheelchair. Patient #13) Patient’s plan of care dated 7/12/24 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included a shower chair. Patient #14) Patient’s plan of care dated 8/12/24 did not contain patient equipment. The patient’s equipment listed in the initial comprehensive assessment included a hospital bed, overbed table, 02 concentrator, and walker.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The 2024 annual cost savings report to the governing board reflected a 4% cost savings.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(5))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 11 (Personnel # 5) did not have evidence all Occupational Therapy Services are provided by a qualified licensed Occupational Therapist (OT) in accordance with the state’s Occupational Therapy Practice Act and the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions. Personnel #5) The contracted OT did not have evidence of current licensure.”

    Rule L0789. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 11 (Personnel # 5) did not have evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records. Personnel # 5) Personnel file did not contain evidence of a criminal background check upon hire.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 11 (Personnel #11) did not have evidence of criminal background checks being obtained in accordance with state requirements. In the absence of state requirements, criminal background checks are obtained within three months of the date of employment for all states that the individual has lived or worked in the past 3 years. Personnel # 11) Personnel file did not contain evidence of a criminal background check upon hire.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

Jul 11, 2025: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 383 words

    “Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the agency failed to ensure that medications listed on the hospice agency’s medication list were the same medications listed on the nursing facility’s medication list for two of 10 patients (Patient (P)4 and P1) whose medications were reviewed out of a total sample of 14. This had the potential to cause P4 and P1 to suffer adverse drug events.Findings include: 1. During a review of P4’s “Physician’s Orders” in P4’s group home revealed P4 did not have an order for Adult Tussin Chest Congestion (a cough medication) 100 mg/5 ml (100 milligrams per 5 milliliters) oral liquid give 10 ml every four hours as needed.Review of P4’s “Client Medication Sheet,” dated for the certification period of 06/24/2025 to 09/21/2025 and provided by the agency, revealed P4 had an active order for Adult Tussin Chest Congestion 100 mg/5 ml oral liquid give 10 ml every four hours as needed.During an interview on 07/11/2025 at 11:40 AM, Registered Nurse (RN)1 stated, “I must have forgotten to mark this order as being discontinued on our paperwork in the office.”2. During a review of P1’s “Medication Sheet” of active orders for the month of July 2025, in P1’s group home, it was revealed the patient was being given Metoprolol Tartrate (a blood pressure medication) 25 mg (milligram) half tablet by mouth twice a day.Review of P1’s “Client Medication Report” dated for the certification period of 04/17/2025 to 07/15/2025 and provided by the agency, revealed Metoprolol Succinate ER (extended release) 25 mg one tablet by mouth twice a day.During an interview on 07/10/2025 at 1:30 PM, Registered Nurse (RN)1 RN1 stated, “I was not aware the Metoprolol had been changed. I will have to call the doctor about this.” RN1revealed the medication report was reviewed at P1’s group home with staff once a month. The Director of Nursing was not available for interview.During an interview on 07/11/2025 at 8:15 PM, the Administrator stated, “I expect the nurses to check our medication profile with the group home’s medication list to make sure they are accurate.”Review of the agency’s policy titled, “Medication List and Monitoring,” dated 09/01/2024, revealed, “…The Hospice registered nurse (RN)…creates and maintains a current medication/drug profile and reviews all patient medications both prescription and non-prescriptions, on an ongoing basis…””

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1)(i)-(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 460 words

    “Based on record review, interview, and agency policy review, the hospice agency failed to ensure that the required individuals (physician, registered nurse (RN), social worker, and/or chaplain) had documented signatures to indicate they attended the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meetings for four of 10 patients (Patient (P)1, P2, P8, and P9) out of a total sample of 14. This failure had the potential for the staff not to have knowledge of the patient’s plan of care.Findings include: Review of the agency’s policy titled, “Interdisciplinary Group (IDG/IDT)/Core Services,” dated 09/01/2024, indicated, “…The IDG/IDT must include, but is not limited to individuals who are qualified in the following professional roles. They will include at least: A. One physician who is a Doctor of Medicine or Osteopathy (may be [sic] a contract employee);B. One registered nurse;C. A social worker or mental health counselor or marriage and family therapist;D. A pastor or counselor (which includes bereavement, dietary and/or spiritual counseling services) …”1. Review of P1’s agency provided “Patient Information Report” revealed P1 was admitted to hospice services on 04/17/2025 with the terminal illness of senile degeneration of the brain.Review of P1’s “IDT Meeting Minutes,” dated 04/29/2025, indicated no evidence that the social worker or chaplain attended the meeting due to no signature on the sign in sheet.2. Review of P2’s agency provided “Patient Information Report” revealed P2 was admitted to hospice services on 03/04/2025 with the terminal illness of senile degeneration of the brain.Review of P2’s “IDT Meeting Minutes,” dated 03/17/2025, indicated no evidence that the physician attended the meeting due to no signature on the sign in sheet.3. Review of P8’s agency provided “Patient Information Report” revealed P8 was admitted to hospice services on 1/17/2025 with the terminal illness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of P8’s “IDT Meeting Minutes,” dated 03/17/2025, indicated no evidence that the physician attended the meeting due to no signature on the sign in sheet.4. Review of P9’s agency provided “Patient Information Report” revealed P9 was admitted to hospice services on 03/13/2025 with the terminal illness of malignant neoplasm of the colon.Review of P9’s “IDT Meeting Minutes,” dated 04/15/2025, indicated no evidence that the social worker attended the meeting due to no signature on the sign in sheet.During an interview on 07/11/2025 at 3:00 PM, the Medical Director stated, “If I attend in person, I will sign the sheet for the meeting. If I attend by Zoom, then someone at the office will have to sign the sheet for me since I am not there in person.”During an interview on 07/11/2025 at 8:15 PM, the Administrator stated, “I do know the social worker was unable to attend a couple of the IDG meetings because the social worker is in the reserves. I don’t remember about the medical director not attending.””

    Rule L0541. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 1,303 words

    “Based on record review, interview and policy review, the agency failed to develop an individualized plan of care for 10 of 10 patients (Patient (P)1, P2, P3, P4, P5, P6, P7, P8, P9, and P10) whose records were reviewed for plan of cares out of a total sample of 14. This failure had the potential for these patients not to receive the individualized care they needed.Findings include: 1. Review of P1’s “Patient Information Report,” provided by the agency, revealed P1 was admitted to hospice services on 04/17/2025 with the terminal illness of senile degeneration of the brain.Review of P1’s “Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” located under the “Patient Chart” tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) and dated for the certification period of 04/17/2025 to 07/15/2025, revealed, “Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) to evaluate patient and develop a nursing plan of care. Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustment to care and develop a plan of care. Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care . . .” 2. Review of P2’s “Patient Information Report,” provided by the agency, revealed P2 was admitted to hospice services on 03/04/2025 with terminal illness of senile degeneration of the brain.Review of P2’s “Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” located under the “Patient Chart” tab in the EMR and dated for the certification period of 03/04/2025 to 06/01/2025, revealed, “Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) to evaluate patient and develop a nursing plan of care. Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustment to care and develop a plan of care. Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care . . .”3. Review of P3’s “Patient Information Report,” provided by the agency, revealed P3 was admitted to hospice services on 03/04/2025 with the terminal illness of Parkinson’s Disease.Review of P3’s “Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” located under the “Patient Chart” tab in the EMR and dated for the certification period of 03/04/2025 to 05/02/2025, revealed, “Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) to evaluate patient and develop a nursing plan of care. Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustment to care and develop a plan of care. Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care . . .”4. Review of P4’s “Patient Information Report,” provided by the agency, revealed P4 was admitted to hospice services on 06/24/2024 with the terminal illness of senile degeneration of the brain.Review of P4’s “Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” located under the “Patient Chart” tab in the EMR and dated for the certification period of 06/24/2024 to 09/21/2024, revealed, “Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) to evaluate patient and develop a nursing plan of care. Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustment to care and develop a plan of care. Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care . . .”5. Review of P5’s “Patient Information Report,” provided by the agency, revealed P5 was admitted to hospice services on 08/12/2024 with the terminal illness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of P5’s “Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” located under the “Patient Chart” tab in the EMR and dated for the certification period of 08/12/2024 to 11/09/2024, revealed, “Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) to evaluate patient and develop a nursing plan of care. Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustment to care and develop a plan of care. Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care . . .”6. Review of P6’s “Patient Information Report,” provided by the agency, revealed P6 was admitted to hospice services on 06/03/2025 with the terminal illness of malignant neoplasm of supraglottis and bronchus of the lung.Review of P6’s “Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” located under the “Patient Chart” tab in the EMR and dated for the certification period of 06/03/2025 to 08/31/2025, revealed, “Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) to evaluate patient and develop a nursing plan of care. Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustment to care and develop a plan of care. Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care . . .”7. Review of P7’s “Patient Information Report,” provided by the agency, revealed P7 was admitted to hospice services on 03/01/2024 with the terminal illness of senile degeneration of the brain.Review of P7’s “Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” located under the “Patient Chart” tab in the EMR and dated for the certification period of 03/01/2024 to 04/29/2024, revealed, “Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) to evaluate patient and develop a nursing plan of care. Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustment to care and develop a plan of care. Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care . . .” 8. Review of P8’s “Patient Information Report,” provided by the agency, revealed P8 was admitted to hospice services on 01/17/2025 with the terminal illness of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Review of P8’s “Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” located under the ‘Patient Chart” tab in the EMR and dated for the certification period of 01/17/2025 to 04/16/2025, revealed, “Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) to evaluate patient and develop a nursing plan of care. Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustment to care and develop a plan of care. Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care . . .”9. Review of P9’s “Patient Information Report,” provided by the agency, revealed P9 was admitted to hospice services on 03/13/2025 with the terminal illness of malignant neoplasm of colon.Review of P9’s “Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” located under the “Patient Chart” tab in the EMR and dated for the certification period of 03/1320/25 to 06/10/2025, revealed, “Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) to evaluate patient and develop a nursing plan of care. Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustment to care and develop a plan of care. Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care . . .”10. Review of P10’s “Patient Information Report,” provide by the agency, revealed P10 was admitted to hospice services on 05/19/2024 with the terminal illness of Parkinson’s Disease.Review of P10”s “Hospice Certification and Plan of Care,” located under the “Patient Chart” tab in the EMR and dated for the certification period of 05/19/2024 to 08/16/2024, revealed, “Hospice RN (Registered Nurse) to evaluate patient and develop a nursing plan of care. Medical Social Worker to evaluate social, emotional, and financial factors related to the patient’s illness, need for additional care/resources, adjustment to care and develop a plan of care. Chaplain to evaluate patient/family/caregiver and develop a plan of care . . .”The Director of Nursing was unavailable for interview.During an interview on 07/11/2025 at 8:30 PM, the Administrator stated, “The doctor has to sign these orders, so the visits have not been made yet to know the plan of care for each patient.”Review of the agency’s policy titled, “Interdisciplinary Group (IDG/IDT)/Core Services,” dated 09/01/24, revealed, “. . . The Hospice will designate an interdisciplinary group(s) that in consultation with the patient’s attending physician, will prepare a written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care will specify the care and services to meet the patient and family specific needs . . . as such needs relate to the terminal illness and related condition . . .””

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 216 words

    “Based on interview, document review, and policy review, the hospice agency failed to have volunteer hours that equaled five percent of total patient hours. This had the potential to cause 16 out of 16 active patients to have unmet needs.Findings include: Review of the hospice agency’s document titled, “Hospice Volunteer Requirement Report,” revealed the agency’s monthly volunteer hour percentages were:July 2024 – 0%August 2024 – 0%September 2024 – 0%October 2024 – 1.74%November 2024 – 1.30%December 2024 – 3.09%January 2025 – 0%February 2025 – 0%March 2025 – 0%April 2025 – 0%May 2025 – 3.47%June 2025 – 2.40%July 2025 – 2.42%This was an average volunteer hour percentage of 1.11% for July 2024 through July 2025.During an interview on 07/11/2025 at 7:00 PM, the Administrator revealed the agency had problems with getting volunteers once trained to give the agency the hours when the volunteers were available. The agency had increased efforts to recruit in new avenues but so far it had not helped.The Volunteer Coordinator was unavailable for interview.Review of the hospice agency’s policy titled, “Volunteers” dated 09/01/24 revealed, “. . . Volunteers will provide day-to-day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals five percent of the total patient care hours of all paid Hospice employees and contract staff . . .””

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 6, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited
Jul 11, 2025Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 15, 2022.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 7.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 66% at home, 5% in assisted living, 4% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 24% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day7.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.6%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Choice Health of Nevada, LLC owns 100% directly since Jun 22, 2023.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: David Jackson (owns 5% or more through other companies, 13%); Katrina Lanier (corporate officer); Katrina Lanier (corporate director); David Jackson (corporate officer); Katie Elizabeth Sandlin (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Ashley Amaral (managing employee (on the payroll)); Eduardo Ramos (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Choice Health at Home Holdings, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 22, 2023
Tcfiii Ch LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 22, 2023
Choice Health at Home, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 22, 2023
Choice Health of Nevada, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Jun 22, 2023
Tcfiii Ch Investor LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies65.43%Jun 22, 2023
Trive Capital Fund III LPOwns 5% or more through other companies42.11%Oct 23, 2024
Tcfiii Ch Spv LPOwns 5% or more through other companies23.31%Oct 23, 2024
Coltala Choice, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies16.61%Jun 22, 2023
Choice Rehab Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies8.93%Jun 22, 2023

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 67.44% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 75% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 86 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89119, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.