Hearth Record

Lifecare Hospice

A hospice in Roseau, Minnesota 56751

715 Delmore Drive, Roseau, Minnesota 56751. (218) 463-2500.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 2 hospices serving ZIP code 56751 had 2.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 31, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 31, 2026: recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 419 words

    “Based on observation, interview, and document review, the agency failed to ensure a comprehensive medication review of all client prescription and over-the-counter medications was completed for 1 of 1 patient (P1) whose medications were reviewed during a home visit. Findings include:P1’s plan of care (POC) 1/8/26 to 4/7/26, identified a start of care (SOC) date 1/8/26. P1’s ordered services included skilled nurse visits (SNV) one time per week for thirteen weeks for various assessments, evaluation, education and medication monitoring. plus 15 visits as needed (PRN). Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of breast and pain related to neoplasm. A number of medications and treatments were listed which included nonformulary over the counter (OTC) sleep medication and Senokot (a laxative) 8.6-50 milligrams (mg) two tablets two times per day. During a home visit on 3/31/26, at 11:30 a.m. family member (FM)-A stated he administered P1’s medications to her daily. FM-A stated he did not want the nurses to set up P1’s medications and he preferred to do it himself. FM-A stated P1 had regular bowel movements every day and has not taken a laxative for quite some time. FM-A could not remember the last time he gave P1 Senokot. FM-A gave stated he bought Sleep-Aid medication from the dollar store and gave P1 the medication every night with very good results. During interview on 3/31/26, at 12:15 a.m. registered nurse (RN)-A stated P1’s medication list should have been updated to show the Senokot was no longer taken two tablets twice a day, but being used as an as needed (PRN) medication. The nonformulary OTC sleep medication should have been updated to include the name of the medication that P1 was actually taking, as well as the dosage, as there were so many different OTC sleep medications available. It was important the client’s medication list reflected exactly what the client was actually taking. When interview on 3/31/26, at 3:54 p.m. the director of nursing stated the nurses were supposed to match what the patient reported to the physician orders and labels on the medication bottles. If any discrepancies were noted, the physician was to be notified. The DON would have expected P1’s Senokot order to be changed to PRN and all medications to be listed specifically to what medication was being taken and the dosage. The agency policy Medications dated 9/96, identified all medications would be listed on the client’s chart. The list would include the date the medication was ordered, the name of the medication, and the dose and frequency for administration.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 887 words

    “Based on interview and document review, the agency failed to ensure chaplain and volunteer visits were included on the plan of care (POC) for frequency and duration for 3 of 10 patients (P1, P4, P5) who’s medical records were reviewed for services. Findings include:P1P1’s plan of care (POC) 1/8/26 to 4/7/26, identified a start of care (SOC) date 1/8/26. P1’s ordered services included skilled nurse visits (SNV) one time per week for thirteen weeks for various assessments, evaluation, education and medication monitoring. plus 15 visits as needed (PRN). Social worker (SW) visits were ordered one time a week for one week for emotional and psychosocial support for the grieving and dying processes. plus 10 visits PRN. Chaplain visits were ordered 15 visits PRN for spiritual assessment, to provide spiritual care, emotional and spiritual grief support to the client and family. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of breast and pain related to neoplasm. P1’s Interdisciplinary Team Meeting and Hospice POC update dated 1/27/26, identified the hospice chaplain had made an initial visit and further visits were planned every one to two weeks.P1’s Interdisciplinary Team Meeting and Hospice POC update dated 3/13/26, identified the chaplain visits were occurring weekly to every other week.P1’s medical record identified chaplain visits on a scheduled basis of weekly to every other week and not PRN as identified on P1’s POC.During interview on 3/31/26, at 1:44 p.m. the hospice chaplain (HC) stated when a client was admitted to hospice the nurses would call her and let her know if the client wanted chaplain services. If the client was open to chaplain services she would visit and provide spiritual care, usually at most, one time per week. HC typically made visits to clients wanting her services, every week to every other week. HC had never recorded visit frequency or duration in a client’s POC. The nurse or someone at the agency would just put in a bunch of visits in the POC that the chaplain could draw from. HC would call the clients at the beginning of each week and schedule which day to go out for a visit. The visits were not for an acute type of visit.When interviewed on 3/21/26, at 2:30 p.m. the director of nursing (DON) stated if the chaplain was scheduling weekly or every other week visits with clients, the visits were not PRN and would need to have a frequency and duration on the client’s POC to indicate what frequency and duration visits were planned with that client for that episode of care.P4P4’s POC 8/21/25 to 11/18/25, identified a SOC date 8/21/25. P4 had services ordered for SNV one visit every week for 14 weeks for various assessments, evaluation, education and medication monitoring. Social worker (SW) visits were ordered once a week for one week plus 15 visits PRN for emotional and psychosocial support for the grieving and dying processes. Diagnoses included malignant melanoma with metastatic to brain (a type of skin cancer that has spread to the brain). P4’s Interdisciplinary Team Meeting and Hospice POC update dated 9/24/25, identified P4 had received three volunteer visits during his episode of care.P4’s medical record identified volunteer visits had occurred on a weekly basis for three weeks. P4’s POC did not identify when the volunteer services were initiated, how often scheduled visits were planned or the duration of the visits for P4’s episode of care. P5P5’s POC dated 12/9/25 to 3/8/26, identified a SOC date 12/9/25. SNV were ordered once per week for 13 weeks and five visits PRN for various assessments, evaluation, education and medication monitoring. Diagnoses included corticobasal syndrome (a progressive, neurological disorder), anxiety and depression. P5’s Interdisciplinary Team Meeting and Hospice POC update dated 2/13/26, identified a volunteer was visiting P5 weekly.P5’s medical record identified volunteer visits had occurred three times in December 2025 and once in January 2026. P5’s POC did not identify when the volunteer services were initiated, how often scheduled visits were planned or the duration of the visits for P5’s episode of care. During interview on 3/31/26, at 9:10 a.m. the volunteer coordinator (VC) stated she attended the Interdisciplinary Team Meetings and documented on the updated POC if a volunteer service was being utilized but had never been told to put frequency or duration or what the volunteer was doing for the patient in the home, i.e.: homemaking, errands, respite, socialization, etc. That would be something that would need to be addressed with the DON.When interviewed on 3/31/26, at 2:30 p.m. the DON stated the volunteers would have a sign-in sheet at the nursing homes, if they were seeing clients there. When seeing clients in their private homes, she could not be sure. The VC would know when volunteers were scheduled to see clients and so nursing would notify her of any changes with the client or if the client needed to cancel a volunteer visit. The VC would also know what the duties and care the volunteer provided to the client and/or family and the volunteer documented that in their visit notes as well. The DON would expect to see the volunteer frequency of services and job duties and care provided to each client on their POC.The agency policy Documentation of Volunteer Services dated 12/97, identified the policy was to ensure all services provided to the agency’s clients were documented in the client’s file.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 333 words

    “Based on interview and document review, the agency failed to ensure the plan of care (POC) included all medical supplies and appliances necessary to meet patient needs for 1 of 10 patients (P7) reviewed. Findings include:P7’s plan of care (POC) 1/15/26 to 4/14/26, identified a start of care (SOC) date 1/15/26. Skilled nurse visits (SNV) were ordered one time per week for 13 weeks for various assessments, evaluation, pain and medication management. Ten as needed (PRN) visits were ordered to address change in condition. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, kidney disease and diabetes. P7’s medication list on the POC included a number of medications and treatments, including an albuterol unit dose, to take 3 milliliters (ml) by nebulization every four hours PRN, budesonide take two ml by nebulization two times daily, DuoNeb take three ml by nebulization three times daily, and home oxygen as ordered, P7’s admission SNV note identified P7 had a 16 French foley catheter in place that would be changed on 2/13/26 and used a Cath Secure tab to secure the catheter tubing, as well as home oxygen at all times. P7’s medical record failed to identify if further catheter supplies such as a 16 French foley catheter, leg and/or bed bag, catheter secure tabs, sterile catheter insertion kits, and graduate cup would be needed in the future and how they would be obtained. P7’s medical record also lacked documentation if P7 owned a nebulizer and oxygen machine and/or if they were to be supplied by the hospice agency. During interview on 3/31/26, at 9:28 a.m. the director of nursing (DON) stated she was unable to find any documentation that supplies and/or equipment were being assessed in the client’s medical record. The DON stated that should be assessed at SOC and ongoing throughout a client’s episode of care. The agency policy Certification and Plan of Care dated 9/96, identified a plan of care would be developed for each client/family and all care provided would be in accordance with the POC.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 415 words

    “Based on interview and document review, the agency failed to ensure duties of volunteers who provided services to clients and families were addressed in the client’s plan of care (POC) for 2 of 2 patients (P4, P5) who received volunteer services in the home. Findings include:P4P4’s POC 8/21/25 to 11/18/25, identified a SOC date 8/21/25. P4 had services ordered for SNV one visit every week for 14 weeks for various assessments, evaluation, education and medication monitoring. Social worker (SW) visits were ordered once a week for one week plus 15 visits PRN for emotional and psychosocial support for the grieving and dying processes. Diagnoses included malignant melanoma with metastatic to brain (a type of skin cancer that has spread to the brain). P4’s Interdisciplinary Team Meeting and Hospice POC update dated 9/24/2, identified P4 had received three volunteer visits during his episode of care. P4’s medical record and POC lacked identification of the tasks and duties (such as homemaking, errands, respite care, reading, music, and/or socialization) the volunteer was assigned to perform during their volunteer visits. P5P5’s POC dated 12/9/25 to 3/8/26, identified a SOC date 12/9/25. SNV were ordered once per week for 13 weeks and five visits PRN for various assessments, evaluation, education and medication monitoring. Diagnoses included corticobasal syndrome (a progressive neurologic disease) anxiety and depression. P5’s Interdisciplinary Team Meeting and Hospice POC update dated 2/13/26, identified a volunteer was visiting P5 weekly.P5’s medical record and POC lacked identification of the tasks and duties (such as homemaking, errands, respite care, reading, music, and/or socialization) the volunteer was assigned to perform during their volunteer visits. During interview on 3/31/26, at 9:10 a.m. the volunteer coordinator (VC) stated she attended the Interdisciplinary Team Meetings and documented on the updated POC if a volunteer service was being utilized and how it was going. Volunteer duties usually included to sit and visit with patients, housekeeping, pray, but mostly visiting. Volunteers did not do medical help at all. VC had never been told to put what the volunteer was doing for the patient in the home, i.e.: homemaking, errands, respite, socialization, etc. During interview on 3/31/26, at 2:30 p.m. the director of nursing (DON) stated she would expect to have the task and duties a volunteer was performing in a client’s home to be addressed on the client’s POC. The agency policy Documentation of Volunteer Services dated 12/97, identified the policy was to ensure all services provided to the agency’s clients were documented in the client’s file.”

    Rule L0644. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 31, 2026Recertification inspection by the state4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 7, 1997.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 18.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 3.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 73.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 56% at home, 5% in assisted living, 32% in a nursing facility, 6% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day18.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends3.5%
Visits near death73.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 17 owners or officers are people: Keith W Okeson (corporate officer); Keith W Okeson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Chuck D Lindner (corporate director); Beth L Johnson (corporate director); Corwin D Vatnsdal (corporate director); Therese A Mcbride (corporate director); Catherine A Huss (corporate officer); Catherine A Huss (managing employee (on the payroll)); Shayne K Isane (corporate director); Mark W Wilson (corporate director); Ronald W Brummer (corporate director); Mark T Karl (corporate director); Brenda K Sather (corporate director); Dan A Urness (corporate director); Jessica R Foss (corporate director); Matthew L Ulwelling (corporate director); Megan S Comstock (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 68% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 26.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 56751, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 2; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 2 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 56751
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Lifecare Hospice This hospice4
Hia Hospice0

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.