Hearth Record

Baraga County Home Care & Hospice

A hospice in L’ Anse, Michigan 49946

18341 Us Highway 41, Suite 1, L’ Anse, Michigan 49946. (906) 524-3320.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 3 hospices serving ZIP code 49946 had 10.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 14, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 6, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission11 deficiencies
  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Record Review. There is no evidence that leadership and the governing body had consistently implemented requirements related to the provision of Medical Director responsibilities as evidenced by, inconsistent completion of the initial certification of terminal illness process and recertification of terminal illness process - 418.102-Medical Director. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator of Home Care and Hospice.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure all requirements related to a comprehensive assessment were implemented. For example, during a review of the medical record for HosRRNHV#2, it was noted that the comprehensive assessment did not include the initial bereavement risk assessment. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator of Homecare and Hospice.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 bereavement records reviewed it was noted the organization had not developed a bereavement plan of care as required. For example, a review of HosRRBR#2 revealed no documented evidence that a bereavement plan of care that specified the type of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator of Home Care and Hospice.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.78(a))

    “Observed in Competency Session. In 1 of 1 applicable Human Resource files reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure that the provision of orientation and training consistent with hospice industry standards was completed for Volunteer #1. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator of Home Care and Hospice.”

    Rule L0643. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d))

    “Observed in Data Session. During the Data Session, it was noted that the organization did not complete a Volunteer Cost Savings report for the years 2023 and 2024. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator of Home Care and Hospice.”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Observed in Data Session. During the Data Session, it was noted that the organization did not completed a Volunteer Cost Savings report for the years 2023 and 2024. Since a cost savings report was not completed as required the organization did not document the provision of volunteer services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract staff. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator of Home Care and Hospice.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))

    “Observed in Competency Session. In 1 of 4 applicable Human Resource files reviewed the organization did not ensure that an initial orientation for the Chaplain that addressed the employee’s specific job duties was completed. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator of Home Care and Hospice.”

    Rule L0662. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in Competency Session. In 2 of 3 applicable Human Resource (HR) files reviewed, it was noted that competence for the Chaplain was last updated in 2022, and competence for the Social Worker was last updated in 2021. This observation was reviewed with agency leadership. Observed in Competency Session. In 3 of 5 Human Resource (HR) files reviewed, it was noted that competence was not initially assessed and documented as a part of orientation for the Chaplain, Registered Nurse #1, and Volunteer #1. This observation was reviewed with agency leadership.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 395 words

    “Observed in Record Review. Example #4: A review of the medical record for HosRRNHV#4, revealed that the Certification of Terminal Illness statement for benefit period #1, did not document clinical information to support the medical prognosis and support for certification of hospice services [The primary terminal condition, related diagnosis, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal condition]. This area of the document was left blank. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Home Care and Hospice. Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization did not ensure its policy titled Certification of Terminal Illness was implemented. For example, a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#2, revealed that there was no documented evidence that a Certification of Terminal Illness statement for benefit period #1 was completed. In addition, the Physician’s physical exam statement did not document clinical information to support the medical prognosis and support for certification of hospice services [The primary terminal condition, related diagnosis, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal condition].Example #2: A review of the medical record for HosRRNHV#1, it was noted that there was no documented evidence that a Certification of Terminal Illness statement for benefit period #1 was completed. In addition, the Physician’s physical exam statement did not document clinical information to support the medical prognosis and support for certification of hospice services [The primary terminal condition, related diagnosis, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal condition].Example #3: A review of the medical record for HosRRNHV#2, revealed that there was no documented evidence that a Certification of Terminal Illness statement for benefit period #1 was completed. The Certifying Physician Summary did not document clinical information to support the medical prognosis and support for certification of hospice services [The primary terminal condition, related diagnosis, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal condition]. This area of the document was left blank. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator of Home Care and Hospice.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 216 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization did not ensure its policy titled Certification of Terminal Illness was implemented. For example, a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#2, it was noted that there was no documented evidence that Certification of Terminal Illness statement(s) for benefit period #2, and benefit period #3 were completed. In addition, the Physician’s physical exam statement did not document clinical information to support the medical prognosis and support for recertification of hospice services [The primary terminal condition, related diagnosis, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal condition]. Example #2: A review of the medical record for HosRRNHV#1, it was noted that there was no documented evidence that a Certification of Terminal Illness statement for benefit period #2 was completed. In addition, the Physician’s physical exam statement did not document clinical information to support the medical prognosis and support for recertification of hospice services [The primary terminal condition, related diagnosis, current subjective and objective medical findings, current medication and treatment orders, and information about the medical management of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal condition]. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator of Home Care and Hospice.”

    Rule L0668. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 204 words

    “Observed in Individual Tracer. Example #2: Individual tracer activities for HosRRHV#1, revealed that plan of care did not include an accurate description of the medication’s the patient was currently taking. The following medication was not listed: Carafate 10ml by mouth up to 3 times per day as needed. During interview the patient’s daughter stated this medication was started 1 month ago. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator of Home Care and Hospice. Observed in Individual Tracer. In 2 of 2 individual tracers, it was noted that the organization did not ensure the medication list included accurate information. For example, individual tracer activities for HOSRRHV#2, revealed that the plan of care did not include an accurate description of the medication’s the patient was currently taking. The following medications were not listed: Brimonidine Tartrate 0.2% 1 drop in each eye daily and Benadryl 25 mg/1-2 tablets by mouth every 6 hours as needed for itching. The plan of care listed: Protonix 40 mg delayed release by mouth 1 tablet twice a day. An interview with the patient’s caregiver revealed the patient is currently taking Protonix 40 mg by mouth once a day. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Home Care and Hospice services.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 14, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 6, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 7, 1999.
  • Ownership: government.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.2% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 73% at home, 8% in a skilled nursing facility, 19% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.1%
Visits near death92.2% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Baraga County Memorial Hospital runs it.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Jayne Walbridge (corporate director); Gail Jestila (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Gail Jestila (corporate director, 0%); Cathryn Beer (corporate director); James Loman (corporate director, 0%); Shirley Younggren (corporate officer); Jeffrey Sweers (corporate director); Robert Stowe (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Burt Mason (corporate officer, 0%); Carole L Lapointe (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Baraga County Memorial HospitalRuns it (operational or managerial control)0%Mar 14, 1988

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 69.23% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 53.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 3 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 49946, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 10; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 3 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 49946
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Baraga County Home Care & Hospice This hospice11
Lake Superior Life Care & Hospice10
Aspirus at Home3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.