Hearth Record

Hospice Compassus-North Central Missouri

A hospice in Columbia, Missouri 65201

303 North Keene Street, Suite 306, Columbia, Missouri 65201. (573) 443-8360.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 12 hospices serving ZIP code 65201 had 9.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 7, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 7, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 472 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes a drug profile that contains the patient’s current: prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs; supplements; herbal remedies; [and] other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication review process includes the identification of the following: the effectiveness of drug therapy; drug side effects; actual or potential drug interactions; duplicate drug therapy; [and] drug therapy associated with laboratory monitoring. The assessment includes evidence that common side effects of medication in the hospice populations are anticipated, and as appropriate, preventive measures are implemented to manage the side effects. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, interview, and observation. Agency policy and procedure #HOS-C_15C “Medication Reconciliation and Management” (revised 01/24/2025) read in part, “For patients residing in their own residence, it is the responsibility of the hospice nurse to perform the following steps at each scheduled nursing visit: 1. Nurse obtains the most current copy of the medication list. 2. Nurse visually reviews the patient’s medication list in the home, comparing it to the medication list from the medical record. 4. If the medication lists do NOT match, the nurse ensures the incorrect list is promptly updated to reflect the correct orders and the medication reconciliation process is completed.” In 1 of 23 (4%) clinical records reviewed and home visits observed, the agency did not ensure that the comprehensive assessment included a drug profile that contained the patient’s current prescription and OTC drugs. Clinical Record 4/Home Visit 4: The patient elected hospice care on 08/08/2024 with a diagnosis of Parkinsonism. During the home visit with the Chaplain (CH) [Personnel Record 4] on 02/04/2025, the patient’s medication list (updated by the daughter on 01/08/2025) was reviewed. The patient’s daughter was not present during the home visit. The patient’s medication list and the medications in the home did not match the hospice medication profile or the Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment. The hospice medication profile did not document Preservision, one (1) pill two times daily, and donepezil 5 mg tablet daily. A clinical record review revealed the medications were reviewed with the patient’s medication regimen. However, Preservision and donepezil were not documented in the hospice medication profile. During a joint phone call on 02/05/2025 with the Director of Clinical Services, the patient’s home medication list was reviewed with the patient’s daughter, who stated in part, “Mom has been taking both of those medications (Preservision and donepezil) for a while.” During a joint record review and interview on 02/05/2025, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed that Preservision and donepezil were not documented on the medication profile for clinical record 4.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 362 words

    “It is required that the hospice designates a registered nurse member of the IDG to provide coordination of care, ensure continuous assessment of each patient’s and family’s needs, and ensure the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. This standard was not met, as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. In 2 of 23 (9%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that a Registered Nurse provided coordination of care to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family needs and implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care. Agency policy #HOS-C15 “Nursing Services” (reviewed 12/24/2024) stated in part “Nursing services include the following: g. Collaboration with the interdisciplinary team and coordination of all patient care/support activities.” Clinical Record 6: The patient elected hospice on 05/09/2024 with a diagnosis of other sequelae of cerebral infarction. The volunteer assignment completed on 08/27/2024 documented volunteer services four (4) times a month beginning in September for patient companion visits and socialization. Two (2) volunteer visits were documented in September. The coordination note completed by the Volunteer Coordinator on 09/27/2024 documented, “Visits will be paused for a while. Volunteer is out with a surgery. Paused on 09/19/2024.” A clinical record revealed no evidence that the Registered Nurse coordinated with the interdisciplinary group to ensure the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care to meet the patient’s volunteer needs for companionship and socialization needs. Clinical Record 12: The patient elected hospice on 06/14/2024 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. The volunteer assignment request dated 06/17/2024 documented, “Patient wants/needs a volunteer. Patient needs socialization, caregiver needs socialization.” The volunteer assignment completed on 07/30/2024 documented volunteer services two (2) times per month for patient companion visits and life review video/audio/journal. A clinical record revealed no evidence that the Registered Nurse coordinated with the interdisciplinary group to ensure the implementation of the interdisciplinary plan of care to meet the patient’s volunteer needs for companionship and socialization needs. During the joint record review and interview on 02/05/2025, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed that the clinical records lacked evidence that the RN coordinated with the interdisciplinary group regarding volunteer needs identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 699 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: reflects patient, and family goals; [and] identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy #C9 “Written Interdisciplinary Plan of Care” (revised 09/27/2019) stated in part, “The content of the plan of care includes at minimum: a. An assessment of the the patient’s and family’s needs and goals f. Measurable goals and outcomes for planned interventions.” In 5 of 23 (22%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s plan of care reflected patient and family goals and identified planned interventions based on problems identified in the comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected hospice care on 11/29/2024 with a diagnosis of unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction. On 12/27/2024, the physician ordered Bactrim DS 800 mg-160 mg, one (1) tab twice daily for urinary tract infection (UTI). A coordination note dated 12/27/2024 documented, “Noted urine in drainage bag to be dark and cloudy. Notified Dr. (name) of patient’s (pts) symptoms and received a new order for Bactrim DS BIDx7D.” On 12/31/2024 the physician ordered wound care “Coccyx wound-cleanse area to coccyx with wound cleanser, apply barrier cream bid and prn.” The Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Reports dated 01/03/2025 and 01/17/2025 did not document patient and family goals and planned interventions for the identified urinary tract infection and coccyx wound. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected hospice care on 08/19/2024 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). On 01/13/2025, the physician ordered, “Amoxicillin 875 mg 1 tablet by mouth 2 times daily for 7 days Reason: UTI.” The skilled nursing (SN) visit dated 01/13/2025 documented, “Foley draining blood-tinged urine with sediment, pt complains of burning in the genital area. New order received from Dr. (name) for Amoxicillin 875mg 1 PO BID X7D.” The Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Reports dated 01/17/2025 and 01/31/2025 did not document patient and family goals and planned interventions for the identified urinary tract infection. Clinical Record 13: The patient elected hospice care on 05/28/2024 with a diagnosis of COPD. On 01/13/2025, the physician ordered, “Doxycycline 100mg capsule by mouth 2 times daily for 7 days Reason: respiratory infection.” The Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Reports dated 01/17/2025 and 01/31/2025 did not document patient and family goals and planned interventions for the identified respiratory infection. Clinical Record 18: The patient elected hospice care on 12/31/2024 with a diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of an unspecified part of the lung. The initial nursing assessment visit dated 12/31/2024 documented a “safety concern related to handling/storage/use of oxygen.” The SN visit dated 01/01/2025 documented, “Indicate when dyspnea occurs at rest. PCGR states he is always dyspneic but it is worse tonight... Assisted pt to sitting position and with nebulizer (neb) treatment (tx).” The Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Reports dated 01/03/2025 and 01/17/2025 did not document patient and family goals and planned interventions for the identified dyspnea and oxygen safety. Clinical Record 19: The patient elected hospice care on 03/04/2024 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. On 07/10/2024, the physician ordered, “Bactrim DS 800/160mg 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours x 7 days for UTI.” The Hospice IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report dated 07/19/2024 did not document patient and family goals and planned interventions for the identified urinary tract infection. In a joint record review and an interview on 02/05/2025, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed that clinical record 2 did not include patient and family goals and planned interventions for urinary tract infection and coccyx wound, clinical record 8 did not document patient and family goals and planned interventions for urinary tract infection, clinical record 13 did not document patient and family goals and planned interventions for respiratory infection, clinical record 18 did not document patient and family goals and planned interventions for dyspnea and oxygen safety, and clinical record 19 did not document patient and family goals and planned interventions for urinary tract infection.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 252 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including the following: drugs and treatment necessary to meet the needs of the patient. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, interview, and observation. In 1 of 23 (4%) clinical records reviewed and home visits observed, the agency did not ensure that the patient’s plan of care included drugs necessary to meet the needs of the patient. Clinical Record 4/Home Visit 4: The patient elected hospice care on 08/08/2024 with a diagnosis of Parkinsonism. During the home visit with the Chaplain (CH) [Personnel Record 4] on 02/04/2025, the patient’s medication list (updated by the daughter on 01/08/2025) was reviewed. The patient’s daughter was not present during the home visit. The patient’s medication list and the medications in the home included Preservision, one (1) pill two times daily, and donepezil 5 mg tablet daily. During a joint phone call on 02/05/2025 with the Director of Clinical Services, the patient’s home medication list was reviewed with the patient’s daughter, who stated in part, “Mom has been taking both of those medications (Preservision and donepezil) for a while.” The patient’s Plan of Care Update Reports, effective 01/17/2025 and 01/31/2025, did not document Preservision and donepezil. During a joint record review and interview on 02/05/2025, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed that Preservision and donepezil were not documented on the medication profile and Plan of Care Update Reports.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 227 words

    “It is required that the hospice follows accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable disease, including the use of standard precautions, such as: hand hygiene; [and] use of gloves, mask, eye protection, or face shield depending on anticipated exposure. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review, interview, and observation. Agency policy #IPC.11 “Infection Control” (revised 09/30/2024) stated in part, “Infection control measures-Compassus utilizes reference materials from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the development and implementation of infection control measures. Guideline for Hand Hygiene in Health Care Settings, CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).” The MMWR read in part, “Indications for hand hygiene-After glove removal.” In 1 of 6 (17%) home visit observations, the agency did not ensure that hand hygiene was performed when indicated per the agency’s policy. Home Visit 3: The patient elected hospice care on 07/08/2022 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The RN provided peri care during the home visit with the Registered Nurse (RN) [Personnel Record 3] on 02/04/2025. After providing peri care, the RN changed their gloves. The RN did not perform hand hygiene after changing/removing gloves per the policy. During an interview on 02/04/2025, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed the finding and the agency policy that hands should be cleansed between and after glove removal.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Nursing services (42 CFR 418.64(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 264 words

    “It is required that the hospice provides nursing care under the supervision of a registered nurse. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy #C12, “Personnel Qualifications and Licensed Services” (revised 08/18/2022), stated in part, “LP/VNs are supervised by registered nurses not less than every month.” In 2 of 20 (10%) clinical records reviewed of patients that received Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) visits, the agency did not ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) provided supervision of the LPN nursing services per agency policy. Clinical Record 4: The patient elected hospice care on 08/08/2024 with a diagnosis of Parkinsonism. The plan of care dated 08/08/2024 through 11/05/2025 ordered skilled nursing (SN) services once (1) weekly beginning 08/08/2024. The LPN completed nursing visits on 08/14/2024 and 09/01/2024. A clinical record review revealed no evidence that LPN supervisory visits were completed in August and September per agency policy. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected hospice care on 08/19/2024 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The recertification plans of care dated 08/19/2024 through 11/16/2025 and 11/17/2024 through 02/14/2025 ordered SN services twice (2) weekly beginning 08/19/2024. The LPN completed nursing visits on 12/06/2024, 12/13/2024, 12/20/2024, 12/23/2024, 12/27/2024, and 01/17/2025. An LPN supervisory visit was completed on 11/25/2024. A clinical record review revealed no evidence that LPN supervisory visits were completed in December and January per agency policy. In a joint record review and interview on 02/05/2025, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed that LPN supervisory visits were not completed per agency policy, not less than monthly.”

    Rule L0591. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 418 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are supervised by a registered nurse who makes an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) meet the patient’s need. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy #C12, “Personnel Qualifications and Licensed Services” (revised 08/18/2022), stated in part, “Hospice Aides are supervised by registered nurses not less than every 14 days.” In 4 of 16 (25%) clinical records reviewed of patients that received Hospice Aide (HA) services, the agency did not ensure that a Registered Nurse (RN) made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the HA. Clinical Record 7: The patient elected hospice care on 06/05/2024 with a diagnosis of chronic diastolic heart failure. The recertification plan of care dated 12/02/2024 through 01/30/2025 ordered HA services twice (2) weekly beginning 12/02/2024. The HA visits were provided beginning 12/02/2024 as ordered. The HA supervisory visits were provided on 12/03/2024 and 12/20/2025, with 17 days outstanding. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected hospice care on 08/19/2024 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The recertification plan of care dated 11/17/2024 through 02/14/2025 ordered HA services twice (2) weekly beginning 11/17/2024. The HA visits were provided beginning 11/17/2024 as ordered. The HA supervisory visits were provided on 01/03/2025 and 01/20/2025, with 17 days outstanding. Clinical Record 14: The patient elected hospice care on 05/16/2024 with a diagnosis of unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction. The recertification plans of care dated 08/15/2024 through 11/11/2024 and 11/12/2024 through 01/10/2025 ordered HA services twice (2) weekly beginning 11/11/2024. The HA visits were provided beginning 11/11/2024 as ordered. The HA supervisory visits were provided on 10/29/2024 and 11/29/2024, with 31 days outstanding. Clinical Record 19: The patient elected hospice care on 03/04/2024 with a diagnosis of senile degeneration of the brain. The recertification plan of care dated 06/02/2024 through 07/23/2024 ordered HA services three (3) times weekly beginning 06/02/2024. The HA visits were provided beginning 06/02/2024 as ordered. The HA supervisory visits were provided on 06/10/2024 and 06/28/2024, with 4 days outstanding. In a joint record review and interview on 02/05/2025, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed that, per agency policy, HA supervisory visits were not completed every 14 days.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 368 words

    “It is required that volunteers are used in day-to-day administrative and/or direct patient care roles. Volunteer services are: noted in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy #HOS-C20 “Volunteer Services” (reviewed 12/24/2024) stated in part, “Volunteers, under the supervision of the volunteer coordinator, provide both patient support and administrative support in a manner and amount consistent with the program’s identified needs.” In 2 of 6 (33%) clinical records reviewed of patients with identified volunteer needs, the agency did not ensure volunteers were used in day-to-day direct patient care roles and noted in the plan of care based on needs identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected hospice on 05/09/2024 with a diagnosis of other sequelae of cerebral infarction. The volunteer assignment completed on 08/27/2024 documented volunteer services four (4) times a month beginning in September for patient companion visits and socialization. Two (2) volunteer visits were documented in September. The coordination note completed by the Volunteer Coordinator on 09/27/2024 documented, “Visits will be paused for a while. Volunteer is out with a surgery. Paused on 09/19/2024.” A clinical record revealed no evidence that the volunteer services were provided, that the patient declined volunteer visits, or that the interdisciplinary group team members increased the frequency of visits to address the patient’s companionship and socialization needs. Clinical Record 12: The patient elected hospice on 06/14/2024 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease. The volunteer assignment request dated 06/17/2024 documented, “Patient wants/needs a volunteer. Patient needs socialization, caregiver needs socialization.” The volunteer assignment completed on 07/30/2024 documented volunteer services two (2) times per month for patient companion visits and life review video/audio/journal. A clinical record review revealed no evidence that the volunteer services were provided, the patient declined volunteer visits, or that the interdisciplinary group team members increased the frequency of visits to address the patient and caregiver socialization needs. During the joint record review and interview on 02/05/2025, the Director of Clinical Services (personnel interview 13) confirmed that the clinical record did not include evidence that volunteer services were implemented based on needs identified in the initial and comprehensive assessments.”

    Rule L0644. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 391 words

    “It is required that a patient clinical record containing past and current findings is maintained for each hospice patient. The record contains correct clinical information that is available to the patient’s attending physician and hospice staff. The record may be maintained electronically or on paper. Each patient’s record includes, at a minimum: the initial plan of care, updated plans of care, initial assessment, comprehensive assessment, updated comprehensive assessments, and clinical notes including the care and services provided. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review, document review, and interview. Agency policy #C31 “Clinical Records” (revised 01/25/2023) stated in part, “Entries into the EMR are to be completed on the date of the visit when at all possible and not later than 10 am the next business day.” In 2 of 23 (9%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure that documentation was completed per the organization’s policy. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected hospice care on 11/29/2024 with a diagnosis of unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) visited the patient on 12/12/2024. The LPN visit note documentation was submitted on 12/15/2024, with one (1) business day outstanding. The Registered Nurse (RN) visited the patient on 12/17/2024. The RN visit note documentation was submitted on 12/22/2024, with three (3) business days outstanding. The RN visited the patient on 12/31/2024. The RN visit note documentation was submitted on 01/06/2025, with three (3) business days outstanding. The RN visited the patient on 01/09/2025. The RN visit note documentation was submitted on 01/12/2025, one (1) business day after the services provided. The LPN visited the patient on 01/14/2025. The LPN visit note documentation was submitted on 01/20/2025, with three (3) business days outstanding. A clinical record review revealed no evidence that the documentation was submitted timely per the agency policy. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected hospice care on 08/19/2024 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The RN visited the patient on 01/13/2025. The RN visit note documentation was submitted on 01/15/2025, with two (2) business days outstanding. A clinical record review revealed no evidence that the documentation was submitted timely per the agency policy. In a joint record review and interview on 02/05/2025, the Director of Clinical Services confirmed that documentation was not submitted timely per agency policy for clinical records 2 and 8.”

    Rule L0672. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 7, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 18, 2006.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 42% at home, 12% in assisted living, 42% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.5%
Visits near death97.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Russell G Adkins (corporate officer); Karli R E Urban (managing employee (under contract)); Laura A Templeton (corporate officer); Jennifer L Rohrbough (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michael Asselta (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Compassus Parent, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 31, 2019
Fc Compassus LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 22, 2014
Compassus Holdings, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 31, 2019
Clp Healthcare Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 22, 2014
Community Hospices of America, LLC.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 22, 2014
Compassus Intermediate, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 31, 2019
Ti V Asc Compassus Investment Aggregator, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies99%Dec 31, 2019
Ascension Towerbrook Healthcare Opportunities LPOwns 5% or more through other companies49.5%Dec 31, 2019
Ti V Compassus Investment Aggregator, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies49.5%Dec 31, 2019
Ascension Capital, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies49.48%Dec 31, 2019
Ascension Health AllianceOwns 5% or more through other companies49.48%Dec 31, 2019
Towerbrook Investors V (Onshore) LPOwns 5% or more through other companies29.75%Dec 31, 2019
Towerbrook Investors V (892), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies14.14%Dec 31, 2019

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.6% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 67.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 65201, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.