Hearth Record

Odyssey Hospice Care, LLC

A hospice in Troy, Michigan 48083

3150 Livernois Rd, Suite 210, Troy, Michigan 48083. (810) 515-1457.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

17 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 44 hospices serving ZIP code 48083 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 10, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

17 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 10, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies
  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that the hospice informed and provided written information to the patient concerning its policies on advance directives, including a description of applicable state law. Patient 10: On the patient consent there is a signature from the hospice agency advanced nurse practitioner as the patient legal representative, the relationship to the patient line below this signature is left blank. The same signature appears on the signature of witness on the consents.”

    Rule L0503. Standard-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that the hospice obtained the patient’s or representative’s signature confirming that they received a copy of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities. Patient 10: On the patient consent there is a signature from the hospice agency advanced nurse practitioner as the patient legal representative, the relationship to the patient line below this signature is left blank. The same signature appears on the signature of witness on the consents.”

    Rule L0504. Standard-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that if a state court has not adjudged a patient incompetent, any legal representative designated by the patient in accordance with state law may exercise the patient’s rights to the extent allowed by state law. Patient 10: On the patient consent there is a signature from the hospice agency advanced nurse practitioner as the patient legal representative, the relationship to the patient line below this signature is left blank. The same signature appears on the signature of witness on the consents.”

    Rule L0507. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient 10: On the patient consent there is a signature from the hospice agency advanced nurse practitioner as the patient legal representative, the relationship to the patient line below this signature is left blank. The same signature appears on the signature of witness on the consents.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence of the appropriate documentation for release of confidential information. Patient 10: On the patient consent there is a signature from the hospice agency advanced nurse practitioner as the patient legal representative, the relationship to the patient line below this signature is left blank. The same signature appears on the signature of witness on the consents.”

    Rule L0516. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the services covered under the hospice benefit. Patient 10: On the patient consent there is a signature from the hospice agency advanced nurse practitioner as the patient legal representative, the relationship to the patient line below this signature is left blank. The same signature appears on the signature of witness on the consents.”

    Rule L0518. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(8))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the scope of services that the hospice will provide and specific limitations on those services. Patient 10: On the patient consent there is a signature from the hospice agency advanced nurse practitioner as the patient legal representative, the relationship to the patient line below this signature is left blank. The same signature appears on the signature of witness on the consents.”

    Rule L0519. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 267 words

    “Upon patient record review and home visits, 5 of 14 (Patient #2,3,4,8,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 2: Upon a home visit the patient is taking, Atorvastatin 40mg, Metformin 500mg Methenamine Hippurate 1gm, Seroquel 25mg, Refresh tears, Rexulti 1mg, Zoloft 50mg, Docusate 100mg, Trospium Chloride 20mg, these medications are not on the medication profile. Corrected on Site. Patient 3: The medication profile list MiraLAX 17gm daily as needed, there is no diluent for this medication. Corrected on site. Patient 4: Upon home visit the patient is taking Lorazepam 0.5mg one tablet every day and every four hours as needed, the medication profile lists Lorazepam 1mg every 4 hours as needed and there is not a scheduled dose of 0.5 mg daily. On the home visit there are medications not on the medication profile: Atropine Sulfate drops, Dulcolax 10mg, and Acetaminophen 650mg Suppository. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medication profile list Acetaminophen 650mg suppository every 4 hours as needed and Acetaminophen PM 500-25mg 2 tablets at bedtime there is not a daily limit for the Acetaminophen. Patient 10: The medication profile list Acetaminophen 650mg suppository every 4 hours as needed and Acetaminophen 500mg, 1 tablet every 8 hours as needed, there is not a daily limit for the Acetaminophen.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 169 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #3,4,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3: In the patient record there is an order for Aspirin and Plavix in the patient record, there is not a risk for bleeding with goals and interventions on the plan of care. Corrected on site Patient 4: In the patient record there is Aspirin ordered, there is not a risk of bleeding on the plan of care with goals and interventions. Corrected on site. Patient 8: In the patient record there is an order for Aspirin, there is not a risk for bleeding on the plan of care with goals and interventions.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 257 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #2,3,4,8,10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: Upon a home visit the patient is taking, Atorvastatin 40mg, Metformin 500mg Methenamine Hippurate 1gm, Seroquel 25mg, Refresh tears, Rexulti 1mg, Zoloft 50mg, Docusate 100mg, Trospium Chloride 20mg, these medications are not on the plan of care. Corrected on Site. Patient 3: On the plan of care there is MiraLAX 17gm daily as needed, there is no diluent for this medication. Corrected on site. Patient 4: Upon home visit the patient is taking Lorazepam 0.5mg one tablet every day and every four hours as needed, on the hospice plan of care there is an order for Lorazepam 1mg every 4 hours as needed and there is not a scheduled dose of 0.5 mg daily. On the home visit there are medications not on the hospice plan of care: Atropine Sulfate drops, Dulcolax 10mg, and Acetaminophen 650mg Suppository. Corrected on site. Patient 8: On the plan of care there is an order record for Acetaminophen 650mg suppository every 4 hours as needed and Acetaminophen PM 500-25mg 2 tablets at bedtime there is not a daily limit for the Acetaminophen. Patient 10: On the plan of care there is an order for Acetaminophen 650mg suppository every 4 hours as needed and Acetaminophen 500mg, 1 tablet every 8 hours as needed, there is not a daily limit for the Acetaminophen.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #7,9) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 7: In the patient record there is an order for oxygen, there is not an oxygen concentrator listed on the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 9: On the patient medication profile there is an order for oxygen, there is not an order for an oxygen concentrator on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 3: In the patient record there is an order for SN 1W1, 2W2, 1W10. There was a nursing visit on 7/31/25 and 8/1/25 in the first week of admission. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    “Upon observation and home visits 1 of 3 (Patient #1), there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient 1: On a home visit the RN did not follow the bag technique of the hospice’s policy, the RN did not wash her hands before patient care and performing vitals and before removing equipment from the bag.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. No evidence that the agency utilized volunteers for at least 5% of the total patient care hours in 2024. The total usage of volunteers for 2024 was less than 1%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 10: On the patient election of benefit form there is a signature from the hospice agency advanced nurse practitioner as the patient legal representative.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,2,4) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: On the psychosocial assessment 7/19/25 there is documentation, “Pt. is 8, Y O F”, 8 is the incorrect age of the patient and F is not an approved abbreviation. On the SN assessment there is documentation, “Cgs verbalize understanding and cooperation”, Cgs is not an approved abbreviation. Corrected on site. Patient 2: On the psychosocial assessment 08/01/25 there is documentation, “92Y Y O M”, Y Y O M is not an approved abbreviation. Corrected on site. Patient 4: On 9/4/25 the RN comprehensive assessment contains a goal to have acute confusion/delirium/agitation reduced to a manageable level to return to routine level of care. The patient is not on GIP and is currently in routine level of care, this documentation is not clear and complete. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 12 (Personnel #4) did not have evidence of State and Federal criminal background checks being obtained on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records and in accordance with state requirements according to Michigan state Act 28 of 2006; MI Choice Waiver Minimum Operating Standards. Personnel 4: Upon record review there is no evidence of a state and federal background check for the Medical Director.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 10, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care17 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 10, 2025.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Eleas Telegadas (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Eleas Telegadas (holds 5% or more security interest, 100%); Eleas Telegadas (corporate officer, 100%); Eleas Telegadas (corporate director, 100%); Baldev K Gupta (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Lisa R Dugas (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 44 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 48083, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 17.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.