Hearth Record

Heartland Hospice (Kansas City)

A hospice in Independence, Missouri 64055

4731 South Cochise Drive, Suite 120, Independence, Missouri 64055. (816) 943-1798.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 43 hospices serving ZIP code 64055 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 1, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 17, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient 14: There was no evidence the agency involved the patient’s choice for an attending in the care planning for the patient.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 245 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 19 (Patient #1,#2,#3,#10,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 1: Upon home visit observation, the patient identified use of Vitamin C, B12, and D3 daily that were not included on the medication profile, and 15mg of melatonin instead of the 10mg identified on the hospice profile. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The medication profile contained duplicative listings of metoprolol. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medication profile contained duplicative listings of alprazolam for 1 tablet three times a day and 1 tablet at bedtime. There was no evidence of instructions to clarify if to be taken together for a total of four administrations or if one was invalid. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medication profile contained two listings of Lantus insulin for 10 units daily and 12 units at bedtime. There was no evidence of instructions for allowable timeframe between the doses. Corrected on site. Upon home visit observation, the facility medication profile and hospice profile did not match. The facility profile contained a bisacodyl suppository daily PRN, Lantus insulin 10 units twice daily, and lorazepam 0.25mg hourly PRN. The hospice profile contained a glycerin suppository daily PRN, Lantus 10 units in the am and 12 units at bedtime, and lorazepam 0.25mg every 4 hours PRN. Patient 14: The medication profile contained Tylenol listed as scheduled instead of PRN in error. Correct on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 105 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #1,#9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained an initial bereavement assessment 12/15/23 with a start of care 5/16/23. Patient 9: There was no evidence of a bereavement assessment.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 315 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 19 (Patients #3,#5,#9,#10,#11,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3,13: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient was a high risk for falls. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to fall safety included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient has a seizure disorder. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to seizure precautions included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medical record contained nursing documentation since 8/16/24 identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to respiratory dysfunction or oxygen use included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to respiratory dysfunction or oxygen use included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient has dysphagia and is insulin dependent requiring blood glucose checks four times daily. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to dysphagia and endocrine dysfunction included in the plan of care. The plan of care also indicated the patient is DNR in error, patient is full code. There was no evidence of a DNR order or equivalent advance directive included in the medical record. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #3,#10,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 3: The medical record contained two orders for alprazolam with no instructions to administer simultaneously for a total of four administrations. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained two orders for Lantus insulin10 units daily and 12 units at bedtime. There was no evidence of instructions for allowable timeframe between the doses. Corrected on site. Patient 14: The medical record contained an order for tylenol listed as scheduled instead of PRN in error. Correct on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 19 (Patients #5,#6,#11,#12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/10/24 identifying the patient had a Hoyer lift and specialty mattress. There was no evidence of orders for DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification 7/31/24 identifying patient use of a wheelchair. There was no evidence of an order for the wheelchair included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of fall mats for safety and oxygen listed on the medication profile. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 12: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying use of a hospital bed, and use of a sit to stand lift for transfers since 9/24/24. There was no evidence of orders for the DME included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #12,#13,#14) did not have evidence that the IDG in collaboration with the attending physician reviewed, revised and documents the individualized plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires but no less frequently then every 15 calendar days. Patients 12,13: There was no evidence of ongoing collaboration with the attending physicians no less than every 15 days, since admission. Patient 14: There was no evidence of collaboration with the attending physician.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 7: The medical record contained a DNR order uploaded into attachments. The current plan of care did not identify a code status and stated no advance directives were in place. After agency inquiry, the patient was originally full code and signed the DNR while on service. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained an ordered nursing frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 10/6/24.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 97 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #15,#16,#17) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes completing all tasks included in the bereavement care plan. Patient 15: There was no evidence the bereavement care plan tasks of sending 6 and 9 month newsletters and support group invitations were completed. Patient 16: There was no evidence the bereavement care plan tasks of sending 3 month newsletters and support group invitations were completed. Patient 17: There was no evidence the bereavement care plan tasks of sending 6 month newsletters and support group invitations were completed.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 254 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #5,#6,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation 10/10/24 identifying patient use of a Hoyer lift for transfers. There was no evidence of instructions for use of a Hoyer included on the aide care plan. The aide care plan stated to use a gait belt for all transfers. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying the patient was wheelchair bound and formerly able to ambulate with stand by assist utilizing a walker during the previous benefit period. There was no evidence of transfer instructions on the aide care plan. The aide care plan stated to walk beside the patient. Corrected on site. Patient 13: There was no evidence of instructions for transfer assistance required for safety on the aide care plan. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 14: There was only evidence of one aide supervisory visit 8/14/24. Patient has had aide services since admission 6/5/24.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The agency had a volunteer utilization rate of 2.47% for 2023.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Physician certification and recertification of terminal illness. Patient 14: There was no evidence of a verbal or written initial certification of terminal illness received from the attending physician.”

    Rule L0676. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 1, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Oct 17, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care14 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jul 5, 1996.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 16.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 60% at home, 6% in assisted living, 32% in a nursing facility, 2% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day16.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.3%
Visits near death96.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jun 6, 2014.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); Sandra J Lowrance (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%); James L Miller (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jun 6, 2014
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 11, 2018
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 5, 2015
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 6, 2014
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Dec 22, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)0%Mar 1, 2022

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.04% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 70.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 43 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 64055, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.