Hearth Record

Amedisys Hospice

A hospice in Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816

3854 American Way, Suite C, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70816. (225) 751-4599.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

1 deficiency cited in the last three years

The middle of the 22 hospices serving ZIP code 70816 had 8.

The last inspection on record was on Mar 13, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 13, 2024: recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency
  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 854 words

    “Based on record reviews and interviews, the hospice agency failed to ensure the IDG maintained a system of communication, coordination, and integration of services for 1 (#9) of 10 (#5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, and #14) patients reviewed in the sample. Review of Patient #9s Clinical record revealed she was admitted to the hospice agency on 10/08/2023 with diagnoses, which included Multiple Sclerosis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Pressure Ulcer-Sacral Stage 3, Colostomy Status and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Review of Patient #9s IDG Comprehensive Assessment and Plan of Care Update Report, dated 11/22/2023 through 02/28/2024, revealed, in part, the following: 11/22/2023: Newly Identified Problems or Needs: None reported to or observed by MSW. Further review of the plan revealed no documented evidence of discussion regarding potential concerns voiced by Patient #9s sister stating Patient #9 was fearful of her daughter and granddaughter. 12/06/2023:Newly Identified Problems or Needs: None reported to or observed by MSW. Further review of the plan revealed no documented evidence of discussion regarding potential concerns voiced by Patient #9s sister stating Patient #9 was fearful of her daughter and granddaughter. 12/20/2023:Newly Identified Problems or Needs: None reported to or observed by MSW. Further review of the plan revealed no documented evidence of discussion regarding potential concerns voiced by Patient #9s sister stating Patient #9 was fearful of her daughter and granddaughter. 01/17/2024:Newly Identified Problems or Needs: None reported to or observed by MSW. Further review of the plan revealed no documented evidence of discussion regarding potential concerns voiced by Patient #9s sister stating Patient #9 was fearful of her daughter and granddaughter. 01/31/2024:Newly Identified Problems or Needs: None reported to or observed by MSW. Further review of the plan revealed no documented evidence of discussion regarding potential concerns voiced by Patient #9s sister stating Patient #9 was fearful of her daughter and granddaughter. 02/14/2024:Newly Identified Problems or Needs: None reported to or observed by MSW. Further review of the plan revealed no documented evidence of discussion regarding potential concerns voiced by Patient #9s sister stating Patient #9 was fearful of her daughter and granddaughter. 02/28/2024:Newly Identified Problems or Needs: None reported to or observed by MSW. Further review of the plan revealed no documented evidence of discussion regarding potential concerns voiced by Patient #9s sister stating Patient #9 was fearful of her daughter and granddaughter. An interview was conducted on 03/11/2024 at 3:10 p.m. with S5RN. She confirmed she provided care for Patient #9. She confirmed Patient #9 lived with and received care from her daughter and granddaughter. She confirmed Patient #9s sister told her she wanted to speak with the social worker regarding concerns of Patient #9 being afraid of her daughter and granddaughter. She confirmed she gave the request to S2SW on 11/21/2023. An interview was conducted on 03/11/2024 at 2:15 p.m. with S2SW. She confirmed she provided care for Patient #9. She confirmed on 11/21/2023, S5RN gave her a message to contact Patient #9s sister regarding concerns of the patient being fearful of her daughter and granddaughter. She confirmed during a phone conversation with Patient #9s sister on 11/21/2023, the sister reported she felt Patient #9 was afraid of her daughter and granddaughter and she was concerned. S3SW confirmed at the time of this conversation, Patient #9 lived with and received care from her daughter and granddaughter. She stated she made S1DOO aware of the conversation and should have documented this information. She stated she and S1DOO did not feel Patient #9s sisters allegations were valid so it was not discussed during IDG. An interview was conducted on 03/11/2024 to 1:30 p.m. with S4LPN. She confirmed she provided care for Patient #9. She stated she was not aware any allegations were made regarding Patient #9 being afraid of her daughter and/or granddaughter. She stated she should have been made aware of this information since she provided care to the resident. An interview was made on 03/11/2024 at 3:20 p.m. with S3RN. He confirmed he provided care for Patient #9. He confirmed he participated in IDG for Patient #9 every 2 weeks and could not recall ever being made aware of or discussing concerns regarding Patient #9s safety or potentially being fearful of her family members. He confirmed he felt he should have been made aware of any potential safety concerns regarding a patient because it would change the way he handled things during his visits. An interview was conducted on 03/13/2024 at 3:05 p.m. with S1DOO. She confirmed S2SW made her aware of Patient #9s sister reporting the patient was afraid of her daughter and granddaughter. She confirmed at the time the report was received, Patient #9 lived with and received care from her daughter and granddaughter. She stated upon being made aware, she reached out to the patient, who told her she was not fearful. She confirmed she did not document this information in Patient #9s clinical record and should have. She stated she did not discuss the allegations with Patient #9s care team during IDG because the report was received from a family member and not the patient herself.”

    Rule L0539. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 13, 2024Recertification inspection by the state1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 14, 2005.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 70% at home, 19% in assisted living, 10% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.1%
Visits near death93.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Amedisys Holding LLC owns 100% directly since Dec 31, 2009.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Bridget R Kaigler (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer); Kristina J Braud (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Jeanne Shingleton (corporate officer); D’ette Stelly (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 14, 2025
Amedisys Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 4, 2015
Amedisys Holding LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Dec 31, 2009

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 83% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.7% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 80.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 22 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70816, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 1.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.