Hearth Record

Moments Hospice of Alexandria LLC

A hospice in Alexandria, Minnesota 56308

507 Nokomis Street Suite D, Alexandria, Minnesota 56308. (877) 666-3687.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 56308 had 1.5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 11, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 1, 2024: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies
  • Core services (42 CFR 418.64)

    The inspectors’ words, 287 words

    “It is required that hospice “core” services are substantially provided directly by hospice employees in a manner consistent with acceptable standards of practice. “Core” services include nursing services, medical social work, and counseling. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCY. It is required that hospice “core” services are substantially provided directly by hospice employees in a manner consistent with acceptable standards of practice. “Core” services include nursing services, medical social work, and counseling. THIS IS A CMS CONDITION LEVEL DEFICIENCY. This CONDITION was not met, as evidenced by personnel record reviews, observations, clinical record reviews, document reviews, and interviews with the Vice President of Clinical Operations, which revealed that the hospice failed to ensure Hospice medical social work services were substantially provided by hospice employees in a manner consistent with acceptable standards of practice. “Core” services included medical social work, and counseling. The organization failed to ensure that the social worker with a baccalaureate degree, had at least one year of experience as a social worker in a healthcare facility prior to hiring [HSRM.7.D/L787]; Failed to ensure that the social worker with a baccalaureate degree was supervised by an MSW [HSRM.23.I/L787]; and Failed to ensure that a qualified social worker provided medical social work services [HCDT.9.I/594]. The cumulative effect of this deficiency has resulted in the hospice organization’s inability to ensure the provision of quality of care for the Condition of Participation CFR 418.64: Core Services. The collective deficient practice illustrated systemic process failures that had the potential to affect all patients receiving hospice care and services from the agency. A review of core services revealed that the agency did not ensure that social work services were being provided with acceptable standards of care by qualified staff.”

    Rule L0587. Condition-level.

  • Medical social services (42 CFR 418.64(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 217 words

    “It is required that medical social services are provided by a qualified social worker. This standard was not met as evidenced by personnel record review, clinical record review, observation, and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) personnel record review of a Social Worker (SW), the agency did not ensure that a qualified social worker provided medical social services. Personnel Record 3/Home Visit 3: The Social Worker (SW) was hired on 12/18/2023. A personnel record review revealed the SW graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Social Work in December 2023. There was no evidence that the SW had one year of social work experience in a healthcare setting prior to hiring at the agency. A competency assessment was completed on 01/16/2024 by an LSW. During the home visit with the SW [Personnel Record 3] on 07/31/2024, the SW reported that they are a Licensed Social Worker (LSW), which is the bachelor’s license type, and not a Master of Social Work (MSW). The personnel record contained no evidence of supervision by a CMS-qualified MSW. During an interview and joint record review on 07/31/2024, the Vice President (VP) of Clinical Operations stated, “No supervision has been done, but it will be done tonight. We are moving an MSW from a sister agency to this agency to provide MSW coverage.””

    Rule L0594. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 327 words

    “It is required that a social worker has: a Master of Social Work (MSW) degree from a school of social work accredited by the Council on Social Work Education; or a baccalaureate degree in social work from an institution accredited by the Council on Social Work Education; or a baccalaureate degree in social work, psychology, sociology, or other field related to social work and is supervised by an MSW meeting the qualification as stated in No. 1 above; and at least one (1) year of social work experience in a health care setting. OR A baccalaureate degree from a school of social work accredited by the Council on Social Work Education and was employed by the hospice before December 2, 2008, is not required to be supervised by an MSW. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview, document review, observation, and personnel record review. In 1 of 1 (100%) personnel record review of a social worker, the agency did not ensure that the social worker with a baccalaureate degree, had at least one year of experience as a social worker in a healthcare facility prior to hire. Personnel Record 3/Home Visit 3: The Social Worker (SW) was hired on 12/18/2023. A personnel record review revealed the SW graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Social Work, in December 2023. There was no evidence that the SW had one year of social work experience in a healthcare setting prior to hiring at the agency. During the home visit with the SW [Personnel Record 3] on 07/31/2024, the SW reported that they are a Licensed Social Worker (LSW), which is the bachelor’s license type, and not a Master of Social Work (MSW). During an interview on 07/31/2024, the Vice President (VP) of Operations confirmed the finding, stating, “I was not aware she was an LSW. We are moving an MSW from the sister office to this office immediately, and she will begin providing supervision and assistance immediately.””

    Rule L0787. Standard-level.

  • Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 254 words

    “It is required that a social worker who holds a bachelor’s degree is supervised by a CMS-qualified MSW who has a degree from a school of social work accredited by the Council on Social Work Education and has one (1) year of experience in a health care setting. This standard was not met as evidenced by interview, observation, document review, and personnel record review. In 1 of 1 (100%) personnel record review of a social worker, the agency did not ensure that the social worker with a baccalaureate degree was supervised by an MSW. Personnel Record 3/Home Visit 3: The Social Worker (SW) was hired on 12/18/2023. A personnel record review revealed the SW graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Social Work, in December 2023. There was no evidence that the SW had one year of social work experience in a healthcare setting prior to hiring at the agency. A competency assessment was completed on 01/16/2024 by an LSW. During the home visit with the SW [Personnel Record 3] on 07/31/2024, the SW reported that they are a Licensed Social Worker (LSW), which is the bachelor’s license type, and not a Master of Social Work (MSW). The personnel record contained no evidence of supervision by a CMS-qualified MSW. During an interview and joint record review on 07/31/2024, the Vice President (VP) of Clinical Operations stated, “No supervision has been done, but it will be getting done tonight. We are moving an MSW from a sister agency to this agency to provide MSW coverage.””

    Rule L0787. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 214 words

    “It is required that the hospice obtains a criminal background check on all hospice employees who have direct patient contact or access to patient records. Hospice contracts require that all contracted employees who have direct patient contact or access to patient records obtain criminal background checks. This standard was not met as evidenced by document review and interview. 1 of 7 (14%) contracts reviewed, the agency did not ensure that the contract required that all contracted employees who have direct patient contact or access to patient records obtained criminal background checks. Contract 1: The contract for Physical Therapy (PT), Occupational Therapy (OT), and Speech Therapy (ST) dated 10/26/2023 stated in part “agrees to provide proof of current professional licensure/certification, TB Test and Hepatitis B acceptance/declination for all therapists providing services.” The contract did not include required documentation that all contracted employees who have direct patient contact or access to patient records obtain criminal background checks. The agency provided evidence that the contracted therapist had criminal background checks. During an interview on 07/30/2024, the Vice President (VP) of Clinical Operation stated “ Ok I will get with them and get it changed.” Contract review revealed that the agency did not ensure that the contract for direct patient care staff included language requiring a background check.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 11, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Nov 21, 2024Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation PartnerNo deficiencies cited
Aug 1, 2024Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 21, 2024.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Shlomo Miller (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Eliyahu Jaffa (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Eliyahu Jaffa (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joseph Greenberg (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 56308, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1.5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.