Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Parsons, Kansas 67357

1819 Main Street, Parsons, Kansas 67357. (620) 421-6161.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 5 hospices serving ZIP code 67357 had 9.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 12, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 12, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 92 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 19 (Patients #1,#2,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 1: The initial comprehensive spiritual assessment was completed 9/26/24 with start of care 9/20/24. Patient 2: The initial comprehensive spiritual assessment was completed 9/27/24 with start of care 9/20/24. Patient 10: The initial comprehensive spiritual assessment was completed 10/17/24 with start of care 10/10/24.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 282 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patients #2,#3,#4,#7,#9,#11,#14) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 2: The medication profile contained acetaminophen 650mg with instructions identifying to be administered for pain or fever listed as scheduled every four hours in error instead of as needed. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medication profile contained Miralax oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent and active diflucan listed that was ordered for 3 days on 11/8/24. Corrected on site. Patient 4,14: The medication profile contained oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 7: Upon medication reconciliation during home visit, the facility medication profile contained narcan and baclofen that were not on the hospice profile. The hospice medication profile contained Celebrex 200mg capsules stating dose was 1 mg in error. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medication profile contained Miralax oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent and oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 11: Upon medication reconciliation during home visit, the facility medication profile contained narcan that was not on the hospice profile and had oxygen as needed instead of continuous as ordered by hospice. The hospice medication profile contained morphine with instructions identifying to be administered for pain or air hunger listed as scheduled every 2 hours in error instead of as needed. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 231 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 19 (Patients #2,#3,#4,#7,#9,#11,#14) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: The medical record contained an order for acetaminophen 650mg with instructions identifying to be administered for pain or fever listed as scheduled every four hours in error instead of as needed. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medical record contained an order for Miralax oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent. The record also contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient has an indwelling catheter. There was no evidence of an order for the catheter type, size, change frequency, and maintenance. Corrected on site. Patient 4,14: The medical record contained an order for oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The hospice medical record contained and order for Celebrex 200mg capsules stating dose was 1 mg in error. Corrected on site. Patient 9: The medical record contained orders for Miralax oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent and oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The medical record contained an order for morphine with instructions identifying to be administered for pain or air hunger listed as scheduled every 2 hours in error instead of as needed. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patients #7,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation 11/21/24 identifying patient use of a fall alarm. There was no evidence of an order for the alarm included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a low air loss mattress and Hoyer lift. There was no evidence of an order for the mattress and lift included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patients #1,#3,#5) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are specific to the patient needs. Patient 1,3,5: The aide care plan did not contain instructions for level of assistance needed for transfers. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 19 (Patients #10,#13) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care Patient 10: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 11/10/24. Corrected on site with late entry of missed visit data. Patient 13: The medical record contained an ordered aide frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 11/3/24. Corrected on site with late entry of missed visit data.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The agency had a volunteer utilization rate of 0.93% for 2023.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Physician certification and recertification of terminal illness. Patient 13: The initial CTI on file for admission 9/24/24 did not contain the attending physician’s signature. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0676. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #18) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 18: There was no evidence of an order to discharge the patient for extended prognosis.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #10) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission mistakenly identifying the patient as using intermittent oxygen. There was no further evidence of oxygen use and the agency verified the patient does not have oxygen in the home.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 15 (Personnel #1) did not have evidence of criminal background checks being obtained in accordance with state requirements. In the absence of state requirements, criminal background checks are obtained within three months of the date of employment for all states that the individual has lived or worked in the past 3 years. Personnel 1: There was no evidence of a criminal background check results in the personnel file.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 12, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 28, 2004.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 21% at home, 9% in assisted living, 66% in a nursing facility, 4% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.5%
Visits near death96.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Curo Health Services LLC owns 100% directly since Mar 1, 2022.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (runs it (operational or managerial control), 0%); Katherine Port (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Mar 1, 2022
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jul 11, 2018

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 100% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 77.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 5 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 67357, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 5 hospices CMS lists serving ZIP code 67357
PlaceDeficiencies, 3 years
Gentiva This hospice11
Harry Hynes Memorial Hospice9
Saint Lukes Hospice of Leavenworth, LLC7
Gentiva14
Home Town Hospice3

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.