Hearth Record

Holy Cross Home Care and Hospice

A hospice in Silver Spring, Maryland 20901

10720 Columbia Pike Second Floor, Silver Spring, Maryland 20901. (301) 557-4663.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 8 hospices serving ZIP code 20901 had 9.5.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 18, 2024: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 8, 2023: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies
  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Document Review. No evidence that the governing body and leadership had established processes to support patient care treatment and services through sustained compliance as evidenced by non compliance with organizational policies of medical records and CMS deficiencies of 418.104.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization did not complete the comprehensive assessment no later than five calendar days after the election of hospice care. In review of the medical record for RRNHV #10 the psychosocial assessment was completed on the 6th day following the election of hospice care and there was no evidence that the spiritual assessment had been completed or documentation that the patient or family declined spiritual care services until 18 days following the start of care. This was validated with the Quality Director”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(8))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Observed in Record Review. The organization was not assessing the volunteer needs for hospice patients/families. The Hospice Clinical Manager reported that the organization had been without a Volunteer Coordinator since April and that the volunteer program had been on hold, and during that time volunteer services were not being assessed or offered to hospice patients/families. In review of the medical records for RRNHV #1, RRNHV #2, RRNHV #3, RRNHV #4, RRNHV #5, RRNHV #6, RRNHV #7, RRNHV #8, RRNHV #9 and RRNHV #10 there was no evidence that the need for volunteers had been assessed and/or offered. This was validated with the Quality Director.”

    Rule L0532. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 197 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 14 patient records reviewed, the written plan of care did not have measurable outcomes anticipated from implementing and coordinating the plan of care. For example, in review of the medical record for RRHV #1 the plan of care included a problem for pain with the goal, patient/caregiver will verbalize/demonstrate knowledge of appropriate pain scales, medications and psychosocial/spiritual support to effectively manage pain and pain will be maintained at an acceptable level of comfort however the goal was not patient specific and failed to identify the acceptable level of comfort for the patient ie; pain level 2- 3, etc. Also, in review of the medical record for RRHV #2 with hypertensive heart disease and COPD the plan of care included the goal; patient will maintain optimal cardiovascular status within disease limitations throughout hospice episode however failed to define what optimal cardiovascular status would be or specific measurable outcomes for the patient or time frames to achieve goals. This was also observed in review of the medical records for RRHV #3, RRHV #4, RRNHV #1, RRNHV #2, RRNHV #3, RRNHV #4 and RRNHV #6. This was validated with the Quality Director. 

”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization’s infection prevention and control policies were not followed when cleaning and disinfecting medical supplies and devices. In observation of the care for RRHV #1 the RN failed to clean the tablet which had been laid on the table without a barrier prior to leaving the home. This was validated with the RN and the Hospice Clinical Manager. Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, staff did not use standard precautions consistent with the organization’s policy Hand Hygiene. For RRHV #3 the social worker failed to perform hand hygiene upon entering the home, after contact with the patient and upon leaving the home. This was validated with the Hospice Clinical Manager.
”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 3 patient records reviewed, the hospice bereavement plan of care failed to specify the frequency of service delivery. In review of the medical record for RRBR #1, RRBR #2 the documentation on the bereavement plan of care did not include the frequency of interventions/service delivery such as visits or telephone calls by the Bereavement Coordinator. This was validated with the Bereavement Coordinator and Quality Manager.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 273 words

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 4 of 4 HR files reviewed, combined home health and hospice, for home health aides, the competency process failed to include CMS requirements. In review of the personnel file for HR #4 and HR #6 of home health aides the competency evaluation conducted at the time of hire did not include evaluation of required elements including; basic elements of body functioning and changes in body function that must be reported to an aide’s supervisor , maintenance of a clean, safe, and healthy environment, recognizing emergencies and initiating necessary emergency procedures, the physical, emotional, and developmental needs of and ways to work with the populations served by the home health aide or hospice aide, including the need to respect the patient and their privacy and property, adequate nutrition and fluid intake. This was validated with the Hospice Clinical Manager. Observed in HR File Review. In 4 of 4 HR files reviewed, combined home health and hospice, for home health aides, the competency process failed to include CMS requirements. In review of the personnel file for HR #4 and HR #6 of home health aides the competency evaluation conducted at the time of hire did not include evaluation of; communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other staff, appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include bed, sponge, tub, or shower bath; sink, tub, or bed shampoo; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination , safe transfer techniques and ambulation, normal range of motion and positioning. This was validated with the Hospice Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Protection of information (42 CFR 418.104(c))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. the organization did not follow their policy ; Records Management Policy regarding storage and destruction of records. The Bereavement Coordinator reported that for families/survivors who have completed the 13 month Bereavement Program those clinical notes which have been documented on paper had not been scanned into the medical record and have been destroyed. This was validated with the Bereavement Coordinator and the Quality Manager.”

    Rule L0680. Standard-level.

  • Retention of records (42 CFR 418.104(d))

    “Observed in Record Review. the organization did not follow their policy: Record Management Policy regarding record retention. The Bereavement Coordinator reported that the clinical notes for persons served in the Bereavement Program had been destroyed after completion of the program at 13 months and not retained for six years after the death of the patient as required by law and regulation. This was validated with the Bereavement Coordinator and the Quality Manager.”

    Rule L0681. Standard-level.

  • Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “Observed in Record Review. the organization did not follow their policy ; Hospice - The Medical Record regarding documentation in the clinical record and which states that documentation on paper forms are scanned into the electronic medical record and the policy Records Management Policy regarding storage and destruction of records. The Bereavement Coordinator reported that she documents clinical notes on paper for bereaved family members that she visits as part of the Bereavement Program however the clinical notes are not scanned into the electronic medical record (EMR) in accordance with the organization’s policy and the medical record is not complete and readily accessible to other team members. For example in review of the electronic medical records for RRBR #1 and RRBR #2 the documentation in the electronic medical record states; See confidential notes however, the clinical notes have not been scanned into the EMR. This was validated with the Bereavement Coordinator and the Quality Manager.”

    Rule L0685. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 home visits conducted, the organization had not provided the patient with an individualized emergency plan based on the patient’s priority level and individualized to the patient’s need. In review of the home folder for RRHV #3 the Individualized Emergency was blank and had not been completed. This was validated with the Hospice Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

  • Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(6))

    “Observed in Document Review. the organization did not communicate in writing expectations to the provider of the contracted services. For RRHV #2 there was no evidence in the home that the DME had provided back up oxygen for the hospice patient who uses oxygen as needed and in review of the DME contract there was no language regarding the provision of delivery of back up oxygen with the delivery of the oxygen concentrator. This was validated with the Hospice Clinical Manager and the Quality Manager. 
”

    Rule L0716. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 1 home visits conducted, to hospice patients that resided in a skilled nursing facility, the organization had not provided the skilled nursing facility (SNF) with required information. In review of the SNF medical record for RRHV #4 there was no evidence that the hospice had provided the facility with the patient’s hospice election form and the physician certification and recertification of the patient’s terminal illness. The Hospice Clinical Manager stated that the hospice election form is provided to the SNF if they request it. This was validated with the Hospice Clinical Manager and the Quality Director.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 18, 2024Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 8, 2023Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 9, 1986.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 88.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 61% at home, 27% in assisted living, 11% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.6%
Visits near death88.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Trinity Health Corporation owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2011.
  • 17 owners or officers are people: Anna Adamson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ray Anderson (corporate director); Corinne Francis (corporate director); Benjamin E Petersen (corporate officer); Marcus Bowens (corporate officer); Emma Flere (managing employee (on the payroll)); Daniel Roth (corporate director); Joshua Moore (corporate director); Donald Mathews (managing employee (on the payroll)); Daniel Drake (corporate officer); Daniel Drake (corporate director); Daniel Drake (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Simone Ross (managing employee (on the payroll)); Robert F Casalou (corporate officer); Robert F Casalou (corporate director); Daniel Isacksen (corporate director); Christine Seppala (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Trinity Health CorporationOwns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2011

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 71% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 67% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.18% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 57.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 8 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 20901, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9.5; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.