St Claire Hospice/Palliative Care
A hospice in Morehead, Kentucky 40351
201 Lyons Avenue, See Notes for Mailing Address, Morehead, Kentucky 40351. (606) 783-6808.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 4of 5 family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
9 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 4 hospices serving ZIP code 40351 had 8.
The last inspection on record was on Feb 27, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jan 17, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 bereavement records reviewed, the organization had not documented an initial post-death bereavement assessment as per the organization’s Bereavement Policy. The bereavement plan of care did not include an assessment of bereavement needs. This finding was discussed with the Bereavement Coordinator at the time of the visit.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 339 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure that the plan of care goals included outcome measures for specific care activities. For example, during a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#1, the following was identified: 1) The plan of care included the following goal statement: “Patient will achieve and maintain regular bowel elimination and skin integrity”. The goal statement did not include a method to measure the effectiveness of problem interventions. 2) The falls risk assessment indicated the patient was at risk for falls. During an interview, the patient’s caregiver stated the patient had experienced a fall during week 1 of the 2nd benefit period. The plan of care was not updated with a goal statement to evaluate the response to care, treatment and services related to fall prevention interventions. 3) During week 3 of the 1st benefit period, an updated comprehensive assessment documented the presence of moderate pain at the buttocks. The plan of care did not include a goal statement to evaluate the response to care, treatment, and services related to pain management. Example #2: During a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#2, it was noted that the patient’s primary diagnosis was Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. The plan of care did not include outcome measures related to the care, treatment, and services of the patient’s primary diagnosis disease process. Example #3: During a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#3, it was noted that the patient’s primary diagnosis was Protein Calorie Malnutrition. The plan of care did not include outcome measures related to the care, treatment, and services of the patient’s primary diagnosis disease process. Example #4: During a review of the medical record for HosRRNHV#5, an updated comprehensive assessment documented the presence of pain at the stomach area. The plan of care did not include outcome measures related to pain management. This observation was reviewed with the Assistant Director of Hospice/Quality and Compliance Hospice and the Director of Home Health and Hospice.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 302 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization did not ensure the plan of care was revised when the patient’s condition changed. For example, a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#1, revealed that the falls risk assessment indicated the patient was at risk for falls. During an interview, the patient’s caregiver stated the patient had experienced a fall during week 1 of the 2nd benefit period. The plan of care was not updated with interventions to maintain patient safety, and strategies to prevent injury. In addition, during week 3 of services an updated comprehensive assessment documented the presence of moderate pain at the buttocks. The plan of care did not include interventions related to pain management. 

Example #2: In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the plan of care did not include interventions based on problems identified in the comprehensive assessment. For example, during a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#2, it was noted that the patient’s primary diagnosis was Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. The plan of care did not include interventions related to the care, treatment, and services of the patient’s primary diagnosis disease process. 

Example #3: During a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#3, it was noted that the patient’s primary diagnosis was Protein Calorie Malnutrition. The plan of care did not include interventions related to the care, treatment, and services of patient’s primary diagnosis disease process. 

Example #4: During a review of the medical record for HosRRNHV#5, an updated comprehensive assessment documented the presence of pain at the stomach area. The plan of care did not include interventions related to pain management. This observation was reviewed with the Assistant Director of Hospice/Quality and Compliance Hospice and the Director of Home Health and Hospice.


”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 4 individual tracers, it was noted that the organization did not ensure that required information was included in the patient record. For example, during home visit activities for HosRRHV#1, it was noted that the patient had an oxygen concentrator in the home. The plan of care did not include orders for oxygen therapy. This observation was reviewed with the Hospice Clinical Manager. 
”
-
Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)
“Observed in Data Session. The organization did not have documentation demonstrating that its quality assessment and performance improvement program (QAPI) included all provided services. There was no evidence that the volunteer program and the bereavement program were included in the program. This finding was discussed with the Director of Home Care at the time of discovery.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))
The inspectors’ words, 94 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 5 patient records reviewed, for patient’s receiving Hospice Aide services, it was noted that the organization did not ensure the plan of care included orders for Hospice Aide services. For example, a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#2, revealed that the Hospice Aide was visiting the patient two times per week, starting week 1 of hospice services. The plan of care did not include a description of visit frequency for hospice aide services. This observation was reviewed with the Assistant Director of Hospice/Quality and Compliance Hospice.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))
The inspectors’ words, 91 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 5 patient records reviewed, for patients receiving Hospice Aide services, it was noted that the organization did not ensure Hospice Aide supervision was effective. For example, during the review of the medical record for HosRRHV#2, it was noted that a Hospice Aide supervision visit was not documented by the Registered Nurse every 14 days during the first benefit period. The first supervision visit was documented during week 6 of hospice services. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Home Health and Hospice. 

”
-
Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))
The inspectors’ words, 101 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, the organization did not ensure that the requirement for a written Certification of Terminal Illness statement was implemented. For example, a review of the medical record for HosRRHV#1, revealed that a CTI statement for benefit period #2 was not present in the medical record. The 2nd benefit period of hospice services started 12 days before the start of survey activities. Documentation to support the medical prognosis and recertification of hospice services was not present in the medical record. This observation was reviewed with the Director of Home Health and Hospice.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))
“Observed in Individual Tracer. In 1 of 4 individual tracers, it was noted that the organization did not ensure the medication list included accurate information. For example, during home visit activities for HosRRHV#1, it was noted that the medication list included the following information: Buspirone HCL 5mg 1 tab 2 times per day. An interview with the patient’s caregiver revealed that Buspirone HCL 5mg was being administered 1 tab 3 times a day. This observation was reviewed with the Hospice Clinical Manager.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2025 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | No deficiencies cited |
| Jan 17, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 9 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 30, 1988.
- Ownership: non-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.3% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 84% at home, 10% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% in a hospital, 4% elsewhere.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 11.4 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 9.8% |
| Visits near death | 91.3% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 18 owners or officers are people: Robert Albert (corporate director); John Northcutt (corporate director); Phillip B Baker (managing employee (on the payroll)); Marla Monahan (corporate director); Marie Dennison (corporate director); Dan Markwell (corporate director); Donald H Lloyd (corporate officer); Wendell Mcclurg (corporate officer); Wendell Mcclurg (managing employee (on the payroll)); Shelley R Irving (corporate director); Russell C Ward (corporate director); Angela Gates (corporate director); Karen N Smith (corporate director); William Redwine (corporate director); Margaret Mouch (corporate director); Anthony Helton (corporate director); Aaron P Banks (corporate director); Oliver T Newcomb (corporate director).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 88.78% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 58.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 4 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 40351, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 9.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| St Claire Hospice/Palliative Care This hospice | 9 |
| Hospice of the Bluegrass, Inc. DBA Bluegrass Care N | 7 |
| Community Hospice | 4 |
| Hospice of Hope Inc. | 10 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.