Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Brookhaven, Mississippi 39601

706 Highway 51 North, P O Box 4060 Mooresville, NC 28117-4060, Brookhaven, Mississippi 39601. (601) 990-2315.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 15 hospices serving ZIP code 39601 had 0.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 20, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 20, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 202 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patients #4,#6,#9,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 4: The medication profile contained oxygen with no delivery method. Patient 6: Upon observation during the home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility list did not contain an albuterol inhaler, duoneb, lorazepam, and miralax identified on the hospice profile. Corrected on site. Patient 9: Upon observation during the home visit medication reconciliation, the patient did not have albuterol nebulizing solution in the home. There was no evidence the nurse recognized the missing medication during request of refills two days prior. Corrected on site. Patient 10: Upon observation during the home visit medication reconciliation, the facility and hospice medication profiles did not match. The facility list did not contain an albuterol nebulizing solution and lorazepam identified on the hospice profile. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 2: There was no evidence of a bereavement assessment. Corrected on site with completion 3/19/25.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #3,#7) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 3: There was no evidence of weekly wound measurements since 2/19/25, as required per agency policy. Patient 7: There was no evidence of weekly wound measurements from 3/7/25 to 3/17/25, as required per agency policy.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 4: The medical record contained an order for oxygen with no delivery method.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 273 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patients #1,#2,#5,#6,#9,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a hospital bed and over bed table. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of hospital bed, bedrails, shower chair, and wheelchair. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of a cane. There was no evidence of an order for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 6: Upon observation during the home visit, the patient had a wheelchair and shower chair. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of a hospital bed, wheelchair, and raised toilet seat that were confirmed during home visit. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 10: Upon observation during the home visit, the patient had a broda chair, hospital bed with rails, and over the bed table. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patient 8: The election form identified the patient’s wife elected a community physician as an attending. Evidence of collaboration with the attending physician occurred 12/27/24, 1/23/25, and 2/19/25, not meeting the frequency of no less than every 15 days.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation 3/10/25 identifying patient was receiving oxygen at 3 liters per minute. The order was for 2 liters and there was no evidence of the nurse correcting the flow for accurate administration.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 148 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patients #11) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient 11: There was no evidence bereavement care plan tasks including providing information on support groups and invitation to memorials were completed for both bereaved family members. There was also no evidence of monthly contact completed unless declined by the high risk bereaved family member.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel 6: There was no evidence of the competency assessment for the required tasks observed with the aide performing on a patient or pseudo patient. Obtaining required vital signs was corrected on site.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #3,#6) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are specific to patient needs. Patient 3: The aide care plan did not contain instructions regarding the patient having a sacral wound dressing. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying the patient is a max assist for transfers. There was no evidence of instructions for transfer assistance included on the aide care plan. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 10: There was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit between 2/25/25 and 3/14/25.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The agency had a volunteer utilization rate of 3.73% for 2024.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #10) did not have evidence that a skills competency assessment, specific to each discipline had been conducted for all personnel including volunteers initially during orientation. Personnel 10: There was no evidence of a skills competency assessment included in the personnel file.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient 3: The medical record contained sacral wound care orders in the initial plan of care order and on 3/4/25 that did not specify facility and hospice responsibility. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 20, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 28, 2000.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 45% at home, 34% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility, 18% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.6%
Visits near death90.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Southerncare Holdings, Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 20, 2002.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Harpreet Sood (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); Anna Smith (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Curo Hospice SC LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Ksoc Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 1, 2011
Southerncare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 20, 2002
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.82% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 69.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 15 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 39601, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 0; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.