Hearth Record

Comfort Hospice and Palliative Care

A hospice in Las Vegas, Nevada 89120

6375 S. Pecos Rd. #202, Las Vegas, Nevada 89120. (800) 888-1315.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 20 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

20 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 75 hospices serving ZIP code 89120 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 8, 2023: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

20 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

20 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 8, 2023: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care20 deficiencies
  • Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process (42 CFR 418.113(a)(4))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Preparedness plan includes a process for cooperation and collaboration with any tribal emergency preparedness officials’ efforts to maintain an integrated response during a disaster or emergency situation.”

    Rule E0009. Standard-level.

  • Arrangement with Other Facilities (42 CFR 418.113(b)(5))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence of contracts/agreements with other facilities/agencies/hospices to receive patients in the event the hospice cannot provide care to their patients during an emergency.”

    Rule E0025. Standard-level.

  • Emergency Officials Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(2))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan includes a primary and alternate contact information for tribal emergency preparedness staff.”

    Rule E0031. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 136 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,2 & 8) did not have evidence in the patient record that an updated review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications Patient #1 was documented on nursing visit dated 5-01-23 as taking Tessalon Pearls for cough which was not included in the medication profile. Patient #2 as observed during the home visit, the medication Humalog Kwik Pen Injection, which was ordered with a sliding scale that was not included in the medication profile. The patient’s Lantus Insulin Injection was changed to 14 units 6 months ago, as confirmed by both the patient and the daughter caregiver, but was still listed in the medication profile as 15 units. Patient #8 was on active antibiotic medication Cephalexin oral which was not updated or included in the medication profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 119 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #1 and 9) did not have evidence the plan of care included all of the patient’s medications dose, route, frequency necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1 was on active medication Humalog Insulin Injection TID that had a sliding scale which was not included in the plan of care. The comprehensive assessment indicated that the patient had a catheter which did not include the specific treatment orders in the plan of care. Patient #9 the comprehensive assessment indicated that the patient had an open abdominal wound which did not include the specific treatment orders in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 192 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1,5,6,8,9 & 10) did not have evidence the plan of care included all equipment’s and supply needs necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #1 was identified in the comprehensive assessment to have air mattress, hospital bed, walker, wheelchair, suction machine that were not included in the plan of care Patient #5 was identified in the comprehensive assessment to have a walker, overbed table that were not included in the plan of care Patient #6 was identified in the comprehensive assessment to have a walker that were not included in the plan of care Patient #8 was identified in the comprehensive assessment to have a hospital bed, walker, recliner chair, e tank that were not included in the plan of care Patient #9 was identified in the comprehensive assessment to have a bedpan, commode, nebulizer, and e tank, foley catheter and wound care supplies that were not included in the plan of care Patient #10 was identified in the comprehensive assessment to have a wheelchair and shower chair that were not included in the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 164 words

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #1 and 9) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #1 Developed a Stage 2 coccyx area pressure ulcer after the comprehensive assessment and initial plan of care on 4-03-23, that was identified on 4-16-23, was not reviewed in the IDG meeting/update on 4-28-23 and not revised in the updated plan of care to include a new wound care order. Wound care provided by nurse without orders. Patient #9 Nursing visit on 3-08-23 documented patient was assessed to have had an abnormal pulse at 45 which was not coordinated or called to the physician, the plan of care included an order to call physician for an abnormal vital signs result of less than 60. Nurse instructed patient to hold the Metoprolol medication which was ordered as daily in the plan of care without a call or any documented coordination done.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 134 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #4) did not have evidence in the personnel file that a competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient which must have included; ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence that documented the cost savings achieved by agency through the use of volunteers. The Documentation must have included the following: • The identification of each position that is occupied by a volunteer • The work time spent by volunteers occupying those positions • Estimates of the dollar costs that the hospice would have incurred if paid employees occupied the positions identified in paragraph (d)(1) of CFR 418.78 for the amount of time specified in paragraph (d)(2) of CFR 418.78”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 3 of 14 (Personnel #8, 9 &10) did not have evidence these hospice personnel have received orientation on the hospice philosophy.”

    Rule L0661. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 3 of 14 (Personnel #8, 9 &10) did not have evidence that these hospice personnel have received orientation on their specific job requirements.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 3 of 14 (Personnel #8, 9 &10) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for these personnel and volunteer during orientation.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Medical director (42 CFR 418.102)

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice designated a physician to serve as Medical Director. This was corrected on Day 3 of survey with an appointment of personnel #10 as the Medical Director.”

    Rule L0664. Standard-level.

  • Medical director contract (42 CFR 418.102(a))

    “Upon contract review, 1 of 4 (Alok Saxena) did not have evidence of a contract to fulfill the role of medical director. There was not an evidence in the contract identifying the role of a Medical Director, contract identified the role as Alt MD. This was corrected on Day3 of survey, agency appointed one of the 2 associate medical directors as the Medical Director.”

    Rule L0666. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence in the election statement of the effective date of election, which may be the first day of hospice care or a later date, but may be no earlier than the date of the election statement in accordance with 418.24”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that all entries were clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated. SN visit 5-13-23 documented that patient was still being provided care in the facility, when patient was discharged from the facility on 5-11-23 and was back to home during the 5-13-23 visit.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the hospice forwarded a summary to the admitting facility and a copy of the patient record, if requested, to a facility when patient was transferred on 11-22-22.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that when the patient revoked the election of hospice care and was discharged from hospice on 1-13-23, the hospice forwarded the discharge summary and a copy of the patient records(if requested) to the patient’s attending physician in accordance with §418.26”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Multiple locations (42 CFR 418.116(a))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the organizational chart did match the hospice’s information submitted to CMS and/or State licensing agencies management personnel. The current DPCS was not listed for the position she is holding as DPCS and the Alt DPCS was not listed for the position he is holding as Alt DPCS.”

    Rule L0799. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 8, 2023Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care20 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 12, 2020.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 83% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 89% at home, 7% in assisted living, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 4% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.4%
Visits near death83.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Lamberto H Valiente (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Lamberto H Valiente (corporate officer, 100%); Lamberto H Valiente (corporate director, 100%); Lamberto H Valiente (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Lamberto H Valiente (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 91.46% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 27.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 75 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 89120, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 20.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.