Aspirus St. Luke’s at Home-Hospice-Duluth
A hospice in Duluth, Minnesota 55805
1011 East 1st Street, Duluth, Minnesota 55805. (218) 249-6100.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 10 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 9of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
10 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 6 hospices serving ZIP code 55805 had 4.
The last inspection on record was on Nov 10, 2023: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Nov 10, 2023: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 124 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment and reassessment identifies the patient’s need for hospice care and services. For example: on review of RRHV#1 the documentation noted 2 open wounds on the patient’s buttocks yet there were no measurements noted in the clinical documentation as required by policy upon initial discovery and first visit of the calendar week. In RRHV#4 the patient had a stage 4 wound to the coccyx that there was not documentation noted that the wound been fully assessed each week per the policy. RRNHV#11 had wounds with dressing changes and the wound assessment was not documented weekly per organization policy. This observation was reviewed with the Hospice Manager.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 114 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to assess potential medication-related problems, including adverse effects, drug reactions, significant side effects, and significant drug interactions, including ineffective drug therapy, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. On home observation for RRHV#2 the RN was observed to perform a medication reconciliation, yet failed to effectively assess the medications in the patient home, as she reviewed the medication profile and reviewed with high risk medications with the patient, yet did not review the medications in the home nor discuss the medications listed on the profile with the patient. This observation was reviewed with the RN and the Hospice Manager.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 362 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care reflect the patient and family goals based on problems identified in the comprehensive assessment that were specific, measurable, and time-bound. In review of RRHV#1 the goals were noted to not be specific, measurable, nor time-bound such as urinary catheter irrigation completed per orders and patient is responding appropriately to current meds. In RRHV#2 a goal was noted to be patient verbalize symptom control of sleep disturbance. In RRHV#3 there were examples such as facility staff is knowledgeable and involved in hospice plan of care for patient and continuity of care is achieved. There were no achieve by dates for the goals. Throughout all records reviewed there was a noted disconnect between the goals established on the plan of care updates and the plan of care report. On the plan of care report all goals have no achieve by dates and were noted to not be specific, individualized, and measurable. In RRHV#4 the goals established on the recent update all had the same achieve by date set for the end of the benefit period. In RRNHV#5 all goals in the update were noted to have an achieve by date of the end of benefit period 1 or 2. The goals that achieve by dates ended at BP1 were continued with and throughout hospice care. In RRNHV#6 an example of updated goal that was non-specific to the patients dyspnea was (pt, sister and niece) will verbalize/demonstrate understanding of managing cardiopulmonary symptoms within constraints of the disease by 9/4/23 and throughout episode of care. Another goal was decision has been made to deactivation of pacemaker/internal defibrillator but no achieve by date. In RRNHV#8 an example of a goals was (Pt) will receive assistance with personal care and hygiene and other activities as needed. In RRNHV# 10 all goals on the most recent update were to be achieved by the end of the benefit period. Throughout all records reviewed there was a trend of goals that were non-specific, not measurable and/or appropriately time-bound. These observations were reviewed with the Hospice Manager and Home Care Services Leadership.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 312 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. For example: on review of RRHV#1 the patient had wounds documented and dressing change orders, however there was no skin integrity care plan to guide the care. Further, there was documentation of starting antibiotics in October but the infection was not reflected in the plan of care. There was an order to change the frequency of the suprapubic catheter changes, yet the change was not reflected in the care plan. On Review of RRHV#4 the caregiver noted on home observation of a Volunteer visiting her regularly, but the volunteer was not reflected on the plan of care. On RRNHV#5 the patient was transitioned to GIP level of care for 4 days in September yet the GIP stay was not reflected in the plan of care. In RRNHV#6 there was documentation of a patient fall, yet the fall was not reflected in the plan of care. There was documentation of issues with dyspnea and education on pursed lip breathing but the issue was not specifically reflected in the care plan. In RRNHV#7 there was documentation of a UTI with antibiotics without a care plan to guide the care. Further, there were multiple medication changes for increased pain, wound odor, and constipation yet the changes in patient status were not reflected in the plan of care. RRNHV#8 also had documentation of increased pain requiring increase in morphine and fentanyl, but the change in status was not reflected in the care plan. In RRNHV#13 the patient was evaluated by the Chaplain and orders noted to develop a spiritual plan of care yet no spiritual care plan was noted in the record. These observations were reviewed with the Hospice Manager.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 182 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. For example: on review of RRHV#1 there was a physicians order that stated suprapubic catheter changes every 3 weeks. The order was incomplete and did not specify a catheter/balloon size. In RRHV#2 an order on the medication profile for oxygen stated O2 2 liters per NC continuously may increase O2 to get sats greater than 90% PRN activity. The order did not give specific instruction on how much to increase the oxygen nor did it specify how often to monitor O2 saturation during activity. During the home observation for RRHV#2 the RN and patient discussed usage of Bipap yet there were no orders for Bipap with settings noted on the clinical record. In review of RRNHV#11 there was an order for wound treatments in September that was incomplete as it did not include the location of the wound. These observations were reviewed with the Hospice Manager.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(3)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 191 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure the hospice conduct and document a patient-specific comprehensive assessment and reassessment that identifies the patient’s need for hospice care and services that included patient and family spiritual orientation, including their desire for the involvement of a religious group - Spiritual concerns or needs identified by the patient or family, such as despair, suffering, guilt, and forgiveness. On review of RRHV#1 it was noted there was no spiritual assessment conducted at admission. On the RN initial comprehensive assess under the question was psychosocial/spiritual status assessed the answer no was documented along with not appropriate at the time of evaluation. On review of RRNHV#12 the current update to the POC completed at recert for 3rd BP noted Chaplain to evaluate and develop a plan of care, with a goal that Chaplain will develop a POC however there was no documentation of a Chaplain assessment completed. In RRNHV#14 had similar update to the poc that noted Chaplain to assess and develop a plan of care and no assessment was documented. This observation was reviewed with the Hospice Manager.”
-
Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. During the volunteer program tracer, the Volunteer Coordinator discussed many volunteer recruitment and retainment effort but was unable to show any documentation of the efforts as required per policy. This observation was reviewed with the Volunteer Coordinator, and Hospice Manager.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 132 words
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 8 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the staff competence was assessed and documented once every three years, or more frequently as required by organization policy. For example: on review of HR#1 for the MSW there was no documentation of competency assessment at least once every three years. This observation was reviewed with the HR team and Home Care Leadership. Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 8 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to ensure staff competence was initially assessed and documented as part of orientation. For example: on review of HR#4 for the VC, there was no documentation that skills and competency was assessed as part of orientation. These observations were reviewed with the HR Team and Hospice Leadership.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 92 words
“Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization failed to ensure the patient record contains information that reflects the patient’s care, treatment, or services. For example: on review of RRHV#2 during the home observation the patient discussed congestion with the RN and noted the CG had gotten Mucinex for the patient, then further the patient presented a prescription bottle of guaifenesin that she noted she had for some time, however the medication was not listed on the medication profile. This observation was reviewed with the Hospice Manager.”
-
Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))
The inspectors’ words, 307 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure that complete and accurate clinical records were maintained. For example: On review of RRHV#2 the RN documentation of medication reconciliation stated yes that expiration dates were reviewed and medication reconciliation was conducted per policy, however on home observation of the medication reconciliation process it was not observed that the expiration dates of medications were checked, nor was the reconciliation carried out per policy. In RRNHV#6 there were three RN visit notes with aide supervisory visits documented in October and November. The RN documented that the aide had not been to the home yet but continued to complete the aide supervisory with documentation that yes the aide follows the plan of care, and yes aide notifies of issues, and that no changes to the POC were indicated at the time. These observations were reviewed with the Hospice Manager. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure that complete and accurate clinical records were maintained. For example On review of RRHV#2 the RN documentation of medication reconciliation was stated yes to expiration dates were reviewed and medication reconciliation was conducted per policy, however on home observation of the medication reconciliation process it was not observed that the expiration dates of medications were checked, nor was the reconciliation carried out per policy. In RRNHV#6 there were three RN visit notes with aide supervisory visits documented in October and November. The RN documented that the aide had not been to the home yet but continued to complete the aide supervisory with documentation that yes the aide follows the plan of care, and yes aide notifies of issues, and that no changes to the POC were indicated at the time. These observations were reviewed with the Hospice Manager.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2023 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 10 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since May 6, 1992.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.4% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 39% at home, 27% in assisted living, 30% in a nursing facility, 4% in a hospital.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 15.8 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 8.2% |
| Visits near death | 95.4% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Aspirus, Inc. owns 100% directly since Mar 1, 2024.
- Aspirus, Inc. runs it.
- 17 owners or officers are people: Scott Allen Lyons (corporate officer, 0%); Mitchell Lynn Cardwell (corporate director, 0%); Maurine Helen Settergren (corporate director); Helena Everett Jackson (corporate director, 0%); Anna Christine Sackette-Urness (corporate director, 0%); James Matheson (corporate director, 0%); Jack Herman Seiler (corporate officer, 0%); Jack Herman Seiler (corporate director, 0%); Nicholas J Van Deelen (corporate officer); Nicholas J Van Deelen (managing employee (on the payroll)); Aimee Nelson Vanstraaten (corporate director); Lori Peck (corporate officer); Lori Peck (managing employee (on the payroll)); Tyler Hack (managing employee (on the payroll)); Matthew F Heywood (corporate officer, 0%); Matthew F Heywood (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Yvonne Marie Solon (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aspirus, Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Mar 1, 2024 |
| Aspirus, Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Mar 1, 2024 |
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 98.25% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 65.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 9 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 6 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 55805, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 10.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Essentia Health St Mary’s Hospice & Palliative Care Services | 8 |
| Aspirus St. Luke’s at Home-Hospice-Duluth This hospice | 10 |
| Ecumen Hospice | 2 |
| St Croix Hospice | 3 |
| Moments Hospice | 2 |
| Gentiva 1 | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.