Hearth Record

Helping Hands Hospice

A hospice in Tucumcari, New Mexico 88401

624 South 2nd Street, Tucumcari, New Mexico 88401. (575) 461-0099.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 5 hospices serving ZIP code 88401 had 12.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 4, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 4, 2024: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 126 words

    “Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that data is collected and analyzed for performance and quality improvement. This deficient practice can lead to poor operational performance and poor quality of care for all patients. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility’s policy titled “;Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, Data Collection, from Policies and Procedures Manual for Hospice 2009 MED-PASS. Inc (Revised June 2018) page 10.1.5” 3. “;Data collection will be ongoing and frequency will be determined by the process improvement activity and approved by the Governing Body.” B. During an interview with the administrative assistant on 12/03/2024 at 3:36 pm stated the facility is currently not reviewing QAPI (Quality Assessment and Program Improvement) and performance improve projects”

    Rule L0563. Standard-level.

  • Performance improvement projects (42 CFR 418.58(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 294 words

    “Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that performance improvement projects are conducted annually addressing the scope, complexity and past performance of hospice operations and services. This deficient practice can result in poor operational performance and poor quality of care for all patients. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility’s policy titled “;Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan, Performance Expectations, Policies and Procedures Manual for Hospice© 2009 MED-PASS, Inc. (Revised June 2018) page 10.1.7 PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION 1. For each process identified to be improved, mechanisms to identify levels, patterns or trends in that process that will trigger further evaluation of the process will be identified. Performance expectations may include, but are not limited to: • Thresholds. • Setting upper and lower control limits. • Percentages. • Ratios. • Setting performance goals for further evaluation. • Identification of patterns/trends. 2. Sample size will be determined for each process improvement activity to adequately represent the process and will be randomly selected. For each established process to be improved, the performance expectation will be determined. The frequency of data collection and analysis will be specified for each process. The QAPI committee, and/or those involved in patient care, will analyze the data collected to pursue opportunities for improvement and identify important problems. 3. A summary of data collection, analysis, recommendations for improvement and report of cumulative findings will be prepared by the QAPI committee. The reports are forwarded to the Governing Body. Failure to achieve expected levels of performance will be documented and an explanation delineated to identify opportunities for improvement. B. During an interview with the administrative assistant on 12/03/2024 at 3:36 pm stated the facility is currently not reviewing QAPI (Quality Assessment and Program Improvement) and performance improve projects.”

    Rule L0572. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 308 words

    “Based on record review and observation the facility failed to monitor, manage and maintain expired patient care supplies. This deficient practice could lead to infection for all patients receiving care. The findings are: A. Record review of the facilitys policy titled “;Supply Maintenance, Procedure, At the Hospice Site(s), page 5.14.1” states: 1. All medical supplies, especially sterile items, will be properly stored in a clean, dry area and handled in a sanitary manner protected from potential contamination as indicated by the manufacturer. 2. Supply packaging will remain intact while stored. If outer package is damaged or opened, supply will be removed and discarded. 3. Supplies will be checked for expiration date prior to use. If outdated, the supplies will be immediately removed from stock and discarded. 4. New medical supplies will be stored behind older supplies to assist in a timely rotation of supplies. 5. Staff will inspect packages of sterile items for evidence of interruption or exposure to liquid prior to use. 6. Staff using sterile medical supplies will handle items in a manner to protect sterility and prevent contamination. If supplies are taken from Hospice to the patient’s environment, staff assures appropriate and safe delivery of supplies. Supplies will be placed in a plastic or paper bag and placed in a clean area of the car for transport. B. During observation on 12/03/2024 at 2:30pm, of supply room the following was revealed: 1. ReadyBath Cap, Conditioning shampoo cap. One use package. Expired 04/2023 2. PeriGuard Ointment Skin Protectant, DermaRite. Soiled and ointment oozing from cap. 3. Derma Klenz, wound cleaner. Bottle half full-on shelf with new full bottles (for single patient use only). Open bottle breaks sterility and can cause cross-contamination. 4. Integrity, wound cleaner. Bottle ¼ full on shelf with new full bottles.(for single patient use only). Open bottle breaks sterility and can cause cross-contamination.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 309 words

    “Based on record review and interview the facility failed to have an initial Certification of Terminal Illness that specified if a patient (P) had an anticipated 6 months or less to live for 3 (P4, P6, and P10) of 14 (P1-P14) patients being reviewed for initial certification of terminal illness. This deficient practice could possibly lead to a delay in patient care. The findings are: A. Record review of the facilitys policy titled “;Certification/Recertification of Terminal Illness” under section 1 stated “;In order to be eligible to elect Hospice care under Medicare, a patient much be certified as being terminally ill” under section 5 stated “;The written certification must specify that it is anticipated that the patients life expectancy is 6 months or less, if the illness runs its normal course.” B. Record review of P4s medical record revealed a form titled “;Hospice Plan of Care and Certification”, but it did not certify that P4 was terminally ill and did not certify that P4 had a life expectancy of 6 months or less to live. C. Record review of P6s medical record revealed a form titled “;Hospice Plan of Care and Certification”, but it did not certify that P6 was terminally ill and did not certify that P6 had a life expectancy of 6 months or less to live. D. Record review of P10s medical record revealed a titled “;Hospice Plan of Care and Certification”, but it did not certify that P10 was terminally ill and did not certify that P10 had a life expectancy of 6 months or less to live. E. During an Interview on 12/03/24 at 3:15 PM with S1, Clinical Staff Member, S1 confirmed that P4, P6, and P10 did not have a certification that certified that all three patients are terminally ill and have a life expectancy of 6 months or less to live.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

May 2, 2024: complaint inspection by the state8 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to meet the Condition of Participation by failing to ensure that 1 (P [patient] 2) of 9 patients (P1-P9) being reviewed had a complete care plan. This deficient practice is likely to lead to patients end of life hospice needs not being met resulting in pain and suffering. The findings are: A. The facility failed to ensure P2 had a complete plan of care. Refer to tag L-0545.”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)

    “Based on record review and interview the facility failed to meet the Condition of Participation by failing to have a qualified home hospice aide providing care. This deficient practice is likely to lead to inadequate patient care for all patients that could result in patient harm. The findings are A. The facility failed to have a qualified home health aide. Refer to tag L0609.”

    Rule L0607. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide a symptom management related to the patients terminal illness by not responding to the patients needs in a timely manner. This deficient practice is likely to lead to all patient needs not being met. The findings are: A. Record review of the facilitys policy titled On-Call Services (services to address the patients immediate needs) Not Dated, Reference number 5016 stated, “;Hospice provides on-call coverage 24 hours a day.” Procedure stated, “;The patient may reach the on-call number provided on the admission to the Hospice program.” B. Record review of the facilitys policy titled Hospice Nursing Care Reference number 3011, Not Dated, stated under Procedure; “;The Hospice nurse is available 24 hours to meet the physical, psychosocial, spiritual and practical needs of patients, families or caregivers.” C. During an interview on 05/01/2024 at 3:00 pm, P3 stated he knows the on-call number and has called it a few times. When called, P3 just got a voicemail and gets a return call a few hours later or the next day. When asked if calling the on-call were emergent calls, P3 stated “;yes.””

    Rule L0512. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 207 words

    “Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure that 1 (P [patient] 2) of 9 (P1-P9) patients reviewed had an Interdisciplinary group meeting with all qualified personnel. This deficient practice is likely to lead to a patients hospice needs remaining unmet and the Interdisciplinary Group being unaware of the patients hospice needs. The findings are: . A. Record review of the facilitys policy titled “;Interdisciplinary Team Coordination of Care” Policy #5003 not dated, stated “;Hospice uses a comprehensive, coordinated healthcare process and an interdisciplinary team to provide services and aid patients, families or caregivers” and “;The interdisciplinary team consists of physicians, nurses, social workers, certified home hospice aids, clergy, counselors, volunteers, and therapists” B. Record review of the facilitys policy titled “;Interdisciplinary Team Meeting” Policy #5004, not dated, stated “;The team meets bi-weekly [every other week].” C. Record review of P2s Medical Record , under the “;Admission Profile” revealed P2 was admitted to the hospice service on 12/04/23 and discharged from service on 12/24/23. P2s medical record did not contain any documentation of Interdisciplinary Team Meetings. D D. During an interview on 04/30/24 at 12:56 PM, with Staff (S)3, Director of Nursing, S3 confirmed that there was no documented Interdisciplinary Group Meetings for P2.”

    Rule L0539. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 154 words

    “Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to develop a written Plan of Care for 1 (P[patient] 2) of 9 (P1-P9) patients reviewed for a Plan of Care. This deficient practice is likely to result in the patients care needs being unmet. The findings are: The findings are: A. Record review of facilitys policy titled “;Interdisciplinary Team Plan of Care” Not dated, stated “;Hospice establishes an individualized plan of care with patient, family or caregiver on the day of admission. The interdisciplinary team reviews the plan within 3 days of the admission to Hospice.” B. Record review of P2s medical record under “;Admission Profile” revealed that P2 was admitted on 12/04/23 and discharged on 12/24/23. P2s medical record did not have a written Plan of Care . C. During an interview on 05/01/24 at 8:31 AM, with Staff (S)4, facility administrator, S4 confirmed that P2 did not have a Plan of Care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 275 words

    “Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to monitor, manage and maintain expired patient care supplies. This deficient practice could lead to infections and ineffective treatment for all patients receiving care. The findings are: A. Record review of the facilitys policy titled “;Supply Maintenance number 5.14.1.”; Revised 2014, stated “;At the Hospice Site: 1. Hospice maintains and delivers supplies according to applicable federal/state laws and regulations. 2. Supplies will be checked for expiration date prior to use. If outdated, the supplies will be immediately removed from stock and discarded. B. During an observation on 04/30/2024 at 10:00 AM, of the supply room, the following was revealed: 1. Eight (8) boxes of insulin syringes (syringe used to administer diabetic medication) with the label from an (Name of Pharmacy) with a patients name on them. These insulin syringes had an expiration date of 06/2014. 2. Central Line (tube going into heart for administration of medications) dressing change kit (Sterile Dressing) with an expiration date of 09/2014. 3. Box of Mepilex Border dressings (dressing to cover a wound) with an expiration date of 10/28/2023. 4. Adaptec Rope (dressing used for wound) with an expiration date 02/2022. C. During an interview on 04/30/24 at 10:00 AM, with Staff (S)3, Director of Nursing (DON), DON confirmed there is no system in place to monitor supplies for expiration dates and that the patients syringes should not have been in the storage room and have such an expired date. S3 stated “;Staff could have pulled the expired items and taken them to a patient for use.” S3 stated “;I had no idea that there were so many expired supplies.””

    Rule L0579. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Medical social services (42 CFR 418.64(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure medical social services are provided to the patients by a qualified social worker. This deficient practice is likely to lead to patients and their families having unmet social service needs. The findings are: A. Record review of the facilitys policy titled “;Psychosocial Services” Policy #3015, not dated, stated “;Hospice provides psychosocial services by a qualified social worker” and “;These services are provided according to the interdisciplinary team plan of care.” B. Record review of the facilitys staff list revealed the facility did not have a qualified social worker on staff. C. During an interview on 05/03/24 at 8:31 AM, with Staff(S)4, Facility Administrator, S4 confirmed that there is no social worker on service, and they have not had a qualified social worker since December of 2023.”

    Rule L0594. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Hospice aide qualifications (42 CFR 418.76(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 202 words

    “Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure there was a qualified Hospice Aid to provide patient care to all patients. This deficient practice is likely to lead to all patient’s showers, hygiene and personal needs not getting met. The findings are: A. Record review of the facilitys document titled “;Home Hospice Aide” not dated, under “;Job Summary” stated “;Successful completion of an approved practical training program with a total of at least 75 hours of combined classroom and supervised clinical training with demonstrated knowledge of necessary skills.” B. Record review of the Personnel File for Staff (S)5, home hospice aide, revealed S5 did not have any training to be a Home Hospice Aide. C. During an interview on 05/03/24 at 8:31 AM, with S4, Facility Administrator, when asked if S5 had completed a training program, S4 stated “;She [S5] had not previously done HHA [home hospice aid] training.” When asked about the amount of training provided, S3 stated, “;about 60 hours of training.” S4 confirmed that the facility could not provide documentation of the training provided to S5. D. During an interview with S5 on 05/02/24 at 9:55 AM, S5 confirmed she had not completed the training program.”

    Rule L0609. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 4, 2024Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited
May 2, 2024Complaint inspection by the state8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 6, 1995.
  • Ownership: other.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 8 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 0 nurse care minutes per routine home care day and a visit near death for 0% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day0.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekendsNot given
Visits near death0.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 88401, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 12; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 5 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 88401
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Helping Hands Hospice This hospice12
Tucumcari HospiceNot given
Family Hospice Ltd DBA Gentiva18
Plains Regional Medical Center HospiceNot given
Excelacare Hospice3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.