Hearth Record

Mayo Clinic Hospice

A hospice in Rochester, Minnesota 55905

200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, Minnesota 55905. (507) 284-4002.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 31, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 22, 2026: complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies
  • Patients’ rights (42 CFR 418.52)

    The inspectors’ words, 146 words

    “Based on the number of deficiencies cited and the severity, the hospice agency failed to meet the Condition of Participation: L500 at 42 CFR 418.52. The agency failed to immediately investigate alleged abuse and take action to prevent further potential violations during the investigation. They also failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Agency (SA) within 5 working days. Refer to L509: Based on interview and document review the hospice agency failed to immediately investigate allegations of abuse and failed to take action to prevent further violations when an allegation was made for 1 of 4 patients (P1) reviewed for abuse. Refer to L511: Based on interview and document review the hospice agency failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency (SA) within 5 working days of becoming aware of the allegation for 1 of 4 patients (P1) reviewed for abuse.”

    Rule L0500. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(4)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 625 words

    “Based on interview and document review the hospice agency failed to immediately investigate allegations of abuse and failed to take action to prevent further violations when an allegation was made for 1 of 4 patients (P1) reviewed for abuse. Findings include:P1’s hospice plan of care (POC) for benefit period 4/9/26 through 7/7/26 identified P1 was on hospice with diagnoses of Alzheimer’s Disease, and dementia with moderate agitation. P1 required assistance of one person with all activities of daily living and transfers.P1’s aide visit note on 5/11/26, from 12:56 p.m. – 1:23 p.m., indicated P1 refused all cares and became physically aggressive with cares.During an interview on 5/21/26, at 11:11 a.m., the assisted living manager stated P1 resided in their memory care unit and on 5/11/26, and between 1:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m., a staff member reported witnessing the hospice aide (HA)-A transfer P1 by herself and throw P1 into the bed “like a ragdoll”. The incident was reported to the hospice agency and to P1’s family member (FM) on 5/11/26.During an interview on 5/21/26, at 3:55 p.m., administrator / nurse manager (NM)-A stated she received a call from the assisted living manager on 5/11/26 reporting rough care by HA-A. On 5/12/26 NM-A informed NM-B of the allegations and instructed her to notify the nurse administrator/DON. NM-A stated HA-A continued to work on 5/12/26 and visited four patients that day. She was off work 5/13/26 and 5/14/26, then placed on administrative leave on 5/15/26.During an interview on 5/21/26, at 4:05 p.m., the nurse administrator (director of nursing) stated on 5/15/26, NM-B informed her there was a report of rough care on 5/11/26 by HA-A. She stated she should have been informed immediately when the hospice agency became aware of the allegations. She stated HA-A should have been removed and put on administrative leave upon receiving the report. NM-B was not available for interview at the time of survey.During an interview on 5/22/26, at 10:25 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A stated she learned of the incident from a staff member at the assisted living on 5/12/26. They stated it happened on 5/11/26. She said the assisted living staff called the hospice agency and informed a nursing supervisor of the rough care.During an interview on 5/22/26, at 1:35 p.m., family member (FM)-A stated the assisted living staff informed him “a hospice person flung her on the bed”. FM-A was unable to recall the date of the incident. FM-A stated the hospice agency did not talk to him about the incident.The hospice agency Investigation Report, dated 5/21/26, indicated on 5/11/26 the assisted living staff reported concerns about an interaction that occurred between HA-A and P1. The hospice agency began their investigation and placed HA-A on administrative leave effective 5/15/26.The hospice agency filed a report with SA on 5/22/26 at 2:10 p.m., indicating the assisted living caregiver witnessed HA-A transfer P1 independently by pulling on P1’s wrists to a standing position, causing P1 to be unstable and swung her on to her bed causing her to fall backwards. The report indicated pulling the patient from the wheelchair and aggressively swinging her into her bed was a violation of the agency’s code of conduct.The agency Abuse, Neglect or Exploitation of Vulnerable Adults and Minors Procedure, dated 4/28/26, directed when a mandated reporter knows or has reason to believe maltreatment of a vulnerable adult has occurred, the reporter must make a report externally. The personnel interacting with the patient must make a report to the common entry point immediately (no later than 24 hours) after becoming aware of the suspected maltreatment. Report immediately to the hospice administrator, or designee, when filing an official abuse/neglect report. The policy lacked direction to take action to prevent further potential abuse during the investigation of abuse allegations.”

    Rule L0509. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(4)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 540 words

    “Based on interview and document review the hospice agency failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency (SA) within 5 working days of becoming aware of the allegation for 1 of 4 patients (P1) reviewed for abuse. Findings include:P1’s hospice plan of care (POC) for benefit period 4/9/26 through 7/7/26 identified P1 was on hospice with diagnoses of Alzheimer’s Disease, and dementia with moderate agitation. P1 required assistance of one person with all activities of daily living and transfers.P1’s aide visit note on 5/11/26, from 12:56 p.m. – 1:23 p.m., indicated P1 refused all cares and became physically aggressive with cares.During an interview on 5/21/26, at 11:11 a.m., the assisted living manager stated P1 resided in their memory care unit and on 5/11/26, and between 1:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m., an assisted living caregiver reported witnessing the hospice aide (HA)-A transfer P1 by herself and throw P1 into the bed “like a ragdoll”. The incident was reported to the hospice agency and to P1’s family member (FM) on 5/11/26.During an interview on 5/21/26, at 3:55 p.m., administrator / nurse manager (NM)-A stated she received a call from the assisted living manager on 5/11/26 reporting rough care by HA-A. On 5/12/26 she informed NM-B of the allegations and instructed her to notify the nurse administrator /director of nursing (DON). NM-A stated she was a mandated reporter but the agency instructed her not to file a vulnerable adult abuse report.During an interview on 5/21/26, at 4:05 p.m., the nurse administrator / DON stated she was informed there was a report of P1 receiving rough care on 5/15/26 by NM-B. The hospice did not make a report to the SA as their team assigned to investigate would determine if a vulnerable adult abuse report was needed.During an interview on 5/22/26, at 10:25 a.m., registered nurse (RN)-A stated she learned of the incident from a staff member at the assisted living on 5/12/26. They stated it happened on 5/11/26. She said the assisted living staff called the hospice agency and informed a nursing supervisor of the rough care. She stated she was a mandated reporter but did not make a report to the SA.The hospice agency Investigation Report, dated 5/21/26, indicated on 5/11/26 the assisted living staff reported concerns about an interaction that occurred between HA-A and P1.The hospice agency filed a report with SA on 5/22/26 at 2:10 p.m., indicating the assisted living caregiver witnessed HA-A transfer P1 independently by pulling on P1’s wrists to a standing position, causing P1 to be unstable and swung her on to her bed causing her to fall backwards. The report indicated pulling the patient from the wheelchair and aggressively swinging her into her bed was a violation of the agency’s code of conduct.The agency Abuse, Neglect or Exploitation of Vulnerable Adults and Minors Procedure, dated 4/28/26, directed when a mandated reporter knows or has reason to believe maltreatment of a vulnerable adult has occurred, the reporter must make a report externally. The personnel interacting with the patient must make a report to the common entry point immediately (no later than 24 hours) after becoming aware of the suspected maltreatment. Report immediately to the hospice administrator, or designee, when filing an official abuse/neglect report.”

    Rule L0511. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 31, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
May 22, 2026Complaint inspection by the state3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 14, 1990.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.3% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 42% at home, 19% in assisted living, 18% in a nursing facility, 20% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.9%
Visits near death93.3% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 44 owners or officers are people: Rafael Fonseca (corporate director); Charles Smith (corporate officer, 0%); Nneka Comfere (corporate director, 0%); Christina Zorn (corporate officer); Katherine Baicker (corporate director, 0%); Anne Sweeney (corporate director); Julie Gerberding (corporate director, 0%); Sarah Mclaughlin (corporate director, 0%); Donald Remy (corporate director, 0%); Natalie Caine (corporate director, 0%); Roshanak Didehban (corporate director, 0%); Jed Davis (corporate director, 0%); Matthew Callstrom (corporate director); Charanjit Rihal (corporate director); Richard Gray (corporate officer, 0%); Richard Gray (corporate director, 0%); Margot Melanson-Arnold (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Richard Davis (corporate director); Jay Alix (corporate director); Ajani Dunn (corporate officer, 0%); Ajani Dunn (corporate director, 0%); Ursula Burns (corporate director); Kevin J Whitford (managing employee (on the payroll)); Abimbola Famuyide (corporate director); Kent Thielen (corporate officer); Kent Thielen (corporate director); George Bilicic (corporate director); Joseph Colaiano (corporate officer, 0%); Sally Anne Brown (corporate officer, 0%); Michael Shannon (corporate director, 0%); Kristin Peck (corporate director, 0%); Eric Moore (corporate director, 0%); Paul Gorman (corporate director); Dennis Dahlen (corporate officer); Douglas Baker (corporate director, 0%); Gianrico Farrugia (corporate officer); Gianrico Farrugia (corporate director); Robin Roberts (corporate director, 0%); Martine Rothblatt (corporate director, 0%); Nancy Peretsman (corporate director, 0%); James Francis (corporate director); Amy Williams (corporate director); Peter Lee (corporate director, 0%); James Robo (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 91% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.82% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 63.3% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • There aren’t enough hospices serving patients in ZIP code 55905 to compare.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Mayo Clinic Hospice This hospice3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.