Hearth Record

Lighthouse Hospice

A hospice in Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002

200 Lake Drive East, Suite 205, Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002. (856) 414-1155.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

8 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 18 hospices serving ZIP code 08002 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 12, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

8 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

8 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 12, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Upon patient record review 4 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 6, 8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 01: The patient was admitted on 10/10/23, the initial comprehensive psychosocial assessment was completed on 10/16/23, the comprehensive spiritual care assessment was completed on 10/19/24. Patient 02: The patient was admitted on 11/16/24, the initial comprehensive psychosocial assessment was completed on 12/2/24. Patient 06: The patient was admitted on 7/25/24, the initial comprehensive spiritual care assessment was completed on 7/31/24. Patient 08: The patient was admitted on 10/10/24, the initial comprehensive spiritual care assessment was completed on 10/18/24.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 14 (Patient #5, 10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment identifies the physical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs related to the terminal illness that must be addressed in order to promote the hospice patient’s well-being, comfort, and dignity throughout the dying process. Patient 05: The patient was admitted on 11/15/24, the comprehensive spiritual care assessment has not been completed to date. Patient 10: The patient was admitted on 11/21/24 and revoked the hospice benefit on 12/4/24, the initial psychosocial comprehensive assessment was not completed, the initial spiritual care comprehensive assessment was not completed.”

    Rule L0524. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 217 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #2, 8, 12) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 02: The medication profile for the hospice agency does not include Lactase tablets 3000 units, take 3 pills, 3 times daily as compared in the SNF medication profile. (Corrected on site.) Patient 08: The medication profile includes Miralax 17G daily PO, it does not include a diluent or instructions for mixing. (Corrected on site.) Patient 12: The medication profile includes Xalatan Opthalmic Solution 0.005%, drop at bedtime, does not include how many drops, and does not specify which eye to instill the medication. The profile includes Cosopt PF Opthalmic Solution 2-0.5% 1% drop daily, it does not include how many drops, and does not specify which eye to instill the medication. The medication profile includes Lidocaine External Patch 4%, 1 patch daily, apply to affected area, 12 hours on 12 hours off, and does not include an application site. (All corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 234 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #5, 8, 10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 05: The patient has a secondary condition of diabetes mellitus and takes Levemir and Lantus for diabetes management, the plan of care does not include a problem statement with interventions and goals for the management and monitoring of the diabetes. (Corrected on site.) Patient 08: The patient is admitted to hospice services with a primary diagnosis of heart failure with evidence of 3+ and 4+ pitting edema upon admission, the plan of care does not include interventions and goals for the management of the edema. (Corrected on site.) Patient 10: The patient is admitted to hospice services for cerebrovascular disease with a history of seizures and a stroke, she also has a gastrostomy tube, the plan of care does not include a problem statement for the management of the neurological conditions with interventions and goals. The plan of care does not include interventions and education for the patient/caregiver for the prevention of aspiration. (Corrected on site.)”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient 02: The plan of care includes interventions and goals for Volunteer services, there are no frequency orders for volunteers.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 231 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient # 8, 12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 08: The medication orders on 10/10/24 for Miralax 17 G scoop, PO daily do not include a diluent or instructions for mixing. (Corrected on site.) Patient 12: Medication orders on 2/21/24 for Xalatan Opthalmic Solution 0.005%, drop at bedtime, does not include how many drops, and does not specify which eye to instill the medication. Medication orders on 2/21/24 for Cosopt PF Opthalmic Solution 2-0.5% 1% drop daily, it does not include how many drops, and does not specify which eye to instill the medication. Medication orders on 2/21/24 for Lidocaine External Patch 4%, 1 patch daily, apply to affected area, 12 hours on 12 hours off, and do not include an application site. (Corrected on site.) Oxygen orders are written as 2L nasal cannula daily for shortness of breath, the patient record includes documentation on 6/10/24 that the patient was receiving oxygen 3L via nasal cannula. Additional documentation on 6/11/24 and 6/13/24 indicated the patient was receiving oxygen 4L via nasal cannula and on 6/17/24 documentation indicated the patient was receiving oxygen 5L via nasal cannula. There were no updated orders for oxygen and specific parameters for oxygen titration.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 08: The plan of care includes orders for Spiritual Care visits 1 time per month, there is no visit made in the month of November.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 419 words

    “Upon patient record review 6 of 14 (Patient #1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 01: The hospice aid task assignment includes orders to shampoo the patients hair on Tuesday and Friday of each week, the aide did not shampoo that patients hair on 11/12/24, 11/15/24, 11/19/24, 11/22/24, 11/26/24, 11/29/24, 12/3/24, 12/6/24 or 12/10/24. The task is marked NV in the patient record on these dates, indicating “not required.” Patient 02: The patient received hospice aide services 5 days per week, the aide was providing hair care but the aide plan of care does not include task assignments to perform shampooing or hair care for the patient. (Corrected on site.) Patient 03: The patient receives hospice aide services with task assignment to perform shampooing once a week. Shampooing was not performed the weeks of 12/1/24 - 12/7/24, 11/10/24 - 11/16/24, and 10/27/24 - 11/2/24, the task is marked NV which indicates “not required at this visit.” Patient 04: The patient record includes orders for hospice aide services 3 times per week with showers to be performed at each visit. Aide services started on 11/22/24, the patient has received 7 visits with one shower performed on 12/2/24 only, the record indicates “not required at this visit” for all other visit entries. Patient 05: The patient was admitted on 11/15/24 and the plan of care includes hospice aide orders for 2 times a week visit to include providing a shower and shampooing (hair care) at each visit. The patient has received 7 visits over the past 4 weeks with no shower or hair care provided. The document is marked NV, indicating the service is not required. Patient 06: The patient record includes orders for hospice aide visits 3 times a week to include linen changes 1 time a week, the documentation does not show evidence of linen changes prior to 10/2/24. The aide was providing hair care but the aide plan of care does not include task assignments to perform shampooing or hair care for the patient. (Corrected on site.) Patient 09: The patient record includes hospice aide task assignments for shampooing 1 time per week on Wednesday. The patient did not receive a shampoo during the week of 11/10/24 or 11/17/24.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 12, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care8 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 8, 1994.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 52% at home, 22% in assisted living, 26% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.4%
Visits near death96.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Care Hospice II, Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 7, 2020.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: John B Hunter (owns 5% or more through other companies, 9.42%); Jesse Reo Moore (corporate officer); Jesse Reo Moore (managing employee (on the payroll)); Wunhuey Cheng (managing employee (under contract)); Bart K Valdez (corporate officer); Bart K Valdez (managing employee (on the payroll)); Grant Brown (corporate officer); Grant Brown (managing employee (on the payroll)); Meredith Darabasz (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dana K Reid (corporate officer); Dana K Reid (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Care Hospice II, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 7, 2020
Care Hospice Acquisition, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 13, 2017
Hospice Care Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Hospice Care Holdings, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Hospice Care Intermediate I, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Hospice Care Intermediate II, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 9, 2020
Thl Equity Fund VIII Investors (Hospice Care), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies29.16%Dec 9, 2020
Thomas H. Lee Parallel Fund VIII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies27.44%Dec 9, 2020
Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund VIII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies15.07%Dec 9, 2020

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.56% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 78.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 18 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 08002, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 8.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.