Hearth Record

Beth Israel Lahey Health at Home

A hospice in Danvers, Massachusetts 01923

199 Rosewood Drive, Suite 380, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923. (781) 756-2488.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 15 hospices serving ZIP code 01923 had 3.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 4, 2026: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 6, 2026: recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 727 words

    “Based on record review, policy review and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure initial bereavement risk assessments were completed upon admission for 6 patients (#1, #2, #8, #11, #9, and #4), out of a total sample of 27 patients. Findings include:Review of the agency policy titled “Comprehensive Assessment”, with revised date of 11/7/2024, indicated the following:During the comprehensive patient assessment, all baseline data and other relevant information will be documented in the patient’s clinical record, including at least the following information, as relevant.*A bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on:-the nature of the relationship to the patient.-circumstances surrounding the illness/prognosis.-behaviors prior and after the illness/prognosis.-survivors need (social, spiritual and cultural) that may impact coping skills.-potential for pathological grief reactions.1.Patient #1 was admitted to the agency in December 2025 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease, Demetia with Behavioral Disturbances.Review of the clinical record did not contain documentation that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed upon admission. 2.Patient #2 was admitted to the agency in November 2025 with a diagnosis of interstitial lung disease.Review of the clinical record did not contain documentation that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed upon admission. 3.Patient #8 was admitted to the agency in December 2025 with a diagnosis of mild vascular dementia with anxiety.Review of the clinical record did not contain documentation that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed upon admission. 4.Patient #11 was admitted to the agency in January 2026 with a diagnosis of vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances.Review of the clinical record did not contain documentation that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed upon admission. During an interview on 2/7/26 at 11:40 A.M., the Executive Director of Quality Compliance and Education reviewed the clinical records for Patient’s #1, #2, #8, and #11 and said the initial bereavement risk assessments were not completed upon admission, as required. Findings include:Review of the agency policy titled “Comprehensive Assessment”, with revised date of 11/7/2024, indicated the following:During the comprehensive patient assessment, all baseline data and other relevant information will be documented in the patient’s clinical record, including at least the following information, as relevant.*A bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on:-the nature of the relationship to the patient.-circumstances surrounding the illness/prognosis.-behaviors prior and after the illness/prognosis.-survivors need (social, spiritual and cultural) that may impact coping skills.-potential for pathological grief reactions.1.Patient #1 was admitted to the agency in December 2025 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease, Demetia with Behavioral Disturbances.Review of the clinical record did not contain documentation that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed upon admission. 2.Patient #2 was admitted to the agency in November 2025 with a diagnosis of interstitial lung disease.Review of the clinical record did not contain documentation that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed upon admission. 3.Patient #8 was admitted to the agency in December 2025 with a diagnosis of mild vascular dementia with anxiety.Review of the clinical record did not contain documentation that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed upon admission. 4.Patient #11 was admitted to the agency in January 2026 with a diagnosis of vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances.Review of the clinical record did not contain documentation that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed upon admission. During an interview on 2/6/26 at 11:40 A.M., the Executive Director of Quality Compliance and Education reviewed the clinical records for Patient’s #1, #2, #8, and #11 and said the initial bereavement risk assessments were not completed upon admission, as required.5.Patient #4 was admitted to the agency in November 2025 with a diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma (cancer forming in the bile ducts) and metastatic to the lung.Review of the clinical record did not contain documentation that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed upon admission. During an interview on 2/6/26 at 8:30 A.M., the Executive Director of Quality Compliance and Education said she was aware that the initial bereavement risk assessments was not completed upon admission, as required.6.Patient #9 was admitted to the agency in November 2025 with a diagnosis of cancer of the right breast metastatic to the bone.Review of the clinical record did not contain documentation that an initial bereavement risk assessment was completed upon admission.During an interview on 2/6/26 at 9:30 A.M., the Hospice Manager said that the bereavement risk assessment was not completed upon admission, as required.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 284 words

    “Based on interview and document review, the agency failed to ensure that services were provided in accordance with the plan of care for 2 patients (#9 and #10), out of a total sample of 27 patients.Findings include: Review of the agency policy, titled, Missed Visits, revised 11/7/24, included the following:*Missed visits will be communicated to the Interdisciplinary Group and/or the attending physician. A missed visit will be rescheduled the same week if possible. Missed visits will be documented in the clinical record.1.Patient #9 was admitted to the agency in November 2025 with a diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma (cancer forming in the bile ducts) and metastatic to the lung.Review of the physician ordered plan of care for 11/5/25 to 2/2/26 and 2/3/26 to 5/3/26 included the following:*Skilled Nursing 1-3 visits a week for 14 weeks.Review of the clinical record failed to include documentation that Skilled Nursing visits were provided for the week of 12/7/25 or 12/21/25.During an interview on 2/6/26 at 9:30 A.M., the Hospice Manager said that she was not able to find documentation in the clinical record to indicate why the Skilled Nursing visits were not provided.2.Patient #10 was admitted to the agency in November 2025 with a diagnosis of Severe Late Onset Alzheimer’s Disease.Review of the physician ordered plan of care for 11/23/25 to 2/20/26 included the following:*Medical Social Worker 1-3 visits per month for 4 months.Review of the clinical record failed to include documentation that Medical Social Worker visits were provided for the month of December or January.During an interview on 2/6/26 at 10:30 A.M., the Hospice Manager said that she was not able to find documentation in the clinical record to indicate why the Medical Social Worker visits were not provided.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 4, 2026Recertification inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 6, 2026Recertification inspection by the state2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 23, 1993.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 94.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 81% at home, 9% in assisted living, 4% in a nursing facility, 3% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.6%
Visits near death94.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • North East Senior Health Corporation owns 100% directly since Mar 15, 2011.
  • 4 owners or officers are people: Deborah A Costello (runs it (operational or managerial control), 80%); Hollie L Williamson (runs it (operational or managerial control), 20%); David Spackman (corporate officer); David Spackman (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Beth Israel Lahey Health, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2019
Lahey Health System Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 1, 2012
North East Senior Health CorporationOwns 5% or more directly100%Mar 15, 2011

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 99.4% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 65.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 15 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 01923, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 3; this one had 2.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.