Hearth Record

Optimal Care Hospice

A hospice in Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546

770 Kenmoor Ave, Suite 100, Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546. (616) 537-8971.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 19 hospices serving ZIP code 49546 had 7.5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 2, 2025: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 27, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 482 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care reflects patient and family goals and identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 19 (16%) clinical records reviewed, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure the individualized written plan of care reflected patient and family goals and identified planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. Clinical Record 2: The patient, a skilled nursing facility resident, elected hospice services on 01/12/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease without dyskinesia with fluctuations. The initial nursing assessment dated 01/12/2024 included documentation that the patient had dysphagia, required a pureed diet with thickened liquids, had a cough, and was at risk for aspiration. The written plan of care dated 01/12/2024 did not reflect patient and family goals and planned interventions associated with the patient’s dysphagia and aspiration risk identified in the comprehensive assessment. A nursing coordination note dated 01/17/2024 included documentation that the patient had tested positive for COVID-19. The clinical record contained no evidence that the plan of care was updated to reflect patient and family goals, planned interventions, and precautions associated with the patient’s diagnosis of COVID-19. Clinical Record 7: The patient, an assisted living facility resident, elected hospice services on 02/02/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The initial nursing assessment dated 02/02/2024 included documentation that the patient had a high fall risk. The written plan of care dated 02/02/2024 did not reflect patient and family goals and planned interventions associated with the patient’s fall risk identified in the comprehensive assessment. The nursing assessment dated 07/12/2024 included documentation that the patient had increased dysphagia and coughing with oral intake. The clinical record contained no evidence that the plan of care was updated to reflect patient and family goals, planned interventions, and precautions associated with the patient’s dysphagia and aspiration risk. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected hospice services on 09/06/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The initial nursing assessment dated 09/06/2024 included documentation that the patient had a high fall risk. The written plan of care dated 09/6/2024 did not reflect patient and family goals and planned interventions associated with the patient’s fall risk identified in the comprehensive assessment. A nursing coordination note dated 09/22/2024 included documentation that the patient had tested positive for COVID-19. The clinical record contained no evidence that the plan of care was updated to reflect patient and family goals, planned interventions, and precautions associated with the patient’s diagnosis of COVID-19. During joint clinical record reviews and interviews on 09/27/2024, the Administrator, Regional Clinical Director, and Vice President of Hospice confirmed that the plans of care identified did not reflect goals and planned interventions specific to the patients’ assessed problems.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 485 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness, including measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 19 (21%) clinical records reviewed, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure the individualized written plan of care (POC) included measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the POC. Clinical Record 1: The patient, an assisted living facility resident, elected the hospice benefit on 08/23/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of unspecified pulmonary hypertension. The initial nursing assessment dated 08/23/2024 included documentation that the patient had verbally reported pain rated four out of ten and required scheduled hydrocodone 5mg/acetaminophen 325mg three times a day and as needed up to six tablets in a 24-hour day. The plan of care dated 08/23/2024 included the goals, pain would be managed at a level acceptable to the patient and medications would be managed appropriately as evidenced by steady symptom control. The plan did not include the measurability of acceptable pain level, appropriate medication management, and steady symptom control as identified by and specific to the patient and family. Clinical Record 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/30/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of other cerebrovascular disease. The plan of care dated 07/27/2024 included the goal, that changes in neurological status would be addressed appropriately. The plan did not identify the specific neurological changes possible with the patient’s specific terminal illness and the measurability of appropriate as identified by and specific to the patient and family. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 09/06/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of unspecified chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The initial nursing assessment dated 09/06/2024 included documentation that the patient had a Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) score of six out of ten. The plan of care dated 09/06/2024 included the goal, pain would be managed at a level acceptable to the patient. The plan did not include the measurability of acceptable as identified by and specific to the patient and family. Clinical Record 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 03/19/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of other symptoms and signs with cognitive functions following other cerebrovascular disease. The plan of care dated 03/19/2024 included the goal, changes in neurological status would be addressed appropriately. The plan did not identify the specific neurological changes possible with the patient’s specific terminal illness and the measurability of appropriate as identified by and specific to the patient and family. During joint clinical record reviews and interviews on 09/27/2024, the Administrator, Regional Clinical Director, and Vice President of Hospice confirmed the individual written plans of care identified did not include measurable outcomes associated with pain and defined neurological changes as identified by and specific to the patient and family.”

    Rule L0548. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 456 words

    “It is required that a hospice aide provides services that are ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group and included in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 18 (22%) clinical records reviewed of patients that received hospice aide services, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure the aide provided services as ordered by the Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) and included in the plan of care. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/23/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of unspecified pulmonary hypertension. The plan of care dated 08/23/2024 included a visit frequency order for the hospice aide of two visits per week starting the week of 08/25/2024. A missed hospice aide visit dated 08/29/2024 included documentation that the patient had refused aide services on 08/29/2024. The clinical record contained no evidence that a second aide visit was provided the week of 08/25/2024 and no documentation of why the visit was missed. Clinical Record 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/29/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of hemiplegia following a cerebral infarction affecting the left dominant side. The physician’s order dated 09/16/2024 included a visit frequency order for the hospice aide of three visits per week starting the week of 09/15/2024. The clinical record contained documented visits on 09/16/2024 and 09/20/2024. The clinical record contained no evidence that a third aide visit was provided the week of 09/16/2024 and no documentation of why the visit was missed. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/08/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease with late onset. The plan of care dated 08/04/2024 included a visit frequency order for the hospice aide of two visits per week. The clinical record contained documented visits on 08/06/2024 and 08/30/2024. The clinical record contained no evidence that a second aide visit was provided the weeks of 08/04/2024 and 08/25/2024 and no documentation of why the visits were missed. Clinical Record 16: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/13/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of other cerebrovascular disease. The plan of care dated 04/14/2024 included a visit frequency order for the hospice aide of once per week for eight weeks. The clinical record contained a documented visit on 04/17/2024. The clinical record contained no evidence that the aide provided visits for the weeks 04/21/2024 through 06/02/2024 and no documentation of why the visits were not made. During joint clinical record reviews and interviews on 09/27/2024, the Administrator, Regional Clinical Director, and Vice President of Hospice confirmed the clinical records contained no evidence of aide visits made as ordered during the weeks identified and no documentation of why the visits were missed or not made.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 320 words

    “It is required that volunteers are used in day-to-day administrative and/or direct patient care roles. Volunteer services provided to patients/families are in a defined role and under the supervision of a designated hospice employee. Volunteer services are noted in the plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 4 (50%) clinical records reviewed of patients that received volunteer services, it was revealed that the agency did not ensure volunteer services were noted in the plan of care. Clinical Record 4: The patient, an assisted living facility resident, elected the hospice benefit on 04/29/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of hemiplegia following a cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side. The volunteer care plan dated 05/14/2024 included plans for volunteer services to be provided to the patient once bi-weekly for companionship The plans of care, reviewed and updated every 14 days since volunteer assignment on 05/14/2024, contained no documented evidence of the volunteer services provided. Clinical Record 5: The patient, an assisted living facility resident, elected the hospice benefit on 06/05/2024 with a terminal diagnosis of hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease (CKD) with heart failure and unspecified stage 1-4 CKD. The volunteer care plan dated 07/29/2024 included plans for volunteer services to be provided to the patient once per week for pet therapy companionship. The plans of care, reviewed and updated no less frequently than every 14 days since volunteer assignment on 07/29/2024, contained no documented evidence of the volunteer services provided. During joint clinical record reviews and interviews on 09/27/2024, the Administrator, Regional Clinical Director, and Vice President of Hospice confirmed the plans of care (POCs) identified did not include documentation of volunteer services provided. The leaders confirmed that an organizational plan of correction has been developed and a process to ensure volunteer services are added to POCs for patient’s currently receiving volunteer services and immediately upon volunteer assignment.”

    Rule L0644. Standard-level.

Dec 15, 2023: complaint inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner2 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(iii))

    The inspectors’ words, 243 words

    “It is required that the documented comprehensive assessment includes. a drug profile that contains the patient’s current: Prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) drugs; . Supplements; Herbal remedies; and Other alternative treatments that could affect drug therapy. The medication review process includes the identification of the following: The effectiveness of drug therapy; Drug side effects; Actual or potential drug interactions; Duplicate drug therapy; Drug therapy associated with laboratory monitoring. The assessment includes evidence that common side effects of medication in hospice populations are anticipated, and, as appropriate, preventive measures are implemented to manage the side effects. The drug profile is updated per the hospice policy and procedure, but, at minimum, at the time of each comprehensive assessment and/or when new medication is added, or changes are made to existing medication. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 6 (17%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure update of the medication profile and consequently a full medication review for potential interactions. Clinical Record 4: The nursing assessment dated 9/7/23, documented a patient complaint of urinary tract infection (UTI), and urine was concentrated. The physician was notified and Levaquin 250mg po daily started. However, the medication profile was not revised to include Levaquin. No review of the medication was documented. During an interview, the Administrator and Corporate Clinical Supervisor confirmed the finding and stated the visit was made by a new Nurse Practitioner who was still learning.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care: Identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. 1 of 6 (17%) clinical records reviewed, revealed the agency did not ensure the plan of care was updated with all interventions and goals identified in the initial or updated comprehensive assessment. Clinical Record 4: The nursing visit dated 9/7/23, documented the patient felt like she had a urinary tract infection (UTI), and had concentrated urine. The physician was contacted and Levaquin 250mg started. The plan of care was not updated with interventions or goals for urinary tract infections. During an interview, the Administrator and Corporate Supervisor confirmed the finding and stated that interventions and goals for UTI were not added to the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 2, 2025Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Sep 27, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner4 deficiencies cited
Dec 15, 2023Complaint inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 5, 2022.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 2% at home, 89% in assisted living, 8% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.8%
Visits near death95.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Expect Exceptional, LLC owns 100% directly since Apr 11, 2024.
  • Careline Holdco, LLC runs it.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Joseph Donald Mead (owns 5% or more through other companies, 82.05%); William L Deary (owns 5% or more through other companies, 14.58%); Nicholas M Kielhorn (managing employee (under contract)); Joseph Donald Mead (corporate officer); Joseph Donald Mead (corporate director); Erik J Wilson (corporate officer); Maciej Solarewicz (managing employee (under contract)); Ann Marie Kindel (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jamie N Vieau (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Expect Exceptional, LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Apr 11, 2024
Careline Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies82.05%Apr 11, 2024
Caring Health Equity Holding, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies17.95%Sep 4, 2024
Careline Holdco, LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jul 9, 2021

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 75% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 73% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.67% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 64.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 19 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 49546, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7.5; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.