Hearth Record

Guardian Angel Hospice

A hospice in Metairie, Louisiana 70003

825 Little Farms, Ave, Ste D, Metairie, Louisiana 70003. (504) 737-2244.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 24 hospices serving ZIP code 70003 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 13, 2025: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 13, 2025: recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 223 words

    “Based on interview and record reviews, the agency failed to revise the plan of care to reflect services provided for a patient’s wound for 1 (Patient #3) of 3 sampled patients reviewed for comprehensive plans of care requirements. Findings: Review of Patient #3’s Nurses Note dated 09/28/2025 revealed Patient #3 had a stage II pressure ulcer (wound caused by unrelieved pressure which causes a break in the skin) to the right buttock. Review of Patient #3’s record revealed Patient #3 continued to have the right buttock wound until 11/10/2025. Review of Patient #3’s Comprehensive Plan of Care for the certification period of 10/18/2025 through 12/16/2025 revealed, in part, no documented evidence the plan of care included wound care interventions for Patient #3’s stage II pressure ulcer to the right buttock. Review of Patient #3’s record revealed no documented evidence of any physician’s orders for Patient #3’s right buttock stage II pressure ulcer. On 11/13/2025 at 11:25AM, the surveyor requested S2DON present any documentation that Patient #3 had wound care orders and/or a revised plan of care for the treatment of Patient #3’s right buttock stage II pressure ulcer. In an interview on 11/13/2025 at 11:28AM, S2DON indicated Patient #3’s plan of care was not updated to include wound care orders and/or treatment of Patient #3’s right buttock stage II pressure ulcer as required.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Control (42 CFR 418.60(b)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 357 words

    “Based on interviews and record reviews, the agency failed to have a coordinated agency-wide program for the surveillance of infections for 4 (Patient #1, Patient #5, Patient #9, Patient #12) of 14 sampled patients records reviewed for infection surveillance requirements. Findings: Patient #1Review of Patient #1’s Patient Order Report dated 08/01/2025 revealed an order for Bactrim (antibiotic used to treat infections) DS one tablet crushed via percutaneous gastrostomy tube twice a day for seven days for a urinary tract infection (bladder infection) Patient #5Review of Patient #5’s Medication Profile Detail dated 09/06/2025 revealed an order for Azithromycin (antibiotic used to treat infections) 500mg one tablet by mouth once a day for 5 days. Patient #9Review of Patient #9’s Patient Order Report dated 08/03/2025 revealed an order for Macrobid (antibiotic used to treat infections) 100mg one tablet by mouth twice a day for seven days for urinary tract infection symptoms. Review of Patient #9’s Patient Order Report dated 08/07/2025 revealed an order for Cipro (antibiotic used to treat infections) 500mg one tablet by mouth twice a day for 7 days. Patient #12Review of Patient #12’s Medication Profile Detail dated 04/25/2025 revealed an order for Dapsone (antibiotic used to treat infections) 100mg one tablet by mouth daily. Review of the agency’s Infection Control Logs for 01/01/2025 through 09/30/2025 revealed no evidence the above mentioned patients and their medications/infections were captured on the agency’s infection control logs. In an interview on 11/12/2025 at 2:58PM, S1Administrator indicated once an infection was identified and the patient was placed on antibiotics, infection surveillance included that the nurse was to discuss the medication and infection in the interdisciplinary team meetings held every 2 weeks. S1Administrator further indicated she would use this information to develop monthly infection control logs which are used to identify trends which require intervention. S1Administrator indicated the agency had not captured Patient #1, Patient #5, and Patient #12’s infections on the infection control logs as required.In an interview on 11/13/2025 at 12:51PM, S1Administrator indicated the agency had not captured Patient #9’s infections as required; therefore, the agency was not effectively tracking and trending infections for the above mentioned patients as required.”

    Rule L0580. Standard-level.

  • Licensed professional services (42 CFR 418.62(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 313 words

    “Based on interview and record reviews, the agency failed to ensure the registered nurse assessed a wound weekly to assess for wound healing for 1 (Patient #3) of 3 sampled patients reviewed with wounds. Findings: Review of Patient #3’s Comprehensive Assessment Patient Assessment Report dated 10/22/2025 revealed, in part, Patient #3 was assessed as having a right buttock pressure ulcer measuring 1 cm by 2 cm. Further review revealed no documentation that the nurse assessed the stage of the wound, the type of tissue present, and/or if there was wound drainage present. Review of Patient #3’s Comprehensive Assessment Patient Assessment Report dated 10/23/2025 revealed, in part, no documentation that the nurse assessed the stage of the wound, the type of tissue present, and/or if there was wound drainage present. On 11/13/2025 at 11:28AM, the surveyor requested S2DON present any documentation that the nurse had assessed Patient #3’s right buttock pressure ulcer’s stage of the wound, the type of tissue present, and/or if there was wound drainage present to Patient #3’s wound for the week of 10/20/2025 through 10/26/2025. In an interview on 11/13/2025 at 11:28AM, S2DON indicated the agency did not have the above mentioned documentation for Patient #3’s right buttock pressure ulcer for the week of 10/20/2025 through 10/26/2025 and did not have anything to present to dispute the above mentioned deficient practice. Review of the Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society’s Guidelines revealed the assessment and documentation of wound status included comprehensive clinical data demonstrating evidence of progress in healing or failure to heal. Comprehensive wound assessment included: dimensions and depth, presence, location and depth of any sinus tracts or undermining areas, status and characteristics of the wound bed, volume, color, and odor of exudates, and evidence of infection in surrounding tissues. Further review revealed when recorded over time, this information can be used to track the progress of wound healing.”

    Rule L0585. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    The inspectors’ words, 169 words

    “Based on interview and record reviews, the agency failed to provide volunteer services at a minimum of five percent or greater of the total paid hospice care hours. Findings: On 11/10/2025 at 9:00AM, the agency was presented with a document request form which included, in part, volunteer services and level of activity reports. On 11/12/2025 at 9:30AM, S1Administrator was provided with a request for any/all documentation related to volunteer documentation for level of services. Review of the agency’s Volunteer Services policy, revised on 05/09/2011, revealed, in part, volunteer services were provided as needed and as ordered by the patient’s plan of care. Review of the agency’s Monthly Volunteer Cost Savings for April 2022 through 10/31/2025 revealed the last documented volunteer services were provided in July 2023. In an interview on 11/12/2025 at 3:45PM, S1Administrator indicated the agency had not provided any volunteer hours since July 2023. S1Administrator further indicated the agency had not provided volunteer services in the amount of five percent or greater since July 2023, as required.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 199 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure documentation corrections were completed in accordance with accepted standards of practice for 1 (Patient #12) of 14 sampled patients records reviewed for documentation requirements. Findings: Review of Nursing 2025 Journal October 2023 article for Handling Documentation Errors revealed, in part, when paper documenting, charting errors should be corrected using the following, in part, draw a single line through the erroneous entry and write either “mistaken entry”, “delete”, or “void”, then draw a single line through the error and write the time date and your name. Review of Patient #12’s Medication Disposal Form dated 06/26/2025 revealed, in part, Morphine (a narcotic, medication used to treat severe pain) 20mg/ml was destroyed with the quantity present and the amount of medication destroyed documented with a number written then another number written on top of the first number. In an interview on 11/13/2025 at 1:20PM, S2DON indicated the documentation correction for the above mentioned morphine destruction was not completed correctly and staff did not follow accepted standards of practice by drawing a single line through the error, write void, initial the entry, and then record the correct amount next to the error.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure the agency completed and/or forwarded a discharge summary to the receiving provider who assumed care for 1 (Patient #12) of 2 sampled patients reviewed for discharge summaries upon discharge. Findings: Review of Patient #12’s Hospice Revocation Statement Form dated 05/18/2025 revealed Patient #12 revoked hospice services on 05/18/2025 to pursue curative treatment. On 11/13/2025 at 9:00AM, the surveyor requested from S1Administrator and S2DON, Patient #12’s discharge summary. On 11/13/2025 at 10:30AM, the surveyor requested from S1Administrator and S2DON, Patient #12’s discharge summary. On 11/13/2025 at 1:15PM, the surveyor requested from S2DON, Patient #12’s discharge summary. In an interview on 11/13/2025 at 1:20PM, S2DON indicated she did not have any information to present which showed that Patient #12’s discharge summary was completed and/or forwarded the discharge summary to the receiving facility as required.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 150 words

    “Based on interviews and record review, the hospice agency failed to obtain a criminal background check on an unlicensed employee who had direct patient contact for 1 (S7Chaplain) of 8 sampled personnel records reviewed for criminal background check requirements. Findings: Review of Louisiana’s R.S. 40:1203.2’s law revealed, in part, the employer shall request in writing that the office or authorized agency conduct a criminal history and security check on non-licensed persons prior to an offer of employment. Review of S7Chaplain’s personnel record revealed, in part, a hire date of 07/15/2025. Review of S7Chaplain’s criminal background check revealed S7Chaplain’s criminal background check was completed on 07/17/2025. In an interview on 11/13/2025 at 12:44PM, S8Office Manager indicated S7Chaplain was hired prior to the criminal background check being completed. In an interview on 11/13/2025 at 12:52PM, S1Administrator indicated the agency should have completed the criminal background check prior to the offer of employment.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 13, 2025Recertification inspection by the state7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 4, 2003.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 84.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 77% at home, 19% in assisted living, 4% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.3%
Visits near death84.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Tracey Mccann (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Allene Mccann (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Tracey Mccann (corporate director); Tracey Mccann (managing employee (on the payroll)); Allene Mccann (corporate director); Allene Mccann (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 92% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.03% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 40.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 24 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70003, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.